Safety and quality of neuraxial analgesia Ulla Sipilinen

  • Slides: 29
Download presentation
Safety and quality of neuraxial analgesia Ulla Sipiläinen 6. 10. 2011 HUCS Jorvi hospital

Safety and quality of neuraxial analgesia Ulla Sipiläinen 6. 10. 2011 HUCS Jorvi hospital

Chestnut´s Checklist • Preparation for neuraxial labor analgesia 1. Communicate (early) with obst provider

Chestnut´s Checklist • Preparation for neuraxial labor analgesia 1. Communicate (early) with obst provider review parturient´s obst history 2. Perform focused preanesth eval: review maternal obst, anest, health history perform targeted physical exam (vital signs, airway, heart, lungs, back) 3. Review relevant lab and imaging studies

 • 4. consider need for blood typing and screening or crossmatching • 5.

• 4. consider need for blood typing and screening or crossmatching • 5. formulate analgesia plan • 6. obtain informed consent • 7. perform equipment check • Check routine equipment • Check emergency recuscitation equipment 8. Obtain peripheral intravenous acces 9. Apply maternal monitors ( Hr, BP, Pulseoximeter 10. Perform a team time-out.

Real life checklist • Airway, airway! • Trombosytes, if symptoms of preechlampsia • Position:

Real life checklist • Airway, airway! • Trombosytes, if symptoms of preechlampsia • Position: BMI • Allergies

maintain your skills • wet tap rate / dural puncture rate • teaching problematic

maintain your skills • wet tap rate / dural puncture rate • teaching problematic • formal training programme for epidural analgesia? • simulator?

Position • sitting/ on side • weight>height-100, examp, 170 cm, 80 kg • consider

Position • sitting/ on side • weight>height-100, examp, 170 cm, 80 kg • consider sitting position

Skin preparation • • • meningitis epidural infection wear mask, sterile gloves, hat skin

Skin preparation • • • meningitis epidural infection wear mask, sterile gloves, hat skin preparation infections are very rare st viridans

early vs late epidural • cervical dilatation less than 4 cm • with low-dose

early vs late epidural • cervical dilatation less than 4 cm • with low-dose local anesthetic technique • no difference in cs rates • C. Wong 2005 and 2009

CSE vs epidural analgesia • CSE when it is really needed • multiparous patients

CSE vs epidural analgesia • CSE when it is really needed • multiparous patients in advanced, rapidly progressing labour • even single-shot spinal • risk of cs, obese, very painful

Air vs Saline • • saline is recommended saline with small air bubble in

Air vs Saline • • saline is recommended saline with small air bubble in Finland air is most popular no differences in the incidence if PDPH between saline or air

Continous vs intermittent • pressure in loss of resistance syringe • no difference •

Continous vs intermittent • pressure in loss of resistance syringe • no difference • personal preferences

Volume • high-volume • low concentration solutions • better analgesia with 20 ml epidural

Volume • high-volume • low concentration solutions • better analgesia with 20 ml epidural than 13 ml or 15 ml • if one-sided or in-adequate analgesia, volume addition ad 5 ml before replacement

PCEA, infusion, bolus? • maintaining • volume! • second dose intructions for midwife: 20

PCEA, infusion, bolus? • maintaining • volume! • second dose intructions for midwife: 20 ml • PCEA best, large bolus are needed to spread widely

Intra-venous epidural • test dose!! • catether migrate into veins very easily and often

Intra-venous epidural • test dose!! • catether migrate into veins very easily and often • saline -injektion, aspiration • important to detect

Obese partiturent • • greater risk for cs epidural space? lumbar space? position: sitting

Obese partiturent • • greater risk for cs epidural space? lumbar space? position: sitting G 18/G 27 120 mm needle CSE or epidural favour early analgesia

Taping • flexed position minimizes the distance between skin and epidural space • the

Taping • flexed position minimizes the distance between skin and epidural space • the catether can move up to 4 cm • leave the catether 5 -6 cm into the epidural space

Routines • • • routines protect from mistakes variation between phycisians analgesia similar undependantly

Routines • • • routines protect from mistakes variation between phycisians analgesia similar undependantly from person on call

Incidence and chaceterics of failures in obstetr analgesia • • • Retrospective analysis of

Incidence and chaceterics of failures in obstetr analgesia • • • Retrospective analysis of 19 259 deliveries 12 590 analgesia Overall failure rate 12% 6. 8 % imcomplete analgesia 5. 6% catether replacement for inadequate analgesia • 98. 8% adequate analgesia • Pan P. et al Int J Obst Anest 2004: 13; 227 -233

Inadequate analgesia • Consider other causes of pain: distended bladder, ruptured uterus • Evaluation:

Inadequate analgesia • Consider other causes of pain: distended bladder, ruptured uterus • Evaluation: catether in epidural space? > not-> replacement or consider CSE • Inadequate analgesia, asymmetric block -> inject saline 5 ml • CSE has lower failure rate than epidural

Intrathecal catether • • important to detect test dose always via catether immediate analgesia

Intrathecal catether • • important to detect test dose always via catether immediate analgesia total spinal anaesthesia may be disasterous

Accidental dural puncture • earlier: catether placed for 24 hrs • now: new epidural

Accidental dural puncture • earlier: catether placed for 24 hrs • now: new epidural analgesia from another lumbar space and epidural blood patch if needed after 24 -36 hrs • delayd application of EBP may cause problems, be aware!

Neuraxial analgesia and neuraxial injury • common claim • indirect injury: longer second stage

Neuraxial analgesia and neuraxial injury • common claim • indirect injury: longer second stage of labour • relaxation of pelvic muscles -> delays rotation of head • no pain-> encourage to push without changing body position

Adverse delivery outcomes • weakened desire to push • increases the risk of instrumental

Adverse delivery outcomes • weakened desire to push • increases the risk of instrumental delivery • risk of vaginal/ perineal trauma • back pain is common

Recommendations • • instructions also for potential complications iv line, hydration hypotension anesthesia for

Recommendations • • instructions also for potential complications iv line, hydration hypotension anesthesia for CS fasting dural puncture

Conclusion 1 • ”Unreasonable to expect, that neuroblocade of the half lower body NOT

Conclusion 1 • ”Unreasonable to expect, that neuroblocade of the half lower body NOT have any affect on labour process. . ” • Chestnut`s

dose examples • • • Ropivacaine 2 mg/ml 10 ml Fentanyl 0. 05 mg/ml

dose examples • • • Ropivacaine 2 mg/ml 10 ml Fentanyl 0. 05 mg/ml 2 ml Saline ad 20 ml • • 2 -dose, given by midwife: 10 ml ropivacaine fentanyl 0. 05 mg/ml 1 ml (Sic!) Saline 9 ml, total dose 20 ml.

dose examples • • CSE: Bupivacain 2. 5 mg Fentanyl 25 mcg saline ad

dose examples • • CSE: Bupivacain 2. 5 mg Fentanyl 25 mcg saline ad 2 ml

Conclusion • Instructions for own hospital • Analgesia should be given early enough •

Conclusion • Instructions for own hospital • Analgesia should be given early enough • Does not increase cs rate

Thank you!

Thank you!