Hospital Acquired Group A Streptococcal Infections What have

  • Slides: 57
Download presentation
Hospital Acquired Group A Streptococcal Infections What have we learned? Nov. 20, 2008 Nick

Hospital Acquired Group A Streptococcal Infections What have we learned? Nov. 20, 2008 Nick Daneman Division of Infectious Diseases Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Illness

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Illness

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Illness

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Illness

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Illness

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Illness

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Illness

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Illness

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Illness

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Illness

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Outbreaks 75 CASES, 10 DEATHS

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Outbreaks 75 CASES, 10 DEATHS

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Hospital Outbreaks 56 Cases 3 year outbreak of Group

Invasive Group A Streptococcus: Dramatic Hospital Outbreaks 56 Cases 3 year outbreak of Group A Streptococcal infection in a nursery Nelson J. Ped. 1976 of Group A Streptococcal surgical site infections Mastro NEJM 1990

 • 1 nosocomial case: – enhanced surveillance – isolate storage • 2 nosocomial

• 1 nosocomial case: – enhanced surveillance – isolate storage • 2 nosocomial cases within 6 months: – typing of isolates – if same strain: • epidemiologic investigation • culture health care workers CID 2002

 • expert opinion • review of a handful of literature outbreaks CID 2002

• expert opinion • review of a handful of literature outbreaks CID 2002

Objectives • describe hospital acquired cases of invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario

Objectives • describe hospital acquired cases of invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario • describe hospital outbreaks of invasive group A streptococcal infections – in Ontario prospective surveillance – systematic review of the literature • provide evidence-based recommendations

Methods: Prospective Surveillance • • • Ontario Group A Strep Study Group population-based surveillance

Methods: Prospective Surveillance • • • Ontario Group A Strep Study Group population-based surveillance Ontario (population 11, 000) 1992 - 2000 all invasive isolates microbiology labs – all Ontario hospitals – largest outpatient microbiology lab

Methods: Definitions • invasive – group A streptococcus from a sterile site • hospital

Methods: Definitions • invasive – group A streptococcus from a sterile site • hospital acquired – neither present nor incubating at admission • outbreak – > 2 cases of culture confirmed, symptomatic GAS infection – epidemiologically linked – caused by same M, T type – indistinguishable by PFGE

Methods: Literature Review • MEDLINE database, 1966 -2004 • search terms • “Streptococcus pyogenes”

Methods: Literature Review • MEDLINE database, 1966 -2004 • search terms • “Streptococcus pyogenes” OR “group A streptococcus” OR “group A streptococcal” • nosocomial OR outbreak OR cross-transmission • review of reference lists • manuscripts reviewed by 2 investigators

Objectives • describe hospital acquired cases of invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario

Objectives • describe hospital acquired cases of invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario • describe hospital outbreaks of invasive group A streptococcal infections – in Ontario prospective surveillance – systematic review of the literature • evidence based recommendations

CID 2005

CID 2005

Ontario Prospective Surveillance 1992 - 2000 2, 351 invasive group A strep infections 291

Ontario Prospective Surveillance 1992 - 2000 2, 351 invasive group A strep infections 291 (12. 4%) hospital-acquired 96 surgical site infections 86 postpartum infections 109 non-surgical, non-obstetrical

Hospital-acquired cases

Hospital-acquired cases

Differences cannot be explained by M-types

Differences cannot be explained by M-types

Group A Strep Surgical Site Infections • 96 cases • out of 9, 078,

Group A Strep Surgical Site Infections • 96 cases • out of 9, 078, 030 surgical admissions • =1. 1 cases / 100, 000 surgical admissions • entire range of surgical procedures – – – – digestive tract 28% musculoskeletal 24% cardiovascular 9% nervous system 11% skin and soft tissue 9% urogyne 8% …

Timing of Invasive Group A Streptococcal Surgical Site Infections median = 5 d

Timing of Invasive Group A Streptococcal Surgical Site Infections median = 5 d

Group A Strep Postpartum infections • 86 cases • out of 1, 269, 722

Group A Strep Postpartum infections • 86 cases • out of 1, 269, 722 live births • =0. 7 cases / 10, 000 live births • ~ 1/10 as common as neonatal group B strep infections • but these were infections of mothers (only 2 newborn cases, both non-invasive)

Post-partum M 28 association

Post-partum M 28 association

Post-partum M 28 association • M 28 predominated in CDC postpartum surveillance 1 •

Post-partum M 28 association • M 28 predominated in CDC postpartum surveillance 1 • also predominates in perineal infection in children 2 • express surface protein (R 28) related to cell-surface molecules in Group B Strep which enhance binding to cervical epithelium 1. Chuang CID 2002; 2. Mogielnicki Ped 2000; 3. Stalhammar MM 1990

Group A Strep Non-surgical, non-obstetrical infections • 109 cases • 40% of all cases

Group A Strep Non-surgical, non-obstetrical infections • 109 cases • 40% of all cases – (despite no mention in nosocomial group A strep guidelines) • time of onset: – median 10. 5 days – range 2 d to >1 year • ? community or nosocomial acquisition?

Group A Strep Non-surgical, non-obstetrical infections • most common syndromes – – primary bacteremia

Group A Strep Non-surgical, non-obstetrical infections • most common syndromes – – primary bacteremia 33% non-necrotizing soft tissue infection 32% lower respiratory tract infection 21% necrotizing fasciitis 6% • 32 / 35 skin infections were associated with preexisting skin breakdown – IV lines (16), G-tubes /tracheostomy (6), chronic ulcers (5), trauma (2), burns (1), other lesions (2)

Risk factors for mortality among hospital-acquired cases

Risk factors for mortality among hospital-acquired cases

Objectives • describe hospital acquired cases of invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario

Objectives • describe hospital acquired cases of invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario • describe hospital outbreaks of invasive group A streptococcal infections – in Ontario prospective surveillance – systematic review of the literature • recommendations

Complementary methods Literature Review Publication bias Prospective Surveillance Hawthorne effects

Complementary methods Literature Review Publication bias Prospective Surveillance Hawthorne effects

Number of Outbreaks Literature Surveillance 66 publications 2, 351 invasive cases 60 available 291

Number of Outbreaks Literature Surveillance 66 publications 2, 351 invasive cases 60 available 291 nosocomial 61 outbreaks 29 outbreak-linked (20 outbreaks)

Outbreak Magnitude Literature Review Prospective Surveillance p Median cases (range) 10 (2 -56) 2

Outbreak Magnitude Literature Review Prospective Surveillance p Median cases (range) 10 (2 -56) 2 (2 -10) <0. 001 Median duration (range) 30 d (1 -1095) 6 d (1 -30) <0. 001

Outbreak Patient Composition

Outbreak Patient Composition

Outbreak Initiation: Index Cases • 3/4 of indexes cases = nosocomial cases • two

Outbreak Initiation: Index Cases • 3/4 of indexes cases = nosocomial cases • two other sources of outbreaks: – ill health care workers • 5 literature outbreaks* – community-acquired cases • 9 of 11 admitted to ICU • 5 of 9 necrotizing fasciitis† * Di. Persio 1996, Holloway 1967, Kakis 2002, Lannigan 1985, Nicolle 1986, Schwartz 1992 †Burnett 1990, Decker 1985, Ejlertsen 2001, Quinn 1965, Walter 1974

Outbreak Initiation: Rapid Tempo • median interval between first two cases – literature outbreaks:

Outbreak Initiation: Rapid Tempo • median interval between first two cases – literature outbreaks: – surveillance outbreaks: 2. 0 d 4. 5 d • interval between first two cases <1 month in 80 of 81 outbreaks

Outbreak Propagation • • • patient to patient colonized health care worker environmental mixed

Outbreak Propagation • • • patient to patient colonized health care worker environmental mixed insufficient information 47% 27% 9% 6% 11%

Outbreak Propagation: Colonized Health Care Workers Colonized health care worker Patient-to-Patient/Environmental

Outbreak Propagation: Colonized Health Care Workers Colonized health care worker Patient-to-Patient/Environmental

Outbreak Propagation: Colonized Health Care Workers • site of health care worker colonization –

Outbreak Propagation: Colonized Health Care Workers • site of health care worker colonization – 31 pharyngeal only – 10 anal – 2 vaginal – 5 skin

Outbreak Propagation: Environmental sources • • • bidet hand shower vinyl sheet airflow mattress

Outbreak Propagation: Environmental sources • • • bidet hand shower vinyl sheet airflow mattress multidose vaccine vials (3) food borne outbreak (1) Claesson 1985, Decker 1976, Gordon 1994, Reid 1983, Rutihauser 1999, Decker 1985

Outbreak Termination: Treatment of Colonized HCWs • data from 24 literature outbreaks • first

Outbreak Termination: Treatment of Colonized HCWs • data from 24 literature outbreaks • first regimen usually successful: – pharyngeal carriage only: – nonpharyngeal carriage: 9/9 (100%) 11/15 (73%) • 4 failures* – 2 ongoing transmission – 2 late relapses (4 mos and 15 mos) • all ultimately successfully eradicated * Berkelman 1982, Mc. Intyre 1968, Schaffner 1969, Viglionese 1991

Outbreak Termination: Patient to Patient Transmission • multifaceted control measures required • 1 st

Outbreak Termination: Patient to Patient Transmission • multifaceted control measures required • 1 st attempt usually unsuccessful (14/25) • most effective control measures – ward closure (86% success) – mass treatment/prophylaxis (69% success)

5 Recommendations

5 Recommendations

#1: Target all Nosocomial Cases Hospitalized CID 2002

#1: Target all Nosocomial Cases Hospitalized CID 2002

#2: Isolation of Necrotizing Fasciitis • 11 community acquired index cases • majority due

#2: Isolation of Necrotizing Fasciitis • 11 community acquired index cases • majority due to necrotizing fasciitis admitted to intensive care unit • isolate necrotizing fasciitis on admission (pending cultures)

#3: immediate investigations • current guidelines for single case: – enhanced surveillance + isolate

#3: immediate investigations • current guidelines for single case: – enhanced surveillance + isolate storage • short interval between first cases (2 -4 d) • will not prevent second case • majority of outbreaks only 2 cases • therefore, preemptive investigations

#4 One month ceiling • current guidelines for 2 cases in 6 months: –

#4 One month ceiling • current guidelines for 2 cases in 6 months: – type isolates; if same strain: • epidemiologic investigations • culturing health care workers • virtually no outbreaks with initial interval >1 month • limit investigations to cases within 1 month

#5: Tailor Investigation by Ward Surgery/Labour & Delivery Miscellaneous Wards • health care worker

#5: Tailor Investigation by Ward Surgery/Labour & Delivery Miscellaneous Wards • health care worker carriers • patient and environmental reservoirs • broad epi search for linked staff • multifaceted infection control strategies • cultures – throat, anal, vaginal, skin • test of cure for nonpharyngeal carriers – – – isolation/cohorting disinfection sterilization ward closure mass treatment

Summary • 12% of invasive group A streptococcal infections are hospital-acquired • three groups

Summary • 12% of invasive group A streptococcal infections are hospital-acquired • three groups with different characteristics and outcomes – surgical (1/100, 000 surgeries) – postpartum (0. 7/10, 000 births) – non-surgical/obstetrical (largest group)

Summary • 10% of hospital-acquired cases are associated with outbreaks – 90% of hospital-acquired

Summary • 10% of hospital-acquired cases are associated with outbreaks – 90% of hospital-acquired cases are sporadic • when outbreaks do occur they are smaller and shorter than those in the literature

Summary • these complementary data sources lead to 5 recommendations: – 1: include all

Summary • these complementary data sources lead to 5 recommendations: – 1: include all hospital cases in guidelines – 2: isolate necrotizing fasciitis – 3: immediate investigations after 1 case – 4: one month ceiling for linked cases – 5: tailor investigations & management to ward

Acknowledgements • • Dr. Allison Mc. Geer Dr. Donald Low Karen Green Ontario Group

Acknowledgements • • Dr. Allison Mc. Geer Dr. Donald Low Karen Green Ontario Group A Streptococcal Study Group