Respiratory Infections Caroline Kowal Preceptor Dr Rhonda Ness

  • Slides: 79
Download presentation
Respiratory Infections Caroline Kowal Preceptor: Dr. Rhonda Ness Core Rounds Dec 11, 2003

Respiratory Infections Caroline Kowal Preceptor: Dr. Rhonda Ness Core Rounds Dec 11, 2003

Objectives n Alberta Clinical Practice Guidelines Community Acquired Pneumonia Adult/Child n Nursing home acquired

Objectives n Alberta Clinical Practice Guidelines Community Acquired Pneumonia Adult/Child n Nursing home acquired Pneumonia n n n Immunocompromised Alcoholics

n n Guidelines not prospectively validated Prior studies of pneumonia guidelines have reported: decreased

n n Guidelines not prospectively validated Prior studies of pneumonia guidelines have reported: decreased lengths of stay, admission rates, and costs n no change in clinical outcomes. n

Definitions n Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) – Pneumonia in pt not hospitalized last 14

Definitions n Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) – Pneumonia in pt not hospitalized last 14 d, OR hospitalized <4 d prior to onset sx Adult - >16 y age

Community Acquired Pneumonia Adults Incidence: n #1 cause of infectious related deaths n #6

Community Acquired Pneumonia Adults Incidence: n #1 cause of infectious related deaths n #6 cause of death overall n 12/1000 adults (US stats) n 80% outpt tx n Mortality <1% for outpt, 14% for admitted n 50% pneumonia cases and 90% mortality in pt >65 years age

n n 2 -27% (50% APG) CAP is S. pneumoniae Risk factors for resistant

n n 2 -27% (50% APG) CAP is S. pneumoniae Risk factors for resistant S. pneumo: n n n n Beta-lactam/quinolone i. e. cipro/macrolide use in last 3 months ETo. H >65 y. o. Immunosupressed Exposure to children in childcare facility Resident of long term care facility Worry if it is a highly resistant S. pneumo (invasive) 7% or 27% pt Outpt DO NOT need antimircobial activity against highly resistant S. pneumo. Use macrolides or B lactam monotx

n n Mycoplasma pneumonia 20% CAP (esp younger) Chlamydia pneumoniae 10% CAP and may

n n Mycoplasma pneumonia 20% CAP (esp younger) Chlamydia pneumoniae 10% CAP and may be co-pathogen in elderly Influenza A and B, parainfluenza, adenovirus in 2 -15% CAP 20% cases TB in residents of long term care facilities (20 -30 X increased risk TB)

Presentation n In elderly, may not have classic S&S, may be afebrile. May present

Presentation n In elderly, may not have classic S&S, may be afebrile. May present with delerium/confusion (44. 5% pneumonia pt) RR> 25 has sensitivity 90% and specificity of 95% for dx pneumonia Single temp 38. 3 C has sens 40% (37. 8 C has sens 70%)

Investigations n Blood culture only if pt has hx of chills/rigors n Blood culture

Investigations n Blood culture only if pt has hx of chills/rigors n Blood culture within 24 h presentation associated with a decreased 30 d mortality in CAP (Meehan, TP, et al. Quality of care, process, and outcomes in elderly patients with pneumonia JAMA 1997; 278: 2080 -2084) n Do 3 sets: n n 1 aerobic/1 anaerobic 1 aerobic from 2 nd site at same time

Blood culture evidence? n n Mortality rate from bacteremic pneumococcal CAP has shown little

Blood culture evidence? n n Mortality rate from bacteremic pneumococcal CAP has shown little improvement in the past three decades, remaining between 19% and 28%, (depending on the population and institution studied) Helpful in 15% pt

Blood gases n n n Sa. O 2 <90% or pt has COPD take

Blood gases n n n Sa. O 2 <90% or pt has COPD take ABG on room air or baseline 02 level if on chronic O 2 therapy Thoracentesis if effusion >10 mm on lateral XR Recurrent pneumonia – need w/u for immunosupression or structural ab. N

Gram stain n n Adequate if < 25 epithelial cells per lowpowered field >10

Gram stain n n Adequate if < 25 epithelial cells per lowpowered field >10 gram-positive, lancet-shape diplococci in a hpf is a sensitive and specific predictor of pneumococcal pneumonia Gram stain not helpful for other types pneumonia NPV 80%

Fine et al. Prediction Rule to identify low risk pt with CAP. NEJM 1997;

Fine et al. Prediction Rule to identify low risk pt with CAP. NEJM 1997; 336: 243 n n n 14, 199 adult in pt with CAP 5 classes of risk of death in 30 d Validated with 38. 039 in pt n n n PORT cohort 2287 in and outpt Detemined 20 factors independently related to mortality in an additive fashion Limits: n n Medical/psychosocial C/I Immunosuppressed May oversimplify, clinical judgement NB No Sa. O 2 in class I

PORT Score n n n n Risk classes 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) Class

PORT Score n n n n Risk classes 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) Class 1 -2 younger pt (35 – 59 y) Class 3 -5 older pt (72 - 79 y) Based also on comorbidities, abnormal physical findings, lab values Outpt mx for class 1 and 2 Brief in pt observation class 3 Admission class 4 and 5

Who to admit? n n n PORT score Hypotension (SBP < 90, DBP <

Who to admit? n n n PORT score Hypotension (SBP < 90, DBP < 60) Tachypnea Low sats Elevated BUN (>20) or Cr > 120 Altered LOC n n n n WBC <4 or >30 ANC <1 Elevated PT or PTT Low plts Multilobar involvement Cavitation Rapid spreading

Who goes to ICU? American Thoracic Society Guidelines n n n n RR >

Who goes to ICU? American Thoracic Society Guidelines n n n n RR > 30 Severe Respiratory Failure (Pa. O 2/Fi. O 2 <250) Ventilated Bilateral infiltrates or multilobar Shock Vasopressors Oliguria (<20 cc/h) Presence of one factor 98% sens, 32% specific

Management CAP n Hydration Wt loss >5 -10% associated w increased mortality n Abx

Management CAP n Hydration Wt loss >5 -10% associated w increased mortality n Abx to cover S. pneumo, M. pneumo, C. pneumo n n n 1 st choice macrolide or doxycycline Macrolide resistance for S. pneumo ~10% and may have suboptimal coverage for H. influenzae. . . Avoid in pt with chills/rigors Floroquinolones – use for failed first line tx or for elderly with significant comorbidity BIPAP (Dean et al. Chest 2000)

Which antibiotics and why? To“Risk stratify” and “Drug stratify” n n Increasing evidence that

Which antibiotics and why? To“Risk stratify” and “Drug stratify” n n Increasing evidence that pneumococcus needs double coverage BASICS TO COVER FOR ALL CAP: S. pneumo, H. flu, M. catarrhalis are principal bugs (B LACTAM) Atypicals include Mycoplasma, Legionella, and C. pneumoniae (MACROLIDE)

Inpatient Mx n n Cephalosporin iv (i. e. , ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, etc. ) with

Inpatient Mx n n Cephalosporin iv (i. e. , ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, etc. ) with significant activity against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis PLUS Macrolide iv to provide activity against atypical organisms

Cipro NOT for CAP n n Inadequate coverage S. pneumo Hydrophilic molecule as opposed

Cipro NOT for CAP n n Inadequate coverage S. pneumo Hydrophilic molecule as opposed to hydophobic molecules of other quinolones n n Activates efflux pumps which may be initial step in quinolone resistance Chen et al found that the prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant pneumococci (MIC ≥ 4 mcg/m. L) increased from 0% in 1993 to 3. 7% in 1998 Combination of reduced susceptibility and increased resistance! Floroquinolones (levo) monotx in critically ill has not been established (but likely would work as covers gm +, gm - , atypicals and some anaerobes) Chen D, Mc. Geer A, de Azavedo JC, et al and The Canadian Bacterial Surveillance. Network. Decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae tofluoroquinolones in Canada. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 233 -239.

When to use “Vitamin L” n n Floroquinolones (levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin) Reserved for selected

When to use “Vitamin L” n n Floroquinolones (levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin) Reserved for selected pts with: (CDC-DRSPWG) Inpt who failed ceftriaxone + macrolide n Allergic 1 st line agents n Documented infection with highly resistant S. Pneumo (penicillin MIC 4 mcg/ml) n

Abx coverage n n n 1 st gen cephalosporins – gm (+) 2 nd

Abx coverage n n n 1 st gen cephalosporins – gm (+) 2 nd gen cephalosporing - Cefoxitin, cefotetan, and cefmetazole, provide coverage against Bacteroides 3 rd gen cephalosporins – more gm (–) rod coverage n n n Ceftazidime for Pseudomonas Imipenem has broad coverage against aerobic and anaerobic organisms. Aztreonam good for gm (-) bacilli such as Pseudomonas Clindamycin, Metronidazole - anaerobes, e. g. B. fragilis.

S. Pneumo Resistance Capital Health Region n n n n Penicillin Amoxicillin Cefuroxime Cefotaxime/ceftriaxone

S. Pneumo Resistance Capital Health Region n n n n Penicillin Amoxicillin Cefuroxime Cefotaxime/ceftriaxone Macrolide TMP-SMX Levofloxacin Vancomycin 15. 8% 4. 7% 9. 8% 3. 9% 13% 21% <1% 0%

S. Pneumo % Sensitivity Antibiotogram Calgary Community vs Nursing Home vs PLC vs FMC

S. Pneumo % Sensitivity Antibiotogram Calgary Community vs Nursing Home vs PLC vs FMC vs RVG n n n Penicillin 87%, 100%, 73%, 95%, 85% Amoxil 100%, 100% Ceftiaxone 100%, 94% Erythro 60%, 100%, 60%, 84%, 66% SXT 60%, 100%, 60%, 75%, 51% July 1, 2001 – June 30, 2002

n S. pneumoniae with penicillin resistance also has resistance to (all on same gene):

n S. pneumoniae with penicillin resistance also has resistance to (all on same gene): n n n Macrolides Augementin TMP-SMX 2 nd and 3 rd generation cephalosporins No resistance to vancomycin or quinolones Various levels of resistance (minimal with cephalosporins, may be intermediate with macrolides)

n BUT. . . Greatest growth in resistance is to floroquinolones n n Greatest

n BUT. . . Greatest growth in resistance is to floroquinolones n n Greatest risk for emergent resistance during tx and resultant tx failures so also has largest increased tx duration because of resistance and big decrease clinical response to emerging infections Risk factors for resistance to floroquinolones: n n n >64 y. o COPD Past fluoroquinolone use

Is Resistant S. pneumo clincially significant? n n n Tx failures reported with AOM

Is Resistant S. pneumo clincially significant? n n n Tx failures reported with AOM and meningitis Relationship with resistance and pneumococcal pneumonia unclear *Ceftriaxone (1 g/day iv) or cefotaxime (1. 5 -2 g/8 h iv) work well in adult patients with systemic nonmeningeal pneumococcal infections caused by strains with ceftriaxone/cefotaxime MIC up to 1 mcg/m. L (or even 2 mcg/ml) n 429 episodes CAP correlated the ceftriaxone/cefotaxime MICs and antibiotic therapy with 30 d mortality rate n In 185 episodes treated with 1 g/d of ceftriaxone (n = 171) or 1. 5 -2 g/8 h of cefotaxime (n = 14) n n 18% (26/148) sensitive strain mortality rate 13% (3/24) intermediate resistant strain mortatlity rate 15% (2/13) resistant strain mortality rate respectively (P = 0. 81) * Pallares R, Capdevila O, Liñares J, et al. Hospital Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Spain; Clinical Relevance of Current NCCLS Ceftriaxone/Cefotaxime Resistance Breakpoints in non-Meningeal Pneumococcal Infections. Abstract

Elderly and CAP n Susceptible gm (-) enteric organisms such as: Klebsiella n Escherichia

Elderly and CAP n Susceptible gm (-) enteric organisms such as: Klebsiella n Escherichia coli n Pseudomonas n n n Increased risk infection with DRSP Need macrolide + cephalosporin or fluoroquinolone

Risk Factors for DRSP or atypical pathogens in the Elderly 1) Increasing fragility (>

Risk Factors for DRSP or atypical pathogens in the Elderly 1) Increasing fragility (> 85 years of age, comorbid conditions, previous infection, etc. ) of the patient 2) Acquisition of the pneumonia in a skilled nursing facility 3) Presence of an aspiration pneumonia, suggesting gram (-) or anaerobics 4) Chronic alcoholism (Klebsiella pneumoniae) 5) Pneumococcal pneumonia in pt with comorbidities and no Pneumovax vaccine 6) Hx of infection with gram (-), anaerobic, or resistant species of S. pneumoniae 7) Hx of treatment failure 8) Previous hospitalizations for pneumonia 9) Previous ICU hospitalization for pneumonia 10) Caught pneumonia in area with known DRSP 11) Immunodeficiency and/or severe underlying disease.

Admission Criteria n n Pneumonia Severity of Illness score Give abx within 8 hours

Admission Criteria n n Pneumonia Severity of Illness score Give abx within 8 hours of arrival to hospital (decreases mortality)

Poor Outcome Risk Factors n n n RR > 30 SBP <90, DBP <60

Poor Outcome Risk Factors n n n RR > 30 SBP <90, DBP <60 ARF Malnourished or >5% wt loss in past month Functional impairment Age/comorbid conditions

. n Numerous studies showing that pneumonia guidelines can reduce mortality and reduce unnecessary

. n Numerous studies showing that pneumonia guidelines can reduce mortality and reduce unnecessary use of resources

Case AJ: 11 yo male n n n N/V/D x 1 day 6 x

Case AJ: 11 yo male n n n N/V/D x 1 day 6 x vomitting, 2 x diarrhea Periumbilical abdo pain “Dizzy” Rhinitis, cough 38 C, HR 117, RR 28, 105/75, 96% RA

AJ’s Exam n n n Pale Small cervical nodes Abdo exam nontender No indrawing

AJ’s Exam n n n Pale Small cervical nodes Abdo exam nontender No indrawing Decreased breath sounds RLL, crackles

Pediatric CAP n n Bronchopneumonia – acute inflammation smaller bronchial tubes and peribronchiolar alveoli

Pediatric CAP n n Bronchopneumonia – acute inflammation smaller bronchial tubes and peribronchiolar alveoli Pneumonitis Syndrome – Infants 1 – 3 months old, afebrile with cough, tachypnea and progressive respiratory distress. n n CXR shows diffuse pulmonary infiltrates and air trapping Single or mutlipathogens involved

Incidence n n 35 -45/1000 kids <5 y. o. 16 -20/1000 in 5 -

Incidence n n 35 -45/1000 kids <5 y. o. 16 -20/1000 in 5 - 9 y. o. 6 -12/1000 >9 y. o. No specific cause of pneumonia identified in 40 -60% cases

Age best predictor for the offending BUG n n As we all know, VIRUSES

Age best predictor for the offending BUG n n As we all know, VIRUSES #1 age 1 month to 2 years RSV 50% Parainfluenza 25% Small number influenza A, B and adenovirus

n Neonatal Period n n n GBS Listeria E. coli n 3 months –

n Neonatal Period n n n GBS Listeria E. coli n 3 months – 2 years n n n Infants 1 – 3 months n n Usu have pneumonitis syndrome Chlamydia trachomatis Bordetella pertussis RSV n n n Usu viral S. pneumo Non typable H. flu M. catarrhalis Mycoplasma pneumonia C. pneumonia Increasing incidence C. Pneumonia (1 -15%) **Hib vacccine offers no protection against NTHI**

n 2 -5 yr n n n Viral S. pneumo H. flu (Hib) Nontypable

n 2 -5 yr n n n Viral S. pneumo H. flu (Hib) Nontypable H. flu M. pneumoniae C. pneumoniae n 6 -18 yr n n n M. pneumoniae S. pneumo C. pneumo NTHI Influenza A and B Adenovirus

Bugs that get you into the ICU n All ages: S. pneumo n Staph

Bugs that get you into the ICU n All ages: S. pneumo n Staph n GAS n Hib n M. pneumoniae n Adenovirus n RSV n

C & M pneumoniae n C. pneumo 15 -18% PCAP aged 3 -12 Most

C & M pneumoniae n C. pneumo 15 -18% PCAP aged 3 -12 Most asx n Only 10% cases result in clinically apparent pneumonia n Fever, malaise, headache, pharyngitis n Some authors state wheezing more common with viral and C & M pneumoniae n ? Increased incidence conjunctivitis n

Risk Factors n n n n n Recent URTI Exposure to cigarette smoke Daycare

Risk Factors n n n n n Recent URTI Exposure to cigarette smoke Daycare Prematurity (up to 1 year) Malnutrition Recent hospitalization (last 3 months) Immunocompromised, cardiopulm or neurologic disorders Low socioeconomic status Cystic fibrosis

2 classic presentations n n Typical: fever, chills, pleuritic chest pain, productive cough Atypical:

2 classic presentations n n Typical: fever, chills, pleuritic chest pain, productive cough Atypical: gradual onset over days to weeks, domination of sx of h/a and malaise, nonproductive cough, low grade fever

n n n Fever, rigors, pleuritic chest/abdominal pain suggest pneumococcal pneumonia Temp >38. 5

n n n Fever, rigors, pleuritic chest/abdominal pain suggest pneumococcal pneumonia Temp >38. 5 C RR >50/min in <11 months RR >40/min in >11 months RR >28 in 5 -16 years

What makes you suspicious of pneumonia vs the good ol’ virus? n Absence of

What makes you suspicious of pneumonia vs the good ol’ virus? n Absence of sx cluster of: Resp distress n Tachypnea n Crackles n Decreased breath sounds excludes pneumonia n 100% specificity (level II) n Based on Lethenthal’s paper: 133 pt aged 3 mo – 15 y (26+ pneumonia)

Sn and Sp of Sx to IC PCAP Leventhal. Clinical predictors of pneumonia as

Sn and Sp of Sx to IC PCAP Leventhal. Clinical predictors of pneumonia as a guide to ordering chest roetgenograms. Clin Pediatr 1982; 21: 730 -734. n n n n n Symptom Tachypnea Cough Toxic Crackles Retractions Flaring Pallor Grunting Sn 92% 81% 44% 35% 35% 19% Sp 15% 19% 60% 82% 87% 94% Findings most sens for predicting infiltrates – tachypnea, cough, toxic look Findings most spec for + infiltrate – flaring, pallor, grunting

CXR Summary n In combination with physical exam, do a CXR when: Questionable dx

CXR Summary n In combination with physical exam, do a CXR when: Questionable dx n Admitting pt n <3 y with fever >39 C and WBC >15 n Complicated pneumonia suspected n

Investigations Pediatric CAP n n CXR gold standard for all pneumonias CBC, diff, blood

Investigations Pediatric CAP n n CXR gold standard for all pneumonias CBC, diff, blood cultures n n n Usu WBC consists of polymorphs Can get leukocytosis with adeno, influenze or Mycoplasma Viral infections can cause leukopenia OR it is a sign of overwhelming bacterial infection Gram stain/culture if older child >2 y. o. consider Mycoplasma Ig. M ELISA(cold agglutinins are of no help) RSV testing not routinely recommended

Testing for Mycoplasma n n n Jadavji suggests serologic testing for mycoplasma for inpts

Testing for Mycoplasma n n n Jadavji suggests serologic testing for mycoplasma for inpts only, not in outpt or ED setting Cold agglutinins titire >1: 128 Ig. M antibody in serum late in acute phase or early convalescence n n PCR assay from throat or nasopharynx OR quadrupling of acute vs convalescent serology

CXR Findings VIRAL n Peribronchial thickening n Diffuse interstitial infiltrates n Hyperinflation BACTERIAL n

CXR Findings VIRAL n Peribronchial thickening n Diffuse interstitial infiltrates n Hyperinflation BACTERIAL n Subsegmental, segmental or lobar infiltrates n Air bronchograms n Round pneumonia in early S. pneumo n n M. pneumo diffuse infiltrates out of proportion to clinical findings (or bronchopneumonia infiltrates in lower lobes) Bilateral reticulonodular interstitial infitrates

n n n 50% bacterial pneumonia will have lobar infiltrate Can also see alveolar

n n n 50% bacterial pneumonia will have lobar infiltrate Can also see alveolar infiltrates Round pneumonia seen with S. pneumo

When to admit pediatric CAP? n Toxic appearance Age <6 months Severe respiratory distress

When to admit pediatric CAP? n Toxic appearance Age <6 months Severe respiratory distress and O 2 requirements Dehydration/vomitting No response to oral abx Immunocompromised n Noncompliant patient/parent n n n

Management n n n Hydrate Antipyretics, pain control Refer pleural effusions Drain empyema Repeat

Management n n n Hydrate Antipyretics, pain control Refer pleural effusions Drain empyema Repeat CXR in 2 -3 wks if: pleural effusion, pneumatocele, pulmonary abcess

Recurrent pneumonia in a child n Consider: n n Aspiration foreign body Congenital malformation

Recurrent pneumonia in a child n Consider: n n Aspiration foreign body Congenital malformation Asthma Pt with recurrent atelectasis in different areas lung n n n CF Immunosuppressed Aspiration

n n Oral treatment adequate IV abx reserved for neonates and pt with severe

n n Oral treatment adequate IV abx reserved for neonates and pt with severe pneumonia

Viral vs bacterial? n n n Mycoplasma and Chlamydia pneumonia more common than we

Viral vs bacterial? n n n Mycoplasma and Chlamydia pneumonia more common than we think (may be misdx as a viral pneumonia) Clinically indistinguishable Tx erythromycin (no advantage to use azithro because azithro is to cover H. influenzae)

RSV n n n Nasal swabs 90% sens (need good swab) < 3 months

RSV n n n Nasal swabs 90% sens (need good swab) < 3 months at risk for apneic spells 2 y to RSV (wheezing, retractions) Albuterol vs epinephrine – “nothing works for bronchiolitis” n n n If severe (hypoxic, indrawing) – use 3 epi’s n 3 ml in 1: 1000 epinephrine (not racemic) If moderate distress – epi no help Can try albuterol, if it helps great

PCAP - Ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and cefuroxime effective in MIC >2. 0 mcg/l n n

PCAP - Ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and cefuroxime effective in MIC >2. 0 mcg/l n n n Goals clinical outcomes of pt tx with beta-lactam antibiotics for a systemic infection outside of the CNS (S. pneumoniae nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone) (MIC ≥ 1. 0 mcg/m. L) Retrospective review of children prospectively identified 1993 - 99 100 pt (71 bacteremic, 14 bacteremic + pneumonia, 3 septic arthritis, 1 cellulitis) n n n 5 and 6 kids had bacteremia with MIC >2. 0 mcg/ml) IV ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or cefuroxime for one or more doses followed by po abx One failure in pt with severe combined immune deficiency and bacteremia Kaplan SL, Mason EO Jr, Barson WJ, et al. Outcome of invasive infections outside the central nervous system caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates nonsusceptible to ceftriazone in children treated with beta-lactam antibiotics. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001; 20: 392 -396

Immunocompromised/Elderly n n Atypical presentation (insidious onset or may be confused with CHR or

Immunocompromised/Elderly n n Atypical presentation (insidious onset or may be confused with CHR or respiratory compromise from lung dz) Atypical organisms/opportunistic infections may be subtle

Nursing Home Acquired Pneumonia n n Prevalence 1. 1 -2. 5% in chronic care

Nursing Home Acquired Pneumonia n n Prevalence 1. 1 -2. 5% in chronic care facilities, incidence 13 - 48% In Calgary single most common reason for T/F to hospital (18. 5% of all admissions) Mortality as high as 44% Exclusions: aspiration pneumonia, hospital acquired, CF, bronchiectasis, TB

NHAP S&S Tachypnea: RR >25 associated with increased morbidity and mortality (sens 90%, spec

NHAP S&S Tachypnea: RR >25 associated with increased morbidity and mortality (sens 90%, spec 99%) n RR> 40 transfer to hospital n Temp >37. 8 C Sens 70%, spec 90% PPV 55% (absence of fever does not R/O infection) n Cough, pleuritic CP, auscultory findings n New onset delerium (44% pts) n

NHAP BUGS n n n n S. pneumo #1 H. influenzae M. catarrhalis Legionella

NHAP BUGS n n n n S. pneumo #1 H. influenzae M. catarrhalis Legionella C. pneumoniae Unknown incidence atypicals Gm (-) Anaerobes not important in NHAP n Cover anaerobes if severe periodontal disease, putrid sputum, necrotizing pneumonia or lung abcess

Wt loss in elderly n Wt loss >5 -10% associated w increased mortality n

Wt loss in elderly n Wt loss >5 -10% associated w increased mortality n >5% in 30 days or 10% in 6 months

NHAP Tx n n Amoxil first line if still in home Add macrolide if

NHAP Tx n n Amoxil first line if still in home Add macrolide if severe pneumonia or underlying lung dz (keep in mind 10% S. pneumo resistance to macrolides, may not cover H. flu) n n n Cefuroxime if worried about Staph Doxy is an excellent choice, low R Fluoroquinolones if failed intial therapy or multiple comorbidities. Try to avoid to decrease resistance formation. (levo overused in NH in particular)

Pseudomonas n n Not seen in CAP Risks: Chronic or prolonged use broad spectrum

Pseudomonas n n Not seen in CAP Risks: Chronic or prolonged use broad spectrum abx (>7 D) n Bronchiectasis n Malnutrition n Neutrophil dysfxn (e. g. >10 mg prednisone/d) n HIV (can get Pseudomonal CAP) n

Pseudomonas Tx n B lactams Pip/tazo Imipenem n Meropenem n n 3 rd and

Pseudomonas Tx n B lactams Pip/tazo Imipenem n Meropenem n n 3 rd and 4 th generation cephalosporins n n n Cefepime, ceftazidime Cipro Aminoglycosides

Aspiration Pneumonia n n Eto. H, IVDU, neurologically impaired, poor oral hygiene Correlate with

Aspiration Pneumonia n n Eto. H, IVDU, neurologically impaired, poor oral hygiene Correlate with gram stain (multiple bacterial morphotypes phagocytosed in WBC’s)

Aspiration Pneumonia Tx n Cover anaerobes (B. fragilis 15%), peptostreptococcus Clindamycin n Cefoxitin n

Aspiration Pneumonia Tx n Cover anaerobes (B. fragilis 15%), peptostreptococcus Clindamycin n Cefoxitin n Pip/Tazo n Metronidazole (not as good if abcess present) n