Taxonomy Classification Taxonomy science of identifying and classifying

  • Slides: 66
Download presentation
Taxonomy & Classification Taxonomy- science of identifying and classifying organisms; all about the naming

Taxonomy & Classification Taxonomy- science of identifying and classifying organisms; all about the naming Classification- systematic grouping and naming of organisms based on shared similarities

Pub. Med Search on 9/13/09 “tree of life” AND 2009 59 articles so far

Pub. Med Search on 9/13/09 “tree of life” AND 2009 59 articles so far this year

Why classify?

Why classify?

“Planet Bob” http: //www. planetbob. asu. edu

“Planet Bob” http: //www. planetbob. asu. edu

Among the Top 10 New Organisms of 2008 (wired. com) smallest snake found in

Among the Top 10 New Organisms of 2008 (wired. com) smallest snake found in Barbados 120, 000 y. o. glacier bacteria alive mother of all living ants- pale, eyeless, subterranean new giant clam species found in Red Sea new catfish found in Venezuela/Colombia nematode turns ant abdomen into fruit mimic to spread eggs new songbird found in Gabon

How to classify?

How to classify?

Taxonomy & Classification Taxonomy- science of identifying and classifying organisms; all about the naming

Taxonomy & Classification Taxonomy- science of identifying and classifying organisms; all about the naming Classification- systematic grouping and naming of organisms based on shared similarities Systematics- branch of biology that seeks to classify biodiversity using everything known about an organism in order to understand its evolutionary relationship to other organisms

A Brief History of Classification

A Brief History of Classification

4 th century B. C. The Age of Aristotle • No modern technology •

4 th century B. C. The Age of Aristotle • No modern technology • How to classify living organisms?

4 th century B. C. The Age of Aristotle • • No modern technology

4 th century B. C. The Age of Aristotle • • No modern technology 2 main “Divisions” Plants (immobile) edible vs. inedible Animals (mobile) blood vs. bloodless walking vs. flying vs. swimming In use for over 2000 years (through 1600 s A. D. ) • • •

 • • 1500 s to 1600 s: The Age of Exploration Extensive travel

• • 1500 s to 1600 s: The Age of Exploration Extensive travel to New World Hudson lands in NY 400 yrs. ago Collect & classify as many specimens as possible Many newly discovered organisms “Folk taxonomy” is the rule “free for all” long descriptive names one organism given multiple names multiple organisms given same name • • •

 • • Folk Taxonomy Solanum caule inermi herbaceo, foliis pinnatis incisis, racemis simplicibus

• • Folk Taxonomy Solanum caule inermi herbaceo, foliis pinnatis incisis, racemis simplicibus Translation: solanum with a smooth herbaceous stem, incised pinnate leaves and simple inflorescence • pill bug, sow’s ear, roly poly, sowbug

1700 s: The Age of Carolus Linnaeus (born Carl Linne in Sweden) • Physician,

1700 s: The Age of Carolus Linnaeus (born Carl Linne in Sweden) • Physician, botanist, zoologist • Father of Modern Biological Classification” • Standardized classification • Originated binomial nomenclature • Genus species • Established hierarchical naming • Broad to specific • Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species

1700 s: The Age of Carolus Linnaeus • Classification system based on phenetics •

1700 s: The Age of Carolus Linnaeus • Classification system based on phenetics • shared physical or other observable characteristics • (does not take into account evolutionary history, fossils, embryology, behavior) How might phenetics mislead us in classifying organisms?

Phenetics may mislead. . . • legless lizards & snakes • bats & birds

Phenetics may mislead. . . • legless lizards & snakes • bats & birds vs. bats & cats

1700 s: The Age of Carolus Linnaeus • Standardized naming solves “folk taxonomy” problem

1700 s: The Age of Carolus Linnaeus • Standardized naming solves “folk taxonomy” problem • Provides common language • one name - one organism • Solanum lycopersicum • Armadillium vulgare How would Linnaeus have divided organisms into Kingdoms?

1700 s: The Age of Carolus Linnaeus • Linnaeus’ 2 Kingdoms (1735) • Plantae

1700 s: The Age of Carolus Linnaeus • Linnaeus’ 2 Kingdoms (1735) • Plantae • Animalia

1700 s-1800 s: The Age of Microscopy • Great advances in microscopes How will

1700 s-1800 s: The Age of Microscopy • Great advances in microscopes How will this affect our system of classification?

1700 s-1800 s: The Age of Microscopy Based on what is known at the

1700 s-1800 s: The Age of Microscopy Based on what is known at the time, how would you classify these?

1700 s-1800 s: The Age of Microscopy • Ernst Haeckel adds 3 rd Kingdom

1700 s-1800 s: The Age of Microscopy • Ernst Haeckel adds 3 rd Kingdom (1866) • Protista (all single-celled organisms) • Plantae • Animalia

1800 s: The Age of Darwin • Charles Darwin publishes On the Origins of

1800 s: The Age of Darwin • Charles Darwin publishes On the Origins of Species How will this influence our system of classification?

1800 s: The Age of Darwin • Charles Darwin publishes On the Origins of

1800 s: The Age of Darwin • Charles Darwin publishes On the Origins of Species • Classification must reflect common descent • Introduces concept of & coins term “Tree of Life” • Ernest Haeckel coins term phylogeny • Classification based on evolutionary

Darwin’s “Tree of Life” On the Origins of Species, 1859

Darwin’s “Tree of Life” On the Origins of Species, 1859

Ernest Haeckel’s Pedigree of Man, 1879

Ernest Haeckel’s Pedigree of Man, 1879

1950 s-60 s: Move from 3 to 4 to 5 Kingdoms 4 Kingdoms based

1950 s-60 s: Move from 3 to 4 to 5 Kingdoms 4 Kingdoms based on phenetics* • Monera (single-celled prokaryotes) • Protista (single-celled eukaryotes) • Plantae (autotrophic, multicellular eukaryotes) • Animalia (heterotrophic, multicellular eukaryotes) (Herbert Copeland, 1956)

1950 s-60 s: Move from 3 to 4 to 5 Kingdoms based on phenetics

1950 s-60 s: Move from 3 to 4 to 5 Kingdoms based on phenetics • Monera • Protista • Plantae • Fungi (absorptive heterotrophs, eukaryotes, mostly multicellular) • Animalia (Robert Whittaker, 1969)

Mid 1900 s: The Cladistic Challenge Begins • Systematics- branch of biology that seeks

Mid 1900 s: The Cladistic Challenge Begins • Systematics- branch of biology that seeks to classify biodiversity using everything known about an organism in order to understand its evolutionary relationship to other organisms • Cladistic analysis- form hypotheses about evolutionary relationships (cladograms and phylogenetic trees) and test by looking for evidence to support or refute, also called phylogenetic systematics • Clade- group of organisms that share common characteristics and a common ancestor

 • Mid 1900 s: The Cladistic Challenge Begins Cladistic analysis (phylogenetic systematics) use

• Mid 1900 s: The Cladistic Challenge Begins Cladistic analysis (phylogenetic systematics) use cladograms (phylogenetic trees) to represent hypotheses about evolutionary relationships rely on all available data (morphological, molecular, biochemical, fossil, behavioral, embryology, etc. ) test hypotheses constant need to reorganize trees to be consistent with new evidence • •

Mid 1900 s: The Cladistic Challenge Begins Example: Cladogram of Reptiles

Mid 1900 s: The Cladistic Challenge Begins Example: Cladogram of Reptiles

“Cladists” recognize only monophyletic groups.

“Cladists” recognize only monophyletic groups.

Mid-late 1900 s: The Molecular Age • DNA and protein sequencing • Comparison of

Mid-late 1900 s: The Molecular Age • DNA and protein sequencing • Comparison of sequences among organisms • Major tool in cladistic analysis • Molecular evolution • Molecular clocks cytochrome c protein sequence alignment

Mid-late 1900 s: The Molecular Age • Kingdom Archaea is added • at 1

Mid-late 1900 s: The Molecular Age • Kingdom Archaea is added • at 1 st called archaeabacteria • based on r. RNA sequence analysis • share features with both eukaryotes & prokaryotes Now there are 6 Kingdoms - Carl Woese, 1977 • Archaea • Eubacteria • Protista • Plantae • Fungi • Animalia

Mid-late 1900 s: The Molecular Age Kingdoms placed into 3 Domains (Carl Woese, 1990)

Mid-late 1900 s: The Molecular Age Kingdoms placed into 3 Domains (Carl Woese, 1990) Bacteria Eukarya Archeae 3 Domains • Bacteria • Archaea • Eukarya common ancestor (cenancestor or LUCA)

3 Domains from a Common Ancestor (Woese, 1977) Bacteria Eukarya Archeae Domains based on:

3 Domains from a Common Ancestor (Woese, 1977) Bacteria Eukarya Archeae Domains based on: • DNA sequence • genome organization • biochemical evidence • cellular characteristics • etc. common ancestor (cenancestor or LUCA) common ancestor referred to as cenancestor or LUCA (last universal common ancestor)

How is cladistics different from older systems of classification?

How is cladistics different from older systems of classification?

CLASSIFICATION: Traditional (phenetics) (structural data) vs. Phylogenetics (cladistics) (all data: structural, fossil, biochemical, molecular,

CLASSIFICATION: Traditional (phenetics) (structural data) vs. Phylogenetics (cladistics) (all data: structural, fossil, biochemical, molecular, etc. )

Homologous vs. Analogous Structures

Homologous vs. Analogous Structures

Homologous vs. Analogous Structures Homologous • similar structures arose from common ancestor • divergent

Homologous vs. Analogous Structures Homologous • similar structures arose from common ancestor • divergent evolution Analogous • similar structures did not arise from common ancestor • convergent evolution • can lead to misinterpretations of evolutionary relationships

How is the fossil record useful in cladistic analysis?

How is the fossil record useful in cladistic analysis?

How is the fossil record useful in cladistic analysis? • sequence in which fossils

How is the fossil record useful in cladistic analysis? • sequence in which fossils appear in strata says something about timing of existence of organism • can reveal ancestral relationships that may have been lost over time

Mid-late 1900 s: The Molecular Age • Move from 5 to 8 Kingdoms •

Mid-late 1900 s: The Molecular Age • Move from 5 to 8 Kingdoms • Protista further subdivided; many members more like plants or animals than they are each other 8 Kingdoms (by some accounts) • Archaea • Eubacteria • Archaezoa • Protista • Chromista • Plantae • Fungi • Animalia Based on evolutionary relatonships and molecular genetics

(Woese et al. , 1990) Domains (3) Archaea Bacteria Eukarya

(Woese et al. , 1990) Domains (3) Archaea Bacteria Eukarya

2000 & on: Age of Phylogenomic http: //genomesonline. org • Whole genomes being sequenced

2000 & on: Age of Phylogenomic http: //genomesonline. org • Whole genomes being sequenced at rapid rate • comparisons reveal new evolutionary relationships • evidence for horizontal gene transfer • evidence that eukaryotes arose from fusion of archaea with bacteria

Hypothesis: Endosymbiotic events resulted in new species Symbiosis -close and often longterm ecological relationships

Hypothesis: Endosymbiotic events resulted in new species Symbiosis -close and often longterm ecological relationships between 2 organisms Endosymbiosis -one organism lives within the cells or tissues of another An example of endosymbiosis w/o formation of new species (so far) is bacteria inside protist inside termite gut. Bacteria helps protist move and get food and helps termite by digesting cellulose.

2000 & on: Age of Phylogenomics • Is it a “Tree of Life” or

2000 & on: Age of Phylogenomics • Is it a “Tree of Life” or Ring of Life”? ? ? • Cladistic analysis continues

 • Tree of Life Web Project (To. L) • Seeks to create “super

• Tree of Life Web Project (To. L) • Seeks to create “super tree” • Thus far based on DNA sequence data from 3000 species • Circle is best viewed at 1. 5 meter diameter (David Hillis)

Phylogenetic systematics (cladistics) is not set in stone!!! • It is a HYPOTHESIS!!! •

Phylogenetic systematics (cladistics) is not set in stone!!! • It is a HYPOTHESIS!!! • trees vs. rings of life? ? ? • How many Kingdoms? ? ? • even the experts disagree • in this class, we will go with 8 • Phyla are constantly being reshuffled • Different sources of evidence lead to competing interpretations • New data becoming available all the time • Hypotheses constantly revised accordingly

8 Kingdoms grouped into 3 Domains

8 Kingdoms grouped into 3 Domains

8 Kingdoms 1. Archaebacteria 2. Eubacteria 3 Domains “commonly” Archaea Bacteria “bacteria” prokaryotes (no

8 Kingdoms 1. Archaebacteria 2. Eubacteria 3 Domains “commonly” Archaea Bacteria “bacteria” prokaryotes (no nucleus) Eukarya eukaryotes (true nucleus) 3. Archaezoa 4. Protista 5. Chromista 6. Plantae 7. Fungi 8. Animalia

8 Kingdoms Archaebacteria- prokaryotes, unicellular (mostly), tend to be extremophiles Eubacteria- prokaryotes, unicellular (mostly)

8 Kingdoms Archaebacteria- prokaryotes, unicellular (mostly), tend to be extremophiles Eubacteria- prokaryotes, unicellular (mostly) Archaezoa- unicellular eukaryotes, no mitochondria, peroxisomes or Golgi apparatus Protista- simple, mostly unicellular eukaryotes, no tissues Chromista- unicellular eukaryotes, brown algae, diatoms Plantae- multicellular eukaryotes, cell walls, tissues, autotrophs Fungi- mostly unicellular eukaryotes, chitin in cell wall, absorptive heterotrophs Animalia- multicellular eukaryotes, tissues, no cell walls, heterotrophs

3 Domains: The Summary Table

3 Domains: The Summary Table

Nuclear envelope • membrane surrounding nucleus; encloses genetic material; only eukarya have “true” or

Nuclear envelope • membrane surrounding nucleus; encloses genetic material; only eukarya have “true” or membrane-bound nucleus absent (prokaryotic) present (eukaryotes)

Membrane-bound organelles • intracellular structures enclosed within a lipid membrane • ex. chloroplasts, mitochondria,

Membrane-bound organelles • intracellular structures enclosed within a lipid membrane • ex. chloroplasts, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, vacuole, nucleus absent (prokaryotic) present (eukaryotes) came about by infolding of the plasma membrane or endosymbiosis

Peptidoglycan in cell wall • cell wall surrounds cell membrane, provides structural support •

Peptidoglycan in cell wall • cell wall surrounds cell membrane, provides structural support • peptidoglycan is a large polymer of sugars and amino acids, forms mesh-like structure that gives rigidity to cell wall present absent

Membrane lipids • fats in the cellular membranes that provide fluidity and/or rigidity ester-linked

Membrane lipids • fats in the cellular membranes that provide fluidity and/or rigidity ester-linked ether-linked ester-linked unbranched hydrocarbons some branched hydrocarbons unbranched hydrocarbons

Plasmids • extra-chromosomal piece of DNA found in cell; often contains antibiotic resistance genes

Plasmids • extra-chromosomal piece of DNA found in cell; often contains antibiotic resistance genes yes no

Circular chromosome present not enclosed in any structure by located near plasma membrane absent

Circular chromosome present not enclosed in any structure by located near plasma membrane absent multiple linear chromosomes located in nucleus

RNA polymerase • enzyme that copies DNA to RNA one kind several kinds 3

RNA polymerase • enzyme that copies DNA to RNA one kind several kinds 3 different kinds

Initiation amino acids for start of protein synthesis • formyl-methionine (f-Met) vs. just plain

Initiation amino acids for start of protein synthesis • formyl-methionine (f-Met) vs. just plain methionine (Met) as the first amino acid added to a protein f-MET MET

Ribosomes • 2 subunits, one large and one small • made of r. RNA

Ribosomes • 2 subunits, one large and one small • made of r. RNA and protein • site of protein synthesis • size is in “sedimentation rate”, abbreviated “s” for Svedberg unit 70 s grouped in long chains called polyribosomes, 30 s + 50 s subunits make up 70 s 80 s

Introns • non-coding sequence in genes • large hn. RNA made first that must

Introns • non-coding sequence in genes • large hn. RNA made first that must be spliced (cut out introns) into m. RNA and then protein is translated from m. RNA rare/absent present in some genes present in all genes

Operons • ordered arrangement of genes within the DNA; arranged by function • ex.

Operons • ordered arrangement of genes within the DNA; arranged by function • ex. all genes involved in lactose utilization (a sugar used as food) are in a single operon and transcribed as a single m. RNA Present Not present

Sensitivity to antibiotics/toxins • chloramphenicol- inhibits ribosomal function affecting protein synthesis • streptomycin- interferes

Sensitivity to antibiotics/toxins • chloramphenicol- inhibits ribosomal function affecting protein synthesis • streptomycin- interferes with f-MET binding to r. RNA and ribosomes, affects protein synthesis • dipthteria toxin- interferes with ribosomal function chloramphenicol and streptomycin: growth inhibited chloramphenicol and streptomycin: growth NOT inhibited diphtheria toxin: growth inhibited

Histones • proteins that are used to compact/package the chromosomal DNA Not present Present

Histones • proteins that are used to compact/package the chromosomal DNA Not present Present in some species Present