UPDATES ON DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF GIST Dr

  • Slides: 84
Download presentation
UPDATES ON DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF GIST Dr Praveen Royal Mokkapati Moderator: Professor NK

UPDATES ON DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF GIST Dr Praveen Royal Mokkapati Moderator: Professor NK Shukla

OVERVIEW • INTRODUCTION • DIAGNOSIS • GUIDELINES ON MANAGEMENT • LOCALISED • ADVANCED •

OVERVIEW • INTRODUCTION • DIAGNOSIS • GUIDELINES ON MANAGEMENT • LOCALISED • ADVANCED • METASTATIC • IMATINIB RESISTANCE

INTRODUCTION • 1 in 1, 000 • 60 to 65 years age group •

INTRODUCTION • 1 in 1, 000 • 60 to 65 years age group • Equal gender distribution • Pediatric GIST

CLINICAL PRESENTATION • Asymptomatic • Lump • Bleeding • Rupture

CLINICAL PRESENTATION • Asymptomatic • Lump • Bleeding • Rupture

ENDOSCOPIC APPEARANCE

ENDOSCOPIC APPEARANCE

EUS APPEARANCE

EUS APPEARANCE

CT APPEARANCE

CT APPEARANCE

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY • c. KIT • PDGFRA • Wild type

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY • c. KIT • PDGFRA • Wild type

DOG 1, DOG 1. 1, K 9

DOG 1, DOG 1. 1, K 9

PRIMARY RESISTANCE (WITHIN 6 MONTHS) c. KIT Exon 9 PDGFRA D 842 V Wild

PRIMARY RESISTANCE (WITHIN 6 MONTHS) c. KIT Exon 9 PDGFRA D 842 V Wild type

SECONDARY RESISTANCE ATP binding site Exon 13, 14 Activation loop Exon 17, 18

SECONDARY RESISTANCE ATP binding site Exon 13, 14 Activation loop Exon 17, 18

CARNEY’S TRIAD CARNEY – STRATAKIS SYNDROME NEUROFIBROMATOSIS – I SDHB deficient GIST SDHA, SDHB,

CARNEY’S TRIAD CARNEY – STRATAKIS SYNDROME NEUROFIBROMATOSIS – I SDHB deficient GIST SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD deficient Wild type Gastric GIST Multicentric small intestine GIST Paragangliomas Pulmonary Chondromas

GUIDELINES • ESMO • NCCN • CANADA, SWITZERLAND, JAPAN

GUIDELINES • ESMO • NCCN • CANADA, SWITZERLAND, JAPAN

 • LOCALISED DISEASE • ADVANCED DISEASE • METASTATIC DISEASE

• LOCALISED DISEASE • ADVANCED DISEASE • METASTATIC DISEASE

LOCALISED DISEASE PART OF GIT SIZE MANAGEMENT STOMACH, DUODENUM, SMALL INTESTINE <3 CM OBSERVATION

LOCALISED DISEASE PART OF GIT SIZE MANAGEMENT STOMACH, DUODENUM, SMALL INTESTINE <3 CM OBSERVATION BIOPSY EXCISION LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH >3 CM BIOPSY EXCISION RECTAL BIOPSY EXCISION

LOCALISED DISEASE PART OF GIT SIZE MANAGEMENT STOMACH, DUODENUM, SMALL INTESTINE <3 CM OBSERVATION

LOCALISED DISEASE PART OF GIT SIZE MANAGEMENT STOMACH, DUODENUM, SMALL INTESTINE <3 CM OBSERVATION BIOPSY EXCISION LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH >3 CM BIOPSY EXCISION RECTAL BIOPSY EXCISION

 • R 1 RESECTION • EXACT R 1 SITE KNOWN? • INCREASED MORBIDITY?

• R 1 RESECTION • EXACT R 1 SITE KNOWN? • INCREASED MORBIDITY? • ADJUVANT TREATMENT • INDICATIONS? • DURATION? • PFS vs OS

RISK STRATIFICATION • NIH Consensus criteria • Modified NIH Consensus criteria or modified consensus

RISK STRATIFICATION • NIH Consensus criteria • Modified NIH Consensus criteria or modified consensus criteria • AFIP criteria • Nomograms MSKCC, Italian • Non linear model

PRE IMATINIB • 5 YEAR SURVIVAL RATE 35% OVERALL • Among 127 patients with

PRE IMATINIB • 5 YEAR SURVIVAL RATE 35% OVERALL • Among 127 patients with completely resected primary GIST • PFS ON CHEMO RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL AT PERCENTAGE 1 YEAR 83% 2 YEARS 75% 5 YEARS 63%

STUDY PHASE RESEARCH QUESTION Z 9000 II ACTIVITY OF IMATINIB IN ADJUVANT SETTING Z

STUDY PHASE RESEARCH QUESTION Z 9000 II ACTIVITY OF IMATINIB IN ADJUVANT SETTING Z 9001 III ADJUVANT 1 YEAR SWEDISH III ADJUVANT 3 YEARS INTERGROUP III TIME TO IMATINIB RESISTANCE

The ACOSOGZ 9000 MEDIAN FOLLOW UP 7. 7 YEARS 1 YEAR ADJUVANT PHASE II

The ACOSOGZ 9000 MEDIAN FOLLOW UP 7. 7 YEARS 1 YEAR ADJUVANT PHASE II OS RFS 1 99 96 3 97 60 5 83 40

 • Greater than or equal to 3 cm c kit positive GIST who

• Greater than or equal to 3 cm c kit positive GIST who underwent R 0 or R 1 resection SURGERY TYPE SURGERY ALONE ARM ADJUVANT ARM R 0 93 89. 9 R 1 7 10. 1

FOLLOW UP 74 MONTHS

FOLLOW UP 74 MONTHS

 • • Greater than 10 cm size Greater than 10 mitosis/50 hpf Greater

• • Greater than 10 cm size Greater than 10 mitosis/50 hpf Greater than 5 cm and greater than 5 mitosis/50 hpf Tumor rupture

PARAMETER 5 YEAR RFS 5 YEAR OS 1 YEAR IMATINIB ARM 47. 9% 81.

PARAMETER 5 YEAR RFS 5 YEAR OS 1 YEAR IMATINIB ARM 47. 9% 81. 7% MEDIAN FOLLOW UP 54 MONTHS 3 YEAR IMATINIB ARM 65. 6% 92% P VALUE <0. 001 0. 02

 • INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH RISK GROUPS, > OR EQUAL TO 3 CM •

• INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH RISK GROUPS, > OR EQUAL TO 3 CM • 3 YEARS DURATION • DOESN’T BRING ABOUT FASTER RESISTANCE

FOLLOW UP GROUP FOLLOW UP VERY LOW RISK NOT ROUTINELY RECOMMENDED LOW RISK CT

FOLLOW UP GROUP FOLLOW UP VERY LOW RISK NOT ROUTINELY RECOMMENDED LOW RISK CT OR MRI 6 – 12 MONTHS FOR 5 YEARS HIGH RISK 3 -6 MONTHS CT OR MRI FOR 3 YEARS 3 MONTHLY FOR TWO YEARS 6 MONTHLY FOR FIVE YEARS ANNUALLY FOR FIVE YEARS

ADVANCED DISEASE NEOADJUVANT THERAPY • INDICATION • INOPERABLE • MULTIVISCERAL RESECTION • FUNCTION SPARING

ADVANCED DISEASE NEOADJUVANT THERAPY • INDICATION • INOPERABLE • MULTIVISCERAL RESECTION • FUNCTION SPARING RESECTION • R 1 • DURATION

ROLE OF MOLECULAR SUBTYPING • EXON 9 • D 842 V • WILD TYPE

ROLE OF MOLECULAR SUBTYPING • EXON 9 • D 842 V • WILD TYPE • IF NOT DONE ROUTINELY?

RESPONSE ASSESSMENT RECIST SWOG PET CHOI

RESPONSE ASSESSMENT RECIST SWOG PET CHOI

B 2222 trial EORTC 62005 NORTH AMERICAN INTERGROUP S 0033

B 2222 trial EORTC 62005 NORTH AMERICAN INTERGROUP S 0033

PSEUDO PROGRESSION • Increase in size • Liver metastasis May happen even in responsive

PSEUDO PROGRESSION • Increase in size • Liver metastasis May happen even in responsive tumors

a. PET b. CHOI c. RECIST

a. PET b. CHOI c. RECIST

CHOI CRITERIA Minimum 10% decrease in tumor size Minimum 15% decrease in tumour density

CHOI CRITERIA Minimum 10% decrease in tumor size Minimum 15% decrease in tumour density

EVIDENCE FOR NEOADJUVANT THERAPY • Based on only case reports and case series •

EVIDENCE FOR NEOADJUVANT THERAPY • Based on only case reports and case series • No phase III studies • Only one prospective series

52 patients – 30 locally advanced(>5 CM) 22 metastatic Median follow up 3 years

52 patients – 30 locally advanced(>5 CM) 22 metastatic Median follow up 3 years 8 – 12 weeks 600 mg imatinib neoadjuvant with 2 years adjuvant imatinib or till progression in metastatic cases Response assessment by RECIST using PET CT and CT

GROUP PARTIAL STABLE PROGRESSION UNKNOWN LOCALLY ADVANCED 7 83 0 10 METASTATIC 4. 5

GROUP PARTIAL STABLE PROGRESSION UNKNOWN LOCALLY ADVANCED 7 83 0 10 METASTATIC 4. 5 91 4. 5 0 GROUP LOCALLY ADVANCED METASTATIC R 0 77 58 R 1 15 5 R 2 8 5, 5 UNSPECIFIED

TYPE OF SURGICAL RESECTION NO OF PATIENTS (PERCENTAGE) R 0 R 1 134 (83.

TYPE OF SURGICAL RESECTION NO OF PATIENTS (PERCENTAGE) R 0 R 1 134 (83. 2%) 27 (16. 8%) 5 YEAR DISEASE SPECIFIC SURVIVAL 95% 5 YEAR DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL 65%

RECTAL GIST

RECTAL GIST

POSTOPERATIVE IMATINIB AFTER NEOADJUVANT

POSTOPERATIVE IMATINIB AFTER NEOADJUVANT

METASTATIC DISEASE • SURGERY? • TKI • DURATION • RESISTANCE

METASTATIC DISEASE • SURGERY? • TKI • DURATION • RESISTANCE

PHASE III • NCT 00956072 in Europe • Chi. CTR-TRC-00000244 in China

PHASE III • NCT 00956072 in Europe • Chi. CTR-TRC-00000244 in China

SURVIVAL 171 patients Median follow up 56. 6 months IMATINIB + SURGERY IMATINIB P

SURVIVAL 171 patients Median follow up 56. 6 months IMATINIB + SURGERY IMATINIB P VALUE 5 YR PFS 58% 40% 0. 4 5 YR OS 75. 4% 50% 0. 022 MEDIAN OS 87. 6 mo 59. 9 mo

PROGRESSION • Compliance • Pharmacokinetics • Secondary resistance • Limited progression vs Generalized progression

PROGRESSION • Compliance • Pharmacokinetics • Secondary resistance • Limited progression vs Generalized progression

NEXT LINES • Imatinib 800 mg • Sunitinib • Regorafenib

NEXT LINES • Imatinib 800 mg • Sunitinib • Regorafenib

PFS DRUG IMATINIB SUNITINIB REGORAFENIB MEDIAN TIME TO PROGRESSION 2 YEARS 5 MONTHS 4

PFS DRUG IMATINIB SUNITINIB REGORAFENIB MEDIAN TIME TO PROGRESSION 2 YEARS 5 MONTHS 4 MONTHS SECONDARY RESISTANCE ATP binding site Exon 13, 14 Activation loop Exon 17, 18

 • DRUGS ACTING AT RESISTANCE SITES • DRUGS ACTING DOWNSTREAM • DRUG COMBINATIONS

• DRUGS ACTING AT RESISTANCE SITES • DRUGS ACTING DOWNSTREAM • DRUG COMBINATIONS

MUTATIONS DRUG EXON 9 800 mg IMATINIB EXON 13 SUNITINIB NILOTINIB EXON 17 REGORAFENIB

MUTATIONS DRUG EXON 9 800 mg IMATINIB EXON 13 SUNITINIB NILOTINIB EXON 17 REGORAFENIB SORAFENIB D 842 V CRENOLANIB

 • DOVITINIB • PAZOPANIB • PONATINIB

• DOVITINIB • PAZOPANIB • PONATINIB

1. 15 vs 7. 07 (p=0. 03) Colon cancer Renal cell cancers Melanoma

1. 15 vs 7. 07 (p=0. 03) Colon cancer Renal cell cancers Melanoma

NOVARTIS VS UNION OF INDIA 1 st April 2013

NOVARTIS VS UNION OF INDIA 1 st April 2013

THANK YOU

THANK YOU