Technical Education Quality Improvement Program TEQIPII State Project

  • Slides: 33
Download presentation
Technical Education Quality Improvement Program TEQIP-II State Project Facilitation Unit Commissionerate Of Technical Education

Technical Education Quality Improvement Program TEQIP-II State Project Facilitation Unit Commissionerate Of Technical Education Gujarat

SPFU TEAM for TEQIP-II State Project Adviser/Director of Technical Education: Shri K. K. Nirala,

SPFU TEAM for TEQIP-II State Project Adviser/Director of Technical Education: Shri K. K. Nirala, IAS SPFU-Cordinator: Prof. Usha Neelkanthan SPFU-Procurment Convener/Joint Director : Dr. V. S. Purani SPFU-Financial Convener: Dr. P. J. Gundalia Officer on Special Duty: Prof. M. J. Aghara Officer on Special Duty: Prof. M. J. Desai

Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme – TEQIP • TEQIP was envisaged in 2003 by

Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme – TEQIP • TEQIP was envisaged in 2003 by MHRD as a long� -term Programme to be implemented in 3 phases • TEQIP-I § 2004 to 2009 § 127 Institutions participated from 13 States § 6 institutions from Gujarat (3 GECs + 1 GIA + 2 GPs) § Allocation of Rs. 50. 37 Cr to Gujarat • TEQIP-II § 2010 to Dec. 2014 and extended till Oct. 2016 § Concept and Design basis on lessons learnt from implementation TEQIP-I § Sub-component 1. 1 : Non TEQIP-I institutes(6 institutions from Gujarat, 6 GECs + 1 GIA) § Sub-component 1. 2 : Old TEQIP-I Institutes + New Institutes with PG Programs § Total Outlay Rs. 2430 Cr. (Rs. 1981 Go. I + Rs. 419 Cr States + Rs. 30 Cr SFIs) Objectives of TEQIP-II • Strengthening Institutions to produce high quality and better employability • Scaling-up postgraduate education and demand-driven R&D&I • Establishing Centers of Excellence for focused applicable research, • Training of faculty for effective Teaching, and • Enhancing Institutional and System Management effectiveness.

Project Overview PROJECT COMPONENTS Component – 1 : Improving Quality of Education in selected

Project Overview PROJECT COMPONENTS Component – 1 : Improving Quality of Education in selected Institutions Sub-Component 1. 1 Strengthening Institutions to improve learning outcomes & employability of Graduates

Project Overview PROJECT COMPONENTS Component – 1: Improving Quality of Education in Selected Institutions

Project Overview PROJECT COMPONENTS Component – 1: Improving Quality of Education in Selected Institutions Sub Component 1. 1 1. 2. 1 1. 3 Total Fund/PI Title Rs. in Crore Strengthening Institutions to improve learning Outcomes and employability of Graduates No. of PIs 10. 00 120 (Govt. /GIA) 04. 00 20 (SFI) Scaling up Post Graduate education and demand driven R&D&I 12. 50 Establishment of Centre of Excellence 05. 00 30 @ 0. 20 > 200 Eligible Criteria 60 Faculty Development (Pedagogical Training) New Institutions (other than old TEQIP-I inst. ) No Polytechnics Old PIs of TEQIP-I New Institutions No Polytechnics Inst. from above 1. 2 PIs and Non PIs Component – 2 : Improving System Management Component Title 2. 1 Capacity Building to Strengthen Management 2. 2 Project Management, Monitoring & Evaluation Total Fund No. of PIs Eligible Criteria 75 -- Proposals from PIs will be invited in SECOND year. Implementation in Final year only 85 -- MHRD, NPIU, SPFU Rs. in Crore

TEQIP-II Project Component: Sub. Component Title 1. 1 Strengthening Institutions to improve learning Outcomes

TEQIP-II Project Component: Sub. Component Title 1. 1 Strengthening Institutions to improve learning Outcomes and employability of Graduates 1. 2 Fund in Crore/PI No. of PIs 10. 00 93 (Govt. /GIA/CFI) 04. 00 20 (SFI) 12. 50 77 Scaling up Post Graduate education and demand driven R&D&I § Sub- Component 1. 1 is designed to strengthen Engineering Institutions to produce high quality Engineers for better employability by: § Updation of Learning Resources § Improvements in Faculty Competence & Quality of Teaching § Improvement in Research & Consultancies § Equity Action Plan § Improvement in Associated Infrastructure

Institutes in TEQIP-II (Sub Component 1. 1 ) Sub Component No. of Institutes Selected

Institutes in TEQIP-II (Sub Component 1. 1 ) Sub Component No. of Institutes Selected and Recommended by the State Steering Committee (SSC) 1. LEC - Morbi 1. 1 Strengthening institutions to improve learning outcomes and employability of graduates 2. SSEC - Bhavnagar 3. GEC – Bhavnagar 4. GEC - G’nagar, (02/12/10) 5. GEC - Rajkot 6. GEC - Patan 7. BVM - V V Nagar (GIA) 29/12/10 No. of Institutes Selected by National Steering Committee (NSC) Selected in First Cycle 1. BVM - VVNagar (GIA) (16/11/11) 2. GEC - Bhavnagar Selected in Second Cycle 1. LEC – Morbi 2. SSEC - Bhavnagar 3. GEC - G’nagar, (23/1/13) 4. GEC - Rajkot 5. GEC – Patan Mo. U: Go. I & Go. G) 19 -09 -2011) Go. G & Two TEQIP Institutes (GEC-B &BVM-V) )14 -02 -2012) Go. G & Govt. TEQIP Institutes (GEC-G, GEC-R , GEC-P, LEC-M, SSEC) )20 -02 -2013)

State Steering Committee (SSC) Sr. Member Design. 1 Principal Secretary, Education Chair Person 2

State Steering Committee (SSC) Sr. Member Design. 1 Principal Secretary, Education Chair Person 2 Financial Advisor, Engineering Education in the State Member 3 Director, Department of Higher Education, MHRD Member 4 Two Industry members: 5 6 Shri Tulsi Tanti, Chairman, Suzlon, Ahmedabad Member Shri Rishi Agarwal, Chairman, ABG Shipyard, Ahmedabad Member Three members having recognized expertise and interest in Engineering Education Director, IIT, Gandhinagar Member Vice Chancellor, Gujarat Technological University, Ahmedabad Member Shri Sunil Parekh Associates & President Pan IIT Alumni Association of Gujarat Member Director of Technical Education, (SPFU Head) Member

CONSTITUTION OF BOG IN EACH PARTICIPATING INSTITUTION Recommendations: • To establish a governance model

CONSTITUTION OF BOG IN EACH PARTICIPATING INSTITUTION Recommendations: • To establish a governance model that will hold each Govt. and GIA institution accountable towards government, civil society, and industry. • The States need to constitute/ensure formation of a Board of Governors in each Project Institution and ensure that the Board of Governors meet at least 4 times in a year. GRs: • SSC formation (27 -07 -2010) • Autonomy (28 -09 -2011) • Four fund (28 -09 -2011) • Amendment four fund for Tuition fee ( 23 -03 -2012) • Bo. G establishment for GEC-B &BVM-V (21 -09 -2012) • Bo. G establishment for Five Govt TEQIP Institutes (18 -02 -2013) • Appointment of Chairman of Govt. Institute Bo. G (20 -02 -2014)

Bo. G Chairman - TEQIP Institutes Bo. G Chairman appointed on 20 -02 -2014

Bo. G Chairman - TEQIP Institutes Bo. G Chairman appointed on 20 -02 -2014 by Go. G for GECs No. Institute Chairman of Bo. G Firm 1 GEC, BHAVNAGAR Shri Chetan Tamboli CMD, Steelcast Ltd. Bhavnagar 2 SSEC, BHAVNAGAR Shri Pradeep Gohil Excel Industry, Bhavnagar 3 GEC, GANDHINAGAR Shri Pratul Shroff Founder CEO, Infochips 4 GEC, PATAN Shri Mahesh Vyas MD, John Energy, 5 GEC, RAJKOT Mr. P. G. Jadeja CEO, Jyoti CNC Automation Ltd. , 6 LEC, MORBI Shri Rajubhai Shah CMD, Harsha Engg. Pvt. Ltd. 7 BVM, VV NAGAR Shri C. L. Patel, Chairman of Charutar Vidyamandal, V V Nagar

Government Orders & TEQIP-II Documents to be followed Government Resolution Issued the State :

Government Orders & TEQIP-II Documents to be followed Government Resolution Issued the State : Granting Autonomy in Participating Institutions : Change pattern of fund releases to block grant basis : Creation of Four Funds : Corpus, Staff Development, Maintenance, Depreciation Establishment of Board of Governors : TEQIP – II Documents by MHRD : Project Implementation Plan Procurement Manual PMSS Manual Financial Manual Good Governance Practice

Category-wise Funding Per Institution Cost (%) (Rs. in crore) Sr. No. Activities Category of

Category-wise Funding Per Institution Cost (%) (Rs. in crore) Sr. No. Activities Category of Expenditure 1 Procurement of Goods (equipment, furniture, books LRs, software & minor items) and Civil Works Procurement 55 5. 50 2 Teaching and Research Assistantships to increase enrolment in existing and new PG programmes Assistantships 10 1. 00 3 Enhancement of R&D and activities R&D 2 0. 20 4 Faculty and Staff development for improved competence FSD 10 1. 00 5 Enhanced interaction with Industry I-I-I Cells 4 0. 40 6 Institutional Management Capacity enhancement Capacity development 3 0. 30 7 Implementation of Institutional academic reforms Reforms 2 0. 20 8 Academic support for weak students Student support 4 0. 40 9 Incremental Operating Cost IOC 10 1. 00 institutional consultancy TOTAL 100 10. 00

Head of Expenditure % Old PIP % Revised PIP Procurement 55% Assistantships 10% R&D

Head of Expenditure % Old PIP % Revised PIP Procurement 55% Assistantships 10% R&D 2% FSD 10% I-I-I- Cells 4% Capacity Development 3% Reforms 2% Student support 4% IOC 10% GRAND TOTAL 100% 35% Indicative Category‐wise Funding for Suggested Activities per Project Institution

Financial Reporting Financial Monitoring Reports (FMRs) § Monthly FMR: Regularly sent to NPIU by

Financial Reporting Financial Monitoring Reports (FMRs) § Monthly FMR: Regularly sent to NPIU by 5 th of every month § E – FMR Half yearly: June and December Online on MIS and submission of hard copy to SPFU.

Fund Release Details Fund Release Statement - TEQIP (In lacs) For the Year: 2012

Fund Release Details Fund Release Statement - TEQIP (In lacs) For the Year: 2012 -13 (75: 25, central /State) Sr. No. Date Received from MHRD 1 01/11/2012 300 100 400 22/01/2013 81 1 st Cycle Institute 2 28/02/2013 1125 -125 1000 30/03/2013 32 2 nd Cycle Institute 3 01/11/2012 3. 75 0. 63 4. 38 30/03/2013 149 1 st Cycle Institute SPFU 4 28/02/2013 22. 5 207. 5 230 30/03/2013 32 2 nd Cycle Institute – SPFU 1451. 25 183. 13 1634. 38 33 1 st Cycle Institute Total Received from State Release to Institutions Date Days Remarks For the Year: 2013 -14 (75: 25, central /State) 1 27/02/2014 300 100 400 31/03/2014 2 28/02/2013 0 300 31/03/2014 392 500 lacs distribution for 2 nd Cycle Institute, (200 lacs from SPFU) 3 28/02/2013 0 0. 62 31/03/2014 392 SPFU Total 300 400. 62 700. 62 TOTAL 1751. 3 583. 75 2335

Fund Release Details For the Year: 2014 -15 –Released (75: 25, central /State) 1

Fund Release Details For the Year: 2014 -15 –Released (75: 25, central /State) 1 09 -06 -2014 562. 5 187. 5 750 12 -11 -2014 153 2 nd Cycle Institute-150 2 09 -06 -2014 60 20 80 12 -11 -2014 153 2 nd Cycle Institute-SPFU 3 30 -12 -2014 150 50 200 21 -02 -2015 51 GEC-Gandhinagar 4 19 -01 -2015 150 50 200 27 -03 -2015 68 GEC-Rajkot 922. 5 307. 5 1230 2673. 75 891. 25 3565 TOTAL 9. 6772992 For the Year: 2015 -16 –Released (75: 25, central /State) 1 25 -03 -2015 262. 500 87. 500 350 15 -06 -2015 80 200 -BVM, 150 -GEC-B 2 30 -06 -2015 150 50 200 18 -08 -2015 48 LEC-M 3 15 -09 -2015 450 150 600 28 -10 -2015 43 200 -LEC-M, GEC-P, BVM 4 28 -10 -2015 825 275 1100 06 -01 -2016 68 300 -GEC-B, SSEC, GEC-R, 200 -GEC-G 562. 500 2250. 000 1885. 000 Left Budget 4135. 000 1687. 500 17. 7747693 400 lacs less as received on March 15 4361. 25 1453. 75 7. 0354878 advances with IITs/IPR/KCG 5815 0 0 40. 8786332 For the Year: 2016 -17 –Released (50: 50, central /State) TOTAL 1 18 -11 -2016 50. 000 100. 000 10 -01 -2017 52 100 -GEC-P 2 30 -11 -2016 135. 000 270. 000 14 -03 -2017 104 70 -SSEC-B, 200 -BVM-V Budget 1785. 000 185. 000 370. 000 G-TOTAL Target 4546. 2501638. 750 6185. 000 5475 1825 7300

Fund Released during Project (Go. I and Go. G share) Budget Head TED‐ 15

Fund Released during Project (Go. I and Go. G share) Budget Head TED‐ 15 TED‐ 19 TED‐ 20 TOTAL 2012 -13 / 201314(75: 25) 35. 00 1900. 00 400. 00 2335. 00 Budget Details year wise in lacs 2014 -15 2015 -16 2016 -17 (75: 25) (50: 50) 80. 00 1150. 00 1850. 00 170. 00 400. 00 200. 00 1230. 00 2250. 00 370. 00 Year GOI GOG TOTAL 1 2012‐ 13 & 2013‐ 14 2 3 4=2+3 Institute Released 5 1751. 25 583. 75 2335 2300 35 2014‐ 15 922. 5 307. 5 1230 1150 80 2015‐ 16 1687. 500 562. 500 2250. 000 0 2016‐ 17 TOTAL 185. 000 4546. 25 185. 000 1638. 75 370 6185. 00 370. 000 6070. 00 0 115. 00 Total Received 115. 00 5070. 00 1000. 00 6185. 00 TOTAL 300. 00 6000. 00 1000. 00 7300. 00 SPFU Remark 6 8 200 - 1 st Cycle 200 -1 st Cycle 300 -2 nd Cycle 200 -GEC-R&GEC-G 150 -rest 2 nd Cycle 400 -LEC&BVM, 200 -GECP, 150 -GEC-B 300 -GEC-B, SSEC, GEC-R, 200 -GEC-G 100 -GEC-P, 70 -SSEC-B, 200 -BVM-V

Expenditure Year wised till Project end Expenditure as per FMR submitted to NPIU (In

Expenditure Year wised till Project end Expenditure as per FMR submitted to NPIU (In lacs) Year 12‐ 13 13‐ 14 BVM-V GEC-B 1. 38 198. 28 4. 01 163. 00 14‐ 15 158. 68 15‐ 16 SSCE-B GEC-R LEC-M SPFU TOTAL 0. 00 5. 38 23. 83 1300. 84 GEC-G GEC-P 0. 00 184. 39 194. 21 184. 13 0. 00 192. 29 0. 00 184. 54 120. 10 150. 40 123. 30 105. 93 135. 17 70. 02 263. 73 310. 32 133. 92 282. 87 195. 64 215. 41 193. 46 31. 52 1595. 34 16‐ 17 224. 63 199. 34 342. 45 368. 21 363. 46 340. 17 300. 21 34. 92 2138. 46 17‐ 18 TOTAL 166. 59 1013. 29 0. 43 797. 19 5. 43 1. 27 0. 00 816. 58 969. 86 849. 15 6. 58 889. 63 1. 02 749. 24 12. 65 181. 31 118. 70 6084. 93 15. 78 863. 59

Fund Released, Expenditure incurred Till 31 st th July-17 (Rs. in lakhs) S. No.

Fund Released, Expenditure incurred Till 31 st th July-17 (Rs. in lakhs) S. No. Institute (1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (2) BVM‐V GEC‐B SSCE‐B GEC‐R LEC‐M GEC‐G GEC‐P Total 8 SPFU Total Amount Allocated Amount disbursed till date Cumulative Exp. During the Expenditure up to reporting month previous month of reporting sinception July‐ 17 Percentage Total cumulative expenditure up to reporting month reporting disbursed July‐ 17 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 1000 1000 850 820 950 850 750 1013. 3 797. 2 816. 6 969. 9 849. 2 883. 2 749. 2 0. 0 0. 0 6. 4 0. 0 1013. 3 797. 2 816. 6 969. 9 849. 2 889. 6 749. 2 101. 33 93. 79 99. 58 102. 09 99. 90 104. 66 99. 90 7000 6078. 49 6. 44 6084. 93 100. 25% 210 115 118. 7 0. 0 118. 7 103. 22% 7210 6185 6197. 19 6. 44 6203. 63 100. 30% Remarks (9)

Expenditure Head wise of Seven Institutes: 31 st July-17 in Lacs Amount Head of

Expenditure Head wise of Seven Institutes: 31 st July-17 in Lacs Amount Head of Allocated Assistants Received Procurement Expenditure Amount hips till date R&D FSD I-I-ICells Capacity Development Reforms Student support IOC GRAND TOTAL BVM‐V 1000 664. 55 0. 00 49. 49 136. 14 32. 14 5. 08 79. 99 12. 84 33. 05 1013. 29 GEC‐B 1000 850 555. 20 0. 00 28. 58 93. 20 23. 11 6. 08 70. 52 9. 12 11. 39 797. 19 SSCE‐B 1000 820 557. 02 30. 54 28. 72 71. 98 22. 37 4. 13 81. 06 2. 45 18. 31 816. 58 GEC‐R 1000 950 569. 03 0. 00 29. 03 110. 79 84. 36 8. 62 68. 82 6. 45 92. 75 969. 86 LEC‐M 1000 850 550. 22 23. 28 28. 59 86. 01 49. 27 6. 54 84. 63 0. 04 20. 58 849. 15 GEC‐G 1000 850 564. 47 16. 27 32. 86 92. 22 56. 48 5. 76 86. 26 3. 50 31. 82 889. 63 GEC‐P 1000 750 6070 539. 50 0. 00 28. 72 65. 80 28. 45 3999. 98 70. 10 226. 00 656. 13 296. 17 5. 29 41. 51 69. 01 540. 28 0. 21 34. 62 12. 26 749. 24 220. 16 6084. 93 Total Category Expenditure 3999. 98 1864. 80 220. 16 6084. 93 Category Expenditure 57. 14% 26. 64% 3. 15% 86. 93% Permissible for PIs 3850. 00 2450. 00 7000. 00 55% 35% % Permissible for PIs SPFU 210. 00 115. 00 TOTAL 7210. 0 6185. 0 53. 08 4053. 06 0. 00 21. 81 0. 00 70. 10 226. 00 677. 94 296. 24 10% 100% 118. 70 9. 29 0. 00 34. 52 50. 80 540. 28 34. 62 254. 68 6203. 71 Note: Procurement limited to 50%, Minor Civil Work 5%, & IOC 10%. At least 4% for academic support to weak students , FSD at least 10%

Performance Assessment Indicators Autonomy (obtained or applied to UGC Name of with no objection

Performance Assessment Indicators Autonomy (obtained or applied to UGC Name of with no objection the from Institution university and state governme nt) GECB BVM SSEC GECR LECM GECG GECP 1 Yes Yes Mo. M of Bo. G (last 4 Months) published on institution's website (Yes/No) NBA accreditation atleast 55% programmes accredited+appli ed‐for Statutory Audit FY: 2013‐ 14: Yes/No 2 Yes Yes 3 Yes Yes 4 Yes Yes Timeline for completion of governance development plan and/or Revised IDP Completion institutional published on of all data governance the input into guidelines, institution's the approved website MIS by governing body and published on institutional website 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Yes Yes Procurement Plan to cover 100% procurement expenditure (Yes/No) Actual expenditure 50% of funds received (Apr 2015) : Yes/No 100% Actual expenditure+ co mmitted expenditure against funds received (Apr, 2015) = Yes/No 7 Yes Yes 8 Yes Yes 9 Yes Yes No. of Indicators Met 9 9 9 9

Management Information System

Management Information System

Procurement Management Support System

Procurement Management Support System

Procurement Management Support System

Procurement Management Support System

Accreditation and Autonomy Status Sr. Institute Intake UGC 2 f GTU NOC Autonomy Status

Accreditation and Autonomy Status Sr. Institute Intake UGC 2 f GTU NOC Autonomy Status NBA status Autonomous Declared by 5/6 UG (83. 33%) NBA Visit scheduled 1 BVM V. V. Nagar 435 Yes UGC Letter Dt: 29. 04. 2015 Programs Accredited All Eligible programs Accredited 2 GEC Bhavnagar 540 Yes Applied on 20 Sept, 2013 4/6(66. 67%) UG Programs Applied NBA Visit awaited 3 SSEC Bhavnagar 720 Yes Applied on 20 Sept, 2013 7/11(63. 63%) UG Programs Applied NBA Visit awaited 4 GEC Rajkot 540 Yes Applied on 20 Sept, 2013 4/6(66. 67%)UG Programs Applied NBA Visit awaited 5 LEC Morbi 510 Yes Applied on 20 Sept, 2013 7/11(63. 64%) UG +PG Programs Applied 6 GEC G’nagar 600 Yes Applied on 20 Sept, 2013 5/8(62. 50%) UG Programs Applied NBA Visit awaited 7 GEC Patan 540 Yes Applied on 20 Sept, 2013 3/5(60. 0%) UG Programs Applied NBA Results are awaited

Academic Outcome Sr. No (A) Faculty Training Institute Total Faculty Trained Number of person

Academic Outcome Sr. No (A) Faculty Training Institute Total Faculty Trained Number of person days 1 BVM-V V Nagar 105 3690 2 GEC-Bhavnagar 105 3114 3 SSEC-Bhavnagar 99 96 2548 4 GEC-Rajkot 96 96 3630 5 LEC-Morbi 91 84 2369 6 GEC-Gandhinagar 77 75 1677 7 GEC-Patan 61 56 2793 TOTAL 634 617 19821 Institute Total Faculty Trained Number of person days in Hours Sr. No (B) Management Capability Building Total No. of Faculty 1 BVM-V V Nagar 32 151 2 GEC-Bhavnagar 25 124 3 SSEC-Bhavnagar 17 82 4 GEC-Rajkot 16 97 5 LEC-Morbi 27 127 6 GEC-Gandhinagar 22 123 7 GEC-Patan 18 85 8 SPFU 16 51 173 840 TOTAL

Academic Outcome (Continue…) Sr. No. PI Ph. D Existing Pursuing Publications admission Ph. D

Academic Outcome (Continue…) Sr. No. PI Ph. D Existing Pursuing Publications admission Ph. D (Improvement) 2015 Total No of PG students 1 BVM 26 24 29 0 00 2 GECB 3 10 20 1 00 3 SSEC 7 24 15 4 74 4 GECG 4 24 80 4 30 5 GECP 4 9 21 4 00 6 GECR 7 23 18 4 00 7 LECM 10 14 60 5 52 61 118 243 23 156 Total

Key Performance Indicators (KPI) with Target Values

Key Performance Indicators (KPI) with Target Values

Excellency achieved in spreading the Best Practices § Good Governance through BOG is in

Excellency achieved in spreading the Best Practices § Good Governance through BOG is in Vogue § Effective Capacity building through IIMA , FII-IIMA § Ph. D. enrolment drive (non-faculties) at GTU and state Tech. Universities. § Faculty development through Mo. U with IIT Gandhinagar § Research activities through Mo. U with Institute of Plasma Research (IPRAhmedabad) including Research Mentoring at Pis. § Support to Weak Students through BISAG : Evolved Innovative way ü Digital Classrooms telecasts lectures covering first to last topic as per GTU curriculum § NPTEL setup for off-line & on-demand lecture series for faculty and students. § SCOPE laboratory Setup at all PIs for improving communication skills § Video Conferencing coordination § Established SIEMENS Centre of Excellence Labs at three Pis. § IOT Laboratory setup at PI in collaboration with Intel by SPFU for effective monitoring, mentoring and

Achievements § Well equipped labs with wide variety and range of equipment's and software's

Achievements § Well equipped labs with wide variety and range of equipment's and software's § Improvement in teaching and learning environment § Autonomy to One Institutes (BVM-V V Nagar) by UGC for six years w. e. f. A. Y. 2016 -17 § Institutes could envisage and implement academic and institutional reforms and key performance Indicators with the support of Mentors and Bo. G members § Key position of BOG Chairman in Industrial Federations leverages employability of graduates § Strategy devised for cleanliness with sustained maintenance at PIs with short to long term planning to meet the EMF norms § Existence of III cell in all Pis

Major Achievements • Autonomy proposal send for all Institutes and BVM received autonomy. •

Major Achievements • Autonomy proposal send for all Institutes and BVM received autonomy. • 48 course NBA proposal sent. • Bo. G chairman appointed from reputed Industrialist • Total Expenditure 6203. 71 lacs of 6185. 0 lacs received for Project(FMR-July-17) • 39. 9 lacs of Equipment's/LRs purchased /LRs etc (FMR-July-17) • 18. 64 lacs of faculty and staff development (FMR-July-17) • More than 600 Faculties trained in various recent subject (22500 Person day( • Ho. D/Principals /Senior Faculties (157 person, 840 person days) received management training at IIMs • 118 Faculty are deputed for Higher Educations • 35 research workshop and 8 Conference organized‘. • More than 2500 Research publication • IPR helped for Encourage Research environment at Institutes • Need based Training assessment done by IIT Gandhingar and Trained more than 500 faculty in short time period

How TEQIP is different ? § PMSS is an effective tool and a management

How TEQIP is different ? § PMSS is an effective tool and a management system for procurement § Faculty satisfaction due to training at premier Institutes. § Students’ satisfaction due to facilities and benefits of TEQIP. § FDP programme has provided capacity building for faculty to improve the teaching and learning environment. § Senior faculties and Heads of the Institute have gained platform to enhance leadership qualities due to exposure at IIMs and IITs. § Role of mentor and performance auditors helped in the implementation of project to achieve the substantial progress. § Research activities mentored by IPR scientists. § Hand holding module of TEQIP (IITs and IIMs) is very successful. § Pivotal role of BOG in strategy planning , decision making and steering the progress of the project.

Thank You

Thank You