DEAP Dark Matter Experiment with Argon PSD Mark

  • Slides: 42
Download presentation
DEAP: Dark Matter Experiment with Argon PSD Mark Boulay Queen’s University arxiv. org: /astro-ph/0402007

DEAP: Dark Matter Experiment with Argon PSD Mark Boulay Queen’s University arxiv. org: /astro-ph/0402007 Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Outline: • Dark Matter Problem • Current techniques for direct detection of dark matter

Outline: • Dark Matter Problem • Current techniques for direct detection of dark matter • Direct detection with Liquid Argon (LAr) • Some advantages of LAr • Design of and Results from DEAP-0: 1 kg LAr cryostat at LANL (preliminary results) • Plans for DEAP-1: 10 kg LAr cryostat at Queen’s (SNOLab early space) Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

The Dark Matter Problem • Rotation curves – Mass density distributed more broadly than

The Dark Matter Problem • Rotation curves – Mass density distributed more broadly than visible objects – Non-luminous halo required to describe rotation curves -First reported in 1933 by Zwicky Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Precision WMAP measurements map. gsfc. nasa. gov • Host of precision measurements culminating in

Precision WMAP measurements map. gsfc. nasa. gov • Host of precision measurements culminating in WMAP. – Interpret power spectrum data by fit to cosmology DARK MATTER PROBLEM is > 70 years old and – Cold dark matter fraction experimentally sound : do not understand origin of accurately determined large fraction of matter in universe. Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Enter Supersymmetry… (…or a new type of particle makes up the dark matter…) •

Enter Supersymmetry… (…or a new type of particle makes up the dark matter…) • SUSY provides a “natural extension” to the standard model of particle physics • “Attractive route towards unifying all four forces ” -theorists • Introduces a new symmetry (R-parity) and possible existence of a new stable particle • New particle properties could well be consistent with those needed to account for the missing dark matter • Generically, direct searches are looking for WIMPs, Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, which would make up the dark matter • So SUSY provides a particle physics solution to a cosmological problem (SUSY not motivated by DM problem) Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Direct WIMP detection in terrestrial experiment • WIMPs can elastically scatter in detector producing

Direct WIMP detection in terrestrial experiment • WIMPs can elastically scatter in detector producing nuclear recoils 40 Ar c • Rate in terrestrial detector depends on WIMP mass and WIMPnucleon interaction cross-section • Energy spectrum of recoils is exponential with E ~ 50 ke. V • Experimental challenge is to detect small number of nuclear recoils with low energy threshold (order event/1000 kg/year > 10 ke. V) Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

The problem with direct WIMP detection (…or why these experiments are so tough…) •

The problem with direct WIMP detection (…or why these experiments are so tough…) • Radioactive decays from materials, and cosmic rays and their byproducts, are backgrounds to recoiling nucleus signal • Even clean materials can lead to billions decays/year for kg-scale detectors. Background events can be further divided into two classes: 1. Events that will ‘look like’ nuclear recoils 2. Events that won’t ‘look like’ nuclear recoils Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Backgrounds in WIMP searches In general, this roughly approximates to: 1. Neutron related backgrounds

Backgrounds in WIMP searches In general, this roughly approximates to: 1. Neutron related backgrounds (since n’s can elastically scatter the target nuclei just like WIMPs can) 2. b/g radiation. This will deposit energy in a detector but not scatter the target nuclei. The approach taken is to reduce: 1. by using very clean materials and running experiment underground 2. by using clean materials and distinguishing n. r. events from b/g s Principle difference between DM experiments is how the distinction of n. r. events from b/g events is accomplished Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

ASIDE: a-emitters plated out on detector surfaces as potentially dangerous background LAr Cryostat wall

ASIDE: a-emitters plated out on detector surfaces as potentially dangerous background LAr Cryostat wall a 210 Po Decay in bulk LAr tagged by a-particle scintillation on surface Decay from surface releases untagged recoiling nucleus a Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

CDMS (Cryogenic Dark Matter Search) Collection of small detectors simultaneously measure deposited energy in

CDMS (Cryogenic Dark Matter Search) Collection of small detectors simultaneously measure deposited energy in charge and phonon channels ~1 kg / “tower” g rays Exploits difference in deposited charge versus phonon energy between b/g ‘s and nuclear recoils Current best limit neutrons ZIP detector 250 g Ge Image from cdms. berkeley. edu Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

XENON (proposed experiment) Many (most) DM experiments are technically very complex in order to

XENON (proposed experiment) Many (most) DM experiments are technically very complex in order to discriminate b/g ‘s from nuclear recoils Total Xe mass 1 tonne Exploits difference in ionization signal (electrons) versus scintillation signal (photons) between b/g‘s and nuclear recoils Figure from Elena Aprile Dark Matter 2004 Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP (Dark Matter Experiment with Argon PSD) • Spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering on liquid 40

DEAP (Dark Matter Experiment with Argon PSD) • Spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering on liquid 40 Ar • Spherical volume of LAr instrumented with PMTs to detect scintillation photons • Discrimination of g/b backgrounds using only scintillation time information from PMTs • Generic spherical design scaleable to large target mass DEAP-n: n = log 10(target mass [kg]) Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Scintillation in liquid argon • ionizing radiation leads to formation of excited dimers in

Scintillation in liquid argon • ionizing radiation leads to formation of excited dimers in argon (Ar*2) • dimers are produced in either singlet or triplet excited states • decays to ground state have characteristic times, and can result in photon emission • ~ 2 ns for singlet state (prompt) • 1. 6 us for triplet state (delayed) • Fraction of dimers in singlet versus triplet state depends on ionization density along track, and thus on incident particle type Net effect is a difference in the photon emission versus time curve for g/b events and for nuclear recoils Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

http: //arxiv. org/astro-ph/0411358 scintillation pulseshape analysis for discrimination of e- vs nuclear recoils ->

http: //arxiv. org/astro-ph/0411358 scintillation pulseshape analysis for discrimination of e- vs nuclear recoils -> no electron-drift DEAP : Dark-matter Experiment with Argon PSD Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Idea is to use scintillation photons only for discrimination in DEAP… …allows for simple

Idea is to use scintillation photons only for discrimination in DEAP… …allows for simple detector design and possibly a more easily realizeable large-scale experiment Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Some advantages of LAr • Inexpensive : 10 kg = 25$ or Lar •

Some advantages of LAr • Inexpensive : 10 kg = 25$ or Lar • Good light yield, 40000 photons/Me. V = good resolution • Used extensively, very large experiments underground • Easily accessible temperature (~85 K) • Same requirements as LN for cryogenic components • “Noble” noble gas • Liquid experiment can be continuously or periodically purified (advantage over crystals) • Allows simple, inexpensive, scalable design Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Simulation of discrimination in argon • 6 pe/ke. V for 75% coverage, with •

Simulation of discrimination in argon • 6 pe/ke. V for 75% coverage, with • 1500 Hz PMT noise • Backgrounds from Ham. R 9288 (approx. 70 m. Bq/PMT) • 5 ns PMT resolution • 20% photon detection efficiency • 100 ns trigger window sets T 0 • Fprompt = Prompt hits(100 ns)/Total hits(15 us) • ~2 kg Ar with 10 ke. Vee threshold (60 pe) Dominant backgrounds assuming proper shielding, depth, and clean construction. Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Background rejection with LAr (simulation) 108 From simulation, rejection > 108 @ 10 ke.

Background rejection with LAr (simulation) 108 From simulation, rejection > 108 @ 10 ke. V (>>!) simulated e-’s 100 simulated WIMPs Mark Boulay (Goal for Super. CDMS is 108) DEAP 29/9/05

DM Sensitivity with LAr with 1 -year exposure LAr with 10 ke. V (electron)

DM Sensitivity with LAr with 1 -year exposure LAr with 10 ke. V (electron) threshold Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Direct detection prediction from SUSY NMSSM (Next-to-MSSM) Prediction from talk by David Cerdeno at

Direct detection prediction from SUSY NMSSM (Next-to-MSSM) Prediction from talk by David Cerdeno at SUSY 2005 (JHEP 12 (2004) 048) 10 -44 cm 2 (10 kg LAr) 10 -45 cm 2 (100 kg LAr) Maybe within our reach! Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP-0 (1 kg) at LANL 40” • PMT in air outside of large vacuum

DEAP-0 (1 kg) at LANL 40” • PMT in air outside of large vacuum chamber • ~1 kg LAr viewed by single 2” PMT • calibration with g’s, n’s (tagged 22 Na and Am. Be) • Demonstration of PSD • Test long term gain stability DEAP-0 Timeline: DEAP-0 Design: Jan 05 M. Boulay, A. Hime, L. Rodriguez (LANL) Order components: Feb 05 Supported by LANL LDRD, Rec’d all components: 05 with technical assistance. May and advice from: Assembly: June, Jul 05 Steve Lamoreaux, Dan Mc. Kinsey, Data run & analysis: Jul, Aug 05 James Nikkel, Seppo Pentilla, … (Analysis being completed) Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Gas Handling System for DEAP-0 SAES purifier, < 0. 1 ppb Mark Boulay DEAP

Gas Handling System for DEAP-0 SAES purifier, < 0. 1 ppb Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP-0 construction at LANL • Conflat construction, Cu gaskets, “standard” components where possible to

DEAP-0 construction at LANL • Conflat construction, Cu gaskets, “standard” components where possible to reduce cost • ~1 kg of liquid argon with 2” windows, viewed by 1 PMT in air Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP-0 Construction at LANL Liquid nitrogen cooling, Ar gas in Cu coils Mark Boulay

DEAP-0 Construction at LANL Liquid nitrogen cooling, Ar gas in Cu coils Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP-0 Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP-0 Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP-0 in vacuum chamber Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP-0 in vacuum chamber Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP-0 PMT setup at LANL PMT coupled to LAr through chamber window Source with

DEAP-0 PMT setup at LANL PMT coupled to LAr through chamber window Source with Cs. I/PMT for gamma tag Vacuum chamber windows Mark Boulay Cs. I tag LAr PMT source DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP-0 windows (post-warm-up) Window to argon chamber …room for improvement! Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP-0 windows (post-warm-up) Window to argon chamber …room for improvement! Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

PMT pulses from LAr, in coincidence with g in Cs. I g-like neutron-like Mark

PMT pulses from LAr, in coincidence with g in Cs. I g-like neutron-like Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Triplet lifetime check Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Triplet lifetime check Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Discrimination in liquid argon Na-22 runs 4 x 106 tagged g’s Mark Boulay Am.

Discrimination in liquid argon Na-22 runs 4 x 106 tagged g’s Mark Boulay Am. Be runs (neutron calibration) <pe/ke. V> = 0. 1 DEAP 29/9/05

Discrimination in liquid argon from DEAP-0 <pe> = 60 preliminary O(1 in 105) consistent

Discrimination in liquid argon from DEAP-0 <pe> = 60 preliminary O(1 in 105) consistent with random coincidence with room neutrons (preliminary) <pe> = 60 corresponds to 10 ke. V with 75% coverage • Final analysis and systematics evaluation being done (Kevin and Reuble) Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Conceptual design of DEAP-1 • ~10 kg Lar • Spherical geometry • PMTs coupled

Conceptual design of DEAP-1 • ~10 kg Lar • Spherical geometry • PMTs coupled to inner chamber through light guides • PMTs surrounded by polyethylene for n absorption • Inner chamber could be (stainless steel, acrylic, copper) • Investigate using expanded polystyrene for thermal insulation (vacuum chamber if needed) Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Photon detection for DEAP-1 Acrylic light guide (UVA) Low background PMT window or acrylic

Photon detection for DEAP-1 Acrylic light guide (UVA) Low background PMT window or acrylic vessel LAr 85 K 6” 300 K Acrylic guide backs off PMT to reduce (a, n) neutron backgrounds, and to reduce thermal load. Q = k. A(Th-Tc)/L ~ 1 Watt Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Photomultiplier tube (PMT) backgrounds in DEAP-1 For reference, 250 events/year for the ET 9390

Photomultiplier tube (PMT) backgrounds in DEAP-1 For reference, 250 events/year for the ET 9390 PMTs Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Inner cryostat backgrounds in DEAP-1 4 neutrons/year/kg of SS (Peter Skensved) ~3% leakage into

Inner cryostat backgrounds in DEAP-1 4 neutrons/year/kg of SS (Peter Skensved) ~3% leakage into signal region (Geant 4 Monte-Carlo) problematic background! • Investigating acrylic chamber for inner cryostat (Kevin Graham) • Could possibly use Copper cryostat Internal backgrounds (impurities in LAr) • Will use gas purification and cold charcoal traps • In-situ assay of internal backgrounds with DEAP-1 Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Neutron active veto (conceptual) Note: thermal neutron capture cross-section on Ar: 675 mbarn Active

Neutron active veto (conceptual) Note: thermal neutron capture cross-section on Ar: 675 mbarn Active neutron veto LAr Vacuum region n • Active veto can mitigate internal and external low-energy (a, n) neutrons • Relaxes internal (a, n) requirements • Possible overlap with SNO+ for liquid scintillator active veto Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Optimizing optics for DEAP-1 elg epmt “Toy” optics model a Y 0 = 0.

Optimizing optics for DEAP-1 elg epmt “Toy” optics model a Y 0 = 0. 8 = 0. 25 =0 = 40 photons/ke. V Model incorporating reflective losses and absorption: Y=R[1/S-1] elgepmt(1 -a)Y 0 Y = yield [photons/ke. V] R = surface reflectivity S = surface PMT coverage elg = light guiding efficiency epmt = PMT efficiency a = absorption Y 0 = photon production yield Mark Boulay Need real model to map inputs to yield, O(10%) (Kati N. ) DEAP 29/9/05

Short-term activities for DEAP-1 at Queen’s • Develop optical model for use in chamber

Short-term activities for DEAP-1 at Queen’s • Develop optical model for use in chamber and light guide design, test model in the lab: GEANT 4 simulation for optics Most parts ordered for light guide/reflectivity tests using a-scintillation in gaseous argon (~1 month to parts? ) • Design cryostat for proper cooling and background requirements for 10 kg detector and for optics/background tests with LAr • Inner chamber R&D (acrylic versus copper versus stainless) • Design and construction of clean room Once these are in place, design and build clean 10 kg experiment (DEAP-1) Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

DEAP-1 Timeline and SNOLab • Currently designing cryostat, selecting components • Clean room being

DEAP-1 Timeline and SNOLab • Currently designing cryostat, selecting components • Clean room being constructed at Queen’s • Plan is to construct and commission DEAP-1 at Queens O(6 months) • Calibration & verification of PSD above ground, spring/summer 2006 • Seek “early” SNOLab space Fall 2006 for UG running • 10 -44 cm 2 with one year livetime Funding for DEAP-1 is in place with CFI/startup grant from Queen’s and LANL LDRD support O(750 K total) • Philosophy is to design DEAP-1 so that scaling to DEAP-3 is feasible, x 100 improvement in background required Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Response of SNOLab Experiment Advisory Committee to DEAP: “Very interesting and recent technical developments

Response of SNOLab Experiment Advisory Committee to DEAP: “Very interesting and recent technical developments using LAr provide the possibility for a conceptually simple and relatively inexpensive route to a large-scale detector. Given existing funds and plan to go forward, we strongly encourage submission of a technical proposal for DEAP-1. ” -SNOLab EAC recommendations, August 2005 meeting Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05

Conclusions • DEAP-0 (1 kg) succesfully executed at LANL • Demonstrated discrimination using PSD

Conclusions • DEAP-0 (1 kg) succesfully executed at LANL • Demonstrated discrimination using PSD only in LAr • Currently designing DEAP-1 (10 kg) for construction at Queen’s • Possibly ready for deployment in early SNOLab space (Sept 2006) 10 -44 cm 2 sensitivity with 1 live-year, 10 ke. V threshold • Funding for DEAP-1 in place, CFI/startup + LANL LDRD Opportunity for hardware design, analysis, Monte-Carlo simulation, underground experiment deployment and running experience, and …potential Discovery of New Physics beyond the new Standard Model… on the timescale of a Ph. D Mark Boulay DEAP 29/9/05