Taking Charge of Yield Revenue Risk Management on

  • Slides: 38
Download presentation
Taking Charge of Yield & Revenue Risk Management on Your Farm Elliot Alfredson Spartan

Taking Charge of Yield & Revenue Risk Management on Your Farm Elliot Alfredson Spartan Crop Insurance $

Objective for Today’s Workshop v “Frame” approaches to managing risk v What’s new in

Objective for Today’s Workshop v “Frame” approaches to managing risk v What’s new in 2002? v Review types of crop insurance v Discuss how crop insurance can be used to: v o Limit financial risk exposure o Substitute for balance sheet liquidly o Facilitate pre-harvest pricing Develop a crop insurance plan $

What’s New In 2002? v Subsidy level and structure has changed: – Subsidy increased

What’s New In 2002? v Subsidy level and structure has changed: – Subsidy increased – More favorable to higher coverage's than previously – Revenue products treated more favorably compared to MPCI than previously. v Authority to facilitate livestock insurance (e. g. , facilitate options on futures “equivalent” across all months; subsidize) $

Alternative Approaches to Managing Risk v Manage sources of risk you face to reduce

Alternative Approaches to Managing Risk v Manage sources of risk you face to reduce risk exposure v Retain risk using your equity / net worth v Choose farm plans which avoid risk v Shift risk to someone else o Insurance o Options on futures contracts $

What lessons do we take from the financial risk management module? v How much

What lessons do we take from the financial risk management module? v How much equity are you willing to risk? v Balance management of financial risk through: m Maintenance of equity m Plans and action that avoid risk m v Tools such as insurance and options that shift risk. How much revenue do you have to generate to cover alternative “cost of production” targets? $

Revenue Required / Acre High debt farm Revenue per acre needed: Corn Soybeans To

Revenue Required / Acre High debt farm Revenue per acre needed: Corn Soybeans To cover economic cost $361. 01 $290. 32 To meet Cash flow requirements $309. 47 $238. 78 To maintain equity $299. 19 $228. 50 $

Revenue Required / Acre Medium debt farm Revenue per acre needed: Corn Soybeans To

Revenue Required / Acre Medium debt farm Revenue per acre needed: Corn Soybeans To cover economic cost $352. 86 $282. 17 To meet Cash flow requirements $312. 45 $241. 76 To maintain equity $284. 59 213. 90 $

Managing Revenue Risk Exposure v Farm plans to avoid risk o Spread sales across

Managing Revenue Risk Exposure v Farm plans to avoid risk o Spread sales across year o Agronomic practices v Plans to shift risk o Options and minimum price contracts o LDP’s o Crop insurance $

But, Some Approaches to Reducing Risk Create New Risks v Suppose I cash forward

But, Some Approaches to Reducing Risk Create New Risks v Suppose I cash forward price corn in late spring / early summer v My objective is to spread sales and take advantage of a risk premium in latespring / early summer new crop markets v But, I also have created a delivery risk if I have a short crop $

Some Types of Crop Insurance v Yield – Named Peril – Multiple-Perils • Trigger

Some Types of Crop Insurance v Yield – Named Peril – Multiple-Perils • Trigger on farm / sub-farm parcel yield • Trigger on county yield index v Revenue index – Trigger on farm / sub-farm parcel revenue index with replacement price coverage $

Insurance to Protect Against Production Shortfall Exposure $

Insurance to Protect Against Production Shortfall Exposure $

Crop Insurance To directly protect against revenue risk exposure $

Crop Insurance To directly protect against revenue risk exposure $

Crop Insurance Tailored to protect against revenue risk exposure and reduce delivery risk associated

Crop Insurance Tailored to protect against revenue risk exposure and reduce delivery risk associated with pre-harvest pricing $

Think in Terms of Revenue Risk Management Portfolios 1. “CAT” MPCI yield coverage and

Think in Terms of Revenue Risk Management Portfolios 1. “CAT” MPCI yield coverage and LDP’s 2. “Pure” revenue insurance and LDP’s 3. Yield insurance, pre-harvest price if price moves significantly above loan and into pricing targets, and LDP’s 4. Revenue insurance with “replacement price coverage”, pre-harvest price if price moves significantly above loan and into pricing targets, and LDP’s $

Let’s Review Some Specific Policies $

Let’s Review Some Specific Policies $

Multiple-Peril (MPCI) $

Multiple-Peril (MPCI) $

Losses Are Paid As A Result of Shortfalls Due to Acts Of God, Not

Losses Are Paid As A Result of Shortfalls Due to Acts Of God, Not Management • • • Hail/fire Drought Disease Excess moisture Animals Insects $

How is Protection Determined? v Insurance yield (APH) is based on the farmer’s own

How is Protection Determined? v Insurance yield (APH) is based on the farmer’s own yield history v Producer chooses level of coverage: from 50% to 85% of APH yield v Losses are paid at a predetermined price set by the RMA/USDA $

How is MPCI Coverage Determined? v Case farm’s APH yield on corn is 128.

How is MPCI Coverage Determined? v Case farm’s APH yield on corn is 128. 5 bu / planted acre v Consider coverage @ 70% of APH yield v Yield guarantee = 128. 5 x. 70 = 90 bu v If yield falls below 90 bu, a loss is triggered $

How are losses paid on MPCI? v Loss is triggered when actual yield goes

How are losses paid on MPCI? v Loss is triggered when actual yield goes below guarantee. v Example: o o o 60 bu. realized yield (90 bu guarantee – 60 ) = 30 bu. Loss 30 bu loss x $2. 05 = $61. 50 $

Units: What Farm Breakout is Units to Calculate Protection, Coverage and Losses? v Enterprise

Units: What Farm Breakout is Units to Calculate Protection, Coverage and Losses? v Enterprise Units – Breakout by Crop, County (whole farm within county) v Basic Units - Breakout by County, Crop, Share v Optional Units – Breakout by Crop, Section, Share $

MPCI Review v Available on most crops v Guarantees can be determined at a

MPCI Review v Available on most crops v Guarantees can be determined at a sub-farm level (section) which increases “effective” coverage from a whole farm yield perspective v Rates & Prices are established by the RMA/USDA and vary by county and your yield relative to “peers” v Subsidized by the RMA/USDA $

“Catastrophic” Yield Coverage v 50 % yield coverage v Losses are paid at 55%

“Catastrophic” Yield Coverage v 50 % yield coverage v Losses are paid at 55% of MPCI indemnity price v Optional v $100 units are not permitted / crop / county $

Selected Revenue Insurances v “Pure” o Revenue Insurance RA v Revenue Insurance With Replacement

Selected Revenue Insurances v “Pure” o Revenue Insurance RA v Revenue Insurance With Replacement Price Coverage o CRC o RA w/ RPC option $

CROP REVENUE COVERAGE v CRC is a Revenue index contract with replacement price coverage

CROP REVENUE COVERAGE v CRC is a Revenue index contract with replacement price coverage v CRC is Designed to facilitate preharvest pricing v CRC is an index contract because the futures price is used to calculate “farm revenue” , not the local cash price $

How is CRC Protection Determined? v CRC guarantees revenue based on the farm unit’s

How is CRC Protection Determined? v CRC guarantees revenue based on the farm unit’s APH yield x CBOT harvest futures price during a base pre-sales closing period. v Price used in setting the guarantee is the higher of CBOT harvest price prior to sales closing and the CBOT harvest price at harvest v CRC gives upside replacement price protection to help mitigate delivery risk for users who pre -harvest price $

Replacement Price Coverage: Case Examples of How Price is Chosen Year Price used Harvest

Replacement Price Coverage: Case Examples of How Price is Chosen Year Price used Harvest Futures Price to calculate the Pre-sales revenue closing Harvest guarantee 1999 $2. 40 $1. 96 $2. 40 1995 $2. 57 $3. 28 $

Calculating Replacement Price Coverage Insurance Revenue Guarantee: 70% Coverage Example Year APH yield (bu)

Calculating Replacement Price Coverage Insurance Revenue Guarantee: 70% Coverage Example Year APH yield (bu) Futures price used Cov Rev. guar. 1999 128. 5 $2. 40 (base) = $308. 40 x 70% = $215. 88 1995 128. 5 $3. 28 (hvst) = $421. 48 x 70% = $295. 04 $

Replacement Price Coverage: Loss Examples Revenue Guarantee 70% Using Dec. Futures in April in

Replacement Price Coverage: Loss Examples Revenue Guarantee 70% Using Dec. Futures in April in Oct Year Base Hvst 1995 $231. 17 $295. 04 1999 $215. 88 $176. 30 Realized revenue Hvst fut. price Act. @ Yield hvst. Rev Loss = Guan. Minus realized 60 $3. 28 = $196. 80 $98. 24 100 $3. 28 = $328. 00 $0. 00 60 $1. 96 = $117. 60 $98. 28 100 $1. 96 = $196. 00 $19. 88 $

How is RA Protection Under the No Replacement Price Option Determined? v RA guarantees

How is RA Protection Under the No Replacement Price Option Determined? v RA guarantees revenue based on farm unit’s APH yield x CBOT harvest futures price prior to sales closing. $

Calculating the RA Insurance Revenue Guarantee: 70% Coverage Example Year APH yield (bu) Presales

Calculating the RA Insurance Revenue Guarantee: 70% Coverage Example Year APH yield (bu) Presales closing futures price ’ 95 128. 5 $2. 57 = $330. 25 x 70% = $231. 17 ’ 99 128. 5 $2. 40 = $308. 40 x 70% = $215. 88 Cov Rev. guar. $

Compare Revenue Insurance Indemnities With and Without Replacement Price Coverage Harvest Futures Price Presales

Compare Revenue Insurance Indemnities With and Without Replacement Price Coverage Harvest Futures Price Presales Year closing Harvest ‘ 95 $2. 57 ‘ 99 $2. 40 $3. 28 $1. 96 Loss Yield With Rep. Price Cov. Pure revenue 60 $98. 24 $34. 37 100 $0. 00 60 $98. 28 100 $19. 88 $

CRC and RA with RPC are “HYBRID” Policies v If the harvest futures price

CRC and RA with RPC are “HYBRID” Policies v If the harvest futures price is less than the pre-sales closing base price, they are pure revenue policies v If the harvest price is greater than the pre-sales closing base price they are a MPCI policy with losses paid at the harvest price $

CRC Features v Yield procedures are the same as MPCI including units; enterprise discounts

CRC Features v Yield procedures are the same as MPCI including units; enterprise discounts are available v Available on only corn, soybeans and wheat v Rates are based on MPCI rates with an adjustment for the price risk component v Rates vary by historical county experience and farm’s APH yield relative to peers $

RA Features v Yield procedures are …. v Available on only corn, soybeans and

RA Features v Yield procedures are …. v Available on only corn, soybeans and wheat v Rates are based on MPCI rates with an adjustment for the price risk component v Rates vary by historical county experience and farm’s APH yield relative to peers $

Revenue Insurances: Where do They Fit? v Pure revenue insurance makes sense if farm

Revenue Insurances: Where do They Fit? v Pure revenue insurance makes sense if farm does little pre-harvest pricing. v Revenue insurance with replacement price coverage fits when farm does significant preharvest pricing. v If the farm uses pre-harvest pricing, Revenue insurance with replacement price coverage typically outperforms MPCI and preharvest pricing … particularly, if farm yield and market price are correlated. $

STOP! • Fill out Crop Insurance Decision Worksheets! $

STOP! • Fill out Crop Insurance Decision Worksheets! $

Tasks: v Calculate protection for each policy to help you in your decision of

Tasks: v Calculate protection for each policy to help you in your decision of whether or not to purchase and, if so, which coverage (deductible). v Start to lay out your objectives and assess whether crop insurance plays a potential role in meeting those objectives. $