Power Point to accompany Chapter 11 Government Intervention

  • Slides: 68
Download presentation
Power. Point to accompany Chapter 11 Government Intervention in the Market

Power. Point to accompany Chapter 11 Government Intervention in the Market

Learning Objectives 1. Know the nature and extent of government expenditure in Australia. 2.

Learning Objectives 1. Know the nature and extent of government expenditure in Australia. 2. Understand why a market economy with competition is generally efficient, and understand the economic bases for government intervention. 3. Distinguish between market failure and government failure. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Learning Objectives 4. Use graphs to show externalities affect economic efficiency, and discuss how

Learning Objectives 4. Use graphs to show externalities affect economic efficiency, and discuss how economic efficiency can be achieved in a market with an externality. 5. Explain how goods can be categorised on the basis of whether they are rival or excludable, and define a public good and a common resource. 6. Discuss how the government and the market deal with contract enforcement and asymmetric information. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Selling noodles is harder than you think To open a restaurant, there is a

Selling noodles is harder than you think To open a restaurant, there is a large number of regulations that have to be satisfied, including business registration, health and safety, fire prevention regulations, alcohol licenses, etc. . § Moreover, tax, insurance and industrial relations laws should also be taken into account. § Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 1 The size of the public sector § There are three commonly

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 1 The size of the public sector § There are three commonly used ways of measuring the size of the public (government) sector 1. The value of the goods and services produced by the government as a proportion of total production in the economy (gross domestic product, GDP). 2. The number of people employed as a proportion of total employment in the economy. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 1 The size of the public sector 3. The level of government

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 1 The size of the public sector 3. The level of government expenditure as a proportion of total expenditure in the economy (as measured by GDP). § This measure includes transfer payments, such as pensions, unemployment benefits and family support payments. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 1 The size of the public sector Method of measurement Australia, 2008

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 1 The size of the public sector Method of measurement Australia, 2008 Government purchases as a percentage of GDP 22% Government employment as a percentage of total employment 16% Government expenditure as a proportion of total expenditure 35% Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Government expenditure by country, 2008: Figure 11. 1 Source: Annex Table 25, General Government

Government expenditure by country, 2008: Figure 11. 1 Source: Annex Table 25, General Government Total Outlays, OECD, 2008 Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Government expenditure on goods and services as a percentage of GDP, Australia, 1960 -2008:

Government expenditure on goods and services as a percentage of GDP, Australia, 1960 -2008: Figure 11. 2 Source: Reserve Bank of Australia (2008), Gross Domestic Product-Expenditure Components, Table G 11. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Federal government expenditure by function: Figure 11. 3 Please insert Figure 11. 3 from

Federal government expenditure by function: Figure 11. 3 Please insert Figure 11. 3 from page 328, as large as possible while retaining clarity. Source: Australian Government (2007), Budget 2007– 08, Appendix D—Australian Government Taxation and Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 What’s good about markets? § Equilibrium in a competitive market results

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 What’s good about markets? § Equilibrium in a competitive market results in the economically efficient level of output, where marginal benefit equals marginal cost. § Also, equilibrium in a competitive market results in the greatest amount of economic surplus, or total net benefit to society, from the production of a good or service. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 The economic bases for government intervention Although markets often lead to

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 The economic bases for government intervention Although markets often lead to economic efficiency, the majority of economists acknowledge the necessity for some government intervention. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 The economic bases for government intervention Reasons for government intervention include:

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 The economic bases for government intervention Reasons for government intervention include: 1. The legal system and the rule of law. 2. Maintaining or enforcing competition. § In Australia, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) aims to ensure that trade practices foster competition. § Contestable market: A market in which the potential for competition exists due to minimal entry and exit costs. Even monopoly markets may have the potential to be competitive with government intervention. § Governments at times try to make markets contestable, eg: telecommunications. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 The economic bases for government intervention 3. Natural monopolies: A situation

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 The economic bases for government intervention 3. Natural monopolies: A situation in which economies of scale are so large that one firm can supply the entire market at a lower than average total cost than can two or more firms. 4. Externality: A benefit or cost that affects someone who is not directly involved in the production or consumption of a good or service. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 The economic bases for government intervention 5. Common resource: An extreme

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 The economic bases for government intervention 5. Common resource: An extreme case of externality where no one can be denied access to the good or service but one person’s use of the resource reduces the possible use by others. The resource is rival but not excludable. 6. Public good: A good or service which an additional consumer does not ‘use up’ or prevent another’s use of it, and no one can be excluded from consuming the good or service. It is both non-rival and nonexcludable. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 The economic bases for government intervention Merit good: A good which

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 The economic bases for government intervention Merit good: A good which is beneficial to society irrespective of the preferences of consumers. 7. § Examples may include museums and art galleries. 8. Asymmetric information. 9. Equity. 10. Stabilisation (macroeconomic) policy. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

11. 1 § MAKING THE CONNECTION Should drugs be legal? How far should individual

11. 1 § MAKING THE CONNECTION Should drugs be legal? How far should individual freedoms extend? Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 3 Market failure and government failure § Market failure: Occurs when the

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 3 Market failure and government failure § Market failure: Occurs when the market does not result in an economically efficient outcome. § § Public interest view of government sees it as the role of government to correct for areas of market failure. Government failure: Occurs when the government fails to correct adequately for market failure or takes actions that lead to a more inefficient outcome than the market. § Private interest view focuses on the activities and policies of governments that bring about government failure. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 3 Market failure and government failure Private interest view: Rent seeking individuals

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 3 Market failure and government failure Private interest view: Rent seeking individuals or groups lobby the government for certain types of regulations and policies that will enable them to capture economic rents at the expense of the general public and economic efficiency. § Rent-seeking behaviour: An unproductive activity of an individual or firm in the pursuit of economic profit above that which would result from a competitive market outcome. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 3 Market failure and government failure § Market failure may require government

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 3 Market failure and government failure § Market failure may require government intervention and regulations to increase efficiency, however, sometimes the removal of regulations may be what is required to increase efficiency. § Deregulation: The policy of reducing government intervention in the market to enable more competition and the unhindered allocation of resources in the economy. § Privatisation: The sale of government-owned businesses and assets to the private sector. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency § Externality: A benefit or cost that affects

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency § Externality: A benefit or cost that affects someone who is not directly involved in the production or consumption of a good or service. § Economic efficiency is reduced, as externalities lead to a divergence between: § Private benefits and social benefits § Private costs and social costs Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency § § Private cost: The cost borne by

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency § § Private cost: The cost borne by the producer of a good or service. Social cost: The total cost of producing a good or service, including both the private cost and any external cost. Private benefit: The benefit received by the consumer of a good or service. Social benefit: The total benefit from consuming a good or service, including both the private benefit and any external benefit. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency How a negative externality in production reduces economic

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency How a negative externality in production reduces economic efficiency § Negative production externalities occur when a production activity imposes costs on others who are not directly associated with that activity, and no compensation is paid. § The social cost of the production activity is greater than the private cost of production. § Production occurs at a level that is higher than the socially efficient level, and price is lower than the socially efficient price. § A deadweight loss occurs. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

The effect of pollution on economic efficiency: Figure 11. 4 Price of electricity Deadweig

The effect of pollution on economic efficiency: Figure 11. 4 Price of electricity Deadweig ht loss Efficient equilibriu m S 2 = social cost S 1 = private cost Cost of pollution P 2 P 1 Market equilibrium 0 Deman d Q 2 Q 1 Quantity of electricity Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency § Examples of negative production externalities include: §

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency § Examples of negative production externalities include: § noise, air, visual and water pollution § land degradation and/or contamination Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency How a positive externality in consumption reduces economic

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency How a positive externality in consumption reduces economic efficiency § Positive consumption externalities occur when a consumption activity benefits others who are not directly involved, and who do not pay for it. § The social benefit from the consumption activity is greater than the private benefit from the activity. § Consumption occurs at a level that is lower than the socially efficient level, and price is higher than the socially efficient price. § A deadweight loss occurs. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

The effect of a positive externality on efficiency: Figure 11. 5 Price of university

The effect of a positive externality on efficiency: Figure 11. 5 Price of university education Positive externality Deadweig ht loss Supply Efficient equilibrium P 2 P 1 Market equilibriu m 0 D 2 = social benefit D 1 = private benefit Q 1 Q 2 Quantity of university education Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency Externalities can result in market failure § Market

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency Externalities can result in market failure § Market failure: Situations where the market fails to produce the efficient level of output. What causes externalities? § Externalities and market failure result from incomplete property rights or from the difficulty of enforcing property rights in certain situations. § Property rights: The rights individuals or businesses have to the exclusive use of their property, including the right to buy or sell it. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency The economically efficient level of pollution reduction §

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency The economically efficient level of pollution reduction § The efficient level of pollution is not zero, (neither is this possible). § The optimal decision is to continue an activity up to the point where the marginal benefit from that activity is equal to the marginal cost. § This concept also applies to the activity of pollution reduction. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency The economically efficient level of pollution reduction §

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency The economically efficient level of pollution reduction § There are benefits from pollution reduction and costs of pollution reduction. § As more pollution is reduced, the additional benefits become smaller, and the additional costs of pollution reduction become greater. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency The economically efficient level of pollution reduction §

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency The economically efficient level of pollution reduction § The efficient level of pollution reduction is up to the point where the marginal benefit from pollution reduction is equal to the marginal cost of pollution reduction: MB = MC. If MB > MC Further reduction will make society better off If MB < MC Further reduction will make society worse off If MB = MC Efficient level of pollution reduction has been achieved Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

The marginal benefit from pollution reduction should equal the marginal cost: Figure 11. 6

The marginal benefit from pollution reduction should equal the marginal cost: Figure 11. 6 Cost or benefit (dollars per tonne) Here the marginal benefit from pollution reduction of $250 per tonne is higher than the marginal cost of $175 per tonne. $250 225 Here the marginal cost from pollution reduction of $225 per tonne is higher than the marginal benefit of $150 per tonne. 200 175 150 Here the marginal cost from pollution reduction and the marginal benefit are both $200. 0 Marginal cost of reducing pollution Marginal benefit from reducing pollution 7. 0 8. 5 10. 0 Economically efficient level of pollution reduction. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia Reduction in sulphur dioxide emissions (in thousands of tonnes per year

11. 2 MAKING THE CONNECTION The reduction in lead in Melbourne’s air Reduction in

11. 2 MAKING THE CONNECTION The reduction in lead in Melbourne’s air Reduction in air pollution has been linked to a decline in infant mortality. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency The Coase Theorem: The basis for private solutions

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency The Coase Theorem: The basis for private solutions to externalities Economist Ronald Coase argued: § § If transaction costs are low, private bargaining will result in an efficient solution to the problem of externalities. Transactions costs: The costs in time and other resources that parties incur in the process of agreeing to and carrying out an exchange of goods or services. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency The Coase Theorem: The basis for private solutions

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4 Externalities and efficiency The Coase Theorem: The basis for private solutions to externalities § The company causing the pollution could pay the victims for the right to pollute, or, § The victims could pay the polluting company to reduce pollution. Limitations to the Coase Theorem § § § Large number of parties involved in bargaining. Unreasonable demands. All parties must have full information about the costs and benefits of pollution reduction. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5 Four categories of goods All goods differ on the basis of

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5 Four categories of goods All goods differ on the basis of whether their consumption is rival and excludable. § Rivalry: The situation that occurs when one person consuming a unit of a good means no one else can consume it. § Excludability: The situation in which anyone who does not pay for a good cannot consume it. § There are four categories of goods: private, public, quasi-public and common resources. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5 Four categories of goods § Private good: A good or service

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5 Four categories of goods § Private good: A good or service that is both rival and excludable. § Public good: A good or service which an additional consumer does not ‘use up’ or prevent another’s use of it, and no one can be excluded from consuming the good or service. It is both non-rival and non-excludable. § Free riding: Benefiting from a good without paying for it. § Quasi-public good: A good that is excludable but not rival. § Common resource: A resource that is rival but not excludable. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Four categories of goods: Figure 11. 7 Excludable Non-excludable Private goods Rival Examples: Big

Four categories of goods: Figure 11. 7 Excludable Non-excludable Private goods Rival Examples: Big Macs Running shoes Non-rival Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Four categories of goods: Figure 11. 7 Excludable Rival Non-excludable Private goods Common resources

Four categories of goods: Figure 11. 7 Excludable Rival Non-excludable Private goods Common resources Examples: Big Macs Tuna in the ocean Running shoes Public park Non-rival Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Four categories of goods: Figure 11. 7 Non-excludable Excludable Rival Private goods Common resources

Four categories of goods: Figure 11. 7 Non-excludable Excludable Rival Private goods Common resources Examples: Big Macs Tuna in the ocean Running shoes Public park Quasi-public goods Non-rival Examples: Cable TV Toll road Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Four categories of goods: Figure 11. 7 Non-excludable Excludable Rival Private goods Common resources

Four categories of goods: Figure 11. 7 Non-excludable Excludable Rival Private goods Common resources Examples: Big Macs Tuna in the ocean Running shoes Public park Quasi-public goods Public Goods Non-rival Examples: Cable TV National defence Toll road Street lighting Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5 Four categories of goods The optimal quantity of a public good

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5 Four categories of goods The optimal quantity of a public good Difficult for the government to know what quantity to supply, because: § § § Consumer preferences are not revealed in the market. A price cannot be charged so there is not price mechanism. § Cost-benefit analysis is sometimes used to determine what quantity of public goods to supply. § The political process is frequently used to determine supply, eg: national defence. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5 Four categories of goods Common resources § Tragedy of the commons:

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5 Four categories of goods Common resources § Tragedy of the commons: The tendency for a common resource to be overused. § The source of the tragedy of the commons is the lack of clearly defined and enforced property rights. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5 Four categories of goods Solutions to the tragedy of the commons?

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5 Four categories of goods Solutions to the tragedy of the commons? § Legal restrictions on access to the common resource. § Taxes § Tradable permits § Quotas Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency The rule of law § The rule of law: The ability of a government to enforce the laws of the country, particularly with respect to protecting private property and enforcing contracts. § The rule of law is essential for economic development. § § Entrepreneurs will not risk investing in a business if their property is not protected by law. Contracts will not be entered in to unless they can be enforced. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency Patents and copyright protection § Patent: The exclusive right to a new product for a specified number of years from the date the product is invented. § Copyright: The legal right of the creator of a book, movie, piece of music or software program to exclusively use the creation during their lifetime. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency Asymmetric information § Asymmetric information: When one party to an economic transaction has less information than the other party. § Adverse selection: The situation in which one party to a transaction takes advantage of knowing more than the other party to the transaction. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency Reducing adverse selection in the car market § Warranties: Free repairs on the car for a specified time period after purchase. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency Reducing adverse selection in the insurance market § Applicants for health insurance undergo medical examinations/ submit medical records. § Applicants for car insurance will have their driving record reviewed and may be charged higher premiums. § Group coverage to large firms. § Use of excess payments and co-payments. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Policy for business and individual behaviour that can increase economic efficiency Reducing moral hazard in the insurance market Moral hazard: The tendency of people who have insurance to change their actions because they have insurance. More broadly, it is an action taken by one party to a transaction that is different to what the other party expected at the time of the transaction. § § Use of specific requirements, eg: require the installation of smoke detectors in buildings. § Use excess payments and co-payments. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

11. 3 § MAKING THE CONNECTION Why is the cost of health care rising

11. 3 § MAKING THE CONNECTION Why is the cost of health care rising in Australia? Government policy has previously tried to increase the uptake of private health insurance in Australia. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Hourly wages in the retail sector, and adverse selection and moral

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Hourly wages in the retail sector, and adverse selection and moral hazard § Li Jong Tan is opening a new furniture store. She is hiring two store salespeople and planning to pay them an hourly wage that is above the minimum wage required by Federal legislation. By paying a higher wage she is hoping that salespeople will provide better quality customer service and care. § Do you think Li is making the right decision to pay a higher hourly wage? Will she be able to avoid adverse selection and moral hazard problems? § What kind of compensation arrangement would be better to avoid these problems? Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Hourly wages in the retail sector, and adverse selection and moral

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Hourly wages in the retail sector, and adverse selection and moral hazard § STEP 1: Review the chapter material. This problem is about moral hazard, which also occurs in labour markets, so you may want to review the sections on adverse selection and moral hazard. § STEP 2: Use the ideas of adverse selection and moral hazard to answer question 1. When salespeople are paid an hourly wage their compensation is determined by how many hours they are at work, rather than how much they sell. So, if they are not monitored they may have an incentive to expend as little effort as possible. Moreover, this type of compensation arrangement may discourage most capable salespeople from applying. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Hourly wages in the retail sector, and adverse selection and moral

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6 Hourly wages in the retail sector, and adverse selection and moral hazard § STEP 3: Answer question 2 by offering another compensation system for Li. Li should consider a commission-based arrangement where part of the wage (above the Federal minimum) would be linked to the number of furniture pieces sold. That way, she may be able to attract people who are prepared to work harder and she will provide them with incentives to sell more furniture, so her sales and profits should be higher. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

An Inside Look Big polluters, and the rest of us should pay Hubbard, Garnett,

An Inside Look Big polluters, and the rest of us should pay Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

An Inside Look Figure 1: If carbon dioxide contributes to global warming, a negative

An Inside Look Figure 1: If carbon dioxide contributes to global warming, a negative externality results from burning coal in electricity generation. Insert Figure 1 from page 354, as large as possible while retaining clarity Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Key Terms § § § § Adverse selection Asymmetric information Coase theorem Common resource

Key Terms § § § § Adverse selection Asymmetric information Coase theorem Common resource Contestable market Copyright Deregulation Excludability Externality Free riding Government failure Market failure Merit good Moral hazard Natural monopoly Patent § § § § Private benefit Private cost Private good Public good Privatisation Property rights Public good Quasi-public good Rent-seeking behaviour Rivalry Social benefit Social cost The rule of law Tragedy of the commons Transactions costs Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Get Thinking! In November 2008, the Rudd Labour Government removed the 2005 Howard Government’s

Get Thinking! In November 2008, the Rudd Labour Government removed the 2005 Howard Government’s ‘Work. Choices’ legislation that allowed workers and employers to negotiate individual contracts of employment (and avoid collective agreements). 1) Putting aside your views on the other aspects of the Work. Choices 2005 legislation, do you think it was a good law to reduce adverse selection and moral hazard in the labour market? 2) Compare advantages and disadvantages of individual contracts versus collective agreements. http: //www. wrc. org. au/documents/WP 39. pdf Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Check Your Knowledge Q 1. The majority of economists agree that: a. there is

Check Your Knowledge Q 1. The majority of economists agree that: a. there is some scope for government intervention in the market. b. there is no role for government intervention in the market. c. governments should play a dominant role in the economy. d. there is no dominant view among the economists if the scope for government intervention exists. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Check Your Knowledge Q 1. The majority of economists agree that: a. there is

Check Your Knowledge Q 1. The majority of economists agree that: a. there is some scope for government intervention in the market. b. there is no role for government intervention in the market. c. governments should play a dominant role in the economy. d. there is no dominant view among the economists if the scope for government intervention exists. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Check Your Knowledge Q 2. The net benefit to society from reducing pollution is

Check Your Knowledge Q 2. The net benefit to society from reducing pollution is equal to ____. a. the sum of the benefits of reducing pollution minus the costs. b. the benefits multiplied by the costs. c. the additional benefit plus the additional costs. d. the quantity of pollution, such as the tons of reduction in sulfur dioxide. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Check Your Knowledge Q 2. The net benefit to society from reducing pollution is

Check Your Knowledge Q 2. The net benefit to society from reducing pollution is equal to ____. a. the sum of the benefits of reducing pollution minus the costs. b. the benefits multiplied by the costs. c. the additional benefit plus the additional costs. d. the quantity of pollution, such as the tons of reduction in sulfur dioxide. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Check Your Knowledge Q 3. How would you characterise the solution to externalities proposed

Check Your Knowledge Q 3. How would you characterise the solution to externalities proposed by the Coase Theorem? a. A private solution to externalities. b. A public solution to externalities. c. The only solution to externalities. d. The least preferred solution. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Check Your Knowledge Q 3. How would you characterise the solution to externalities proposed

Check Your Knowledge Q 3. How would you characterise the solution to externalities proposed by the Coase Theorem? a. A private solution to externalities. b. A public solution to externalities. c. The only solution to externalities. d. The least preferred solution. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Check Your Knowledge Q 4. When uninformed buyers are willing to pay the average

Check Your Knowledge Q 4. When uninformed buyers are willing to pay the average of the price of ‘lemons’ and good used cars, which of the following will occur? a. Most used cars offered for sale will be good used cars. b. Most used cars offered for sale will be ‘lemons’. c. The quantity supplied of ‘lemons’ will be identical to the quantity supplied of good used cars. d. Only good used cars will remain in the market. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Check Your Knowledge Q 4. When uninformed buyers are willing to pay the average

Check Your Knowledge Q 4. When uninformed buyers are willing to pay the average of the price of ‘lemons’ and good used cars, which of the following will occur? a. Most used cars offered for sale will be good used cars. b. Most used cars offered for sale will be ‘lemons’. c. The quantity supplied of ‘lemons’ will be identical to the quantity supplied of good used cars. d. Only good used cars will remain in the market. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Check Your Knowledge Q 5. If potential buyers have difficulty separating ‘lemons’ from good

Check Your Knowledge Q 5. If potential buyers have difficulty separating ‘lemons’ from good used cars, what will they do? a. They will not take this into account in the prices they are willing to pay. b. They will be absolutely indifferent between cars, and will pay the same price for either type of car. c. They will take this into account in the prices they are willing to pay. d. They will pay a price for a car that is always too high. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia

Check Your Knowledge Q 5. If potential buyers have difficulty separating lemons from good

Check Your Knowledge Q 5. If potential buyers have difficulty separating lemons from good used cars, what will they do? a. They will not take this into account in the prices they are willing to pay. b. They will be absolutely indifferent between cars, and will pay the same price for either type of car. c. They will take this into account in the prices they are willing to pay. d. They will pay a price for a car that is always too high. Hubbard, Garnett, Lewis and O’Brien: Essentials of Economics © 2010 Pearson Australia