Anne Duffy HMI Raising Achievement Through Communication Raising

Anne Duffy HMI Raising Achievement Through Communication

Raising standards, improving lives Outline of the presentation A summary of the changes to school inspection from 1 September 2012 and for independent schools, January 2012 A summary of survey findings Some data and discussion

Changes to inspection arrangements for maintained schools and academies

Raising standards, improving lives A good education for all The changes, which came into effect from 1 September 2012, are intended to support headteachers and principals in their work to provide the best possible education for pupils and learners. The 12 -week consultation, launched on 4 February 2012, received over 5, 000 responses. The views from the consultation directly shaped the changes we have made.

Raising standards, improving lives We are continuing to focus on what really matters Inspectors will continue to judge the quality of education provided in the school and its overall effectiveness - taking account of four other key judgements: the achievement of pupils at the school the quality of teaching in the school the behaviour and safety of pupils at the school the quality of the leadership in, and management of, the school.

Raising standards, improving lives During the inspection Inspectors will continue to: spend as much time as possible in classes, observing lessons, talking to pupils about their work, gauging their understanding and engagement in what they are doing, and their perceptions of the school hear children in primary schools and some Year 7 and 8 pupils read, and they will look at data involve the headteacher and senior managers fully during the inspection, including during inspection team meetings.

Raising standards, improving lives We will continue to use a four-point scale The satisfactory grade has been replaced by ‘requires improvement’ Outstanding (grade 1) Good (grade 2) Requires improvement (grade 3) Inadequate (grade 4)

Raising standards, improving lives We will continue to inspect ‘good’ schools less frequently than weaker schools Most mainstream schools judged to be outstanding at their last inspection will be exempt from routine inspection, unless concerns are raised about their performance. Most schools judged to be ‘good’ at their last inspection will be inspected after four or five years, or sooner if there are concerns about the school’s performance. Further details about the risk assessment process and how Ofsted determines the timing of inspections of schools judged to be good or outstanding at their last inspection can be found in ‘Risk assessment of maintained schools and academies’ at www. ofsted. gov. uk.

Raising standards, improving lives We require ‘outstanding’ schools to have outstanding teaching This does not mean that every lesson seen by inspectors needs to be outstanding, but that over time teaching is enabling almost all pupils to make excellent progress, acquire knowledge, deepen their understanding and develop and consolidate their skills. Inspectors do not expect to see a particular teaching style. However, good and outstanding teaching also means that pupils know how well they are doing and what they need to do to improve.

Raising standards, improving lives We expect pupils to make excellent progress in ‘outstanding’ schools In an ‘outstanding’ school it is likely that the proportion of pupils making, and exceeding, expected progress will be high compared with national figures. In an ‘outstanding’ school we will expect pupils’ attainment to be at least in line with national averages, with many pupils attaining above this. There will, of course, be exceptions, but in an ‘outstanding’ school, if pupils’ attainment is below that of all pupils nationally, the gap will be closing rapidly.

Raising standards, improving lives We only judge schools to be ‘good’ if they are providing a good standard of education Pupils’ starting points - as shown by their prior attainment - are different and our judgements are based on progress from starting points, not just attainment alone. Ofsted’s grade descriptors show that a school can be ‘good’ even where pupils’ attainment is below average but they are making good progress. Teaching is judged in relation to the impact it has on pupils’ learning. If teaching is good, pupils should be learning well and making good progress over time.

Raising standards, improving lives We have replaced the ‘satisfactory’ judgement with ‘requires improvement’ We think that the only acceptable standard of education is a good or better education. Only a good school is good enough. Where a school is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate, it will be deemed to ‘require improvement’. Inspection reports will be clear about why these schools are not yet ‘good’, what they need to do to improve, and their strengths.

Raising standards, improving lives We will inspect schools that ‘require improvement’ earlier than ‘good’ schools Ofsted will re-inspect schools judged to ‘require improvement’ within a maximum period of two years. We will work with schools to help them to improve as quickly as possible. The timing of the next inspection will reflect the individual school’s circumstances and will be informed by what inspectors find at monitoring visits.

Raising standards, improving lives We expect schools that ‘require improvement’ to become good schools within a defined timescale If a school has been judged to require improvement at two consecutive inspections, and is still not ‘good’ at the third, Ofsted is likely to find the school to be inadequate at that inspection. This means it will be placed in ‘special measures' unless there are exceptional circumstances. Ofsted will therefore expect schools to improve to ‘good' within four years.

Raising standards, improving lives We have replaced the current ‘notice to improve’ with ‘serious weaknesses’ If a school is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but has leadership and management that are adequate or better, it is likely to be deemed to have ‘serious weaknesses’. Schools which are inadequate overall and which have inadequate leadership and management will be deemed to require ‘special measures’ as at present.

Raising standards, improving lives We have shortened the notice we give for an inspection Inspectors will normally contact the school during the afternoon of the working day before the inspection, although we reserve the right to inspect without notice where we have concerns. A short period of notice will still allow the school to make the necessary practical arrangements and inform parents about the inspection.

Raising standards, improving lives The views of parents After the initial phone call from the lead inspector, we email a letter that schools must use to notify parents about the inspection. The letter includes details about how to access Parent View. We ask schools to use any other means they have, such as email or text alerts, to contact parents about the inspection and to remind them to complete Parent View – though parents can submit responses at any time during the school year.

Raising standards, improving lives The views of parents Schools will no longer be required to administer the circulation and collection of parent and pupil questionnaires. From September 2012, we will use Parent View as the main way for parents to give inspectors their views. However, inspectors will also take account of parents’ views expressed through correspondence, through meetings, and through the results of past surveys carried out by the school.

Raising standards, improving lives The views of parents Schools can also include links to Parent View on their website. We have built in safeguards to minimise the risk of the site being misused. More details are available at: www. parentview. ofsted. gov. uk

Raising standards, improving lives We have placed a greater emphasis on governance Ofsted places greater emphasis on whether governors are: holding schools sufficiently to account for pupils’ achievement and the quality of teaching supporting and challenging school leaders deploying resources effectively, including the pupil premium. From September 20102, all inspection reports will contain a comment on the effectiveness of governance. In a small number of schools in autumn 2012, where governance is weak, we will recommend that governance is subject to an external review.

Raising standards, improving lives We have placed an even greater emphasis on the progress pupils make in mathematics (numeracy), English (literacy) and communication Pupils read widely and often across all subjects. Pupils develop and apply a wide range of skills to great effect, in reading, writing, communication and mathematics. They are exceptionally well prepared for the next stage in their education, training or employment.

Raising standards, improving lives Extracts …. . Outstanding achievement Pupils make rapid and sustained progress throughout year groups across many subjects, including English and mathematics, and learn exceptionally well. Pupils develop and apply a wide range of skills to great effect, in reading, writing, communication and mathematics. They are exceptionally well prepared for the next stage in their education, training or employment. Where standards of attainment of any group of pupils are below those of all pupils nationally, the gap is closing rapidly.

Assessment & expectation All teachers have consistently high expectations of all pupils. They plan and teach lessons that enable pupils to learn exceptionally well across the curriculum. Teachers systematically and effectively check pupils’ understanding throughout lessons, anticipating where they may need to intervene and doing so with notable impact on the quality of learning. The teaching of reading, writing, communication and mathematics is highly effective and cohesively planned and implemented across the curriculum.

Raising standards, improving lives We evaluate the robustness of performance management within the school Inspectors ask schools to provide anonymised information of the outcomes of the most recent performance management of all teachers. They evaluate the robustness of performance management arrangements and consider the correlation between the quality of teaching in a school and the salary progression of the school’s teachers. We take the necessary steps to ensure that no individual teacher is identified.

Raising standards, improving lives Further details about inspection arrangements We have published a School inspection handbook. It explains how the inspection will be conducted and the judgements that will be made by inspectors. It also contains the grade descriptors that are used by inspectors when making their judgements. Schools may also to wish to look at the Subsidiary Guidance, which sets out some additional guidance about inspection in particular settings. These documents are available at www. ofsted. gov. uk

Changes to independent school inspections

What independent schools do well Behaviour – good levels of supervision; effective behaviour management strategies; tackle bullying well Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development for pupils Good levels of individual support for SEND – learning and behaviour Quality of care in residential special schools

What schools need to do better Recruitment procedures and safeguarding pupils’ welfare, health and safety The quality of teaching: competent but not enough is outstanding The quality of education and outcomes for looked after children in children’s homes Leadership and management that generates improvements in teaching and learning, enabling children to achieve more, be more independent and better prepared for adult life

Consultation spring 2012 We proposed some improvements to the current framework and you gave strong endorsement to: Retaining a close focus on safeguarding pupils’ welfare, health and safety Retaining separate key judgements for the quality of teaching and the quality of curriculum – but omit ‘quality of education’ Reporting on pupils’ achievement Introducing a key judgement for leadership and management Introducing a new key judgement for ‘overall effectiveness’ Introducing a judgement for ‘behaviour and safety’ - we tried it out in some ‘ghost pilots’

The new framework judgements Overall effectiveness Pupils’ achievement Quality of the teaching Quality of the curriculum Pupils’ behaviour and personal development Pupils’ welfare, health and safety Leadership and management

How often will my school be inspected? Schools catering for vulnerable pupils (LAC; SEND) – every three years ‘Mainstream’ schools which are ‘good’ or better; meet all the regs in parts 1 – 4 and had no more than four regulatory failures elsewhere; every six years – smooth cycle All others – every three years Residential provision in RSS – annually – one integrated Boarding schools – every three years – one integrated Registered EY provision: 3 years; new schools – 3 years Monitoring the progress of inadequate schools as required

Recent Ofsted reports on English and literacy Reading by six; how the best schools do it, 2010 Removing barriers to literacy, 2011 (090297) Moving English Forward: action to raise standards of English in schools, 2012 (110118) (100197) Excellence in English: what we learnt from 12 outstanding schools, 2011 (100229)

What do we know about English in schools? Standards apparently continue to rise, especially by the end of Key Stage 4 Around seven in ten schools were judged to be good or outstanding in their English subject inspections Nearly one in five schools was judged to be outstanding in English

…but standards in English are still not high enough improvement slowing by the end of Key Stage 2 new floor standards and higher expectations from government evidence of decline in international comparisons e. g. Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)

…but standards in English are still not high enough The ripple effect: public/media concern about literacy standards increasing pressure on schools to raise standards in English the elephant in the room – GCSE results

Misconceptions pace: ‘the faster the lesson, the better the learning’ volume of activities: ‘the more, the better’

What constrains learning? Limited time for independent work Continual and repetitive, rather than productive, review of learning Teaching to the test Inflexible, over-detailed and burdensome lesson plans

What makes an English lesson outstanding? Clear and realistic plans Teaching that responds to the needs of the class Meaningful tasks, with ‘real’ audiences and ‘real’ contexts where possible Time for pupils to think, plan, write, demonstrate understanding, and learn independently Effective differentiation, including challenge for more able pupils

What makes an English curriculum outstanding? It is distinctive and innovative It successfully engages, supports and challenges all pupils It maintains an appropriate balance between reading, writing, speaking and listening It establishes clear progression

Areas of concern Oral communication skills of children on entry to primary schools Transition from KS 2 to KS 3 Subject knowledge of co-ordinators in primary schools

The progress pupils make in mathematics (numeracy), English (literacy) and communication

http: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=MS 5 P 6 Gc. UC 4 s

Thank you