ETCulvert Design and Rating of Precast Culverts ACPA
- Slides: 80
ETCulvert Design and Rating of Precast Culverts ACPA Pipe School February 14, 2014 Houston, TX Roy Eriksson, P. E. Brian Barngrover, P. E.
Roy Eriksson, PE n Roy L. Eriksson, P. E. , is President of Eriksson Technologies, Inc. Based in Tampa with a branch office in Denver, Eriksson specializes in engineering software development and the rendering of consulting engineering services to the precast/prestressed concrete and highway bridge markets. Roy has over 25 yrs experience in structural engineering with extensive design and detailing experience in precast/pretensioned, CIP post-tensioned, spliced girder, cable-stayed and steel bridges. 2
Brian Barngrover, PE n Brian Barngrover, P. E. , is Vice-President of Eriksson Technologies, Inc. Brian is in charge of software development at Eriksson Technologies. He has over 30 years experience in software development for the engineering community, along with experience in engineering design for the precast/prestressed concrete market. Brian began his career at a major precast/prestressed concrete fabricator gaining firsthand experience in all aspects of the design, detailing, and fabrication of precast concrete. 3
Agenda 8: 00 am 10: 35 am 11: 30 am Welcome 1. Overview of AASHTO LRFD 2. Culvert Design by LRFD 3. ETCulvert Overview 4. Interface Walk-thru Break 5. Common Design Questions 6. Advanced Topics 7. Questions 4
Agenda 1. Overview of AASHTO LRFD 2. Culvert Design by LRFD 3. ETCulvert Overview 4. Interface Walk-thru 5. Common Design Questions 6. Advanced Topics 7. Questions 5
Objective of LRFD To provide a comprehensive and consistent Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification. This code was calibrated to obtain uniform reliability (a measure of safety) at the strength limit state for all materials 6
Limit State “A condition beyond which the bridge or component of the bridge fails to satisfy the provisions for which it was designed. ” 7
Basis of LRFD Methodology All limit states shall satisfy: h S g i Q i £ f Rn = R r where: h = Load modifier (= h. D h. R h. I > 0. 95) gi = Load factors Qi = Force effects f = Resistance factors Rn = Nominal resistance Rr = Factored resistance 8
Ductility (h. D = Du /Dy ) • Property of component or connection which allows inelastic response • Varies (h. D= 0. 95/1. 05) for strength limit states only; h. D=1. 00 for all other limit states • Components and Connections • Static and Dynamic 9
Redundancy • Ability to support applied loads following the loss of a main loadcarrying member • Varies (h. R = 0. 95/1. 05) for strength limit states only; h. R=1. 00 for all other limit states • Failure-Critical (Nonredundant, h. R=1. 05) • Nonfailure-Critical (Redundant, h. R=0. 95) 10
Operational Importance • Operation of structure critical or essential for social, survival or security reasons • Varies (h. I = 0. 95/1. 05) for strength and extreme event limit states only; h. I=1. 00 for all other limit states • Consequential factor, not physical factor 11
Limit States Service: Stress, deformation, and cracking n Fatigue and Fracture: Limit cracking n Strength: Strength and stability n Extreme Event: Period of return greater n than life of structure (e. g. , crash barrier) 12
Service Limit States I: Normal operational use of bridge. II: Control yielding of steel structures and slip of connections due to live load. III: Tension in prestressed concrete superstructures. IV: Tension in prestressed concrete substructures. 13
Fatigue and Fracture Limit State Loading combination for repetitive gravitational vehicular live load and dynamic responses under a single design truck. Not for use in buried structures. 14
Strength Limit State I: III: IV: V: Normal operational use of bridge without wind load Special design vehicles without wind Wind velocity > 55 mph Very high dead load to live load ratios Normal vehicular use of bridge with 55 mph wind velocity 15
Extreme Event Limit State I: Earthquake n II: Vehicular and vessel collision n 16
Loads 17
Loads 18
Loads n Permanent Loads n Transient Loads - Dead Loads: DC, DW - Earth Loads: EH, EV, ES - Live Load • Vehicular (e. g. , HL 93, permit, etc. ): LL, IM, CV • Live load surcharge: LS - Water Load: WA 19
Limit States for Culverts n Strength n Service n Extreme Event n Fatigue – Not for box culverts - Flexure of members (i. e. , slabs, walls) - Transverse Shear (i. e. , slabs, walls) - Stresses in rebar (i. e. , crack control) - Deflections (single cells, top slab only) - Not in ETCulvert - But might need to be assessed 20
Load Combinations Recall that all limit states shall satisfy: h S g i Q i £ f Rn = R r 21
Load Combinations 22
Load Combinations 23
Questions? 24
Agenda 1. Overview of AASHTO LRFD 2. Culvert Design by LRFD 3. ETCulvert Overview 4. Interface Walk-thru 5. Example Problem 6. Advanced Topics 7. Questions 25
Structural Modeling 4 -Sided, Single. Cell (Box) 3 -Sided Frame 26
Structural Modeling One-foot wide strip of culvert is used for structural analysis n Dead and live loads are distributed to this strip n All results are therefore on a per foot basis n 27
Loads n Permanent Loads n Transient Loads - Self-Weight: DC - Future Wearing: DW - Earth Loads: EH, EV, ES - Live Load • • Vehicular (e. g. , HL 93, permit, etc. ): LL, IM, CV Live load surcharge: LS - Water Load: WA 28
Loads 29
Structural Analysis Structure analyzed using stiffness method (3 D space frame) n Analysis performed using unfactored loads n Load combinations assembled based on applicable Limit States n 30
Structural Analysis Addition to the 2013 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 31
Must Assess/Check: Flexure n Shear n Stresses in Rebar n Deflections n 32
Flexural Strength n Must satisfy: M r = Mn ≥ M u P-M interaction is optional n Minimum steel n 33
Shear Strength n Must satisfy: V r = Vn ≥ V u Where: Vn = Vc + Vs 34
Computing Vc n Box Culverts - Fills ≥ 2’ • Use 5. 14. 5. 2 for slabs • Use 5. 8. 3 for walls - Thickness ≥ 16” or member is in tension: 5. 8. 3. 4. 2 - Thickness < 16”: 5. 8. 3. 4. 1 - Fills < 2’ • Use 5. 8. 3 for all members n 3 -Sided Structures - For all fill depths: • Use 5. 8. 3 for all members 35
LRFD 5. 14. 5. 3 36
5. 8. 3 Sectional Model Two Methods to Compute Resistance: n 5. 8. 3. 4. 1: Simplified Method (constant b) n 5. 8. 3. 4. 2: General Procedure 37
Simplified Method (constant b) 38
General Procedure New approach to shear design n Modified Compression Field Theory (MCFT) n MCFT new to U. S. , but used in Canada for a number of years n Based on variable-angle truss analogy n Assumes diagonally-cracked beam can be idealized as a truss at the strength limit state n 39
Shear Design Procedure Must assure: Vn = V r > V u Vn = Vc + Vs + Vp < 0. 25 f’cbvdv + Vp where, Vc = 0. 0316 b ( fc’)0. 5 bvdv Vs = (Avfy/s)dvcotq Vp = Vertical component of prestress force 40
Computation of Vc: Direct Method n Appendix B 5 n 41
Compute Vc: (App. B 5) 1. Compute v/fc’ 2. Assume value of q 3. Compute ex 4. Knowing v/fc’ and ex, look up new value of q 5. If new q ¹ old q, go to Step 3. 6. When value of q converges, b is now known 7. Compute Vc 42
Concrete Shear Stress (v) Shear stress on the concrete is computed by: 43
Tensile Steel Strain (ex) where, 44
Table 5. 8. 3. 4. 2 -1: Values of q and b for Sections with Transverse Reinforcement. 45
Compute Av Knowing Vc , compute required Vs: = V u/ - V c - V p n But, Vs = (Avfydvcotq)/s n So, solve for required Av n Check minimum Av n 46
Crack Control n LRFD 5. 7. 3. 4 47
Distribution Reinforcement n LRFD 9. 7. 3. 2 48
Shrinkage & Temperature n 4 -Sided (Boxes) n 3 -Sided - LRFD 5. 10. 8 - LRFD 12. 14. 5. 8 49
Deflections Single-Cell, 3 -Sided Frames n Top Slab n Limit: n - L/800 - L/1000 - Or user defined 50
Load Rating Culverts 51
Load Rating of Buried Concrete Structures 52
Overview of Load Rating Process LRFR Philosophy n Rating Levels n - Design load rating - Legal load rating - Permit load rating n Rating Levels for HL-93 n General Load Rating Equations - Inventory - Operating 53
Rating Levels Design load rating n Legal load rating n Permit load rating n 54
Rating Levels for HL-93 n Inventory n Operating - b = 3. 5 - LL factor = 1. 75 - b = 2. 5 - LL factor = 1. 35 55
General Load Rating Equation 56
Limit States for Culvert Rating 57
Load Rating Example in MBE 58
Questions? 59
Agenda 1. Overview of AASHTO LRFD 2. Culvert Design by LRFD 3. ETCulvert Overview 4. Interface Walk-thru 5. Common Design Questions 6. Advanced Topics 7. Questions 60
ETCulvert Concrete Culvert Design in Accordance with AASHTO LRFD Specifications 61
ETCulvert Scope Handles both 3 - and 4 -sided culverts n 1 to 4 cells n Includes both US Customary and Metric (SI) Units n Supports: n § LRFD 5 th Edition § STND 17 th Edition § AREMA 2010 Edition 62
ETCulvert Scope Allows use of either rebar or mesh n Optional shear steel n User-definable truck library n Automatic load ratings (LRFR or LFD) n Integrated 3 D analysis engine n 63
ETCulvert Scope On-line help n Comprehensive user manual n Long-hand solutions n Detailed QC manual n 64
ETCulvert Architecture Comprehensive Menus n Windows standard toolbar n Four output views n All written in C# n. NET Framework n 65
Comprehensive Menus Standard Windows menus n All program options available through menus n 66
Windows Standard Toolbar 67
Main View 68
Text Report 69
Results Graphs 70
3 D Rendering 71
Overview of the Design Process n ETCulvert has 2 Modes of Operation § Design Mode § Fully automatic parametric mode § Member thicknesses calculated or fixed § Generates size and spacing of reinforcement § Analysis Mode § All dimensions are under the control of the user § All reinforcement is modifiable 72
Design Mode Automatically size members n Automatically select reinforcement n 73
Analysis Mode Assign member sizes n Change any reinforcement type/spacing n 74
2 D sketches and text report show current status of design 75
Parametric process continuously updates the design 76
Moving Load Analysis Any number of axles n Variable axle spacing and weights n Patterned lane load n Combination of truck and lane load n Dedicated tandem load available n 77
Reinforcement types supported n n Mild rebar – Standard bar sizes Mesh: - Smooth - Deformed 78
Critical Section Checks Detailed tables for both flexural and shear critical sections n Can include effect of haunches in determining location of critical section n Automatically includes ratings, both inventory and operating n 79
Questions? 80
- Hec-ras deck roadway data editor
- Etculvert
- Acpa land acknowledgement
- Protocole acpa
- Riset rating dan non rating
- Precast concrete utility vaults
- "precast pipe"
- Hollow core slab connection details
- Admixtures
- Concrete veneer panels
- Parapet wall construction detail
- Precast concrete toilet structures
- Precast concrete brisbane
- Precast sound wall
- Osha concrete and masonry construction
- Precast
- Precast aerated concrete
- M&m precast
- Precast roof nd
- Precast concrete dog leg staircases
- Vendor rating advantages and disadvantages
- Interconnect billing solution
- Rating scales and rubrics
- Pilot testing in performance management
- Nqs assessment
- Emotional rating scale
- What is form in system analysis and design
- Grid controlled x ray tube
- Sil rating table
- Workday performance rating scale
- Ama impairment rating chart
- Value questions examples
- 5 point scale examples
- Learning space rating system
- Ama impairment rating chart
- Supports intensity scale rating key
- Texas assessment.gov/telpastrainingcenter
- Individual performance contract rating (ipcr) form
- Ssis-rs
- Summated rating
- Ska rating
- Synthetic rating cost of debt
- Heathrow elementary school
- Predictive prioritization
- Va ptsd rating scale pdf
- Graphic rating scale example
- Graphic rating scale
- A 540 degree appraisal involves evaluation by
- Forced distribution method
- Bars rating scale
- Palin parent rating scale
- Behaviorally anchored rating scale
- Credit rating scale
- Gross rating points
- Contoh skala penilaian grafis
- Latent aspect rating analysis
- Latent aspect rating analysis
- Jenis skala psikologi
- Fire suppression rating schedule
- Example of semantic differential scale
- Graphic rating scale method
- Esrb rating font
- Which rating star is given by griha for points 71-80
- Graphic rating scale method
- Layout planning and design
- Fuse rating
- Presentation rating scale
- Ip rating scale
- Schedule 40 pressure rating
- Tanner staging male
- Direct behavior ratings
- Credit rating spread table
- Credit rating
- Computer organization & architecture: themes and variations
- Wright's classification of behaviour
- A rating error occurs
- Behaviorally anchored rating scale
- Palin parent rating scale
- Evaluation of sales force
- Performance levels
- Disadvantages of bell curve in performance appraisal