Developmental dysplasia of the Hip DDH Natural history

  • Slides: 76
Download presentation
Developmental dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) Natural history, management and outcomes West Bank, Autumn

Developmental dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) Natural history, management and outcomes West Bank, Autumn 2009

Aetiology § Genetic: polygenic syndromic sex-linked § Hormonal: oestrogen ; relaxin § Mechanical: breech

Aetiology § Genetic: polygenic syndromic sex-linked § Hormonal: oestrogen ; relaxin § Mechanical: breech liquor deficiency

Mechanical § Left : Right – 4 : 1 § Breech : DDH ≥

Mechanical § Left : Right – 4 : 1 § Breech : DDH ≥ x 10 (N. B. frank) § Liquor ↓ : moulded baby - plagiocephaly - scoliosis - foot deformity - skew pelvis

Genetic / mechanical Joint laxity Acetabular and femoral version

Genetic / mechanical Joint laxity Acetabular and femoral version

Birth pathology in DDH Simple: Acetabulum normal Femoral head normal Labrum normal Capsule stretched

Birth pathology in DDH Simple: Acetabulum normal Femoral head normal Labrum normal Capsule stretched

Neonatal DDH Ligamentum teres True socket

Neonatal DDH Ligamentum teres True socket

Teratological DDH § Irreducible § False acetabulum § Defective anterior acetabulum “anteverted” § Increased

Teratological DDH § Irreducible § False acetabulum § Defective anterior acetabulum “anteverted” § Increased femoral neck anteversion

False acetabulum Arthrogryposis with dislocations & delivery fracture

False acetabulum Arthrogryposis with dislocations & delivery fracture

Untreated dysplasia without dislocation in the Navajo 18 children § 15 became normal §

Untreated dysplasia without dislocation in the Navajo 18 children § 15 became normal § 3 stayed dysplastic Pratt, Freiberger, Arnold. CORR; 1982

Which hip dysplasia pain? • Complete dislocation with no false acetabulum: NO • Complete

Which hip dysplasia pain? • Complete dislocation with no false acetabulum: NO • Complete dislocation with false acetabulum: • Subluxation: YES Wedge, Wasylenko. CORR, 1978

45 -year old • Subluxation • False acetabulum • Severe OA

45 -year old • Subluxation • False acetabulum • Severe OA

. . . and adult unrecognised dysplasia?

. . . and adult unrecognised dysplasia?

Early treatment • Diagnose! • Splint • Review

Early treatment • Diagnose! • Splint • Review

Ortolani test

Ortolani test

Ultra Sound !

Ultra Sound !

UK Screening Committee: the problems • Poor science • Poor testers • No national

UK Screening Committee: the problems • Poor science • Poor testers • No national training • No national audit • Litigation programme

U. K. National Screening Committee (2006) • Universal U. S. not recommended • Clinical

U. K. National Screening Committee (2006) • Universal U. S. not recommended • Clinical exam. • by properly trained ( at birth & 6 weeks) Refer “at risk” babies

The extended role practitioner & orthopaedic team working

The extended role practitioner & orthopaedic team working

The questionnaire

The questionnaire

Ultrasonographer at work

Ultrasonographer at work

Annie: extended role physio.

Annie: extended role physio.

Oxford experience • 1500 new screenings / year • 700 follow-up screenings / year

Oxford experience • 1500 new screenings / year • 700 follow-up screenings / year • 95% successful splints

Challenges in hip dysplasia • Subluxation • Incongruity • Early arthritis

Challenges in hip dysplasia • Subluxation • Incongruity • Early arthritis

The older child

The older child

Closed reduction • E. U. A. • Adductor tenotomy • Safe position in POP

Closed reduction • E. U. A. • Adductor tenotomy • Safe position in POP

Open reduction • Bikini incision • Psoas tenotomy • Ligamentum teres? • Transverse ligament

Open reduction • Bikini incision • Psoas tenotomy • Ligamentum teres? • Transverse ligament • Limbus? • Capsulorraphy

Arthrogram • Head shape • Cover • Congruity • Articular cartilage • Labrum

Arthrogram • Head shape • Cover • Congruity • Articular cartilage • Labrum

DDH: what influences arthritis risk? • Age at treatment • Quality of reduction •

DDH: what influences arthritis risk? • Age at treatment • Quality of reduction • Stability • AVN

Oxford DDH follow-up

Oxford DDH follow-up

Results - Arthritis Opposite hips 4%: moderate/ severe OA Affected hips 40%: moderate/ severe

Results - Arthritis Opposite hips 4%: moderate/ severe OA Affected hips 40%: moderate/ severe OA

Femoral operation • Shortening • Varus/valgus +/- rotation • Trochanteric transfer • Neck lengthening

Femoral operation • Shortening • Varus/valgus +/- rotation • Trochanteric transfer • Neck lengthening

Femoral shortening for DDH Hey-Groves (1928)

Femoral shortening for DDH Hey-Groves (1928)

Valgus/ extension osteotomy? AVN with trochanteric overgrowth Better in adduction and flexion

Valgus/ extension osteotomy? AVN with trochanteric overgrowth Better in adduction and flexion

Neck-shaft angle after femoral osteotomy

Neck-shaft angle after femoral osteotomy

Pelvic operation Re-alignment: simple e. g. Salter complex e. g. Bernese Re-shaping: e. g.

Pelvic operation Re-alignment: simple e. g. Salter complex e. g. Bernese Re-shaping: e. g. Pemberton Augmentation: e. g. shelf Chiari

Salter Innominate osteotomy

Salter Innominate osteotomy

Salter & femoral osteotomy K. E. 21 - 12 - 1999

Salter & femoral osteotomy K. E. 21 - 12 - 1999

Staheli shelf

Staheli shelf

Chiari osteotomy

Chiari osteotomy

Outcome of Chiari osteotomy • 236 of 388 osteotomies reviewed at 25 years •

Outcome of Chiari osteotomy • 236 of 388 osteotomies reviewed at 25 years • 51% good; 30% fair; 18% poor • Best results: ≤ 7 years; no OA • Femoral osteotomy: no better (Windhager et al. JBJS 1991)

Very late salvage Schanz osteotomy

Very late salvage Schanz osteotomy

Radical salvage • • • Fusion Replacement Excision

Radical salvage • • • Fusion Replacement Excision

Hip arthrodesis Consider for: i. Young male ii. Unilateral iii. Infection

Hip arthrodesis Consider for: i. Young male ii. Unilateral iii. Infection

Joint replacement Consider for: i. Severe arthritis ii. Failed “ conservative” Rx. iii. Bilateral

Joint replacement Consider for: i. Severe arthritis ii. Failed “ conservative” Rx. iii. Bilateral disease

Joint replacement • May be complex • +/- femoral shortening • +/- acetabular grafting

Joint replacement • May be complex • +/- femoral shortening • +/- acetabular grafting

Severe arthritis DDH AVN OA

Severe arthritis DDH AVN OA

End-stage O. A.

End-stage O. A.

High, painful DDH

High, painful DDH

DDH: THR does not solve all ills! Right: painless Left: severe pain

DDH: THR does not solve all ills! Right: painless Left: severe pain

THR outcomes in DDH • Charnley cemented hips: 5 of 38 loose at 11

THR outcomes in DDH • Charnley cemented hips: 5 of 38 loose at 11 years Bobak, Wroblewski et al 2000 • Harris uncemented hips: 20% loose at 7 years 46% loose at 12 years Jasty, Anderson, Harris, 1999