Darfur Case Study Haruka Iwamura and Kohei Fujikawa

  • Slides: 51
Download presentation
Darfur Case Study Haruka Iwamura and Kohei Fujikawa

Darfur Case Study Haruka Iwamura and Kohei Fujikawa

Outline - Historical Background - The Crisis - Actions of the International Community -

Outline - Historical Background - The Crisis - Actions of the International Community - Failures of the International Community - The R 2 P Framework - Wheeler’s Criteria - The Situation Today

Historical Background Sudan • Independent since 1956 • Ex British colony

Historical Background Sudan • Independent since 1956 • Ex British colony

Historical Background • Civil War divided between north and south from: • 1955 -1972

Historical Background • Civil War divided between north and south from: • 1955 -1972 • 1983 -2005 South Sudan became Independent in 2011

Historical Background Ethnicity • 3 disparate regions unified into a country by Britain. 134

Historical Background Ethnicity • 3 disparate regions unified into a country by Britain. 134 languages. • Border doesn’t have much to do with geography or demography. GENERALLY, • North of Sudan is ethnically Muslim • South of Sudan is ethnically black and Christian.

Historical Background • Capital Khartoum (originally slave market to sell blacks) “Abid”=black people Means

Historical Background • Capital Khartoum (originally slave market to sell blacks) “Abid”=black people Means slave. -Ruled by Arabs

Historical Background Western Sudan (Darfur) GENERALLY • Arab nomadic tribes. (Affiliated with government) •

Historical Background Western Sudan (Darfur) GENERALLY • Arab nomadic tribes. (Affiliated with government) • Black Agricultural Tribes

Historical Background - History of peaceful coexistence - Hatred derives from the hierarchy of

Historical Background - History of peaceful coexistence - Hatred derives from the hierarchy of ethnicity from British colonial rule. The paler the skin (the more Arabic, ) the better.

Historical Background - South of Sudan has oil wells - North of Sudan has

Historical Background - South of Sudan has oil wells - North of Sudan has ports to the Red Sea - People in the north that exported Southern oil made money and stayed in power.

Historical Background -South complains for lack of benefits. -The South started a rebellion. 1983

Historical Background -South complains for lack of benefits. -The South started a rebellion. 1983 -2005 South Sudanese War • South eventually won 49% of oil revenues

Historical Background Western Sudan (Darfur) The Blacks in the West did not get the

Historical Background Western Sudan (Darfur) The Blacks in the West did not get the benefits since they were in Northern Sudan. The Black tribes started a rebellion. Beginning of the Darfur Crisis (2003)

The Crisis • 2003 spring • Two rebel movements • SLM (Sudanese Liberation Movement)

The Crisis • 2003 spring • Two rebel movements • SLM (Sudanese Liberation Movement) • JEM (Justice and Equality Movement) started a campaign against political and economic marginalization of Darfur. • The Sudanese government was in the process of negotiations with Southern army • SPLMA (Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army)

- Sudanese government turns to China and gains weapons to take down the rebellion.

- Sudanese government turns to China and gains weapons to take down the rebellion. - Annihilate villages. -Black agricultural tended to be rebel sympathizers.

 • Plane bombing during night • During the day, helicopter + machineguns •

• Plane bombing during night • During the day, helicopter + machineguns • Janjaweed shot civilians and rape women • Burn houses • Dig up food stores and use oil to destroy them • throw dead bodies on wells.

Desertification • Arab herders and black farmers had coexisted for 1000 s of years

Desertification • Arab herders and black farmers had coexisted for 1000 s of years despite tension. • The Sahara desert extended 100 km in the last 40 yrs. • Arab herders sponsored by the government became Janjaweeds and attacked the Black farmers

Over 400 villages destroyed. • Aside from governments vs rebels • Bandits and militias

Over 400 villages destroyed. • Aside from governments vs rebels • Bandits and militias -> looting humanitarian aid. Commit sexual crimes. Rebels started to fight amongst each other Leads to more complication

Government stance • Avoids serious negotiations with rebel groups. • Refused to prosecute crimes

Government stance • Avoids serious negotiations with rebel groups. • Refused to prosecute crimes against humanity. • Expelled humanitarian aid groups • 300, 000 Darfuri refugees in neighboring chad. • 300, 000 killed. • Janjaweed also attacked the Chad government in April 2006 • 6 million population. 4. 7 million is affected somehow.

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out Ceasefire Agreement N’Djamena in

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out Ceasefire Agreement N’Djamena in Chad • AU sent AMIS • The end of Sudanese Civil War (African Union Mission in Sudan) to Darfur • DPA (Darfur Peace Limitation of AU mission Agreement) • AU/UN hybrid operation started May The US sent an investigating commission to Darfur George W Bush acknowledged it as “genocide” • ICC a warrant for President Bashir’s arrest 2010 2011 AU sent AMIS • CPA 2008 2009 2004 April • Independence of South Sudan

2004 July UN Security Council Resolution 1556 UN asked Sudanese government to disarm Arab

2004 July UN Security Council Resolution 1556 UN asked Sudanese government to disarm Arab militias ⇒ UN didn’t specify to disarm Janjaweed ⇒ Sudanese government didn’t disarm it Embargoes on weapons against non government Peace negotiation started Abuja in Nijeria AU took the lead ⇒ The conference didn’t go smoothly

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out 2005 January • AU

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out 2005 January • AU sent AMIS Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) • CPA the end of Sudanese Civil War Army(SAL) • DPA (Darfur Peace Agreement) • AU/UN hybrid operation started Sudanese Civil War ended A birth of united government 2008 2009 • ICC a warrant for President Bashir’s arrest 2010 2011 North government – South Sudan Liberation • Independence of South Sudan The President : Omar Bashir

2005 March UN Resolution 1591 Embargoes on weapons against Sudanese government UN Resolution 1593

2005 March UN Resolution 1591 Embargoes on weapons against Sudanese government UN Resolution 1593 UN decided to entrust a ICC with investigating the violation of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Darfur

2003 2004 • Darfur Conflict broke out • AU sent AMIS 2005 • CPA

2003 2004 • Darfur Conflict broke out • AU sent AMIS 2005 • CPA the end of Sudanese Civil War 2006 • DPA (Darfur Peace Agreement) 2007 • AU/UN hybrid operation started 2008 2009 • ICC a warrant for President Bashir’s arrest 2010 2011 2006 May • Independence of South Sudan Darfur Peace Agreement (DPA) Sudanese government – SLA Minnawi (SLA Abdul Wahid al Nur/ JEM refused to join)

2006 May UNSC Resolution 1679 UN decided to shift from AMIS(African Union Mission in

2006 May UNSC Resolution 1679 UN decided to shift from AMIS(African Union Mission in Sudan) to UN operation (It was suggested by US government since 2005 summer) ⇒ Sudanese government refused the expand of UN force

2006 November Adis Abeba meeting Mediation started Led by : UN Secretary General special

2006 November Adis Abeba meeting Mediation started Led by : UN Secretary General special envoy Eliasson AU special envoy Salim ⇒ both of them retired in 2008 June Bassole, ex Foreign Minister of Burkina Faso took over

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out 2007 June • AU

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out 2007 June • AU sent AMIS Sudanese government agreed to AU/UN hybrid operation • CPA the end of Sudanese Civil War • DPA (Darfur Peace Agreement) UNSC Resolution 1769 Darfur AU/UN mission UNAMID • AU/UN hybrid operation started ・The protection of civilians 2008 2009 ・Monitoring and verifying implementation of agreement • ICC a warrant for President Bashir’s arrest ・Contribution to the promotion of human rights and law ・Monitoring and reporting the situation along the borders with Chad and Central Africa 2010 2011 • Independence of South Sudan ※ (Bashir sent a letter to Kofi Annan. Time-buying tactic? )

2007 August Peace negotiation Arusha in Tanzania 2007 October Peace negotiation Sirte in Libya

2007 August Peace negotiation Arusha in Tanzania 2007 October Peace negotiation Sirte in Libya SLA Abdul Wahid al Nul /JEM didn’y participate No ceasefire agreement

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out 2008 August • AU

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out 2008 August • AU sent AMIS Beijing Summer Olimpics • CPA the end of Sudanese Civil War • AU/UN hybrid operation started ・Alan Wolfe (US republican) ・Segolene Royal (candidate of French President) ・Steven Spielberg (he turned down the position of art adviser of Olimpics ) • ICC a warrant for president Bashir’s arrest 2010 2011 by: • DPA (Darfur Peace Agreement) 2008 2009 Criticism for Chinese reaction to Darfur • Independence of South Sudan

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out 2009 March • AU

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out 2009 March • AU sent AMIS • CPA the end of Sudanese Civil War • DPA (Darfur Peace Agreement) ⇒ Sudanese government refused ⇒ Govenmet expeled 13 NGOs from Sudan • AU/UN hybrid operation started 2010 February 2008 2009 ICC promulgated a warrant for President Bashir’s arrest • ICC a warrant for president Bashir’s arrest Framework agreement for settelment f Sudan conflict Sudanese government - JEM 2010 2011 • Independence of South Sudan JEM left

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out • AU sent AMIS

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • Darfur Conflict broke out • AU sent AMIS • CPA the end of Sudanese Civil War • DPA (Darfur Peace Agreement) • AU/UN hybrid operation started 2011 July Republic of South Sudan • ICC a warrant for president Bashir’s arrest 2010 2011 South Sudan Referendum Decided South Sudan’s independence 2008 2009 2011 January • Independence of South Sudan

Failures of the Int’l Community • Peacekeeping Operations • AMIS-African Union Mission in Sudan

Failures of the Int’l Community • Peacekeeping Operations • AMIS-African Union Mission in Sudan (AU) 2004 • • Only multilateral organization willing to risk soldiers with consent of Sudanese regime. • Inexperienced in finances and military defense matters. • Deployed after heaviest phase of killing was over.

 • Peacekeeping Operations • UNAMID- United Nations-African Union Mission in Darfur (UN+AU) •

• Peacekeeping Operations • UNAMID- United Nations-African Union Mission in Darfur (UN+AU) • Replaced underequipped and underfunded African union peacekeeping mission in Darfur. • Resolution 1769. operationalized 2008

Peacekeeping Operations • Did not have the mandate to proactively protect civilians • Dependent

Peacekeeping Operations • Did not have the mandate to proactively protect civilians • Dependent on funding from EU and US • UNAMID- leadership issues

Peacekeeping Operations • There is no peace in Darfur so there cannot be peacekeeping.

Peacekeeping Operations • There is no peace in Darfur so there cannot be peacekeeping. Romeo Dallaire argued , “the clear intent of the resolution was. . . civilian protection. . . the question is what peacekeepers can realistically do in such a fragile political environment”

Failures of the Int’l Community • ICC Arrest warrant 2006 Thirteen NGOs were expelled.

Failures of the Int’l Community • ICC Arrest warrant 2006 Thirteen NGOs were expelled. Less information of the crisis came out because NGOs feared being expelled for speaking out.

Failures of the Int’l Community • Darfur Peace Agreement 2006 • Failure in disarming

Failures of the Int’l Community • Darfur Peace Agreement 2006 • Failure in disarming the Janjaweed after resolution 1556 and 1564. • Only one rebel faction joined. SLA Minawi (JEM and SLA Abdul. Wahid didn’t) • The Darfur rebellion fractured into more than 15 groups along tribal lines after DPA

 • Failures of Human Rights Council • Dec 2006 - HRC sent the

• Failures of Human Rights Council • Dec 2006 - HRC sent the High Level Mission to assess human rights situation. Sudan refused to grant access to HLM • . Recommendations to Sudan • Take all necessary measures to prevent attacks on civilians • regular police patrols to refugee and IDP camps

Failures of the Int’l Society • Possibilities of Intervention -UNSC has authorized military intervention

Failures of the Int’l Society • Possibilities of Intervention -UNSC has authorized military intervention without consent of the government -UN has intervened in internal conflicts as threats to international peace -Groups like Ecowas or NATO have ignored authorization from SC as well - Already an intervention in South of Sudan

The R 2 P Framework -First real case of R 2 P -R 2

The R 2 P Framework -First real case of R 2 P -R 2 P was unable to free itself from the political dynamics of the international community for the Darfur Crisis. -Advocates of R 2 P were not able to agree on an effective strategy.

-Russia and China: Oil and arms exports Chechnya, Tibet… -USA War on Terror Afghanistan

-Russia and China: Oil and arms exports Chechnya, Tibet… -USA War on Terror Afghanistan and Iraq Intelligence from Sudan -Arabs Opposed Western-led intervention in North Africa -Threats to peace of Southern Sudan -Towards the fear of Sudan blocking humanitarian aid

R 2 P overestimates norm of intervention until 2005 Many countries didn’t believe that

R 2 P overestimates norm of intervention until 2005 Many countries didn’t believe that the Responsibility to Protect fell to the Security Council Arabs , Africans -> AU Only Romania and Philippines argued Security Council to be primarily responsible.

Ambiguities of the R 2 P Framework • How should civilians be protected? •

Ambiguities of the R 2 P Framework • How should civilians be protected? • Who does the responsibility fall to?

Wheeler’s criteria Supreme humanitarian emergency ○ Necessity/Last Resort × Proportionality × Positive Humanitarian Outcome

Wheeler’s criteria Supreme humanitarian emergency ○ Necessity/Last Resort × Proportionality × Positive Humanitarian Outcome × Humanitarian Motives ○ Humanitarian Justification ○ Legality ○ Selectivity ○

Supreme humanitarian emergency - Population in Darfur ○ 6 million 4. 7 million is

Supreme humanitarian emergency - Population in Darfur ○ 6 million 4. 7 million is affected by Darfur Conflict some how =more than ¾ - Around 400, 000 people were killed - Millions of refugees - Is the worst humanitarian case in 21 st century

× Necessity/Last Resort - Not enough military force was sent to stop the conflict

× Necessity/Last Resort - Not enough military force was sent to stop the conflict and help the civilians × - AU in 2004, 150 soldiers ⇒ in 2005, 7000 soldiers - UNAMID in 2009, 16000 soldiers (= the largest scale in 21 st century) BUT there is no effective peace agreement in Darfur (DPA in 2006 did not work) Does peace keeping work in Darfur?

Positive Humanitarian outcome × - Still the conflict lasts in Darfur - In 2011

Positive Humanitarian outcome × - Still the conflict lasts in Darfur - In 2011 Independence of South Sudan ⇒ Since then the conflict became worse - No effective peace agreement in Darfur (DPA in 2006 is not important because of the absence of some militia groups) - Arrest warrant to president Bashir in 2009, but still not arrested - NGOs in Darfur release less information, because they are afraid of being expelled

Humanitarian Motives ○ - International society didn’t want to repeat the disaster like Rwanda

Humanitarian Motives ○ - International society didn’t want to repeat the disaster like Rwanda - AU wanted to solve the problem in Africa, and help Africans

○ - According to the UN Charter, humanitarian intervention is not permitted without UNSC’s

○ - According to the UN Charter, humanitarian intervention is not permitted without UNSC’s resolution ⇔ BUT in 1999 an aerial bombardment by NATO in Serbia without UNSC’s resolution - Non intervention State sovereignty, self-determination should be respected ⇔ BUT in humanitarian intervention to Rwanda in WHY NOT IN DARFUR?

Legality ○ - According the UN charter, if there’s a threat to the stability

Legality ○ - According the UN charter, if there’s a threat to the stability of the international society, intervention is allowed. - Hundred of thousands of refugees → Chad

○ - No fact that intervention was done to protect only government / anti-government

○ - No fact that intervention was done to protect only government / anti-government groups - US’s reverse selectivity US China ⇔ ICC BUT US decided to use ICC to do something for Darfur

Situation Today in Darfur The Conflict still lasts in Darfur According to the Human

Situation Today in Darfur The Conflict still lasts in Darfur According to the Human Rights Watch’s report, since 2010 December, serious abuse has increased Government attacks people who are related to anti government groups ⇒ More than 70, 000 people had to shelter -attack, aerial bombing to the villages -residents have been killed -house have been razed -massive looting has taken place -cutting the road to the neighbor village

Situation Today in Darfur Minni Minawi Leader of SLA (Sudanese Liberation Army) Sighned DPA

Situation Today in Darfur Minni Minawi Leader of SLA (Sudanese Liberation Army) Sighned DPA (Darfur Peace Agreement) in 2006 2007~2010 December Governmental presidental adviser Chairperson of the Transitional Darfur Regional Authority ⇒ dismissed, back to Juba (capital of South Sudan) takes p arms again Because of the absence of SLA Abdul Wahid al Nur/ JEM DPA did not work, but now DPA does not mean anything