Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods Gerard T
- Slides: 40
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah
Problem: Ground Roll Degrades Signal 0 2000 Offset (ft) 3500 Time (sec) Reflections 2. 5 Ground Roll
Problem: PS Waves Degrade Signal Time (sec) 0 4. 0 Reflections Converted S Waves
Time (sec) Problem: Tubes Waves Obscure PP 4. 0 0 2000 Depth (ft) Reflections Time (s) Reflections Aliased tube. Converted waves S Waves 0. 14 3100
Problem: Out-of-Plane Ground Roll
Outline • • Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Field Data Results Multicomponent Data Example Conclusion and Discussion
Traditional Filtering Methods F-K Dip Filtering in - p domain linear - p parabolic - p hyperbolic - p Least Squares Migration Filter
Separation Principle: Exploit Differences in Moveout & Part. Velocity Directions Time SIGNAL Frequency SIGNAL Transform NOISE Distance NOISE Overlap Signal & Noise Wavenumber
Tau-P Transform Tau Time Sum Transform Distance P
Transform Distance Tau Time Tau-P -P Transform Tau P
Transform Distance Tau Time Tau-P -P Transform Tau Mute Noise P
Transform Tau Time Tau-P Transform Problem: Indistinct Separation Signal/Noise Distance P
Transform Distance Tau Time Hyperbolic Transform Tau-P Transform Distinct Separation Signal/Noise P
v v v v v Irregular Moveout B Time * Breakdown of Hyperbolic Assumption A Distance
Time B A Distance Time Filtering by Parabolic - p Signal/Noise Overlap p
Filtering by LSMF Invert for m p & m s Kirchhoff P-reflectivity Modeler Time PP PS Distance d = Lp mp + L m s s
Filtering by LSMF -1 Time PP Ls Z -1 PS Distance Lp M 21 X
LSMF Method 1. d=L m + L m p p s s data 2. unknowns Find mp by conjugate gradient 3. Model Coherent Signal d = Lp mp
Multicomponent Filtering by LSMF PS PP Time PP Z PS Distance d x = L pmp + L m s s d z = L pmp + L m
Summary Traditional coherent filtering based on approximate moveout LSMF filtering operators based on actual physics separating signal & noise Better physics --> Better focusing, more $$$
Outline • • Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Surface Wave Data Multicomponent Data Example Conclusion and Discussion
ARCO Field Data Time (sec) 0 2. 5 2000 Offset (ft) 3500
LSM Filtered ARCO Data Field(V. Data Const. ) Time (sec) 0 2. 5 2000 Offset (ft) 3500
F-K Filtered LSM Filtered Data (13333 ft/s) (V. Const. ) Time (sec) 0 2. 5 2000 Offset (ft) 3500
S. F-X of Frequency (Hz) 0 50 Spectrum of ARCO Data LSM Filtered Data (V. Const) F-K Filtered Data (13333 ft/s) 2000 Offset (ft) 3500
Outline • • • Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Field Data Results Multicomponent Data Example Graben Example Mahogony Example • Conclusion and Discussion
Graben Velocity Model 0 Depth (m) 0 X (m) V 1=2000 m/s V 2=2700 m/s V 3=3800 m/s V 4=4000 m/s V 5=4500 m/s 3000 5000
Synthetic Data 0 Time (s) 5000 0 0 Offset (m) PP 1 PP 2 PP 3 PP 4 5000 PP 3 PP 4 1. 4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component
LSMF Separation 5000 0 Offset (m) 5000 Offset (m) PP 1 Time (s) PP 2 PP 3 PP 4 1. 4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component
True P-P and P-SV Reflection Offset (m) 5000 0 Time (s) 5000 0 0 Offset (m) 1. 4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component
F-K Filtering Separation 0 Time (s) 0 0 5000 Offset (m) PP 1 PP 2 PP 3 PP 4 5000 Offset (m) PP 3 PP 4 1. 4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component
Outline • • • Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Field Data Results Multicomponent Data Example Graben Example Mahogony Field Data • Conclusion and Discussion
CRG 1 Raw Data Time (s) 0 PS PS 4 CRG 1 (Vertical component) PS
CRG 1 Data after Using F-K Filtering Time (s) 0 PS PS 4 CRG 1 (Vertical component) PS
CRG 1 Data after Using LSMF Time (s) 0 PS PS 4 CRG 1 (Vertical component) PS
CRG 2 Raw Data (vertical component) Time (s) 0 4 CRG 2 (Vertical component)
CRG 2 Data after Using F-K Filtering (vertical component) Time (s) 0 4 CRG 2 (Vertical component)
CRG 2 Data after Using LSMF (vertical component) Time (s) 0 4 CRG 2 (Vertical component)
Outline • Coherent Filtering Methods • ARCO Field Data Results • Multicomponent Data Example • Conclusion and Discussion
Conclusions Filtering signal/noise using: moveout difference & particle velocity direction - Traditional filtering $ vs $$$$ LSMF computes moveout and particle velocity direction based on true physics.
- Scientific literature review
- Companding in pcm
- Control of noise pollution ppt
- Pyrogen aerosol fire suppression system
- Entertainer name suppression
- Nitin group
- Fire suppression rating schedule
- Dr swade endocrinologist
- Fm 200 vs novec 1230 comparison
- Superheterodyne wave analyzer
- Suppression clothes
- Piranha fire suppression system
- Foam suppression system
- Fire suppression
- What is personality
- Articulatory suppression
- Reinforced robot humor suppression pump
- Lactation suppression
- Path length difference
- Coherent text
- Cohesive devices examples
- Photodesintegration
- Coherent and cohesion meaning
- Incoherent interface
- Coherent detection in optical communication
- Coherence and incoherence
- Coherent examples
- Coherent scattering
- Coherent accelerator processor interface
- Mti radar with power amplifier
- Edge tangent flow
- Probability of error for non coherent fsk
- May
- Coherent curriculum
- A coherent set of related functionality
- Coherent sampling
- Rangkaian coherent detector am-dsb-sc terdiri dari
- Importance of coherent lesson plan
- Coherent paragraph
- Example of coherence
- Coherent ui a modern user interface