T 7 005 Survival and Prognostic Factors for

  • Slides: 19
Download presentation
T 7 -005 Survival and Prognostic Factors for Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma after

T 7 -005 Survival and Prognostic Factors for Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Wen-Yen Huang (黃文� ), Cheng-Hsiang Lo, Jen-Fu Yang, Ming-Yueh Liu, Yee-Min Jen, Chun-Shu Lin, Hsing-Lung Chao Department of Radiation Oncology Tri-Service General Hospital

DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST: NONE

DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST: NONE

RADIOTHERAPY IN LIVER TUMORS ¢ RT was not standard treatment for liver cancer. ¢

RADIOTHERAPY IN LIVER TUMORS ¢ RT was not standard treatment for liver cancer. ¢ Limitation: * poor radiation tolerance of normal liver * organ motion

SABR FOR LIVER CANCER INTSGH ¢ Research overview 1. Indications (safety and efficacy) (1)

SABR FOR LIVER CANCER INTSGH ¢ Research overview 1. Indications (safety and efficacy) (1) Recurrent HCC (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012) (2) TACE-failed HCC (European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2014) (3) Re-irradiation for HCC (Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2014) 2. Identify prognostic indicators (1) 18 F-FDG PET parameters (J Nucl Med 2013) 3. Image response evaluation (1) Radiographic response evaluation for PVTT (Therapeut Radiol Oncol 2016) (2) Functional image biomarker (DWI) (Ongoing) 4. Other than HCC (1) SABR for Cholangiocarcinoma (2017 Tumori, Epub) 5. Development and validation of nomogram for treatment outcome (1) For BCLC stage C disease (International study under ALRT SIG) SIG 6. Immunological biomarkers before and after SABR (1) Tim-3, PD 1, PD L 1 (ongoing)

PURPOSE ¢ To evaluate the survival outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with BCLC

PURPOSE ¢ To evaluate the survival outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with BCLC stage C HCC after SABR.

MATERIALS &METHODS ¢ A retrospective cohort study ¢ Between December 2007 and July 2015

MATERIALS &METHODS ¢ A retrospective cohort study ¢ Between December 2007 and July 2015 ¢ BCLC stage C disease ¢ Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A–B

RESULTS ¢ 110 patients with 148 tumors ¢ 1 -year in-field control rate: 76.

RESULTS ¢ 110 patients with 148 tumors ¢ 1 -year in-field control rate: 76. 9% 3 -year in-field control rate: 66. 4% ¢ 1 -year OS: 49. 6% 3 -year OS: 23. 6%

Median survival: ≥ 2, 1, and 0 predictors: 5. 8, 22. 7, and 26.

Median survival: ≥ 2, 1, and 0 predictors: 5. 8, 22. 7, and 26. 4 months (p < 0. 001)

EXTERNAL VALIDATION ¢ NTUH 35 cases BCLC stage C Child A/B

EXTERNAL VALIDATION ¢ NTUH 35 cases BCLC stage C Child A/B

EXTERNAL VALIDATION Ø TSGH 110 cases BCLC stage C Child A/B Ø Ø Median

EXTERNAL VALIDATION Ø TSGH 110 cases BCLC stage C Child A/B Ø Ø Median survival: ≥ 2, 1, and 0 predictors: 5. 8, 22. 7, and 26. 4 months (p < 0. 001) Ø NTUH 35 cases BCLC stage C Child A/B Median survival: ≥ 2, 1, and 0 predictors: 2. 7, 9. 6, and 24. 8 months (p < 0. 02)

FUTURE WORK ¢ Asia Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting (APPLE) Asia liver radiation

FUTURE WORK ¢ Asia Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting (APPLE) Asia liver radiation therapy special interest group international study ¢ Title: Development and validation of a nomogram for Treatment Outcome of Patients with BCLC stage C HCC after SABR: an international study in Asia

THANK YOU FOR YOUR LISTENING

THANK YOU FOR YOUR LISTENING