Terapia Neoadiuvante Revisione delle evidenze scientifiche Valentina Guarneri

  • Slides: 27
Download presentation
Terapia Neoadiuvante Revisione delle evidenze scientifiche Valentina Guarneri Nonantola, 19 Novembre 2011

Terapia Neoadiuvante Revisione delle evidenze scientifiche Valentina Guarneri Nonantola, 19 Novembre 2011

Preoperative vs postoperative, Overall Survival DDFS o OS? ? ? The Cochrane Library, Issue

Preoperative vs postoperative, Overall Survival DDFS o OS? ? ? The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2008

p. CR vs residual disease, Overall Survival The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2008

p. CR vs residual disease, Overall Survival The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2008

NEOADJUVANT P-FEC TRASTUZUMAB IN HER 2+ OPERABLE BREAST CANCER T-FEC 19 pts T-FEC +

NEOADJUVANT P-FEC TRASTUZUMAB IN HER 2+ OPERABLE BREAST CANCER T-FEC 19 pts T-FEC + H 23 pts 26. 3 % 65. 2 % p. CR ER pos 27 % 61 % p. CR ER neg 25 % 70 % 78. 9 % 86. 9 % p. CR p. N 0 Buzdar, J Clin Oncol 2005 Buzdar AU, Clin Cancer Res 2007

NOAH HER 2 -positive LABC (IHC 3+ or FISH+) (n=115) HER 2 -negative LABC

NOAH HER 2 -positive LABC (IHC 3+ or FISH+) (n=115) HER 2 -negative LABC (IHC 0/1+) (n=113) (n=99) H + AT q 3 w x 3 cycles H+T q 3 w x 4 cycles H q 3 w x 4 cycles + CMF q 4 w x 3 cycles Surgery followed by radiotherapya H continued q 3 w to week 52 19 crossed over to H

Gianni L, Lancet 2010

Gianni L, Lancet 2010

HR negative, or HR+ with c. N+

HR negative, or HR+ with c. N+

GEPAR-QUATTRO: EFFICACY OUTCOMES 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 yp. Tis

GEPAR-QUATTRO: EFFICACY OUTCOMES 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 yp. Tis yp. T 0/is, N 0 yp. N 0 Untch M, J Clin Oncol 2010

Untch M et al, J Clin Oncol 2011

Untch M et al, J Clin Oncol 2011

NEO-ALTTO STUDY DESIGN Invasive operable HER 2+ BC T > 2 cm (inflammatory BC

NEO-ALTTO STUDY DESIGN Invasive operable HER 2+ BC T > 2 cm (inflammatory BC excluded) LVEF 50% N=450 Stratification: • T ≤ 5 cm vs. T > 5 cm • ER or Pg. R + vs. ER & Pg. R – • N 0 -1 vs. N ≥ 2 • Conservative surgery or not R A N D O M I Z E lapatinib paclitaxel trastuzumab paclitaxel lapatinib S U R G E R Y F E C trastuzumab X 3 6 wks + 12 wks lapatinib trastuzumab 34 weeks 52 weeks of anti-HER 2 therapy Baselga J et al. SABCS 2010

Neo-ALLTO: PATHOLOGIC RESPONSE L: lapatinib; T: trastuzumab; L+T: lapatinib plus trastuzumab p. CR pathologic

Neo-ALLTO: PATHOLOGIC RESPONSE L: lapatinib; T: trastuzumab; L+T: lapatinib plus trastuzumab p. CR pathologic complete response Baselga J et al. SABCS 2010

CHER LOB Trial: study plan C O R E B I O P S

CHER LOB Trial: study plan C O R E B I O P S Y R A N D O M I Z A T I O N A B Lapatinib 1500 mg/daily C S U R G E R Y Chemotherapy 5 FU 600 mg/m 2 Epi 75 mg/m 2 CTX 600 mg/m 2 TXL 80 mg/m 2 Trastuzumab 2 mg/kg Lapatinib 1000 mg/daily Guarneri V, ASCO 2011

CHER-LOB: EFFICACY OUTCOMES 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Arm

CHER-LOB: EFFICACY OUTCOMES 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Arm A: CT + trastuzumab p. CR (breast & axilla) Arm B: CT + lapatinib Node negativity Arm C: CT + trastuzumab/lapatinib Breast conservation Guarneri V, ASCO 2011

NEOSPHERE: STUDY DESIGN TH (n=107) docetaxel + trastuzumab Patients with operable or locally advanced

NEOSPHERE: STUDY DESIGN TH (n=107) docetaxel + trastuzumab Patients with operable or locally advanced /inflammatory* HER 2 -positive BC Chemo-naïve & primary tumors >2 cm (N=417) THP (n=107) docetaxel + trastuzumab + pertuzumab S FEC q 3 w x 3 trastuzumab q 3 w cycles 5– 17 U R G FEC q 3 w x 3 trastuzumab q 3 w cycles 5– 17 E HP (n=107) trastuzumab + pertuzumab TP (n=96) docetaxel + pertuzumab R Y docetaxel q 3 w x 4→FEC q 3 w x 3 trastuzumab q 3 w cycles 5– 17 FEC q 3 w x 3 trastuzumab q 3 w cycles 5– 21 Study dosing: q 3 w x 4 BC, breast cancer; FEC, 5 -fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide *Locally advanced=T 2– 3, N 2– 3, M 0 or T 4 a–c, any N, M 0; operable=T 2– 3, N 0– 1, M 0; inflammatory = T 4 d, any N, M 0 H, trastuzumab; P, pertuzumab; T, docetaxel Gianni L et al. SABCS 2010

NEOSPHERE: p. CR RATES p. CR, % 95% CI p = 0. 0198 p

NEOSPHERE: p. CR RATES p. CR, % 95% CI p = 0. 0198 p = 0. 0141 50 p = 0. 003 40 45. 8 30 20 29. 0 24. 0 10 0 16. 8 TH H, trastuzumab; P, pertuzumab; T, docetaxel THP HP TP Gianni L et al. SABCS 2010 6

HORMONE RECEPTOR STATUS AND p. CR % p. CR Trial/author pts # Regimen HR

HORMONE RECEPTOR STATUS AND p. CR % p. CR Trial/author pts # Regimen HR + % HR- HR+ Kemeny 54 FACVb 66 20. 0 7. 7 Ring 435 CMF, A/E 71 21. 6 8. 1 Bear 1211 AC 59 13. 6 5. 7 Bear 565 AC+T 57 22. 8 14. 1 GEPARDO 250 dd. AD+/-T 56 15. 4 1. 1 GEPARDUO 913 dd. AD/CA-D 74 22. 8 6. 2 GEPARTRIO 286 TAC/TAC-NX 68 36. 6 10. 1 Guarneri 1731 FAC+/-P 68 23. 8 7. 8 Gianni 438 A+/P/CMF 63 42. 2 11. 6 Guarneri 201 FEC/ET/GET 74 16. 6 3. 5 Colleoni 399 ECF/EC/ET/Vi. Fu P 68 33. 3 7. 6

p. CR BY HORMONE RECEPTOR STATUS L: lapatinib; T: trastuzumab; L+T: lapatinib plus trastuzumab

p. CR BY HORMONE RECEPTOR STATUS L: lapatinib; T: trastuzumab; L+T: lapatinib plus trastuzumab p. CR pathologic complete response HR: hormone receptors Baselga J et al. SABCS 2010

CHER-LOB: p. CR rate by HR 60 56. 2% 50 40 30 25% 35.

CHER-LOB: p. CR rate by HR 60 56. 2% 50 40 30 25% 35. 7% HR- HR+ 26. 6% 22. 7% 20 10 HR+ HR- 0 Arm A (CT + T) Arm B (CT +L) Arm C (CT + L) T: trastuzumab; L: lapatinib; T+L: trastuzumab plus lapatinib

NEOSPHERE: p. CR AND HORMONE RECEPTORS STATUS 70 60 ER or PR pos ER

NEOSPHERE: p. CR AND HORMONE RECEPTORS STATUS 70 60 ER or PR pos ER and PR neg p. CR, % 95% CI 50 63. 2 40 30 20 36. 8 10 0 26. 0 5. 9 20. 0 TH H, trastuzumab; P, pertuzumab; T, docetaxel THP 30. 0 29. 1 17. 4 HP TP Gianni L et al. SABCS 2010

Chang, ASCO 2011

Chang, ASCO 2011

Chang, ASCO 2011

Chang, ASCO 2011

PST IN HER 2+ OPERABLE BREAST CANCER: KEY FINDINGS • • • Patient selection

PST IN HER 2+ OPERABLE BREAST CANCER: KEY FINDINGS • • • Patient selection is mandatory for the integration of novel agents in cancer treatment Chemotherapy + trastuzumab is the gold standard Double-HER 2 blockade increases the p. CR rate Endocrine pathway is still important even in presence of HER 2 co-expression A dual anti-HER 2 blockade + endocrine therapy is promising The preoperative setting is ideal to test new combinations through the “window of opportunity model”