Total Quality Management What is Quality Old Quality

  • Slides: 40
Download presentation
Total Quality Management

Total Quality Management

What is Quality?

What is Quality?

Old Quality vs. New Quality Difference between old quality (Rolls Royce, personal banker, .

Old Quality vs. New Quality Difference between old quality (Rolls Royce, personal banker, . . . ) and new quality is that old was the work of craftsmen and the new is the work of a system (Toyota, Big Mac, Boeing Aircraft, Disney World, . . . ). The old is expensive, made for the few, using skilled hands, is beautiful and functionally based. The new reduces cost, made for the many by intelligent minds and should drive the economy and make business more competitive. Toyota Commercial

Why care about quality increase productivity expand market share raise customer loyalty enhance competitiveness

Why care about quality increase productivity expand market share raise customer loyalty enhance competitiveness of the firm at a minimum, serve as a price of entry

Achieving high quality Is Difficult Only 36% of the firms felt that Total Quality

Achieving high quality Is Difficult Only 36% of the firms felt that Total Quality programs boosted their ability to compete. Firms Arthur D. Little Survey of 500 Over 50% of firms rated their efforts D or F relative to increasing customer satisfaction, increasing market share, or reducing their cost. Rath and Strong Main Problem: Achieving high quality is as easy to understand as losing weight and quitting smoking and is as difficult to do. Steve Schwartz, IBM MDQ VP

Why Quality is so difficult to do? Quality can only be defined in terms

Why Quality is so difficult to do? Quality can only be defined in terms of an agent (a judge of quality). One has to translate future needs of the user into measurable characteristics

Service Industries are particularly Difficult Reasons: High volume of transaction Immediate consumption Difficult to

Service Industries are particularly Difficult Reasons: High volume of transaction Immediate consumption Difficult to measure and control More labor intensive High degree of customization required Image is a quality characteristic Behavior is a quality characteristic

Quality Gurus Deming: The father of the quality movement. Scientific approach to quality Juran:

Quality Gurus Deming: The father of the quality movement. Scientific approach to quality Juran: Quality by design Crosby: Quality is free

Deming’s “Seven Deadly Diseases” Lack of Constancy of purpose Emphasis on short term profits

Deming’s “Seven Deadly Diseases” Lack of Constancy of purpose Emphasis on short term profits Evaluation of performance, merit rating or annual review of performance Mobility of management Running the company on visible figures alone Excessive medical costs Excessive costs of warranty fueled by lawyers that work on contingency fees Interview with Deming

What is TQM? ? The essence of Total Quality Management is a common sense

What is TQM? ? The essence of Total Quality Management is a common sense dedication to understanding what the customer wants and then using people and science to set up systems to deliver products and services that delight the customer. Greg Hughes President AT&T Transmission Systems

Basic Concepts of TQM Customer Focus Continuous Process Improvement - Kaizen Employee Empowerment –

Basic Concepts of TQM Customer Focus Continuous Process Improvement - Kaizen Employee Empowerment – Everyone is responsible for quality Quality is free - focus on defect prevention rather than defect detection for it is always cheaper to do it right the first time Benchmarking – Legally stealing other people’s ideas Customer-Supplier Partnerships Management by fact. . by numbers. . by data – Balanced scoreboard (financial, customer, process, learning)

Quality in U. S. vs. the Japanese U. S. conforming to the requirements at

Quality in U. S. vs. the Japanese U. S. conforming to the requirements at the least cost Japanese joint responsibility to make the end customer happy 12

“ I met the requirements” nt e irem qu e R s t c

“ I met the requirements” nt e irem qu e R s t c u OEM Supplier d o r ts P l u or t Res s e T OEM Combative non collaborative relationship 13

“Creating the Best Vehicle/Systems with All the People All the Suppliers All the Time”

“Creating the Best Vehicle/Systems with All the People All the Suppliers All the Time” YOU meet the requirements! SOR Let’s create the best Vehicle and Systems together. Partnership - Collaborative relationship 14

Strength of USA vs. Japan Concept Good Innovative Ideas Good Implementation Strength of USA

Strength of USA vs. Japan Concept Good Innovative Ideas Good Implementation Strength of USA Mfg Strength of Japanese Mfg KAIZEN Time Good Ideas, Good Implementation are the goals of everyone in the automotive industry 15

Seven Basic Quality Tools To improve Process Quality Scatter Diagrams: Plot data on a

Seven Basic Quality Tools To improve Process Quality Scatter Diagrams: Plot data on a chart – no attempt is made to classify the data or massage it Pareto Charts: Organize data on a histogram based on frequency from most prevalent to least. Help identify major causes or occurrences (80: 20 rule) Check Sheets: Easy way to count frequency of occurrence by front line workers Histograms: Categorize data is cells and plot (see if any patterns emerge) Run Charts: Plot data as a function of time Cause and effects Charts: fishbone diagrams are used to identify the root causes of a problem Control Charts: are statistical tools used to determine if the variation in results is caused by common or special events

Failures in O-rings

Failures in O-rings

Graph Fit of O-ring failures

Graph Fit of O-ring failures

Full O-ring data including no failures

Full O-ring data including no failures

T R A N S A C T I O N T I M

T R A N S A C T I O N T I M E RUN CHART Time of Day

Data Collected From Check Sheet Time Range (in secs) Frequency 44 -50 51 -57

Data Collected From Check Sheet Time Range (in secs) Frequency 44 -50 51 -57 58 -64 65 -71 72 -78 79 -85 86 -92 93 -99 100 -106 107 -113 1 4 17 12 14 19 18 11 3 1

A Histogram

A Histogram

Be careful of Cell Size

Be careful of Cell Size

Pareto Chart (80 -20 Rule) Further info on Pareto Charts

Pareto Chart (80 -20 Rule) Further info on Pareto Charts

Pareto Diagrams Purpose: helps organize data to show major factors ◦ displays data in

Pareto Diagrams Purpose: helps organize data to show major factors ◦ displays data in the order of importance ◦ organize based on fact rather than perception To construct: ◦ use data from a check sheet or similar instrument ◦ analyze data to determine frequency ◦ identify the vital few ◦ calculate percentages ◦ add percentages to find vital few (80%) ◦ draw cumulative curve Typical Application: ◦ display relative importance of different factors choose starting point for problem solving monitor success identify basic cause of a problem ◦ use a selling tool to gain support ◦

Teller Processes Sequence of activities Fatigue Training Too many steps Control functions Attitude Processing

Teller Processes Sequence of activities Fatigue Training Too many steps Control functions Attitude Processing Delays Too much downtime Not user friendly Slow response time Computers Fishbone Diagram aka Cause & Effect Diagram

Cause and Effect Diagram “Fishbone Diagram” Purpose: ◦ visual display of information to identify

Cause and Effect Diagram “Fishbone Diagram” Purpose: ◦ visual display of information to identify root causes rather than symptoms. To construct: ◦ determine the issue and write problem statement in a box to the right of diagram ◦ find the main causes and write them on branches flowing to the main branch (method, equipment, people, material, environment, customer expectations, money, management, govt. regulations) ◦ identify all possible causes and write them on the diagram as sub-causes in each category Typical Application: ◦ determine the real cause of the problem ◦ check the potential effects of a solution Fishbone Diagrams Explained 5 Why’s problem solving technique

Mizenboushi and GD 3 Concepts Good Design Prevent Problems Robust Design - keep Good

Mizenboushi and GD 3 Concepts Good Design Prevent Problems Robust Design - keep Good Designs - minimize change Find Problems GD 3 Good Dissection Good Discussion DRBFM DRBTR Address any potential issues up stream at Design Phase 28

Quality Focus At the Design Stage Quality from the start – Directs attention to

Quality Focus At the Design Stage Quality from the start – Directs attention to “Change” ® Change = potential to have problems Directs attention to “Interfaces” ® Most defects occur at the “interface” Focus on Change Points & Interface Points 29

No change – No Problem Examples: • Design change • Packaging environment change •

No change – No Problem Examples: • Design change • Packaging environment change • Usage environment change • New manufacturing process • New supplier Change Points have the highest potential to introduce defects 30

DRBFM – Example Tire Pressure Monitoring System – Changing the sensor from Aluminum Valve

DRBFM – Example Tire Pressure Monitoring System – Changing the sensor from Aluminum Valve to Rubber Valve. • Purely for cost reduction purposes. . . System Performance is the same. Simple change – What could go wrong? 31

Interfaces – (Interfaces where issues can brew and surface later) Customer to Supplier Department

Interfaces – (Interfaces where issues can brew and surface later) Customer to Supplier Department to Department System Interfaces The Crash sensor failure on Honda Minivans Interface Points have the highest potential to introduce defects 32

Design Review By Failure Modes (DRBFM) Basic Concepts Before and After – Description of

Design Review By Failure Modes (DRBFM) Basic Concepts Before and After – Description of the Change Point Describe the Potential failure modes Describe the Design Countermeasures Target Testing of the change points and Countermeasures Only Design techniques to uncover defects at the design stage – Up stream

Design DRBFM Verify/Validate DRBTR Design Changes Test Result (Change in product due to test:

Design DRBFM Verify/Validate DRBTR Design Changes Test Result (Change in product due to test: Cracks, Leaks, etc. ) Focus on Implementation 34

Where do failures occur Design Phase (Suppliers are Up Stream) Production In the field

Where do failures occur Design Phase (Suppliers are Up Stream) Production In the field Where is it cheapest to detect failures? Example: Replacing a four crash sensors by a single one. .

When Failures Occur! Why did the failure happen? Symptoms vs. Root Causes (Investigate the

When Failures Occur! Why did the failure happen? Symptoms vs. Root Causes (Investigate the whole chain): Suppliers/Component failure Design Manufacturing Change management Why were not able to detect it? Rootcause Analysis: • Why Occurred? • Why Not Detected? 36

Failure Detection 5 Ws-2 Hs Who Where When What Why How was the problem

Failure Detection 5 Ws-2 Hs Who Where When What Why How was the problem found? How can we isolate it? Turn On / Turn Off Rootcause Analysis Methodology

Failure Isolation – KT Analysis: Is - Is Not Why is this design and

Failure Isolation – KT Analysis: Is - Is Not Why is this design and not the other similar design Why this plant and not another plant Why this operator and not the other operator Why in winter and not in the summer Why this computer and not the other computer Why in this model and not in other models Rootcause Analysis Methodology

Finding the root causes of a problem is not Fault Finding/Criticism. To find problems

Finding the root causes of a problem is not Fault Finding/Criticism. To find problems is not fault finding/criticism. To find problems is a creative act, same as innovation. We should never stop at only finding problems, but also develop a systemic corrective action plan. . . FIX THE PROCESS that created the problem & identify detection algorithms We never forget that every job should relate directly to improving a product. Other jobs are nothing but waste, e. g. , only to check, to inspect, etc. Everyone should readily accept help from review participants. 39

Summary - Concepts Quality all the time by everyone from an end user prospective

Summary - Concepts Quality all the time by everyone from an end user prospective Address issues up stream. Address product and process defects at the design stage Fixing problems usually involves fixing the systemic process issues that caused the problem – Reoccurrence Prevention Focus on Implementation Focus on Change Points and Interfaces