MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC PANCREATITIS R A

  • Slides: 35
Download presentation
MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC PANCREATITIS R. A. Singh MD FRCPC AGAF Clinical Assistant

MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC PANCREATITIS R. A. Singh MD FRCPC AGAF Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, UBC

Disclosures • Speaker honorarium from: Takeda Abbvie Janssen Pentax • Clinical Research Funds Celgene

Disclosures • Speaker honorarium from: Takeda Abbvie Janssen Pentax • Clinical Research Funds Celgene Gilead Takeda Janssen No financial disclosures for this specific talk

Learning Objectives • Distinguish the pathophysiology, complications and management between acute and chronic pancreatitis

Learning Objectives • Distinguish the pathophysiology, complications and management between acute and chronic pancreatitis • Distinguish between the in- patient management between acute and chronic pancreatitis

Introduction • Acute Pancreatitis (AP) and Chronic Pancreatitis(CP) are two distinct disease states •

Introduction • Acute Pancreatitis (AP) and Chronic Pancreatitis(CP) are two distinct disease states • Most common cause of AP is gallstones and alcohol • Less common cause include hyperlipidemia, hypercalcemia, celiac disease, autoimmune, drugs • Chronic Pancreatitis is rarely dealt with in hospital • CP is usually caused by alcohol • Smoking is an independent risk factor for CP progression

Pathophysiology • Acute pancreatitis is caused by acute inflammation of the pancreatic parenchyma •

Pathophysiology • Acute pancreatitis is caused by acute inflammation of the pancreatic parenchyma • Acute inflammation can lead to systemic inflammatory response syndrome ( SIRS) • SIRS can lead to respiratory depression, renal failure and hypovolemic shock • Sepsis is typically caused by transmural lumenal bacterial migration

Pathophysiology • Chronic pancreatitis is caused by chronic inflammation and fibrosis • This damage

Pathophysiology • Chronic pancreatitis is caused by chronic inflammation and fibrosis • This damage can lead to exocrine dysfunction ( diarrhea) or endocrine dysfunction ( diabetes) and cancer • Pain is common • Acute on chronic pancreatitis is caused by acute parenchymal inflammation on the background of CP • This leads to self limited abdominal pain and short stays in hospital • Serious acute complications are rare

Case 1 • 35 year old woman presents with 24 h of epigastric pain,

Case 1 • 35 year old woman presents with 24 h of epigastric pain, emesis • History of alcohol abuse ( 1 bottle vodka/d) • No meds • T 36. 8, P 92, BP 147/92, RR 15 Sa. O 2 95% on Rm air • Tender in Epigastrium • JVP difficult to see • Chest clear • WBC, 19. 4, HGB 175, urea 4. 9, Cr 80, GLU 8, Ca 2. 20, LFTs N, Lipase 620 • Diagnosis : Acute Alcoholic Pancreatitis

CT: Normal Pancreas

CT: Normal Pancreas

Case 1

Case 1

Case 1 Initial resuscitation should be aggressive 250 -300 cc/h Monitor urine output CIWA

Case 1 Initial resuscitation should be aggressive 250 -300 cc/h Monitor urine output CIWA protocol Avoid excessive analgesics/sedation DVT Prophylaxis Practical Nursing Issues: Wide range narcotics dangerous Monitor urine output (poorly done) Monitor Resp/ O 2 saturations Check for DVT prophylaxis

Case 1 ( 12 h post admission) • Patient has been on the ward

Case 1 ( 12 h post admission) • Patient has been on the ward for 2 h • Urine output 50 cc/hr • Pain under control. BP/P stable. RR 22/min Sa. O 2 92% • No evidence of withdrawal • Concerns? • RR is increased , Sa. O 2 decreased • Next steps • Notify MRP, ABG, CXR, increase O 2 • CXR shows bilateral pleural effusions and evidence of pulmonary edema • ABG( Room Air) p. H 7. 32 PO 2 60, PCO 2 55 BE 6

Case 1 • ICU asked to assess • Patient brought to ICU for observation

Case 1 • ICU asked to assess • Patient brought to ICU for observation • Patient continues to deteriorate in ICU and is intubated within 2 hr of admission to ICU ( 16 h post admission) • Practical Nursing Issues: AP patients can deteriorate quickly, changes in respiratory status can be subtle

Case 1 • Severity of Pancreatitis difficult to assess on admission • Number of

Case 1 • Severity of Pancreatitis difficult to assess on admission • Number of Scoring Models to assess Severity • Ranson’s Criteria is the most commonly used : • Admission Age >55 WBC >16, 000 GLU > 11 LDH >350 AST >250 48 h Fall in HCT >10% Increase BUN>1. 98 Ca < 2 mmol p. O 2 <60 mm. Hg BE>4 Fluid Seq>6 L Severe Pancreatitis greater or equal to 3

Case 1 • Radiographic Evidence of Necrosis, Significant Peripancreatitic edema/fluid indicate severe pancreatitis •

Case 1 • Radiographic Evidence of Necrosis, Significant Peripancreatitic edema/fluid indicate severe pancreatitis • Admission CT may not show necrosis or significant peripancreatic edema

Case 1 (72 h Post Admission)

Case 1 (72 h Post Admission)

Case 1 • Severe Pancreatitis based on Ranson’s Criteria and CT • Enteral feeds

Case 1 • Severe Pancreatitis based on Ranson’s Criteria and CT • Enteral feeds should be considered for all patients with severe pancreatitis • Feeding should start by 72 h • NG feeds likely acceptable • Semi elemental feeds

Case 1: Role for ERCP? • ERCP indicated for biliary pancreatitis with jaundice, dilated

Case 1: Role for ERCP? • ERCP indicated for biliary pancreatitis with jaundice, dilated biliary tree, ascending cholangitis • If risk for stone is low or moderate, less invasive imaging with MRCP or EUS indicated first

ERCP (CBD Stones)

ERCP (CBD Stones)

EUS (for CBD stones)

EUS (for CBD stones)

MRCP

MRCP

Case 1 • Patient recovers and is discharged • She represents to hospital 2

Case 1 • Patient recovers and is discharged • She represents to hospital 2 months later with LUQ pain, early satiety and intermittent emesis. VSS; afebrile • Lab work shows a mild increase in lipase, normal WBC • CT shows a large 9 x 6 cm loculated cyst in the lesser sac compressing the stomach • Diagnosis : Pseudocyst

Pancreatic Pseudocyst

Pancreatic Pseudocyst

Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage • Percutaneous Drainage • Endoscopic Drainage ( ERCP v EUS approach)

Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage • Percutaneous Drainage • Endoscopic Drainage ( ERCP v EUS approach) • Surgical

Percutaneous Drainage • Largely historical interest • Used primarily for acutely infected fluid collections

Percutaneous Drainage • Largely historical interest • Used primarily for acutely infected fluid collections • Drainage results poor • Fistula formation

Surgical Drainage • More morbid than endoscopic drainage • Indicated for Complex loculated pseudocysts

Surgical Drainage • More morbid than endoscopic drainage • Indicated for Complex loculated pseudocysts • Indicated for Cysts not causing bulge in the stomach • Indicated for failed drainage procedures

Pseudocyst Drainage (Surgical)

Pseudocyst Drainage (Surgical)

Pseudocyst Drainage ( Endoscopic) • ERCP approach. Needle knife cut followed by placement of

Pseudocyst Drainage ( Endoscopic) • ERCP approach. Needle knife cut followed by placement of double pigtail stents • EUS guided and placement of fully covered metal stent • Echoendoscope is not the ideal scope for pseudocyst draineage

Pseudocyst Drainage (Endoscopic)

Pseudocyst Drainage (Endoscopic)

Pseudocyst (Endoscopic Drainage)

Pseudocyst (Endoscopic Drainage)

Acute Pancreatitis Key Points • First 48 h crucial • Aggressive fluid resuscitation required

Acute Pancreatitis Key Points • First 48 h crucial • Aggressive fluid resuscitation required • Urine output should be monitored • Remember DVT prophylaxis • Beware of respiratory compromise and sepsis • Enteral feeding should be started early in SAP • Pseudocyst drainage can often be managed endoscopically

Case 2 • 43 yo man presents with epigastric pain for weeks. Some nausea.

Case 2 • 43 yo man presents with epigastric pain for weeks. Some nausea. No vomiting. • Vitals stable; afebrile • CBC, lytes, BUN/Cr normal. GLU 10. 5 • Lipase 250 • CT Atrophic Pancreas, Numerous Calcifications in Pancreatic parenchyma. No peripancreatic edema or fluid • Dx Acute exacerbation of CP

Chronic Pancreatitis: Imaging

Chronic Pancreatitis: Imaging

Chronic Pancreatitis: Management • IV fluids and analgesics • Little risk of infection, SIRS

Chronic Pancreatitis: Management • IV fluids and analgesics • Little risk of infection, SIRS or respiratory failure • Symptoms usually settle in a few days • Push for Alcohol and smoking cessation • Complications are typically long term such as pancreatic insufficiency, biliary obstruction and cancer • May be a role for pancreatic enzymes for pain control • Minimal role for EUS guided celiac plexus blockade

Chronic Pancreatitis: Risk of Cancer • Well documented increased risk • No surveillance guidelines

Chronic Pancreatitis: Risk of Cancer • Well documented increased risk • No surveillance guidelines • Tumour is often difficult to distinguish from focal chronic pancreatitis

Chronic Pancreatitis: Key Points • Hospitalized patients follow a benign course • Management is

Chronic Pancreatitis: Key Points • Hospitalized patients follow a benign course • Management is largely supportive • Priority is to eliminate triggers ( e. g. alcohol and smoking) • Pancreatic enzymes can be used to treat pain or steatorrhea