911 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng Mehmet Official Theory

9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Official Theory: • 4 teams of 19 “SUICIDE MUSLIM TERRORISTS” hijacked 4 flights and crashed the planes into buildings and the ground.

THEY USED CUTTERS • This cutter was presumed to be used in flight UA 93, exhibit of the government in Moussaoui’s trial.

Consequences • 2948 killed during the strikes. • Two wars started and two countries invaded. • More than 3600 American soldiers dead, in addition to hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian people. • Bin Ladin, known by few, became an overnight televison celebrity. • Terrorist strikes increased as never before: Bali, Madrid, London, Iraq, Afghanistan, Turkey, Yemen, … • Muslims are labeled as TERRORISTS. That was the beginning of the never-ending war against Muslims and no one acted to stop it.

Anomalies 1 • Flight passenger lists had none of the terrorists names. It is possible to make false identity documents for 1, 2 or 3 people; where are the rest? • Several terrorists reported alive. See BBC http: //news. bbc. co. uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151. stm • FBI Director Robert Mueller admitted that "the identity of several of the hijackers is in doubt", but he never explained how they had first been identified. • Arguing over « National Security » almost all information has been classified secret and became inaccessible.

Anomalies 2 • None of the black boxes have ever been released to the public. • None of the planes parts has been identified by their serial numbers. • The twin towers could not collapse. They were designed to resist an impact of a similar sized commercial plane, the 707. • The official reports contain too many omissions, distortions, and lies.

What’s the Reality? • There are several evidences. But we will study only three proved facts: • All four planes were controlled by only ONE team. They used American electronic weapon technology. • Twin towers were demolished by explosives. • The plane that hit the Pentagon was not a Boeing 757. • For more details, we recommend to look into internet. Attention: There are too many unrealistic theories on the web. We want to emphasize that we refute them. But when the amount of available information is very small it’s normal to get so many theories, and many disinformation agents. You have to form your own opinion.

How could the US government make the strikes? • Set up a team to make the strikes • Use technology to precisely control the planes • The realisation by one team using technology will create some behavioral differences compared with the official version of 4 different terrorist teams

One team / 4 teams Work Coordination between planes Relation between One team Four Teams Serial, Parallel, To guarantee the reliability of the actions and make no mistake, they could manage only one plane at a time Yes, As consequence of the serial work it becomes an obligation End of one plane action & Beginning of the next plane deviation Each plane has its own team and pilot, they will act independently from other planes No, As the terrorists couldn’t contact each other after the takeoffs, the planes will be independent Take off & Deviation of the same plane

Probable Timeline Graphic if 4 Different Teams • The deviation from flight route will happen about 15 minutes after the take off. • Each plane will fly directly to its target without worrying about other flights. • Take off delays couldn’t be anticipated. . After take off, terrorists could not contact each other. • There couldn’t be any interdependence between the planes.

Official Flight Path Source: http: //www. 9 -11 commission. gov/report/911 Report. pdf

The sequence of the events

Timeline graphic & conclusions • All hijacks were made sequentially, one plane at a time! • Before deviating from its flight route, each plane waited for the previous plane to be put on target! • The deviation of any plane was dependent on the situation of the preceeding plane.

CONCLUSION • The planes were hijacked by ONE TEAM! • To guarantee the reliability of the action and not make mistakes they managed one plane at a time. • When their job was finished on a plane, they began the job of the next plane.

HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE? • It’s possible if the planes have remote adjustable automatic control capabilities! • This technology has existed for decades. • 1994 - An experiment at the Crows Landing NASA Facility in the Central Valley of California involved 110 landings of a Boeing 737 airliner using an experimental GPS navigation system. http: //ludb. clui. org/ex/i/CA 3033/ • In 10/1/2001, Raytheon released a document showing developments made on civil aircrafts like 727 and 737 to control them by automatic systems.

TOMAHAWK MISSILES A SMALL PLANE WHICH GUIDES ITSELF ACCORDING TO GPS MEASURED POSITION

CONTROLE AND GUIDANCE SYSTEM POSITION MEASUREMENT Independent from the missile ORIENTATION MEASUREMENT Independent from the missile FLIGHT SURFACES MOTORISATION Simulates pilot actions in an aircraft Size increases when missile becomes bigger COMPUTER Independent from the missile They must be too much bigger in an aircraft In the market it is possible to find different sizes and versions, including non reversible ones as standard product. • If all these systems are installed inside the aircraft but not activated, the plane reacts normally and can take off naturally. • When activated, the plane reacts like a missile. • The install has to be done during the last maintenance operation. The maintenance database of these planes has been cleaned up the day of 9/11 and became inaccessible to everybody including the professional aviation companies.

WHAT ABOUT THE PILOTS? • The installed flight surface control servos can be of non reversible type to prevent the pilots countermanding the remote controls. • The guidance control computer could use one digital output to activate a release valve injecting a military war gas inside the plane killing all passengers and flight crew. • In this case, the autopilot can be used to guide the planes. But for the required precision and the validation of the ground control systems, the use missile control system would be necessary.

PLANES • In the next page, we consider that technology installed in all planes which are controllable like missiles with the same ground equipment. • Lets notice that for high speed equipment like planes, the precision of the GPS is reduced. Especially in altitude measurement it becomes impossible to measure at better precision than +/-50 m. • The realization explained in the next page is the most probable explanation we found considering all available evidence, the feasibility, the reliability and simplicity of each action. We demand that an independent justice court collect all evidences, make the investigation and tell us the reality of these actions.

Managing and sequence of events ~8: 25 – The automatic control of AA 11 is validated Deviation towards twin towers 8: 14 – Right rotation request to AA 11, pilots ok 7: 59 – Take off AA 11 End of connection = pilots dead & automatic control activated 8: 25+ – Automatic guidance system PID parameters are adjusted to guarantee the precision of impact Take off UA 175 8: 42 – Pilots reported have heard « everyone stay in your seats » End of connection = pilots dead & automatic control activated Deviation of UA 175 8: 45 – AA 11 impact on North Tower 8: 42 – AA 11 adjustments end 10: 06 – UA 93 impact to ground 9: 35 – Pentagon plane adjustments end Deviation of UA 93 8: 54 - UA 175 adjustments end 9: 03 – UA 175 impact on 8: 42 – Take off AU 93 South Tower Deviation of AA 77 With 41 min delay ~8: 50 – The automatic control of UA 175 is validated PID parameters of AA 11 copied into UA 175, same B 767 Immediate deviation towards twin towers 8: 20 – Take off AA 77 9: 38 – Pentagon impact

The Pentagon Strike • These are the sole published images of the Pentagon strike. Everything is done to avoid any possibility of identifying the plane. We only see the tail part of the plane. • In reality, there are some movies of the strike recorded by surveillance cameras, some civilian. All were confiscated by the FBI immediately after the strike and have never been released.

Pentagon : Damages on the right Façade • • • The entry hole – central fuselage of plane, Column 14 The last damaged column in the right side, Column 20 With 10 ft between two columns and 6 bays, that makes 60 ft as half the damage span

Pentagon : Plane Approach Direction • The wingspan calculated corresponds to a Boeing 737 -400 that is 95 ft • Flight AA 77 was a 757 with a wingspan of 125 ft so 3 extra columns should have been damaged • Approach angle of the plane 52° : Half a wingspan = right side half damage span(60 ft) * sin 52° = 47 ft, Implies a wingspan = 94 ft

Pentagon: Closer Impact Drawing • The dimensions fit exactly to those of a Boeing 737

Pentagon : Official Report • The official report recognizes that the damages span over 120 ft, converted to the perpendicular of the plane direction that makes 90 ft instead of 125 ft for a 757 • But to justify the presence of a Boeing 757, the same report tells « the external 1/3 of the wings did no damage on the façade » . And that is justified with the impact that the engines made prior to reaching the façade which had to break down the extremity of the wings.

Broken ventilation wall The report assumes this was broken by the left engine. Note no traces of the engine ploughing into the ground before the wall. All cable drums were before the wall. This cable drum crossed over starting from the ground near the wall. It had to touch the wall at the ground.

Pentagon : Construction of 737 impact

Pentagon : Plane Position at Impact Official Theory : The reality : White plane Red plane 737 -400 • The entry hole, Column 14 • The last damaged column in the right side, Column 20 757 -200 AA 77

Hidden plane • A Boeing 757 -200 was too long and had to be visible behind the box • A Boeing 737 -400 is just hidden behind the box

The Pentagon strike review • • 8: 54 The team finished their job on UA 175 which is flying toward its target. The team switches on the missile control system on board AA 77, switches off the transponder and lowers it to make it invisible to radar. After that moment the flight route of AA 77 is unknown. But we know that it flew the going path in 8: 54 -8: 20=34 minutes including the take off. For the return path, it took 9. 38 -8. 54=44 minutes WITHOUT TAKE OFF. Including the presence of another take off, there are still 10 min extra. These are the required 10 min for the crash of AA 77 on the ground in a secret military zone. There is still enough time to take off a 737 and fly it to the Pentagon situated at 10 km from Dulles airport where AA 77 took off.

Why Change the Plane? • It is possible to hit a plane on 400 m high towers using a GPS receiver. A precision of +/-50 m is still enough. A receiver like that can be installed in the nose of the plane where it is invisible from outside. • To hit a plane on 23 m high building the GPS receiver is not precise enough. But it had to be done while not being sure on the result. So it was necessary to install another altitude sensor which has a precision less than 1 m. • To reach that precision, the sensor must have its measurement surface placed outside of the aircraft body. If that kind of sensor was installed on the 757 of AA 77 it would be detected by the visual inspection made before each take off. • If the altitude measurement is not precise enough, the plane can either hit the ground or pass over the building. That’s unacceptable for this kind of action.

Pentagon : All Damages • Notice the orange area where the slab deflected upwards. The sole possibility for that deflection is an explosion happening under it. A kerosene explosion can not accomplish this so far from the façade.

TOWERS COLLAPSE • Official Theory : Kerosene fire highly weakened the metal and made the towers collapse. • The heating of structures of the towers is a speculation subject. In practice, it was impossible to measure temperature of the structures. The smoke was dark showing low temperature fires. In the History, there is no steel framed building collapsing by fire. The fire could not explain these collapses. • The bottom levels of the buildings were not heated at all.

ANOMALIES OF THE OFFICIAL REPORTS • The official reports give all details of outer columns and floor trusses but they hide the most important information about the inner core columns. In some pictures the size of these columns are reduced to present them as meaningless.

Floor plan of NIST report Interior core columns are drawn at good scale. But no dimension details appear in the whole report. Notice that most of the core columns can be accessed from inside the elevators shafts. Source: http: //wtc. nist. gov/pub s/NISTNCSTAR 11. pdf

NIST Report exterior columns oversized

Floor plan of FEMA report Interior core columns are drawn as small square dots representing them as minor elements. Dimension details are not shown in the whole of the report. Source: http: //www. fema. gov/p df/library/fema 403_ch 2. pdf

Columns picture Interior core columns are much bigger and stronger than exterior columns. In addition these interior core columns are linked to each other making them extremely strong.

PHOTO AFTER THE COLLAPSE NORTH TOWER WTC 1 SOUTH TOWER WTC 2 Outer columns still vertical Internal columns demolished Outer columns still vertical

PHOTO AFTER THE COLLAPSE Façade columns still vertical Internal columns demolished, There must be 47 tube columns, which are 5” thick in the lower floors

STRUCTURE OF THE TOWERS Internal columns are the main structure of the building Demolished during the collapse! The Commission report contains that LIE : External columns that remained vertical over some floors after the collapse It is clear that the inner columns are the main structure of the building. That’s true in all well produced high buildings. Reversely, the exterior walls can really be compared to a hollow steel shaft.

RESISTANCE OF THE STRUCTURE According to the official reports According to the reality of the towers and to anti-seismic construction rules

CONCRETE MADE SKYCRAPER (30 floors) Cast concrete core section Outer columns

Possible damage • These internal columns are able to resist against collapsing of all upper floors. • The worst possible damage is the sinking of some floors at impact level. Lower floors remaining unchanged.

Internal Core Columns Remain Standing During the Collapse WTC 2 These pictures are taken by Aman Zafar who was near the towers (www. amanzafar. com). They show that the inner core of both WTC 1 and WTC 2 remained standing while the floors and façade columns were collapsing. That proves that the core section was resistant enough and could not collapse without explosives. WTC 1

Pictures Set 1 2 2 3 4

Internal Column Dimensions WTC 2 • WTC 2: The width of the columns remaining still standing are smaller than the width of the core section. It is consistent with the width of the two smallest columns rows in blue. That's identical to the core reduced by the columns which are accessible from the lift shafts. The destruction of these columns will lead to the demolition of whole tower.

Internal columns dimensions WTC 1

TOWERS DEMOLITION • The sole possibility to demolish these towers is to explode these internal columns at their junctions. HOW that can be made? • During the last week-end of 8 -9 September 2001, radio controlled and coded RDX or C 4 explosives were installed on all junctions of the core columns that are accessible from the lift shafts. Each pack is identified by a numeric code. The explosives for the same floor have the same code. Each pack has a quick fixing tool for assembly on the columns. 15 people can install explosives on both towers during the week-end. • After the plane hit, on basis of the impact floor, the authors knew the identity code of the explosives which must be exploded to start the demolition. • To avoid the upper level parts from falling on lower level explosives causing them to explode, the explosion speed must be higher than free fall in the air. • The measured progression speed of the explosions is near the free fall speed +/- measurement errors. • A laptop computer situated near the towers contained a program producing the radio codes to fire the explosives at wanted speed. • The control center where the team acted is very probably the WTC building 7 from where both towers are visible and which was collapsed during the afternoon of 9/11/01 and which was owned by the same Larry Silverstein who owned the twin towers.

Core Columns Destruction Method • Such explosions happened on all welded junctions of the columns.

The distance between two explosions is approximately 3 floors, 36 ft

EXPLODED COLUMNS

Horizontal sheared column • This picture shows the sheared connection between a box core column and an H section column. This type of connection existed at the uppermost floors of WTC towers. We see that the shearing was made by lateral displacement of the H sectioned column. The welds are pushed rightward in the picture. Such shearing is consistent with the explosion demolition method.

TOWERS DEMOLITION • Only very big explosions can explain the creation of such a huge amount of dust and metal columns thrown so far away. The explosions cut the internal columns of the structure of the tower.

SOUTH TOWER DEMOLITION Continuously increasing dust size is meaningful. The explosions are so quick that falling dust reaches newly created dust by the explosions of the lower floors.

NORTH TOWER DEMOLITION Video: http: //www. plaguepuppy. net/public_html/collapse%20 update/wtc 1_jets. mpg

OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 1 • Arabic flight manuals found in a car near of one of the airports: the international language for aviation is English. Student pilots must have an adequate knowledge of English to be accepted for training and all their flight manuals would be in English if, as has been claimed, they undertook flight training in the USA. Arabic manuals are highly suspect and might have been specially prepared in justification of the events following 9/11. • The half burnt hijacker’s passport found at ground zero: No human body was found, no debris was recognizable, but this passport remained intact, only slightly charred! In reality, this passport was retained by the CIA or some other agency. Then burnt before being shown to the medias.

OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 2 • Phone calls made by cellular phones from planes flying at high altitudes of 30, 000 feet: Even now in 2007, such calls remain impossible. By design mobile phone signals are guided horizontally to save power and only reach mobile phones at ground level. Therefore, the cellular phones cannot be used in the air. • Since several decades the technique of synthesizing a voice synthesis is widely used. Israeli companies connected to Hollywood are the market leaders in this domain. • When listening to some of the alleged call, there is no background noise coming from the planes; the sound is extremely clear as if spoken by actors.

OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 3 • Cockpit communications from UA 93 released in 2006: These communications do not have any credibility. They contain meaningless repeats of "sit down!", "what? ", and "Allahu akbar". This last sentence is the most familiar Muslim expression in the West, but Muslims would not use it when faced with death. • Moussaoui case: He was arrested 3 weeks before the strikes when intending to start flight training on 747 s. When preparing strikes of this magnitude, it would make sense to start training years ahead, no 3 weeks. • "I want to learn to fly without take off and without landing" : These alleged comments were provided of their willingness to crash the planes into a building. However, many amateurs interested in flying express themselves like this, wanting the enjoyment of flight without the tedious hard work. By itself such a sentence is worthless as evidence.

What About Bin Ladin? • • • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. During the first three years Bin Ladin said he was not involved in 911! Now, he is telling that he is the author! To consider his messages, this needs to be handled by a court of impartial justice : He should speak to an independent court. He should be protected, his life guaranteed, to make his testimony totally free. All of his testimony should be checked against the facts. It is too easy for the Bush Administration to have him free, speaking as Bush wants him to speak. It is also very easy to produce his voice. I refuse to recognize Bin Ladin as a spokesman for Muslims.

OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 4 Video of OBL released in November 2001: We saw a bearded man like OBL speaking with very bad sound and making statements like "their lost is more than 3 billion dollar", whereas OBL had studied in England spoke English well. Physiognomic studies showed that this person was not Bin Ladin. In addition, an ideological fighter will not emphasis financial losses. But we know that for the domestic media the emphasis on financial losses is very important to make an impression on people in the US Video of OBL released in November 2004 : Here I believe that it was indeed Bin Ladin and he spoke like a Muslim. He indirectly takes responsibility for the strikes and justifies them on basis of 1980's Lebanon strikes: It's too easy for the USA to ask OBL to take responsibility for the strikes in order to left alone! Any way, OBL must be heard by a court of justice, and all what he says must be checked. In 9/2007, other movies containing another OBL with shorter and painted beard speaking against the same background have been released. It's clear that this is not the same person. What kind game is being played here? After using him in 2004, did they kill him and put an actor in his place? It is difficult to tell. The truth can only be found if real evidence is presented.

CONCLUSIONS • There are many convergent evidences that prove the official theory is false! • The presence of Muslim suicide pilots is not proved. • There is enough evidence to request the disclosure of all classified information. Without that disclosure, both national and world security are in danger. • These strikes can not be managed without knowledge and permission of the Bush administration’s high level deciders.

Does the US Administration have the skills to accomplish these strikes? • YES, they do! Some false flag terror strikes having different manner and authors that justified wars : • Explosion of cruiser Maine! (1898) • Reichstag fire (1933) • Pearl Harbor (1941) • Operation Northwoods (1962) • Assassination of JFK (1963) • Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam (1964)

IMAGE GAMES OFFICIAL ASCE REPORT’S FIRST PAGE US Navy Base in San Diego City googleearth THE REALITY OF THE FACTS

The Conquistador, Successor of Hitler He managed to start the invasion of Muslims countries

Why? Bali, Madrid, London, Morocco, . . • Life in Muslim countries is simple: If you don’t bother anyone, no one will bother you. But if you attack someone, you will get an equal reaction. • Let’s remember that before 9/11/01, during Clinton’s Administration efforts for peace in Palestine, the strikes had been reduced and there was dialogue. • If the number and the intensity of the attacks are low and the reactions remain moderate, it can be resolved with good results. • Today the intensity of the aggression (Americans) and injustices (Israelis) are so high that there is no room for dialogue or moderate reactions. • The traditional method of Muslim countries has not adapted to today’s aggressions and injustices. • We need another solution! The last remaining one is Justice which is imperfect, costly, and slow. Muslims must get used to its methods and complexities. And justice must be less imperfect.

Why? Madrid and London • Let me explain some doubts about the Madrid and London blasts. I did no investigation into these actions. But my thoughts are: • In Madrid they used cellular phones as radio controlled firing systems, similar to the explosives used in the WTC towers. The method was new. In 2007 Muslims are still making suicide bombings without using such technology. The authors must be the same people who made 9/11 strikes. I hope the current lawsuit in Spain will lead to some truth. I trust Spanish justice. • The cctv cameras of the London tube were controlled and recorded by an Israeli company, before, during, and after the blasts. Simple children are shown as terrorists. • These are the sole organized big blasts in European countries. • All other actions done by Muslims in European countries were individual actions made by foolish people: Theo Van Gogh murder and other people placing gas bottles near the door of a synagogue. • These small actions are not comparable to the Madrid and London blasts. • To get stronger credibility and remove all doubts in such investigations, all evidences must be checked and independent Muslim professionals must be fully involved. • This was before the verdict of Spanish court on 31 october 2007.

11 March 2004 Madrid strikes • • • The Spanish court of justice reached its verdict on 31 th October 2007 after 3 years of investigation and an 8 -month trial against 28 defendants. Three of them were found guilty and received more than a total of 40, 000 years imprisonment for having supplied or placed the explosives without participating in the actual bombing. The remaining 25 defendants were not at all involved in the Madrid bombings. 18 of them received several jail sentences of up to 18 years without having taken part in or being related to the bombings. 7 were acquitted. The masterminds of the bombings were not identified. How can 3 years of investigation bring 25 uninvolved people to the trial while the masterminds remain unknown? This poses serious questions for the impartiality of the trial. During 3 years of investigation all the evidence collected should have identified the masterminds and let those 25 without any direct involvement go free. It appears that the court needed to put the blame on someone and thus found passed guilty verdicts on random Muslim suspects. As for the exploded flat in Madrid it could well be that ordinary Arab tourists had stayed there. Whilst they were out of the flat some people might have installed explosives in their flat. Upon their return the culprits ignited the explosives by remote control, filming it at the same time for the benefit of the media.

July 7, 2005 London strikes • The cctv cameras of the London tube were controlled and recorded by an Israeli company. • There is no record showing the Muslim bombers entering these wagons. • Natanyahu who had to give a conference near the explosion area received a call from the Mossad asking him to remain in his hotel. • The policewoman Lizzie Kenworthy was next to the exploded wagon. She entered inside the explosion area and explained what she saw: The chap next to her had lost his leg and there was a woman to their left who was on her back trapped in the metal, which had twisted up through the middle of the carriage. The roof was still on, but the lining of the carriage had been blown off. The sides had also come off and there was a big hole in the floor. That means the bombs were placed under the carriage. Sources http: //www. julyseventh. co. uk/ http: //news. independent. co. uk/uk/crime/article 333787. ece • According to that testimony of a policewoman it’s impossible that any passenger have placed these bombs under the carriage. So Muslims are not involved in 7/7 London events. • Justice has to be done again.

MY MOTIVES • The World is becoming a small village, the changes are very huge. • Humanity is facing several challenges. One of the challenges is diversity of life. • As a Muslim, I believe that diversity, being the will of God, will enrich us with our differences. Koran 5/48, 49/13. • As a scientist, I consider peaceful diversity as one of the most important conditions for life to exist. • That diversity can only exist in a just world! • I know that interest groups created these strikes to start wars. I didn’t start this investigation to help these warlike people. So let’s not deviate into hate which will make easier the work of these warlike people. Only some American Republican leaders are guilty. • Let’s act as responsible people for peace and justice. That means fighting against our own unjust people as well. Justice is in the best interest of all.

END Eng. Mehmet Copyright 2003 -2008