Introduction to diagnostics Wonderful and diverse profession Practioner

  • Slides: 47
Download presentation
Introduction to diagnostics

Introduction to diagnostics

 • Wonderful and diverse profession • Practioner to possess a wide range of

• Wonderful and diverse profession • Practioner to possess a wide range of skills, knowledge and personal characteristics

SLP work as Case selector Case evaluator Diagnosticia n interviewer Parent counsellor Teacher Consultant

SLP work as Case selector Case evaluator Diagnosticia n interviewer Parent counsellor Teacher Consultant Coordinator Record keeper Researcher

STUDENT CLINICIAN MOVE FROM ONE AREA TO ANOTHER MAXIMIZE STRENGTH IN ALL ASPECTS AND

STUDENT CLINICIAN MOVE FROM ONE AREA TO ANOTHER MAXIMIZE STRENGTH IN ALL ASPECTS AND TO PROVIDE BEST POSSIBLE SERVICES

DIAGNOSIS • Comprehensive and difficult task • Requires synthesis of entire field Knowledge of

DIAGNOSIS • Comprehensive and difficult task • Requires synthesis of entire field Knowledge of norms and testing techniques Skills in observation Ability to relate effectively and empathetically Great deal of creative intuition

 • Communication is a function of entire person, thus it is important to

• Communication is a function of entire person, thus it is important to scrutinize all aspects of behaviours. • Need to know about changing people in a dynamic environment. • Need to diagnose communicators not just communications.

Diagnosis process = science and art Science Art • Each case – clinician to

Diagnosis process = science and art Science Art • Each case – clinician to think , solve problem, form hypothesis, gather data and arrive at conclusion • Assessment is much more than the simple administration of a few psychometrically adequate test or scales.

 • Diagnostician must have neutral conduct – interact with client to determine the

• Diagnostician must have neutral conduct – interact with client to determine the real effect of communication impairment. • Functional consequence

Diagnosis • Greek word “to distinguish”. • Dia – apart • Gnosis- to know

Diagnosis • Greek word “to distinguish”. • Dia – apart • Gnosis- to know • Distinguishing a persons problem from a large field of potential disabilities.

Evaluation • Process of arriving at a diagnosis • Initial diagnosis • Competent clinician

Evaluation • Process of arriving at a diagnosis • Initial diagnosis • Competent clinician should continue the evaluation

Assessment • • • Ongoing process Gathering baseline data, monitoring treatment progress, determining if

Assessment • • • Ongoing process Gathering baseline data, monitoring treatment progress, determining if generalization has occurred from training and documenting functional gains in communication

FOUNDATIONAL INTEGRITY -5 PRINCILES • • • THOROUGH VARIETY OF ASSESMENT MODALITY VALID RELIABLE

FOUNDATIONAL INTEGRITY -5 PRINCILES • • • THOROUGH VARIETY OF ASSESMENT MODALITY VALID RELIABLE TAILORED TO INDIVUDAL CLIENT

SEVEN STEPS IN COMPLETEING AN ASSESSMENT • • • OBATIN HISTORICAL INFORMATION INTERVIEW THE

SEVEN STEPS IN COMPLETEING AN ASSESSMENT • • • OBATIN HISTORICAL INFORMATION INTERVIEW THE CLIENT STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL INTEGRITY OF OPME SAMPLE AND EVALAUTE SCREEN THE CLIENTS HEARING EVLAUTE ASSMT INFORMATION TO DETERMINE IMPRESSION, DIAGNOSIS/ CONCLUSION • SHARE CLINICAL FINDING THROUGH AN INTERVIEW.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) • Provides the standard language by

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) • Provides the standard language by which clinicians, researchers, and public health officials communicate about mental disorders. • The current edition of the DSM, the fifth revision (DSM-5) , was published in May 2013

1952: DSM-I 1968: DSM-II 1980: DSM-III 1987: DSM-III-R 1994: DSM-IV 2000: DSM-IV-TR 2013: DSM-5

1952: DSM-I 1968: DSM-II 1980: DSM-III 1987: DSM-III-R 1994: DSM-IV 2000: DSM-IV-TR 2013: DSM-5

DEVELOPMENT • DSM-5 was constructed with the goal of addressing limitations in the DSM-IV

DEVELOPMENT • DSM-5 was constructed with the goal of addressing limitations in the DSM-IV while integrating the latest scientific and clinical evidence on the empirical basis of psychiatric disorders. • The priority was to ensure the best care of patients possible and, in the process, improve usability for clinicians and researchers.

Classification • The DSM-5 is based on explicit disorder criteria, which taken together constitute

Classification • The DSM-5 is based on explicit disorder criteria, which taken together constitute a “nomenclature” of mental disorders, along with an extensive explanatory text that is fully referenced for the first time in the electronic version of this DSM.

SECTIONS A. Neurodevelopmental Disorders B. Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders C. Bipolar and

SECTIONS A. Neurodevelopmental Disorders B. Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders C. Bipolar and Related Disorders D. Depressive Disorders E. Anxiety Disorders F. Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders G. Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders H. Dissociative Disorders J. Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders K. Feeding and Eating Disorders L. Elimination Disorders

M. Sleep-Wake Disorders N. Sexual Dysfunctions P. Gender Dysphoria Q. Disruptive, Impulse-Control and Conduct

M. Sleep-Wake Disorders N. Sexual Dysfunctions P. Gender Dysphoria Q. Disruptive, Impulse-Control and Conduct Disorders R. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders S. Neurocognitive Disorders U. Personality Disorders V. Paraphilic Disorders W. Other Mental Disorders X. Medication-Induced Disorders Y. V and Z codes

Purposes of ICD • • Monitor health epidemics/threats to public Assess health/disease burden Identify

Purposes of ICD • • Monitor health epidemics/threats to public Assess health/disease burden Identify vulnerable/at risk populations Define obligations of WHO members to provide health care access to their populations • Form guidelines for care & standards of practice • Facilitate research into more effective treatments

History of ICD, continued • ICD-1 first revision 1900 (in use 1900 -1909). No

History of ICD, continued • ICD-1 first revision 1900 (in use 1900 -1909). No Mental and Behavioral Disorders • ICD-2 1909 (1910 -1920), International Classification of Causes of Sickness & Death • ICD-3 1920 (1921 -1929) • ICD-4 1929 (1930 -1938), transfer to categories based on etiology • ICD-5 1938 (1939 -1948), practical consideration devoted to comparability between successive ICD versions (GEMs) • And then WWI and the founding of the UN

History of ICD, continued • WHO constitution ratified 1948 and entrusted with the ICD

History of ICD, continued • WHO constitution ratified 1948 and entrusted with the ICD • ICD-6 1948 (1949 -1957 ) 1 st WHA adopted the renamed International Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death. • Morbidity added to mortality • Introduced Mental, Psychoneurotic, and Personality Disorders.

ICD Sample Chapters and Codes Chapter Range of Codes I. Certain infectious and parasitic

ICD Sample Chapters and Codes Chapter Range of Codes I. Certain infectious and parasitic diseases II. Neoplasms III. Disease of the blood IV. Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases A 00 -B 99 C 00 -D 48 D 50 -D 89 E 00 -E 90 V. Mental and behavioral disorders F 00 -F 99 VI. Diseases of the nervous system VII. Diseases of the eye and adnexa VIII. Diseases of the ear and mastoid process IX. Diseases of the circulatory system X. Diseases of the respiratory system …continues through XXI. Factors influencing health G 00 -G 99 H 00 -H 59 H 60 -H 95 I 00 -I 99 J 00 -J 99 status and contact with health services (Z 00 -Z 98)

Common type of test • Standardized – same manner across all indvl • Non

Common type of test • Standardized – same manner across all indvl • Non standardized – different manner

Standarized test • Norm referenced • Criterion referenced

Standarized test • Norm referenced • Criterion referenced

Norm referenced test • Standarized • Comparisonof individual performance to the performance of larger

Norm referenced test • Standarized • Comparisonof individual performance to the performance of larger group • Test developers to determine normative standard that will identify what avg is for a given test

Advantage • • Objective Efficient Skills can be compared Common ground of discussion Clinician

Advantage • • Objective Efficient Skills can be compared Common ground of discussion Clinician donot require high clinical expertise to administer

Disadvantage • • • Do not allow indvl variation Static – tells wahta a

Disadvantage • • • Do not allow indvl variation Static – tells wahta a person knows not how a person learn Testing envmt- unnatural Evaluate- isolated skills withut considering other factors Should be administered as instructed May not be appropriate for certain population.

Criterion referenced test • Identify what a client can and cannot do compared to

Criterion referenced test • Identify what a client can and cannot do compared to a predefined criterion • Assumes a level of performance that must be met for a behavior to be acceptable. • Any score below- deviant • May /maynot be std

Advantage • Objective • Efficient

Advantage • Objective • Efficient

Disadvantage • Test envmt- unnatural • Isolated skills

Disadvantage • Test envmt- unnatural • Isolated skills

Foundation of test or measure • Validity • Reliability

Foundation of test or measure • Validity • Reliability

Validity • Refers to the degree to which a procedure actually measures what it

Validity • Refers to the degree to which a procedure actually measures what it purports to measure. • Related to the purpose for which the test is used

Face validity • Test looks like it asseses the skill it claims to assess.

Face validity • Test looks like it asseses the skill it claims to assess.

Content validity • Test contents are representative of the content domain of the skill

Content validity • Test contents are representative of the content domain of the skill being assessed. • Judgemental in nature and requires clear definition of what the content should be. •

Established by three factors • Appropriateness of the type of items. • The completeness

Established by three factors • Appropriateness of the type of items. • The completeness of the item sample. • The way in which the item assess the content.

Construct validity • Test measures a theoretical construct or trait • Rely on indirect

Construct validity • Test measures a theoretical construct or trait • Rely on indirect evidence and reference. •

Criterion validity • Established by use of an external criteria.

Criterion validity • Established by use of an external criteria.

Reliability • Results are replicable • When administered properly, a test gives consistent results

Reliability • Results are replicable • When administered properly, a test gives consistent results on repeated administration • With different interpreters judging the same admin.

Test – retest reliability • Test stability over time • Administer same test multiple

Test – retest reliability • Test stability over time • Administer same test multiple times to same group then comparing score • Similar – reliable and stable.

Rater reliability Intra rater Inter rater Same person more than one time More than

Rater reliability Intra rater Inter rater Same person more than one time More than person- result consistent

Split half reliability • Test internal consistency • Results from one half correlated with

Split half reliability • Test internal consistency • Results from one half correlated with results in another half

Dynamic assessment • Notion of using time in diagnostic session to gain insight into

Dynamic assessment • Notion of using time in diagnostic session to gain insight into the performance on treatment task • Learning process and direction for treatment • Rely on the Vygotsky ZPD.

Static assessment • Snap shot of child performance. • Standardised test

Static assessment • Snap shot of child performance. • Standardised test

Static Dynamic • • • Active participants • Examiner participates • Results describe modifiability

Static Dynamic • • • Active participants • Examiner participates • Results describe modifiability • Administration fluid and responsive. Passive participants Examiner observes Result identify deficits Standardized administration