Determinants of Credit Default Swap Spread Evidence from

Determinants of Credit Default Swap Spread: Evidence from the Japanese Credit Derivative Market

Agenda Introduction Data Regression Analysis Robustness Check Conclusion

Introduction CDS Market Overview In the left-hand panel of this Graph , Remolona and Shim (2008) shows that Asia-Pacific names comprise almost a quarter of all those traded around the world In right-hand panel, for a breakdown by economy within the region, this list shows a total of 921 names. Japan has the greatest number of names in Asia-Pacific. we consider Japan play an important role in the Asia-Pacific area. Therefore, it is of interest to study credit spread determinants on Japan dataset, The current study fills the gap in the literature by examining CDS spread in Japan market.

Introduction Level Credit Spread of Economic Model Data Difference Regression Analysis Robustness Check Conclusion

Credit Spread Dynamics Structured Model Black and Scholes(1973) Merton(1974) Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein, and Martin(2001) Structured Model Reduce-form Model • Default Intensity process Firm value process Ericsson, Jacobs, and Oviedo(2005) • Leverage level • Volatility • Default Prob. • Recovery Rate • Risk-free Rate In this paper, we apply the structure model to the empirical examination of the Japanese CDS market, because it obviously describes the default mechanism and enables us to analyze the relationship between credit spread and financial and macroeconomic variables. Credit Spread On the other hand, a reduced-form model assumes that a default process is unobservable and a latent factor known as default intensity determines the probability of default. CDS Spread

Brief summary of Credit Spread Drivers Leverage level Volatility Risk-free Rate Macroeconomic Factors + + ? Credit Spread • First, The higher leverage of a firm, the higher probability of default. • Second, increasing volatility will increase the default probability. • Third, the risk-free rate determines the risk-adjusted drift of firm value and thus an increase in the risk-free rate tends to decrease risk-adjusted default probabilities. • There is a negative relation between risk-free rate and credit spread.

Data Requirement of Dataset: cds spread from Markit Group 180 -day historical volatility , leverage ratio from PACAP database. Risk-Free Rate: Weekly data on 2 -year Japan government bond yields are collected from Datastream database. Observed firm: At least 252 observations of CDS Spread 106 Japanese firms from Markit Group database Data Period : January 2001 to December 2004

Regression Analysis Dependent Variable CDS Spread Level CDS Spread difference in a period Explanatory Variables We run univariate and multivariate regressions for the CDS spread and CDS Spread difference on explanatory variables based on theory of the main determinants of credit spread. We further separate the whole sample into sub-samples by various criteria. For example by credit rating, different sample period, and financial and non-financial industries. In general, our findings remain robust after controlling these various criteria. Leverage: Historical Volatility: Sampling from 180 daily return of stock price in a shifting window Risk-free Rate: weekly data on 2 -year Japan Government Bond Yield Square of Risk-free Rate: To Capture potential nonlinear effect for Risk-free Rate Slope of yield Curve : Difference between 2 -year and 10 -year Japan Government Bond Yield which convey information on economic condition Market Return: Proxy for the overall business climate

Result • Table 1 Cross-sectional summary statistics • Table 2 Empirical results for the whole sample • Table 3 Results partitioned by credit rating • Table 4 Results partitioned by different sub-sample periods (whole 2001 -2004; separate into 2001 -2002 &2003 -2004 ) • Table 5 Results partitioned by financial and nonfinancial industry From Table 3 to 5 , we reports Results partitioned by various criteria.

Table 1 Panel A indicates that there are firms with very high levels of CDS spreads. Panel B shows that financial leverage, firm specific volatility, and the risk-free rate, are more related to the CDS spread.

Table 2 From table 2 to table 6, we have the same table format, In Panel A is for level data and Panel B is for difference data. From table 2 to table 6, Regressions for level data has higher explanatory power over regressions based on difference data. First, we find that the coefficients on leverage are significant and positive. Second, the coefficients on historical volatility are also positively significant. Third, the results on the risk-free rate has a significant negative relation between CDS spread level and risk-free rate.

Table 3 For lower credit rating firms, leverage , historical volatility and risk-free rate are more sensitive to CDS spread than higher credit rating firms. .

Table 4 We find that, in general, the results for the sub-sample periods are very similar to each other and to the whole sample period results. In general, our results in Table 4 suggest that theoretical explanatory variables remain robust to explain the CDS spread for different time periods in Japan.

Table 5 The theoretical variables, such as leverage; historical volatility, and risk-free rate show similar results as the whole sample. However, the results for financial industry show different pattern, compared to non-financial industry, which may be due to unique characteristics of financial firms. In general, our findings remain robust after controlling financial and nonfinancial industry firms.

Robustness Check A robustness check using an alternative approach. Following Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein, and Martin (2001) and Ericsson, Jacobs, and Oviedo (2005), we estimate the coefficients by first running the time-series regressions for each firm Calculate the cross-sectional mean of the estimated coefficients.

Table 6 The results are similar to those in the previous section.

Conclusion This study investigates the determinants of CDS spread for the Japanese market and contributes the literature. Effects of level in leverage and implied volatility on CDS spread are positively significant. A negative relation between risk-free rate and CDS spread. Theoretical determinants perform well in explaining crosssectional variation in the level of CDS spread. Limited explanatory power on the difference 0 f CDS spread. Findings are consistent with theory with statistical significance.