ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA UPDATES Dr Marco Matos Gold Coast

  • Slides: 48
Download presentation
ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA UPDATES Dr Marco Matos Gold Coast Cancer Care, Gold Coast University Hospital

ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA UPDATES Dr Marco Matos Gold Coast Cancer Care, Gold Coast University Hospital and Pacific Private Oncology Group

USA. Uterine cancer: new cases and dates ● 1990 33000 4000 ● 2000 36100

USA. Uterine cancer: new cases and dates ● 1990 33000 4000 ● 2000 36100 6500 ● 2010 43470 7950 ● Ovarian cancer 21880 new cases and 13850 deaths ● Cervical cancer: 12200 new cases and 4210 deaths

● ● In Australia endometrial cancer affects 1 in 69 women before the age

● ● In Australia endometrial cancer affects 1 in 69 women before the age of 75. In 2010, 2100 women were diagnosed. 6 /day ● 370 expected deaths a year ● The incidence is increasing

Obesity significantly increases the risk of developing cancers including endometrial cancer [TITLE]

Obesity significantly increases the risk of developing cancers including endometrial cancer [TITLE]

In 2020, more than 70% of the population of Australia will be overweight [TITLE]

In 2020, more than 70% of the population of Australia will be overweight [TITLE]

[TITLE] Non endometrioid (serous, clear cell carcinoma) cancers disproportional contribute to deaths in comparison

[TITLE] Non endometrioid (serous, clear cell carcinoma) cancers disproportional contribute to deaths in comparison with endometrioid histology

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

Carcinogenesis model of type I endometrial cancer: PTEN, MSI and Kras alterations playing an

Carcinogenesis model of type I endometrial cancer: PTEN, MSI and Kras alterations playing an earlier important role. P 53 mutations a late event [TITLE]

Carcinogenesis model of type II endometrial cancer: P 53 mutation an early event [TITLE]

Carcinogenesis model of type II endometrial cancer: P 53 mutation an early event [TITLE]

Molecular alterations differ in Type 1 vs type 2 endometrial cancers ● ● Endometrioid

Molecular alterations differ in Type 1 vs type 2 endometrial cancers ● ● Endometrioid adenocarcinoma (Type 1) – PTEN loss of function (up to 60%) – PI 3 KCA mutation (30%) – K ras mutation (10 - 20%) – FGFR 2 mutations (12 - 16%) – Microsatelalite instability (20 – 45%) – Nuclear accumulation of b- cadherin (18 – 47%) Papillary Serous (Type 2) – P 53 mutations (90%)

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

MANAGEMENT

MANAGEMENT

Survival improves in the hands of a trained Gynae-oncologist

Survival improves in the hands of a trained Gynae-oncologist

Hormonal therapy of endometrial cancer Agent Tumour grade Number RR % Medroxyprogesterone 800 mg/d

Hormonal therapy of endometrial cancer Agent Tumour grade Number RR % Medroxyprogesterone 800 mg/d Podratz 1985 1 2 3 14 17 27 40 15 2 Tamoxifen 40 mg/d alternating with medroxyprogesterone 200 mg/d Whitney 2003 1 2 3 15 17 27 33 Medroxyprogesterone 160 mg/d x 3 weeks then Tamoxifen 40 mg /d x 3 weeks Fiorica 2003 1 2 3 16 17 22 38 24 22

Response rates and survival to single agent chemotherapy AGENT Prior treatment Number RR% Prob

Response rates and survival to single agent chemotherapy AGENT Prior treatment Number RR% Prob PFS (>6 mo) OS months 25 0 0. 08 8. 7 48 25 0. 21 8. 9 Caelyx 43 9 0. 23 8. 2 Topotecan 28 7 0. 25 9 Oxaliplatin 52 13 0, 27 10. 9 27 8 0. 11 6. 4 27 4 0. 28 9. 4 50 12 0. 20 8. 7 Etoposide Paclitaxel Docetaxel No 77% prior Rx Pemetrexed Ixabepilone 94% prior Rx

Biological agents: response rate and PFS Agent N RR % Prob Clinical (PFS> 6

Biological agents: response rate and PFS Agent N RR % Prob Clinical (PFS> 6 mo) Benefit Ratio (CR + PR +SD) Duration of stability (median months) TKI and VEGF inhibitors Gefitinib 29 3. 8 0. 15 Lapatinib 30 3. 3 0. 10 Bevacizumab 52 13. 5 0. 40 Temsirolimus 18 25 82 6. 7 Temsirolimus 27 7 51 3. 8 Deferolimus 45 7 33 <4 Everolimus 35 0 43 4. 5 MTOR inhibitors

LET’S LOOK AT THE DATA:

LET’S LOOK AT THE DATA:

GOG 30 Adryamicin in advanced / recurrent endometrial cancer ● Adryamicin 60 mg/m 2

GOG 30 Adryamicin in advanced / recurrent endometrial cancer ● Adryamicin 60 mg/m 2 ● N = 43 ● CR= 26 % + PR= 12% = 37% ● Better survival for responders, p<. 05 ● Active agent

GOG 34 Phase III, surgery + radiotherapy +Doxorubicin in stage IC, II and IIIA

GOG 34 Phase III, surgery + radiotherapy +Doxorubicin in stage IC, II and IIIA EC ● Doxo 60 mg/m 2 q 3 /52 up to 500 mg ● No G 3 – 4 cardio toxicity ● Survival 60 vs 66%, p= NS ● “Unable to determine effect” ● Morrow et al Gyn Onc 36: 166, 1990

GOG 99 Surgery +- adjuvant radiotherapy

GOG 99 Surgery +- adjuvant radiotherapy

GOG 107 phase III trial, doxorubicin +- cisplatin in stage III/ IV EC ●

GOG 107 phase III trial, doxorubicin +- cisplatin in stage III/ IV EC ● Doxo 60 +- CDDP 50 mg/m 2 q 3/52 ● N= 281 ● ● G 3 -4 leucopenia (62 vs 40%), anaemia (22 vs 4%), N/V (13 vs 4%) Dox; CR 8%+ PR 17%= 25%, PFS 3. 9 mo, OS 9 mo Dox + CDDP; CR 19% + PR 23% = 42%, PFS 5. 7 mo , OS 9. 2 mo Adding cisplatin improves RR and PFS but not OS at the cost of more toxicity

GOG 122 Adjuvant Radiotherapy vs AP

GOG 122 Adjuvant Radiotherapy vs AP

● Adverse events were more common with AP ● At 24 mo: p<0. 01:

● Adverse events were more common with AP ● At 24 mo: p<0. 01: – DFS: WART 46 vs AP 59%, OS: WART 59% vs AP 70%

GOG 177 RR: 57 VS 34%, PFS 8. 3 vs 5. 3, m. OS

GOG 177 RR: 57 VS 34%, PFS 8. 3 vs 5. 3, m. OS 15. 3 vs 12. 3 mo all in favour of TAP but at increased neurotoxicity

GOG 184

GOG 184

OTHER UPDATES

OTHER UPDATES

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]

[TITLE]