Neutrino Oscillations at the Atmospheric Scale Jeff Hartnell

  • Slides: 39
Download presentation
Neutrino Oscillations at the Atmospheric Scale Jeff Hartnell Rutherford Appleton Laboratory One-day Io. P/Cf.

Neutrino Oscillations at the Atmospheric Scale Jeff Hartnell Rutherford Appleton Laboratory One-day Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting on Neutrinos 29 th June 2005 Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Talk Outline n n n Neutrino oscillation formulism Production of Atmospheric Neutrinos State-of-the-art: ¡

Talk Outline n n n Neutrino oscillation formulism Production of Atmospheric Neutrinos State-of-the-art: ¡ ¡ n Super-Kamiokande K 2 K New Experiments: ¡ MINOS n n ¡ Beam Neutrinos Atmospheric Neutrinos Opera/Icarus Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Neutrino Oscillation Formulism n Disappearance experiments ¡ n Look for neutrinos missing at particular

Neutrino Oscillation Formulism n Disappearance experiments ¡ n Look for neutrinos missing at particular energies (E) and distances (L) Appearance experiments ¡ Look for neutrinos of a particular flavour not present at the source possibly as L/E Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Production of Atmospheric Neutrinos Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Production of Atmospheric Neutrinos Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Super-Kamiokande n n n Located in Kamioka, Japan 50 k. T water Cerenkov detector

Super-Kamiokande n n n Located in Kamioka, Japan 50 k. T water Cerenkov detector (22. 5 k. T fiducial) ~12000 PMTs Overburden of 2700 mwe Separate muons and electrons by Cerenkov ring structure Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Super-K Flavour Separation e m- Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Super-K Flavour Separation e m- Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Latest Super-K Zenith Angle Results OD Up Down OD New finer binned analysis and

Latest Super-K Zenith Angle Results OD Up Down OD New finer binned analysis and new distributions Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

L/E Analysis (2004) n Select high L/E resolution events ¡ n Can better constrain

L/E Analysis (2004) n Select high L/E resolution events ¡ n Can better constrain Δm 223 “See” the dip? Best fit region of Δm 223. Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting Oscillatory Dip

Super-K Parameter Space Latest zenith angle results Allowed regions lie between (old) zenith and

Super-K Parameter Space Latest zenith angle results Allowed regions lie between (old) zenith and L/E results Best fit: Dm 2 = 2. 5 x 10 -3 e. V 2 sin 2(2 q) = 1. 0 Has shifted up! (old) Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

K 2 K (KEK to Kamioka) n n n Neutrinos from KEK accelerator Uses

K 2 K (KEK to Kamioka) n n n Neutrinos from KEK accelerator Uses Super-K as Far detector, 250 km baseline 2 Near detectors: ¡ ¡ Water Cerenkov “Sci. Bar” scintillator detector Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

K 2 K Results (149. 7 expected) Shape comparison Confirmation of Super-K Δm 223

K 2 K Results (149. 7 expected) Shape comparison Confirmation of Super-K Δm 223 results Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Challenges ahead n n n Clearly “see” the oscillatory signature Show νμ → ντ

Challenges ahead n n n Clearly “see” the oscillatory signature Show νμ → ντ rather than νμ → νx Precisely measure Δm 223 Determine if sin 2(2θ 23) is maximal Measure sub-dominant oscillation mode: νμ → νe (determine θ 13) CP Violation… see later talks Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

New/Current Accelerator Experiments n Nu. MI (Neutrinos at the Main Injector) ¡ Currently operating

New/Current Accelerator Experiments n Nu. MI (Neutrinos at the Main Injector) ¡ Currently operating n n n ¡ ¡ ¡ n First neutrinos seen in January Operations started in March Currently delivered ~1. 2 x 1019 pot total Experiment: MINOS Future Experiments: Minerva, NOv. A Neutrino test-beam (!) for Opera CNGS (CERN Neutrinos to Gran Sasso) ¡ ¡ Due to switch on in Summer 2006 Experiments: Opera and Icarus Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

The Nu. MI Beam n Currently: ¡ ¡ ¡ n Running in the low-energy

The Nu. MI Beam n Currently: ¡ ¡ ¡ n Running in the low-energy configuration Delivering ~1. 9 x 1013 protons per 10 usec pulse Cycle time of 2 -4 secs Goal: ¡ 3. 7 x 1013 ppp every 1. 9 secs Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

MINOS n n 735 km baseline Two magnetised iron-scintillator tracking calorimeters ¡ ¡ Near

MINOS n n 735 km baseline Two magnetised iron-scintillator tracking calorimeters ¡ ¡ Near detector at Fermilab Far detector at Soudan Underground Lab. Near Detector: 980 tons Det. 1 Far Detector: 5400 tons 735 km Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting Det. 2

The MINOS Detectors Near Detector, 980 tons n Far Detector, 5400 tons Identical in

The MINOS Detectors Near Detector, 980 tons n Far Detector, 5400 tons Identical in important features: ¡ ¡ ¡ 2. 54 cm thick steel planes 1 cm thick scintillator planes 1. 5 T magnetic field Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Start data taking Target leak Commissioning of the neutrino beam Commissioning of the primary

Start data taking Target leak Commissioning of the neutrino beam Commissioning of the primary proton beam § In order to understand the systematic of neutrino production and detector response have run with different beam energies (LE, p. ME, p. HE) Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Consider High-energy Data Set n n n 1. 7 x 1018 pot ~150000 spills

Consider High-energy Data Set n n n 1. 7 x 1018 pot ~150000 spills In the Far detector: ¡ ¡ ¡ 21 charged-current-like events (contain a track) 9 neutrino-induced rock muons 6 cosmic muons (expected 7) Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Far det. High-energy Event 2 D: U-Z Projection 2 D: V-Z Projection ~2. 5

Far det. High-energy Event 2 D: U-Z Projection 2 D: V-Z Projection ~2. 5 Ge. V muon ~5 Ge. V shower U and V axes tilted at 45 deg to X and Y Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting End-on view

Beam event separation (Far) (N. Saoulidou) Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Beam event separation (Far) (N. Saoulidou) Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

MINOS Atmospheric Neutrinos (Preliminary results) n n ~7 k. T-years of data Recorded 107

MINOS Atmospheric Neutrinos (Preliminary results) n n ~7 k. T-years of data Recorded 107 events See hints of zenith angle dependence Also: first deep underground detector that can resolve muon charge: ¡ ¡ N+ / (N+ + N-) = 0. 35 ± 0. 06 (stat. ) ± 0. 02 (syst. ) Expect: N+ / (N+ + N-) = 0. 35 with CPT invariance Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

MINOS Time-line n Collect 1 x 1020 protons on target (pot) by the end

MINOS Time-line n Collect 1 x 1020 protons on target (pot) by the end of the year ¡ n n n Sensitivity ~= SK / K 2 K results Ramp up beam intensity next year to ~2. 5 x 1020 pot/year Then up to 3. 7 x 1020 pot/year Run for 5 years Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting MINOS sensitivity by the end of 2005 (~1 e 20 pot)

Sensitivity with 16 e 20 pot (~5 yr) See the dip and the rise

Sensitivity with 16 e 20 pot (~5 yr) See the dip and the rise “smoking gun” for neutrino oscillations Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting Significantly constrain Δm 223 to 10% at 90% CL

MINOS Sensitivity to νe Appearance n Look for subdominant oscillation modes: ¡ n 3

MINOS Sensitivity to νe Appearance n Look for subdominant oscillation modes: ¡ n 3 sensitivity plot νμ → νe (θ 13) Achieve a factor of 2 -3 over CHOOZ limit in 3 -5 years at 3 sigma Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting SK

CNGS: Opera and Icarus n n n Baseline: 730 km <Eν> = 17 Ge.

CNGS: Opera and Icarus n n n Baseline: 730 km <Eν> = 17 Ge. V optimised for τ appearance Icarus is a liquid argon TPC with very high spatial resolution Can do lots of physics: beam tau appearance, electron appearance, solar & atmospheric neutrinos, supernova neutrinos, proton decay… Focus on Opera in this talk Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Opera n The “Brick” - Emulsion Cloud Chamber ¡ ¡ n Pb / emulsion

Opera n The “Brick” - Emulsion Cloud Chamber ¡ ¡ n Pb / emulsion layers Look for kinks in tracks Electronic detectors (scint. , RPCs, Drift tubes): ¡ ¡ triggering and localisation of events Muon ID and momentum 1 mm 10 X 0 t n 8. 3 kg Pb Emulsion layers Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Opera Sensitivity (full mixing, 5 years run @ 4. 5 x 1019 pot /

Opera Sensitivity (full mixing, 5 years run @ 4. 5 x 1019 pot / year) OPERA signal (Dm 2 = 1. 9 x 10 -3 e. V 2) (Dm 2 = 2. 4 x 10 -3 e. V 2) (Dm 2 = 3. 0 x 10 -3 e. V 2) 6. 6 10. 5 16. 4 BKGD 0. 7 1. 8 kton fiducial n n Looking for a small number of events Very dependent on Δm 223 Probability of observing in 5 years a number of candidates greater than a 4 background fluctuation Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting D. Autiero (Neutrino ’ 04)

Summary-to-date n It’s now 40 years since the first atmospheric neutrinos were detected and

Summary-to-date n It’s now 40 years since the first atmospheric neutrinos were detected and a lot has happened since: ¡ ¡ n Deficit of muon neutrinos discovered Zenith angle dependence shown SK L / E analysis shows possible oscillatory dependence K 2 K observes νμ disappearance and a spectral distortion using accelerator neutrinos The latest (fine binned) SK analysis gives: ¡ ¡ 2. 0 x 10 -3 < Δm 223 < 3. 0 x 10 -3 e. V 2 at 90% CL (~40% range) 0. 93 < sin 2(2θ 23) < 1. 0 at 90% CL (~7% range) Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Challenges ahead (the roadmap) n Confirm SK and K 2 K allowed region ¡

Challenges ahead (the roadmap) n Confirm SK and K 2 K allowed region ¡ n Clearly “see” the oscillatory signature ¡ n Opera/Icarus (~2011) Precisely measure Δm 223 ¡ ¡ n MINOS (~2010) Show νμ → ντ rather than νμ → νx ¡ n MINOS (~2006) Note: all these results depend on #pot delivered and the value of Δm 223 and sin 2(2θ 23) MINOS: 10% (~2008) NOv. A / T 2 K: 3% (~2015) (see Gary Barker’s talk) Determine if sin 2(2θ 23) is maximal NOv. A / T 2 K: 1% (~2015) Sub-dominant mode, νe appearance (θ 13) ¡ MINOS: Factor of 2 over CHOOZ (~2010) ¡ NOv. A / T 2 K: ~order of magnitude better (~2015) ¡ n n CP Violation… neutrino factory / super beams? Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Backup slides Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Backup slides Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Opera m spectrometer Magnetised Iron Dipoles Drift tubes and RPCs nt Target: - a

Opera m spectrometer Magnetised Iron Dipoles Drift tubes and RPCs nt Target: - a “wall” of Pb/emulsion “bricks” - planes of orthogonal scintillator strips Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Future Experiment: NOv. A n n n 15 mrad off-axis in the Nu. MI

Future Experiment: NOv. A n n n 15 mrad off-axis in the Nu. MI beam 30 k. Ton Totally Active Scintillator Design 810 km baseline Stage 1 approval from Fermilab and R&D money Aim to have 5 k. T by early 2010 and complete detector by mid-2011. Physics: ¡ ¡ Measure Δm 223 to 2 -4% at 90% CL Quasi-elastic events very clean: n n Measure sin 2(2θ 23) to 0. 5 -3% at 90% CL For details on sensitivity to θ 13, CPV and mass hierarchy see Gary Barker’s talk Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

NOv. A Sensitivities 5 -year n run with Proton Driver Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf.

NOv. A Sensitivities 5 -year n run with Proton Driver Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Future Exp. : T 2 K (Tokai to Kamioka) n n n J-PARC accelerator

Future Exp. : T 2 K (Tokai to Kamioka) n n n J-PARC accelerator facility in Tokai Use SK detector as with K 2 K ~45 mrad off-axis (2. 5 deg) 295 km baseline Start physics running in 2009 Similar sensitivity to NOv. A on atmospheric scale parameters: ¡ ¡ n Measure sin 2(2θ 23) to 1 -2% Measure Δm 223 to 2 -4% at 90% CL As with NOv. A, for details on θ 13, CPV and mass hierarchy see Gary Barker’s talk Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Brief History of Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements n First detected, via neutrino-induced muons, in 1965

Brief History of Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements n First detected, via neutrino-induced muons, in 1965 (very deep: ~3 km, ~8000 mwe) ¡ ¡ n First fully contained events in early 1980 s ¡ n Kolar gold fields in S. India East Rand Proprietry mine in S. Africa Proton decay experiments (a background!) First hint of atmospheric anomaly in 1986 ¡ IMB proton decay experiment noticed a deficit in events with an identifiable muon decay: n n n In 1988 the Kamiokande experiment went further and suggested that neutrino oscillations could be the cause of the deficit ¡ n n Measured N (νμ) / NTotal = 26% ± 3% Expected 34% ± 1% Determined R’ = 0. 59 ± 0. 07 (stat. ) Fine-grained iron calorimeters NUSEX and Frejus experiments reported no deficit within statistical errors but Soudan-2 did In 1998 the breakthrough came with Super-Kamiokande… Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Finer-Binned 2 -Flavor Analysis Preliminary Combine advantages of standard and L/E analyses - PC

Finer-Binned 2 -Flavor Analysis Preliminary Combine advantages of standard and L/E analyses - PC events divided into OD stop/OD through-going - New FC multi-ring e-like category - Finer m-like momentum binning; coarser e-like momentum binning Total of 370 bins in zenith angle, momentum c 2 incorporates Poissonian uncertainties Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting

Allowed regions for the various subsamples 370 bin analysis 180 bin analysis Preliminary Finer

Allowed regions for the various subsamples 370 bin analysis 180 bin analysis Preliminary Finer binning for multi-Ge. V, PC, multi-ring improves the Dm 2 constraint Jeff Hartnell, Io. P/Cf. FP Meeting