Writing a Manuscript For peer reviewed journal https

Writing a Manuscript For peer reviewed journal https: //www. springer. com/gp/autho 1 rseditors/authorandreviewertutorials/ writing-a-journalmanuscript? utm_source=freesampl e&utm_medium=email&utm_camp aign=SNlistsample&sap-outbound. Wayan Darmawan IPB id=F 44 EF 5 F 878 DCD 84 C 5 EC 9 EFF

1. Why you should write and publish a Manuscript? 2 1. Important for your research lifecycle and your career as a scientist 2. necessary to get your work seen by the scientific community 3. To exchange your ideas globally and to ensure you receive the recognition for your results

2. Before you begin writing § Identifying hot topics by reading regularly to enables you to keep up to date with recent advancements and identify certain issues or unsolved problems § Reference managers Bib. Te. X, End. Note, Mendeley, Papers, Ref. Words Zotero, Read. Cube § Types of manuscripts Original Research, Review Articles, Short reports or Letters, Case Studies 3

3. The general structure of a full article § § § § 4 Title Authors Abstract Keywords Main text (IMRa. D) § Introduction § Methods § Results § Discussion § Conclusions Acknowledgements References Supplementary material

3. 1 Title § This is your opportunity to attract the reader’s attention. § Readers are the potential authors who will cite your article § Keep it informative and concise. § Reviewers will check whether the title is specific and whether it reflects the content of the manuscript. Max info in least words § <12 words, <100 characters § 5 § List the topics covered by the manuscript. Try to put all of the topics together in the title using as

Exampl e: Vaccinating Children and Adolescents with Inactivated Influenza Virus for Inhibiting the Spread of Influenza in Unimmunized Residents of Rural Communities This title has too many unnecessary words. Influenza Vaccination of Children in Rural Communities This title doesn’t give enough information about what makes the manuscript interesting. Effect of Child Influenza Vaccination on Infection Rates in Rural TIP: Communities: An. Write effective title. short, easy totitles, understand, andselect conveys the down a : few possible and then important of the research. the bestaspects to refine further. 6 Ask your colleagues for their opinion

3. 2 Authors § § § 7 First Author Co-Author Corresponding Author Ghost Author Gift/Honorary Author Keep it informative § indicate name of all the authors and their affiliation § E-mail address for CA § ORCID ID for CA

3. 3 Abstract and Keywords Allow editor and referees to make a judgement § Appears in indexing databases § Abstract should answer these questions: What was done? Why did you do it? What did you find? Why are these findings useful and important? § Follow word limitations (around 250 words)!!! § Use only those abbreviations that are firmly established in the field. § 8

§ Keywords are a tool to help indexers and search engines find relevant papers They should: Represent the content of your manuscript Be specific to your field or sub-field Manuscript title : Direct observation of nonlinear optics in an isolated carbon nanotube Poor keywords : molecule, optics, lasers, energy lifetime Better keywords : single-molecule interaction, Kerr effect, carbon nanotubes, energy level structure Manuscript title : Increases in levels of sediment transport at former glacial-interglacial transitions 9 Poor keywords : climate change, erosion, plant effects

3. 4 Introduction § § Describe the problem / unanswered question § Are there any existing solutions? § What are innovations proposed? § § 10 Your chance to convince readers of the importance of your work. What do you hope to achieve? fill a gap in the knowledge or to answer a previously unanswered question At the end of your Introduction is a clear and exact statement of your study aims

Make sure your citations are: Well balanced, Current, Relevant § § § 11 Cite scientific publications on which JOURNAL your article would be published Avoid excessive self-citations Avoid excessive citations of publications from the same Journal/Region

• Tense Previously published work, known facts and hypotheses : present tense Voice Active more precise and less wordy than passive • Singulars and plurals 12

3. 5 Materials and Methods § § Describe the details of how you conducted your study. You should: Use subheadings to separate different methodologies Describe what you did in the past tense Describe new methods in enough detail Describe established methods briefly, and simply cite a reference State all statistical tests and parameters TIP : Check the ‘Instructions for Authors’ for your target journal , how manuscripts should present the Materials and Methods. 13 Look at previously published papers in the journal website.

3. 6 Results 1. Simply state what you found 2. Presented in a logical order 3. Use subheadings to separate the results 4. Use the past tense to describe your results 5. Refer to figures and tables in the present tense 6. Do not duplicate data among figures, tables, and text 7. Include the results of statistical analyses in the text, usually by providing p values 8. Do not “hide” data in the hope of saving it for a later paper. 14

Figures and Tables § § 15 2 or 4 data sets per figure; well-selected scales; appropriate axis label size; symbols Each photograph must have a scale marker of professional quality on one corner. Use color ONLY when necessary. If different line styles can clarify the meaning, never use colors Do not include long boring tables!

Schematic Diagram Wood disk Pith A 2 Fiber length and MFA test specimen A 3 A 1 1 2 3 4 Radial rings from pith 1 B 1 2 3 B 2 4 B 3 Moisture, Density, Shrinkage, and Bending test specimen 16

Photogr aph 17

Line chart 18

70 1000 60 50 800 40 600 Fiber Length 400 MFA 200 30 20 10 0 0 1 19 MFA (degree) Fiber length (µm) 1200 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Radial increment from pith to bark

Bar chart 160 Unpainted weathered Acrylic painted weathered 140 MOR (MPa) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Teak Camphor Wood Species 20 Pine

Tables Table. . . General description of the woods used and the coating systems applied Characteristics Paint : Paint type Specific gravity Volume solid Spreading rate Coating layer Wood panels : Species Density (g/cm 3) Durability Moisture (%) 21 Description Water based acrylic; pigments oxide transparent; high build 1. 06 ± 0. 02 g/cc 40 ± 2 % 4 m 2/l 3 layer Pine Camphor Teak (0. 52± 0. 06) (0. 86± 0. 02) (0. 67± 0. 03) Low Moderate High (10. 5± 1. 1) (12. 6± 1. 2) (11. 0± 1. 4)

Table. . . Calculated p values of statistical t test at 0. 05 significant level for mean differences between the Perhutani and Community teak traits Traits Mean values from pith to bark Mean p value of Perhutani teak Community teak difference t test Density (g/cm 3) 0. 67 (0. 03) 0. 49 (0. 03) 0. 18 0. 0001 Longit. shrinkage (%) 0. 81 (0. 11) 0. 13 (0. 02) 0. 68 0. 001 Radial shrinkage (%) 2. 31 (0. 63) 1. 68 (0. 24) 0. 63 0. 042 Tangential shrinkage (%) 3. 27 (0. 82) 3. 61 (1. 01) -0. 34 0. 377 Fiber length (µm) 1406 (170) 1155 (238) 251 0. 004 MFA (degree) 28 (6) 34 (7) -6 0. 041 MOE (kg/cm 2) 130196 (11417) 84925 (13216) 45271 0. 0001 MOR (kg/cm 2) 1042 (150) 782 (90) 260 0. 004 22

3. 7 Discussion Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø 23 Many manuscripts are rejected due to poor Discussion Make the Discussion corresponding to the Results. Discuss your results in order of most to least important Compare the published results with yours, convince the reader that you are correct or better Mention any inconclusive results Briefly describe the limitations of your study Discuss what your results may mean State how your results extend the findings of previous studies If your findings are preliminary, suggest future studies

Pitfalls to be Aware of: ØStatements that go beyond what the results can support ØSpeculations on possible interpretations should be rooted in fact, rather than imagination ØAvoiding data manipulation both in Table and Figure/Image 24

3. 8 Conclusions Ø Ø Ø 25 Tells how your work advances the field from the present state of knowledge! Should NOT repeat the Abstract, or experimental results You should also suggest future experiments.

3. 9 Acknowledgements Recognize those who helped in the research 1. Financial supporters 2. Proofreaders 3. Typists 4. Suppliers who may have given materials 26

References § § § 27 List references according to Author for the Journal More mistakes are found in the references than any other part of the manuscript It is one of the most annoying problems, and causes great headaches among editors…

Formatting your manuscript Have you: 1. Obeyed all word and character limits (title, running title, abstract, manuscript text)? 2. Included all required sections? 3. Met language requirements (US or UK English)? 4. Supplied all requested contact information? 5. Inserted figures in the correct location (in text, end of manuscript, separate files)? 6. Correctly formatted references? 7. Used the correct file format for your images (. jpg, . png, . pdf, . ppt)? 28 8. Stated ANY conflicts of interest?

HAVE A GOOD ARTICLE Ready for publish 29