Current State of Surgical Training William Allum Chair

  • Slides: 41
Download presentation
Current State of Surgical Training William Allum Chair, Joint Committee of Surgical Training

Current State of Surgical Training William Allum Chair, Joint Committee of Surgical Training

Current Issues l l l Profile of Surgical Training – – Shape of Training

Current Issues l l l Profile of Surgical Training – – Shape of Training Opportunity to improve Workforce Credentialling – Trainers Generic Professional Capabilities Simulation v 10 - ISCP / e Logbook Surgeon Outcomes Budget

Shape of Training l An agreement between – – – – Medical Education England

Shape of Training l An agreement between – – – – Medical Education England Academy of Medical Royal Colleges GMC Council of Postgraduate Medical Deans Medical Schools Council NHS Education Scotland NHS Education Northern Ireland NHS Education Wales

Key broad recommendations l l l Service requires Doctors with more general skills Requirement

Key broad recommendations l l l Service requires Doctors with more general skills Requirement for Specialists remains Training – to CST within 6 years Credentialing for specific competencies Training must be more flexible and respond to patient/service needs Blurring the primary/ secondary care interface

Issues No extra money Cost of Credentialling? What is the level of CST? Blurring

Issues No extra money Cost of Credentialling? What is the level of CST? Blurring of primary / secondary care interface Generalist and Specialist Issues Service reconfiguration - Future of DGH?

What has Happened? l UK-wide implementation group, chaired by Professor Ian Finlay (2014) l

What has Happened? l UK-wide implementation group, chaired by Professor Ian Finlay (2014) l Division of the report into six workstreams (Autumn 2014) l Workstreams fed back to the implementation group l Report to 4 DH Ministers (Winter 2014/15) l 4 DH Ministers Statement (February 2015) l Implementation Group extended

Workshops l General themes and progression to CST l Primary – secondary care interface

Workshops l General themes and progression to CST l Primary – secondary care interface l Interaction with employers l Issues relating to SAS doctors l Academic pathway l Credentialing

What has Happened? l UK-wide implementation group, chaired by Professor Ian Finlay (2014) l

What has Happened? l UK-wide implementation group, chaired by Professor Ian Finlay (2014) l Division of the report into six workstreams (Autumn 2014) l Workstreams fed back to the implementation group l Report to 4 DH Ministers (Winter 2014/15) l 4 DH Ministers Statement (February 2015) Implementation Group extended (Spring 2015) l

DH Statement 1. Implementation in an incremental fashion to minimize service disruption (short and

DH Statement 1. Implementation in an incremental fashion to minimize service disruption (short and medium term ) 2. Preserve current fit for purpose structures 3. Continue the UK Steering Group supported by 4 Nation Implementation Groups 4. Commission an impact assessment to report by summer 2015 5. Implement the recommendation that the careers of SAS doctors should be enhanced. 6. Pilot credentialing (eg cosmetic surgery) 7. Seek draft descriptions of training pathways to include CST within 6 years and credentialing for each theme

What might the implications be for craft specialties? l l l Relatively little Broad

What might the implications be for craft specialties? l l l Relatively little Broad disciplines will remain Training will be general enough to permit most doctors to participate in and treat emergency patients Specialist interest will remain Some sub-specialist activities will be credentialed

What might the implications be for craft specialties? Training • Fewer trainers but better

What might the implications be for craft specialties? Training • Fewer trainers but better recognition • More use of simulation techniques • Immersion training • Competency based rather than time based • Training to enter team structures • ? Formal mentoring after CST

Strategy for Change in Surgical Training l Opportunity for Surgery l Improve quality of

Strategy for Change in Surgical Training l Opportunity for Surgery l Improve quality of teaching and training – commitment from LEPs l Time for training and supervision l Rota review for emergency service provision l Role of Allied Healthcare Professional workforce

Improving Early Years Training Better preparation in foundation Longer placements Better and more simulation

Improving Early Years Training Better preparation in foundation Longer placements Better and more simulation Apprentice style training Adjusted service role Broader based training Improve d quality of core training Changed structure of surgical team

Improving Surgical Training What are the Objectives l To improve quality of surgical care

Improving Surgical Training What are the Objectives l To improve quality of surgical care l To improve the quality of surgical training

HEE Perspective Define the Service Define the Team composition Define the role of the

HEE Perspective Define the Service Define the Team composition Define the role of the Consultant Define the Training Programme

Process Induction High Volume, Low Risk Low Volume, High Risk • • • Modular

Process Induction High Volume, Low Risk Low Volume, High Risk • • • Modular • High level of support and supervision • Day Unit, Surgical Assessment Unit, Emergency theatre etc • Supplemented by refreshers • Modular • More independent • Supplemented by refreshers Intensive Boot camp Simulation Human factors

Basic Surgical Skills • Modular • To include EGS, Urology, Paediatric surgery, Critical care,

Basic Surgical Skills • Modular • To include EGS, Urology, Paediatric surgery, Critical care, Vascular Run Through, Competence Based, MRCS required for progression Emergency General Surgery • Modular • To Include UGI, LGI National selection Post CCT Training • UGI • Colorectal • HPB

Contemporary Challenges to Delivery of Surgical Simulation

Contemporary Challenges to Delivery of Surgical Simulation

Framework for Technology Enhanced Learning

Framework for Technology Enhanced Learning

Simulation - Drivers l Clinical Experience l Change in working practices l EWTR l

Simulation - Drivers l Clinical Experience l Change in working practices l EWTR l Technological and Scientific advances l Efficacy of Simulation

Challenges Human Resources l Trained Faculty – – – l Design curriculum Provide structured

Challenges Human Resources l Trained Faculty – – – l Design curriculum Provide structured feedback Role model Time for Training – – Service vs Training Patient safety demands on trained surgeons

Challenges Educational Strategy l Structured curriculum – – – l Trainee clinic time vs

Challenges Educational Strategy l Structured curriculum – – – l Trainee clinic time vs simulation time – l Learning outcomes Assessment instruments Formative and summative feedback SDL Trainee Awareness

JCST Survey l In this post, did you receive simulation and clinical skills training?

JCST Survey l In this post, did you receive simulation and clinical skills training?

Availability of Simulation by Deanery Yes No N/A East Midlands 42. 1% 36. 3%

Availability of Simulation by Deanery Yes No N/A East Midlands 42. 1% 36. 3% 21. 5% East of England 44. 4% 38. 5% 17. 1% KSS 65. 4% 27. 5% 7. 1% London 51. 1% 32. 6% 16. 3% North West Mersey 35. 9% 45. 9% 18. 2% North West 40. 3% 19. 4% Northern East 65. 4% 19. 8% 14. 8% N Ireland 27. 4% 48. 0% 24. 6% Scotland 41. 0% 39. 8% 19. 2% South West 32. 9% 47. 8% 19. 3% Thames Valley 48. 6% 37. 0% 14. 4% Wales 38. 9% 44. 3% 16. 8% Wessex 36. 0% 42. 5% 21. 5% West Midlands 39. 1% 38. 3% 22. 6% Yorkshire / Humber 58. 3% 29. 8% 11. 9% TOTAL 46. 0% 36. 5% 17. 5%

Availability of Simulation by Specialty Cardiothoracic Surgery Yes No N/A 60. 3% 23. 3%

Availability of Simulation by Specialty Cardiothoracic Surgery Yes No N/A 60. 3% 23. 3% 16. 4% Core 49. 8% 36. 7% 13. 5% General Surgery 40. 7% 43. 8% 15. 5% Neurosurgery Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 33. 6% 43. 4% 23. 0% 27. 5% 30. 8% 41. 7% Otolaryngology 57. 6% 23. 5% 18. 9% Paediatric Surgery 57. 6% 34. 9% 7. 5% Plastic Surgery Trauma and Orthopaedic 41. 9% 36. 9% 21. 2% 44. 7% 34. 0% 21. 3% Urology 53. 4% 30. 1% 16. 5% Vascular Surgery 58. 3% 41. 7% 0. 00%

Challenges Logistics l l l Task and Procedural Simulators Space for hardware Space for

Challenges Logistics l l l Task and Procedural Simulators Space for hardware Space for learners Funds to support and maintain Centralised resources Sharing resources

ISCP – What’s it for? Curriculum Tells you what you need to know Guide

ISCP – What’s it for? Curriculum Tells you what you need to know Guide to learning Personal study Teaching Informal assessment Feedback Formal Assessment Guides learning Provides structure Improves feedback Improves training Records outcomes

ISCP v 10 l First ever complete re-write l Faster Better prepared for future

ISCP v 10 l First ever complete re-write l Faster Better prepared for future developments l l l Planned for July / August release Beta version available now

ISCP v 10 l Web design Navigation Features l Content l l Easier to

ISCP v 10 l Web design Navigation Features l Content l l Easier to use More intuitive Simpler appearance Quicker Improve feedback Reduce tick box culture To improve training and learning To meet objectives of ISCP evaluation v 10 aims to keep ahead of the field l

http: //v 10 beta. iscp. ac. uk

http: //v 10 beta. iscp. ac. uk

Learning Agreement l l Central feature Planning of objectives Review of progress Simpler to

Learning Agreement l l Central feature Planning of objectives Review of progress Simpler to complete – – – Logical No longer needs downloading of topics BUT Evidence will still be linked to topics

Improved WBAs l Emphasis on feedback l Structured free text at the top –

Improved WBAs l Emphasis on feedback l Structured free text at the top – Strengths – Weaknesses – Actions l Anonymous assessment of trainer quality l Reflective record

Supervisor Reports l Clinical supervisor l Educational supervisor l Structured feedback – 9 domains:

Supervisor Reports l Clinical supervisor l Educational supervisor l Structured feedback – 9 domains: knowledge, clinical skills. . . – Performance descriptors for each – Free text and performance grade for each domain

GMC Developments l Generic Professional Capabilities l Standards for Training l Equality and Diversity

GMC Developments l Generic Professional Capabilities l Standards for Training l Equality and Diversity Guidance for Curricula and Assessment l Standards for Curricula and Assessment

Generic Professional Capabilities l Generic Professional Capabilities – – – Effective communication Leadership, team

Generic Professional Capabilities l Generic Professional Capabilities – – – Effective communication Leadership, team working, improving quality and patient safety Complex and vulnerable groups Education and training Research

Generic Professional Capabilities l Generic Professional Skills – – l Practical skills Clinical skills

Generic Professional Capabilities l Generic Professional Skills – – l Practical skills Clinical skills Generic Professional Knowledge – NHS structure

JCST Budget

JCST Budget

JCST Finances Source Amount (£) Trainee fee 1, 203, 048 GMC – for CESR

JCST Finances Source Amount (£) Trainee fee 1, 203, 048 GMC – for CESR work* 129, 737 Total external income 1, 332, 785 Funding of JCST 2013 -14

JCST Finances Outgoings of JCST (by JCST function) 2013 -14 Function Trainee enrolment and

JCST Finances Outgoings of JCST (by JCST function) 2013 -14 Function Trainee enrolment and certification ISCP QA CESR – equivalence work Expenditure (£) 1, 421, 893 109, 082

JCST Finances Area of Spending Amount (£) Staff 821, 000 Honoraria 70, 000 Travel

JCST Finances Area of Spending Amount (£) Staff 821, 000 Honoraria 70, 000 Travel 23, 000 Catering and AV 30, 000 Office Costs 14, 000 Accommodation, service and other charges 573, 000 Overall total 1, 531, 000 Outgoings of JCST by Type of Spending 2013 -14