Announcements n Homework n Chapter 4 n n

  • Slides: 53
Download presentation
Announcements n Homework – n Chapter 4 n n 8, 11, 13, 17, 19,

Announcements n Homework – n Chapter 4 n n 8, 11, 13, 17, 19, 22 Chapter 6 n 6, 9, 14, 15 n Exam n Thursday

4 -8 n Meaning of Confidence interval? n Is an interval around the experimental

4 -8 n Meaning of Confidence interval? n Is an interval around the experimental mean that most likely contains the true mean (m).

Homework 4. 11

Homework 4. 11

Question 4 -13. A trainee in a medical lab will be released to work

Question 4 -13. A trainee in a medical lab will be released to work on her own when her results agree with those of an experienced worker at the 95% confidence interval. Results for a blood urea nitrogen analysis are shown …. a) What does abbreviation d. L refer to? d. L = deciliter = 0. 1 L = 100 m. L b) Should the trainee work alone?

Comparison of Means with Student’s t Is there a significant difference? First you must

Comparison of Means with Student’s t Is there a significant difference? First you must ask, is there a significant difference in their standard deviations? NO YES f-test

4 -13. d. L = deciliter = 0. 1 L = 100 m. L

4 -13. d. L = deciliter = 0. 1 L = 100 m. L Ftable = 6. 26 Find spooled and t No difference

ttable = 2. 262 No significant difference between two workers … Therefore trainee should

ttable = 2. 262 No significant difference between two workers … Therefore trainee should be “Released”

Homework 4 -17. If you measure a quantity four times and the standard deviation

Homework 4 -17. If you measure a quantity four times and the standard deviation is 1. 0 % of the average, can you be 90 % confident that the true value is within 1. 2% of the measured average Yes

Homework 4 -19. Hydrocarbons in the cab of an automobile … Do the results

Homework 4 -19. Hydrocarbons in the cab of an automobile … Do the results differ at 95% CL? 99% CL? Ftable ~ 1. 84 Find spooled and t No Difference

Homework The table gives t for 60 degrees of freedom, which is close to

Homework The table gives t for 60 degrees of freedom, which is close to 62. ttable = 1. 671 and 2. 000 at the 90 and 95% CL, respectively. The difference IS significant at both confidence levels.

n 4 -22. Q-test, Is 216 rejectable? n 192, 216, 202, 195, 204 Qtable

n 4 -22. Q-test, Is 216 rejectable? n 192, 216, 202, 195, 204 Qtable = 0. 64 Retain the “outlier” 216

Chapter 6 Chemical Equilibrium

Chapter 6 Chemical Equilibrium

Chemical Equilibrium n n Equilibrium Constant Equilibrium and Thermodynamics n n n n Enthalpy

Chemical Equilibrium n n Equilibrium Constant Equilibrium and Thermodynamics n n n n Enthalpy Entropy Free Energy Le Chatelier’s Principle Solubility product (Ksp) Common Ion Effect Separation by precipitation Complex formation

Example The equilibrium constant for the reaction -14 + K = 1. 0 x

Example The equilibrium constant for the reaction -14 + K = 1. 0 x 10 H 2 O H + OH w NH 3 + H 2 O NH 4+ + OH- KNH 3 = 1. 8 x 10 -5 Find the Equilibrium constant for the following reaction NH 4+ NH 3 + H+ K 3 = ?

Equilibrium and Thermodynamics A brief review …

Equilibrium and Thermodynamics A brief review …

Equilibrium and Thermodynamics enthalpy => H enthalpy change => DH exothermic vs. endothermic entropy

Equilibrium and Thermodynamics enthalpy => H enthalpy change => DH exothermic vs. endothermic entropy => S free energy Gibbs free energy => G Gibbs free energy change => DG

Equilibrium and Thermodynamics DGo = DHo - TDSo DGo = -RT ln (K) K

Equilibrium and Thermodynamics DGo = DHo - TDSo DGo = -RT ln (K) K = e-(DGo/RT)

Equilibrium and Thermodynamics n The case of HCl H+ + Cl- K=? DHo =

Equilibrium and Thermodynamics n The case of HCl H+ + Cl- K=? DHo = -74. 83 x 103 J/mol DS 0 = -130. 4 k. J/mol DGo = DHo - TDSo DGo = (-74. 83 k. J/mol) – (298. 15 K) (-130. 4 k. J/mol) DGo = -35. 97 k. J/mol

Equilibrium and Thermodynamics n The case of HCl H+ + Cl- K=? DGo =

Equilibrium and Thermodynamics n The case of HCl H+ + Cl- K=? DGo = (-74. 83 k. J/mol) – (298. 15 K) (-130. 4 k. J/mol) DGo = -35. 97 k. J/mol

Predicting the direction in which an equilibrium will initially move Le. Chatelier’s Principle and

Predicting the direction in which an equilibrium will initially move Le. Chatelier’s Principle and Reaction Quotient

Le Chatelier's Principle n n If a stress, such as a change in concentration,

Le Chatelier's Principle n n If a stress, such as a change in concentration, pressure, temperature, etc. , is applied to a system at equilibrium, the equilibrium will shift in such a way as to lessen the effect of the stress. Stresses – n n n Adding or removing reactants or products Changing system equilibrium temperature Changing pressure (depends on how the change is accomplished

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12 O 6(s) + 6 O 2(g) Equilibrium moves Right Predict in which direction the equilibrium moves as a result of the following stress: Increasing [CO 2]

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12 O 6(s) + 6 O 2(g) Equilibrium moves Left Predict in which direction the equilibrium moves as a result of the following stress: Increasing [O 2]

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12 O 6(s) + 6 O 2(g) Equilibrium moves Left Predict in which direction the equilibrium moves as a result of the following stress: Decreasing [H 2 O]

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12 O 6(s) + 6 O 2(g) NO CHANGE Predict in which direction the equilibrium moves as a result of the following stress: Removing C 6 H 12 O 6(s) K does not depend on concentration of solid C 6 H 12 O 6

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12 O 6(s) + 6 O 2(g) Equilibrium moves Right Predict in which direction the equilibrium moves as a result of the following stress: Compressing the system System shifts towards the direction which occupies the smallest volume. Fewest moles of gas.

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12

Consider 6 CO 2 (g) + 6 H 2 O(g) C 6 H 12 O 6(s) + 6 O 2(g) Equilibrium moves Right DH = + 2816 k. J Predict in which direction the equilibrium moves as a result of the following stress: Increasing system temperature System is endothermic … heat must go into the system (think of it as a reactant)

Consider this Co. Cl 2 (g) Co (g) + Cl 2(g) K=2. 19 x

Consider this Co. Cl 2 (g) Co (g) + Cl 2(g) K=2. 19 x 10 -10 When [COCl 2] is 3. 5 x 10 -3 M, [CO] is 1. 1 x 10 -5 M, and [Cl 2] is 3. 25 x 10 -6 M is the system at equilibrium? Q= Reaction quotient

Compare Q and K Q = 1. 02 x 10 -8 K = 2.

Compare Q and K Q = 1. 02 x 10 -8 K = 2. 19 x 10 -10 System is not at equilibrium, if it were the ratio would be 2. 19 x 10 -10 When Q>K TOO MUCH PRODUCT TO BE AT EQUILIRBIUM Equilibrium moves to the left Q<K TOO MUCH REACTANT TO BE AT EQUILIRBIUM Equilibrium moves to the Right Q=K System is at Equilibrium

Solubility Product Introduction to Ksp

Solubility Product Introduction to Ksp

Solubility Product solubility-product the product of the solubilities solubility-product constant => Ksp constant that

Solubility Product solubility-product the product of the solubilities solubility-product constant => Ksp constant that is equal to the solubilities of the ions produced when a substance dissolves

Solubility Product In General: A x. B y <=> x. A+y + y. B-x

Solubility Product In General: A x. B y <=> x. A+y + y. B-x [A+y]x [B-x]y K = ------[Ax. By] K = Ksp = [A+y]x [B-x]y

Solubility Product For silver sulfate Ag 2 SO 4 (s) <=> 2 Ag+(aq) +

Solubility Product For silver sulfate Ag 2 SO 4 (s) <=> 2 Ag+(aq) + SO 4 -2(aq) Ksp = [Ag+]2[SO 4 -2]

Solubility of a Precipitate in Pure Water EXAMPLE: How many grams of Ag. Cl

Solubility of a Precipitate in Pure Water EXAMPLE: How many grams of Ag. Cl (fw = 143. 32) can be dissolved in 100. m. L of water at 25 o. C? Ag. Cl <=> Ag+ + Cl. Ksp = [Ag+][Cl-] = 1. 82 X 10 -10 (Appen. F) let x = molar solubility = [Ag+] = [Cl-]

EXAMPLE: How many grams of Ag. Cl (fw = 143. 32) can be dissolved

EXAMPLE: How many grams of Ag. Cl (fw = 143. 32) can be dissolved in 100. m. L of water at 25 o. C? Ag. Cl(s) Initial Change Equilibrium Ag+ (aq) + Cl- (aq) Some - - -x -x +x +x (x)(x) = Ksp = [Ag+][Cl-] = 1. 82 X 10 -10 x = 1. 35 X 10 -5 M

EXAMPLE: How many grams of Ag. Cl (fw = 143. 32) can be dissolved

EXAMPLE: How many grams of Ag. Cl (fw = 143. 32) can be dissolved in 100. m. L of water at 25 o. C? x = 1. 35 X 10 -5 M n How many grams is that in 100 ml? # grams = (M. W. ) (Volume) (Molarity) = 143. 32 g mol-1 (. 100 L) (1. 35 x 10 -5 mol L-1) = 1. 93 X 10 -4 g = 0. 193 mg

The Common Ion Effect

The Common Ion Effect

The Common Ion Effect common ion effect n a salt will be less soluble

The Common Ion Effect common ion effect n a salt will be less soluble if one of its constituent ions is already present in the solution

The Common Ion Effect EXAMPLE: Calculate the molar solubility of Ag 2 CO 3

The Common Ion Effect EXAMPLE: Calculate the molar solubility of Ag 2 CO 3 in a solution that is 0. 0200 M in Na 2 CO 3. Ag 2 CO 3 <=> 2 Ag+ + CO 3 -2 Ksp = [Ag+]2[CO 3 -2] = 8. 1 X 10 -12

EXAMPLE: Calculate the molar solubility of Ag 2 CO 3 in a solution that

EXAMPLE: Calculate the molar solubility of Ag 2 CO 3 in a solution that is 0. 0200 M in Na 2 CO 3. Ag 2 CO 3 <=> 2 Ag+ + CO 3 -2 Initial Change Equilibrium Solid - 0. 0200 M -x Solid +2 x +x 0. 0200+x Ksp = [Ag+]2[CO 3 -2] = 8. 1 X 10 -12 Ksp=(2 x)2(0. 0200 M + x) = 8. 1 X 10 -12 4 x 2(0. 0200 M + x) = 8. 1 X 10 -12

EXAMPLE: Calculate the molar solubility of Ag 2 CO 3 in a solution that

EXAMPLE: Calculate the molar solubility of Ag 2 CO 3 in a solution that is 0. 0200 M in Na 2 CO 3. 4 x 2(0. 0200 M + x) = 8. 1 X 10 -12 no exact solution to a 3 rd order equation, need to make some approximation first, assume the X is very small compared to 0. 0200 M 4 X 2(0. 0200 M) = 8. 1 X 10 -12 X= 1. 0 X 10 -5 M

EXAMPLE: Calculate the molar solubility of Ag 2 CO 3 in a solution that

EXAMPLE: Calculate the molar solubility of Ag 2 CO 3 in a solution that is 0. 0200 M in Na 2 CO 3. X = 1. 0 X 10 -5 M (1. 3 X 10 -4 M in pure water) Second check assumption [CO 3 -2] = 0. 0200 M + X ~ 0. 0200 M + 0. 00001 M ~ 0. 0200 M Assumption is ok!

Separation by Precipitation

Separation by Precipitation

Separation by Precipitation Complete separation can mean a lot … we should define complete.

Separation by Precipitation Complete separation can mean a lot … we should define complete. Complete means that the concentration of the less soluble material has decreased to 1 X 10 -6 M or lower before the more soluble material begins to precipitate

Separation by Precipitation EXAMPLE: Can Fe+3 and Mg+2 be separated quantitatively as hydroxides from

Separation by Precipitation EXAMPLE: Can Fe+3 and Mg+2 be separated quantitatively as hydroxides from a solution that is 0. 10 M in each cation? If the separation is possible, what range of OH- concentrations is permissible. Two competing reactions Fe(OH)3(s) Fe 3+ + 3 OH- Mg(OH)2(s) Mg 2+ + 2 OH-

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? Ksp = [Fe+3][OH-]3 = 2 X 10 -39 Ksp

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? Ksp = [Fe+3][OH-]3 = 2 X 10 -39 Ksp = [Mg+2][OH-]2 = 7. 1 X 10 -12 Assume quantitative separation requires that the concentration of the less soluble material to have decreased to < 1 X 10 -6 M before the more soluble material begins to precipitate.

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? Ksp = [Fe+3][OH-]3 = 2 X 10 -39 Ksp

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? Ksp = [Fe+3][OH-]3 = 2 X 10 -39 Ksp = [Mg+2][OH-]2 = 7. 1 X 10 -12 Assume [Fe+3] = 1. 0 X 10 -6 M What will be the [OH-] required to reduce the [Fe+3] to [Fe+3] = 1. 0 X 10 -6 M ? Ksp = [Fe+3][OH-]3 = 2 X 10 -39

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? Ksp = [Fe+3][OH-]3 = 2 X 10 -39 (1.

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? Ksp = [Fe+3][OH-]3 = 2 X 10 -39 (1. 0 X 10 -6 M)*[OH-]3 = 2 X 10 -39

Add OH- Mg 2+ Fe 3+ 3+ Fe 2+ Mg Mg 2+ Fe 3+

Add OH- Mg 2+ Fe 3+ 3+ Fe 2+ Mg Mg 2+ Fe 3+ 3+ Fe 3+ Mg 2+ 2+ Fe Mg Fe 3+ Mg 2+ 2+ Mg Fe 3+

Mg 2+ Mg 2+ Mg 2+ 2+ Mg 2+ Fe 3+ @ equilibrium What

Mg 2+ Mg 2+ Mg 2+ 2+ Mg 2+ Fe 3+ @ equilibrium What is the [OH-] when ^ this happens Is this [OH-] (that is in solution) great enough to start precipitating Mg 2+? Fe(OH)3(s)

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? Ksp = [Fe+3][OH-]3 = 2 X 10 -39 (1.

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? Ksp = [Fe+3][OH-]3 = 2 X 10 -39 (1. 0 X 10 -6 M)*[OH-]3 = 2 X 10 -39

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? What [OH-] is required to begin the precipitation of

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? What [OH-] is required to begin the precipitation of Mg(OH)2? [Mg+2] = 0. 10 M Ksp = (0. 10 M)[OH-]2 = 7. 1 X 10 -12 [OH-] = 8. 4 X 10 -6 M

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? @ equilibrium [OH-] to ‘completely’ remove Fe 3+ ^

EXAMPLE: Separate Iron and Magnesium? @ equilibrium [OH-] to ‘completely’ remove Fe 3+ ^ -11 = 1. 3 X 10 M [OH-] to start removing Mg 2+ = 8. 4 X 10 -6 M “All” of the Iron will be precipitated b/f any of the magnesium starts to precipitate!!