Evidence for Evolution II contemporary Lecture Contemporary evidence

  • Slides: 31
Download presentation
Evidence for Evolution II: contemporary Lecture Contemporary evidence for evolution Natural selection, theoretical problems,

Evidence for Evolution II: contemporary Lecture Contemporary evidence for evolution Natural selection, theoretical problems, and new evidence Goal Summarize how molecular and developmental biology support evolution; what new discoveries convinced scientists of natural selection

Problem for Darwin I: Lord Kelvin and the age of the earth

Problem for Darwin I: Lord Kelvin and the age of the earth

Estimating the age of the earth

Estimating the age of the earth

Problem for Darwin II: absence of transitional fossils Archaeopteryx:

Problem for Darwin II: absence of transitional fossils Archaeopteryx:

Ancestors of whales Ambulocetus natans – 50 mya.

Ancestors of whales Ambulocetus natans – 50 mya.

Problem for Darwin III: plausibility of Natural Selection

Problem for Darwin III: plausibility of Natural Selection

Contemporary evidence for evolution: Molecular genetics

Contemporary evidence for evolution: Molecular genetics

Arbitrary nature of genetic code

Arbitrary nature of genetic code

Developmental Biology see figure 3. 15

Developmental Biology see figure 3. 15

Pax 6 controls eye development in all triploblasts!

Pax 6 controls eye development in all triploblasts!

Embryological experiments: the same gene can function in multiple organisms

Embryological experiments: the same gene can function in multiple organisms

Evidence for evolution: historical constraints

Evidence for evolution: historical constraints

Evolution in Natural Populations Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)

Evolution in Natural Populations Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)

Sequence Evolution in six children Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997

Sequence Evolution in six children Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997

Why are. Human branches longer in children D-F? Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et

Why are. Human branches longer in children D-F? Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997

Evolution in Natural Populations Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997 •

Evolution in Natural Populations Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997 • A brief interlude for some genetics review • Mutations within a gene can be classified as: – Synonymous (silent) – Non-synonymous

Distinguishing selection from mutation Effect of mutation Not selected (neutral) Selected against (deleterious) Selected

Distinguishing selection from mutation Effect of mutation Not selected (neutral) Selected against (deleterious) Selected for (favorable) Relative probability of mutation remaining in population

Evolution in Natural Populations Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996

Evolution in Natural Populations Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996 • • • Studied weedy, wind-dispersed plants located on the islands off the west coast of Vancouver Island Censused the plant populations of 200 islands and a region of the mainland over a 10 -year period Extinction and recolonization events occurred frequently on the islands.

Evolution in Natural Populations Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996

Evolution in Natural Populations Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996 • Studied two species: – Hypochaeris radicata – Lactuca muralis. William S. Justice @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database © Markku Savela

Evolution in Natural Populations Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996

Evolution in Natural Populations Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996 • Both are Asteraceae (composites). • Both produce achenes consisting of a feathery pappus and a seed.

Evidence of selection on dispersal

Evidence of selection on dispersal

Speciation and selection? Provisional definition: Species – An interbreeding group of organisms that is

Speciation and selection? Provisional definition: Species – An interbreeding group of organisms that is reproductively isolated from (does not interbreed with) other groups of organisms

Selection and speciation? Habitat selection in Drosophila – Rice & Salt 1988, 1990 •

Selection and speciation? Habitat selection in Drosophila – Rice & Salt 1988, 1990 • Flies choose – lightness or darkness (left vs. right) – selection for phototaxis – up or down – selection for geotaxis – acetaldehyde (white vial) or ethanol (black vial) – selection for chemotaxis • Experimenters choose time period: early (E), middle (M), and late (L) – selection for development time

Selection and speciation? Habitat selection in Drosophila – Rice & Salt 1988, 1990 •

Selection and speciation? Habitat selection in Drosophila – Rice & Salt 1988, 1990 • Flies mated within the maze • Control lines: 120 females chosen randomly • Selected lines – 60 females each from: • dark, up, acetaldehde, early (5 E) • light, down, ethanol, late (4 L)

Evolution and Artificial Selection Habitat selection in Drosophila – Rice & Salt 1988, 1990

Evolution and Artificial Selection Habitat selection in Drosophila – Rice & Salt 1988, 1990 • Experimental larvae were mixed and placed together in the maze to start the next generation. • Controls were run through the maze separately. • Offspring of mothers collected from 5 E and half of the controls were raised on a chemical that turned their eyes brown.

Selection and speciation - outcome Habitat selection in Drosophila – Rice & Salt 1988,

Selection and speciation - outcome Habitat selection in Drosophila – Rice & Salt 1988, 1990 Dotted line: 5 E Solid line: 4 L 5 E

Selection and speciation: summary Habitat selection in Drosophila – Rice & Salt 1988, 1990

Selection and speciation: summary Habitat selection in Drosophila – Rice & Salt 1988, 1990

Contemporary evidence: new species Hedylepta

Contemporary evidence: new species Hedylepta

New species: Tragopogon mirus

New species: Tragopogon mirus

More creationist / ID arguments Letter to the editor, Nature, December 2006. I believe

More creationist / ID arguments Letter to the editor, Nature, December 2006. I believe that, as a result of media bias, there seems to be total ignorance of new scientific evidence against theory of evolution. Such evidence includes (1) race formation (microevolution), which is not a small step in macroevolution because it is a step towards a reduction of genetic information and not towards its increase. It also includes formation of (2) geological strata sideways rather than vertically, (3) archaeological and palaeontological evidence that dinosaurs coexisted with humans, (4) a major worldwide catastrophe in historical times, and so on. Dr. Maciej Giertych, Polish member of European parliament Ph. D in tree physiology, U Toronto.

Readings and study questions • Chapter 2 in Freeman and Herron (3 rd or

Readings and study questions • Chapter 2 in Freeman and Herron (3 rd or 4 th edition) • Questions 2 and 4 at end of chapter 2 Sources Cody and Overton. 1996. Short-term evolution of reduced dispersal in island plant populations. J. of Ecology 84: 53 -61. Ganeshan et al. 1997 Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genetic evolution in children with different rates of development of disease. J. of Virology 71: 663 -677 Giertych, M. 2006. Letter to editor. Nature 444: 265. Ownbey, M. 1950. Natural hybridization and amphiploidy in the genus Tragopogon. American Journal of Botany 37: 487 -499. Rice, WR and Salt, GW. 1988. Speciation via disruptive selection on habitat preference – experimental evidence. American Naturalist 131: 911 -917. Rice, WR and Salt, GW. 1990. The evolution of reproductive isoation of a correlated character under sympatric conditions – experimental evidence. Evolution 44: 1140 -1152.