Differentiating Shock Syndromes Hemodynamics and Vasopressors in the

  • Slides: 42
Download presentation
Differentiating Shock Syndromes: Hemodynamics and Vasopressors in the ICU Michael D Schmidt, Pharm. D

Differentiating Shock Syndromes: Hemodynamics and Vasopressors in the ICU Michael D Schmidt, Pharm. D Critical Care Clinical Pharmacist Belleville Memorial Hospital Belleville, IL

Disclosures • I have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Disclosures • I have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Learning Objectives 1. Understand hemodynamic variables used to classify shock syndromes 2. Classify 4

Learning Objectives 1. Understand hemodynamic variables used to classify shock syndromes 2. Classify 4 different types of shock based on etiology 3. Compare vasoactive drugs commonly used to treat shock 4. Develop a treatment plan for a patient presenting with shock

Introduction • What is shock? – Inadequate perfusion – Leading to inadequate oxygen delivery

Introduction • What is shock? – Inadequate perfusion – Leading to inadequate oxygen delivery • Is it hypotension? – Commonly – Be aware of patient specific variables

Common Clinical Presentation • Altered Mental Status – Anywhere from confusion to coma •

Common Clinical Presentation • Altered Mental Status – Anywhere from confusion to coma • Skin findings – Cool/Cold – Clammy – Poor turgor • Renal function – Low urine output – Elevated creatinine?

Hemodynamic Variables • Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) mm. Hg – An estimation of peripheral

Hemodynamic Variables • Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) mm. Hg – An estimation of peripheral arterial blood flow – Essential for tissue/organ perfusion SBP + (2 x DBP) MAP = 3 • Heart Rate (HR) BPM – The rate at which the heart is beating

Hemodynamic Variables • Cardiac Output (CO) L/min – A measure of the amount of

Hemodynamic Variables • Cardiac Output (CO) L/min – A measure of the amount of blood being pumped by the heart CO = SV x HR • Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) – Measures constriction/dilation of the circulatory system (afterload) MAP - CVP SVR = 80 x CO

Hemodynamic Variables • Central Venous Pressure (CVP) mm. Hg – Measures blood volume returning

Hemodynamic Variables • Central Venous Pressure (CVP) mm. Hg – Measures blood volume returning to the heart (preload) – May be helpful in determining volume status – However, not an accurate predictor of volume responsiveness • Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP) – Measures pressure in pulmonary artery – Indirect measure of left atrial pressure

Circulation Preload (CVP) Heart Rate Contractility Afterload Stroke Volume Systemic Vascular Resistance Cardiac Output

Circulation Preload (CVP) Heart Rate Contractility Afterload Stroke Volume Systemic Vascular Resistance Cardiac Output Mean Arterial Pressure

Hemodynamic Monitoring Devices • Pulmonary Artery (PA) catheter – Advantage: Directly measures CO –

Hemodynamic Monitoring Devices • Pulmonary Artery (PA) catheter – Advantage: Directly measures CO – Disadvantages: • Difficult to place • No superiority data • May be arrhythmogenic

Hemodynamic Monitoring Devices • Central Venous Catheter (CVC) – Advantages: • Easier and safer

Hemodynamic Monitoring Devices • Central Venous Catheter (CVC) – Advantages: • Easier and safer than PA catheter • Can measure CVP • Can measure Scv. O 2 – Unless femoral CVC * * Chest 2010; 138(1): 76 -83

Hemodynamic Monitoring Devices • Arterial pulse pressure waveform analysis – Many different brand names

Hemodynamic Monitoring Devices • Arterial pulse pressure waveform analysis – Many different brand names – Advantages: • Continuous CO measurement • Assessment of stroke volume and pulse pressure – As well as variation in these parameters – Disadvantages: • Valve dysfunction and arrhythmias decrease accuracy • SVV is only validated in intubated patients

Laboratory Markers • Lactate – Product of anaerobic metabolism • Elevation is a good

Laboratory Markers • Lactate – Product of anaerobic metabolism • Elevation is a good marker of tissue hypoperfusion – Trending may be useful to grade, or possibly guide, resuscitation in septic shock – Can cause anion-gap metabolic acidosis

Laboratory Markers • Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (Scv. O 2) – Accurate measure of

Laboratory Markers • Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (Scv. O 2) – Accurate measure of peripheral oxygen delivery • Assuming patient is not profoundly anemic – When oxygen delivery is appropriate: • Sa. O 2 – Scv. O 2 = 25% (100% - 75% = 25%) • 25% is the normal extraction ratio (ERO 2) – When oxygen delivery is inadequate: • ERO 2 increases • Scv. O 2 decreases – Continuous monitoring is more appropriate than occasional

Differentiating Shock States • 4 main types of shock: – Hypovolemic • “Not enough

Differentiating Shock States • 4 main types of shock: – Hypovolemic • “Not enough blood” – Cardiogenic • “Heart not working” – Obstructive • “Something’s in the way” – Vasodilatory/Distributive • “No pressure”

Differentiating Shock States Shock State Hypovolemic Cardiogenic Obstructive Vasodilatory/Distributive CVP PCWP CO SVR

Differentiating Shock States Shock State Hypovolemic Cardiogenic Obstructive Vasodilatory/Distributive CVP PCWP CO SVR

Differentiating Shock States • Hypovolemic shock – Characterized by inadequate blood volume – Causes:

Differentiating Shock States • Hypovolemic shock – Characterized by inadequate blood volume – Causes: • • Hemorrhage (trauma, GI, post-partum, etc. ) Burns Diarrhea/Vomiting Excessive perspiration – Treatment: • Fix the underlying cause • Replace volume lost • Support BP if necessary

Differentiating Shock States • Cardiogenic shock – Inability of the heart muscle to adequately

Differentiating Shock States • Cardiogenic shock – Inability of the heart muscle to adequately pump blood – Causes: • Damage to the heart – Myocardial infarction, decompensated heart failure, mycordial/septal/valve rupture, arrhythmia (tachy or brady) – Treatment: • Fix the underlying cause • Stimulate the heart muscle • Optimize fluid and BP

Differentiating Shock States • Obstructive shock – Interference with normal pumping by an outside

Differentiating Shock States • Obstructive shock – Interference with normal pumping by an outside force – Causes: • Pulmonary embolism • Cardiac tamponade • Tension pneumothorax – Treatment: • Fix the underlying cause • Optimize fluid and BP

Differentiating Shock States • Vasodilatory/Distributive shock – Relative deficiency of volume due to loss

Differentiating Shock States • Vasodilatory/Distributive shock – Relative deficiency of volume due to loss of tone in vasculature – Causes: • • Sepsis Anaphylaxis Spinal cord injury Poisoning/Overdose – Treatment: • Fix the underlying cause • Increase blood volume • Increase blood pressure

Vasoactive Agents • Definition: Drugs that cause either constriction or dilation of blood vessels

Vasoactive Agents • Definition: Drugs that cause either constriction or dilation of blood vessels – Inotropic drugs often lumped in as well • Mostly analogues of naturally occurring chemicals within the body – Specifically chemicals that impact the adrenergic system – “Fight or Flight” response • All should be run through a central line

The Adrenergic System EXERTION ADRENAL GLAND NOREPINEPHRINE BRAIN S P I N A L

The Adrenergic System EXERTION ADRENAL GLAND NOREPINEPHRINE BRAIN S P I N A L C O R D STRESS NOREPINEPHRINE BLOODSTREAM HEART

The Adrenergic System • Three primary receptor subtypes of concern – Alpha 1 •

The Adrenergic System • Three primary receptor subtypes of concern – Alpha 1 • Vasoconstriction – Beta 1 • Increased heart rate and contractility – Beta 2 • Bronchial and vascular dilation

Vasoactive Agents Drug Phenylephrine Norepinephrine Epinephrine Receptors Alpha 1 > Beta 1 Alpha 1

Vasoactive Agents Drug Phenylephrine Norepinephrine Epinephrine Receptors Alpha 1 > Beta 1 Alpha 1 = Beta 1 Dopamine Dobutamine Vasopressin Beta 1 > Alpha 1 Beta 1 > Beta 2 Vasopressin receptors

Vasoactive Agents • Phenylephrine – Alpha 1 specific agent • Increased SVR is primary

Vasoactive Agents • Phenylephrine – Alpha 1 specific agent • Increased SVR is primary action • May decrease CO due to increased afterload – At normal doses may be less potent than other agents – Generally only recommended as salvage therapy

Vasoactive Agents • Norepinephrine – Primarily alpha 1 but some beta 1 activity •

Vasoactive Agents • Norepinephrine – Primarily alpha 1 but some beta 1 activity • Increased SVR • May increase HR and contractility – Often notable due to increased afterload – Preferred first line therapy in Septic Shock* – Less likely to cause tachycardia/arrhythmia than agents with more beta 1 activity – Effective in other vasodilatory shock states * Crit Care Med 2013; 41(2): 580 -637

Vasoactive Agents • Epinephrine – Equivocal alpha 1 and beta 1 activity • Increased

Vasoactive Agents • Epinephrine – Equivocal alpha 1 and beta 1 activity • Increased SVR • Increased heart rate • Increased contractility – May be considered as first or second line in septic shock* – Preferred therapy in anaphylactic shock * Crit Care Med 2013; 41(2): 580 -637

Vasoactive Agents • Dopamine – Receptor preference is dose dependent < 5 mcg/kg/min •

Vasoactive Agents • Dopamine – Receptor preference is dose dependent < 5 mcg/kg/min • Primarily dopamine receptors • Increased renal blood flow • Small increase in contractility 5 – 10 mcg/kg/min • Beta 1 > Alpha 1 • Increased contractility • Small increase in HR and SVR > 10 mcg/kg/min • Alpha 1 > Beta 1 • Increased SVR • Increased HR and contractility

Vasoactive Agents • Dopamine (cont. ) – Only recommended in septic shock when low

Vasoactive Agents • Dopamine (cont. ) – Only recommended in septic shock when low risk of tachyarrhythmia or absolute or relative bradycardia* – Useful in certain cardiogenic shock populations • Bradyarrhythmias – Not recommended for renal protection – Safer to administer peripherally than other agents * Crit Care Med 2013; 41(2): 580 -637

Vasoactive Agents • Dobutamine – Beta selective agent with mostly beta 1 activity •

Vasoactive Agents • Dobutamine – Beta selective agent with mostly beta 1 activity • Increased contractility • Increased heart rate • May decrease SVR, but usually notable – First line agent for many cardiogenic shock patients • Especially heart failure or bradyarrhythmia – May consider in septic shock if Scv. O 2 persistently low after volume and MAP optimized* * Crit Care Med 2013; 41(2): 580 -637

Vasoactive Agents • Vasopressin – Most notable activities at V 1 a & V

Vasoactive Agents • Vasopressin – Most notable activities at V 1 a & V 2 receptors • V 1 a receptor = direct vasoconstriction • V 2 receptor = increased water resorption by kidneys – Usually second line agent (rarely used as monotherapy) – In septic shock low dose may decrease norepinephrine requirements – In hemorrhagic stroke (specifically variceal hemorrhage) high dose can be considered to decrease bleeding – Can be useful in difficult to wean patients

Putting It All Together 1. Identify the etiology of the shock 2. Treat the

Putting It All Together 1. Identify the etiology of the shock 2. Treat the underlying cause 3. Target drugs to treat the dysfunctional circulation

Patient Case #1 83 y/o F found unresponsive at nursing home. Recent tx for

Patient Case #1 83 y/o F found unresponsive at nursing home. Recent tx for UTI with levofloxacin Skin: Cold to the touch, poor turgor HR 122 BP 74/40 RR 25 Temp 102 F WBC 15. 6 Lactate 4. 3 UA: + nitrites, gross pyuria Blood cults: 2/2 positive for GNR

Patient Case #1 • What is the most likely etiology of shock? – Vasodilatory

Patient Case #1 • What is the most likely etiology of shock? – Vasodilatory (septic) • What is the optimal treatment? – Follow sepsis algorithm… – Early effective antibiotics (Fix underlying cause) – Fluids & vasopressors • Norepinephrine preferred first line

Patient Case #2 77 y/o M with lightheadedness and fatigue 2 day history of

Patient Case #2 77 y/o M with lightheadedness and fatigue 2 day history of increasing melena No history of liver disease HR 124 BP 88/54 RR 18 Temp 98. 3 F Hgb 5. 4 Hct 29% Stool guaiac positive

Patient Case #2 • What is the most likely etiology of shock? – Hypovolemic

Patient Case #2 • What is the most likely etiology of shock? – Hypovolemic (hemorrhagic) • What is the optimal treatment? – Replace blood lost – Get him to the GI lab (Fix underlying cause) – May consider vasopressor if shock progressing despite blood/too unstable for GI lab

Patient Case #3 67 y/o F with shortness of breath and swelling Just returned

Patient Case #3 67 y/o F with shortness of breath and swelling Just returned from 7 day Mexican vacation History of AHA Stage C congestive heart failure Skin: Cool to touch, +3 pitting edema HR 72 BP 80/46 RR 24 Temp 99. 0 F Chest Xray: Diffuse pulmonary edema

Patient Case #3 • What is the most likely etiology of shock? – Cardiogenic

Patient Case #3 • What is the most likely etiology of shock? – Cardiogenic (heart failure exacerbation) • What is the optimal treatment? – Dobutamine to increase contractility and heart rate • Attempt to mobilize fluid – Diuresis if blood pressure will tolerate – Fix underlying cause? • LVAD or transplant

Patient Case #4 43 y/o M w/ chest pain and shortness of breath Acute

Patient Case #4 43 y/o M w/ chest pain and shortness of breath Acute onset today, returned from Dubai 3 days ago No past medical history HR 56 BP 70/53 RR 27 Temp 101. 3 F CT chest: large saddle pulmonary embolism TTE: severe RV dilation

Patient Case #4 • What is the most likely etiology of shock? – Obstructive

Patient Case #4 • What is the most likely etiology of shock? – Obstructive (pulmonary embolism) • What is the optimal treatment? – Thrombectomy or thrombolysis (fix underlying cause) – Vasopressors unlikely to provide much benefit • May increase stress on heart with marginal improvement in circulation

Summary • Early recognition and classification of shock syndrome can help to guide therapy

Summary • Early recognition and classification of shock syndrome can help to guide therapy • Determining the underlying cause and rapidly fixing it (if possible) is the most effective therapy • Commonly used vasopressors have different hemodynamic effects and should be selected based on goals of therapy

Questions? Michael D Schmidt, Pharm. D Critical Care Clinical Pharmacist Belleville Memorial Hospital Belleville,

Questions? Michael D Schmidt, Pharm. D Critical Care Clinical Pharmacist Belleville Memorial Hospital Belleville, IL mschmidt 2@memhosp. com