INSTRUCTIONAL LEARNING CYCLE FollowUp Phase Office of Education
- Slides: 26
INSTRUCTIONAL LEARNING CYCLE: Follow-Up Phase Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Follow-Up Phase of ILC
Follow-Up Phase Guiding Question How will we use the evidence of student learning and strategy implementation to improve our individual and collective professional practice?
Analyze Post-Assessment Results Click on the document to download it for further review.
Analyze Post-Assessment Data Conclusions about student learning Description of the movement of students between proficiency levels Far From Proficient Above Proficient
Analyze Post-Assessment Data What were you expecting to see? Were the post-assessment scores higher, lower, or the same as your expectations? Compared to the pre-assessment, did the scores go up, down or stay the same? Which students stayed at the same proficiency level, which lost ground, which increased? What do you want to know more about?
Analyzing Implementation Data Identification of Implementation Data ILC Process Document Collected Data Fidelity of Implementation? Collaborative Conversation
Types of Implementation Data That went well! Needs some adjustments Didn’t work Quantitative Data Qualitative Data
Evaluating the Implementation Was the instructional plan implemented as intended? • All of the components of the instructional plan were implemented with the agreed upon frequency. • Some instructional components were implemented as planned. • Variations in instructional practices were evident. • Some teachers implemented instructional practices as agreed upon.
Determining Impact on student achievement
Making Connections What did you do intentionally during instruction to support students in achieving the learning target? What worked well? What didn’t work well? Did the frequency of the instructional strategy and the instructional approaches influence the results? Did the selected common strategies work? Did a certain strategy work better with certain students?
Positive What worked well? Negative What didn’t work well?
Reflecting on Results How did the way we actually implemented the instructional plan influence our student results? Use of graphic organizers in other subjects Incorrect graphic organizer
What Did We Learn? What did we learn from this process about student learning and teacher instructional practice? Student Results Instructional Practice
What’s Next? What are our next steps? Are we ready to move on to a new area of focus? Or do we need to adjust our instructional plan and re-teach?
Action Items
Plan for Next Steps Who will be responsible? Deadline?
Plan School Support Team Meeting School Level Team Building Principal SI Team members Teachers participating in the ILC Promote continuous reflection School Support Team District Representative Intervention Specialist School Improvement Facilitator Examine progress
School Support Team Meeting Structure Schedule Format
School Support Team Meeting Presentation q Each teacher’s name and content area or grade level q The learning targets, content focus and instructional strategies q Data collected on adult implementation and what the data suggests q Pre and Post Assessment data collected on student achievement and what the data suggests q Lessons learned from the ILC q Recommendations for what to keep the same and what to change in the next ILC
School Support Team Meeting Presentation Sharing of strengths and weaknesses Determine what support teachers may need Sharing of additional information Handout? Brochure? Power. Point presentation?
Review You must answer each question in the review before you can continue to the last slide of the presentation
Question 1: Who are the required members of the School Support Team? A. District Representative, Intervention Specialist, School Improvement Facilitator B. District Representative, Intervention Specialist, School Improvement Facilitator, Building Principal C. District Representative, Michigan Department of Education, School Improvement Facilitator, Other external support providers
Question 2: You should focus on two things when reflecting on what you learned during the process. They are: A. B. C. D. Student results and instructional practice Implementation data and pre-assessment data Instructional strategies and content Quantitative data and qualitative data
Question 3: Once the collaborative tasks of the Follow Up Phase have been completed what are the next action items? A. Identify next steps and plan for the School Support Team meeting B. Gather implementation data and post assessment data C. Adjust the instructional plan and reteach D. Rate the implementation for fidelity and reflect on lessons learned
Conclusion
- Followup edge
- Followup:actionitems
- Followup visit
- Instructional learning cycle
- Instructional learning cycle
- Instructional learning cycle
- Quotes about data driven instruction
- Cuadro comparativo de e-learning
- Normal phase vs reverse phase chromatography
- M tswett pronunciation
- Mobile phase and stationary phase
- Stationary phase and mobile phase in hplc
- Normal phase vs reverse phase chromatography
- Line current and phase current
- Detectors used in hplc
- Phase to phase voltage
- Broad phase vs narrow phase
- Sample mentoring and coaching form for teachers
- 8 stages of system development life cycle
- Pre investment phase
- M phase of cell cycle
- Phases of mitosis
- Phase of menstrual cycle
- M phase
- Office in factory
- Responsibility of front office department
- Geothermal education office