Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris

  • Slides: 30
Download presentation
Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris Power. Point Presentation by H. Lynn

Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris Power. Point Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan Community College-Omaha Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 1

Behavior in Social and Cultural Context Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 2

Behavior in Social and Cultural Context Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 2

Behavior in Social and Cultural Context • • • Roles and Rules Social Influences

Behavior in Social and Cultural Context • • • Roles and Rules Social Influences on Beliefs Individuals in Groups Us Versus Them: Group Identity Group Conflicts and Prejudice Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 3

Roles and Rules Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 4

Roles and Rules Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 4

Roles and Rules • The Obedience Study • The Prison Study • The Power

Roles and Rules • The Obedience Study • The Prison Study • The Power of Roles Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 5

The Obedience Study • Stanley Milgram and coworkers investigated whether people would follow orders,

The Obedience Study • Stanley Milgram and coworkers investigated whether people would follow orders, even when the order violated their ethical standards. • Most people were far more obedient than anyone expected. – Every single participant complied with at least some orders to shock another person • Results are controversial and have generated much research on violence and obedience. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 6

The Power of Roles • Factors that cause people to obey – Allocating responsibility

The Power of Roles • Factors that cause people to obey – Allocating responsibility to the authority – Routinizing the task – Wanting to be polite – Becoming entrapped • Entrapment: A gradual process in which individuals escalate their commitment to a course of action to justify their investment of time, money, or effort. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 7

Social Influences on Beliefs Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 8

Social Influences on Beliefs Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 8

Social Influences on Beliefs • Attributions • Attitudes Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice

Social Influences on Beliefs • Attributions • Attitudes Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 9

Attributions • Attribution Theory: – The theory that people are motivated to explain their

Attributions • Attribution Theory: – The theory that people are motivated to explain their own and other peoples’ behavior by attributing causes of that behavior to a situation or a disposition. • Fundamental Attribution Error: – The tendency, in explaining other people’s behavior, to overestimate personality factors and underestimate the influence of the situation. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10

Attitudes • Attitude: – A relatively stable opinion containing beliefs and emotional feelings about

Attitudes • Attitude: – A relatively stable opinion containing beliefs and emotional feelings about a topic. • Validity Effect: – The tendency of people to believe that a statement is true or valid simply because it has been repeated many times. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 11

Influencing Attitudes Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 12

Influencing Attitudes Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 12

Coercive Persuasion • Person is under physical or emotional duress. • Person’s problems are

Coercive Persuasion • Person is under physical or emotional duress. • Person’s problems are reduced to one simple explanation, repeated often. • Leader offers unconditional love, acceptance, and attention. • New identity based on group is created. • Person is subjected to entrapment. • Person’s access to information is controlled. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 13

Individuals in Groups Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 14

Individuals in Groups Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 14

Individuals in Groups • • Conformity Groupthink The Anonymous Crowd Courage and Nonconformity Wade

Individuals in Groups • • Conformity Groupthink The Anonymous Crowd Courage and Nonconformity Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 15

Conformity • Subjects in a group were asked to match line lengths. • Confederates

Conformity • Subjects in a group were asked to match line lengths. • Confederates in the group picked the wrong line. • Subjects went along with the wrong answer on 37% of trials. No, it’s not hard! Sample Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall A B C 16

Groupthink • In close-knit groups, the tendency for all members to think alike and

Groupthink • In close-knit groups, the tendency for all members to think alike and suppress disagreement for the sake of harmony. • Symptoms of Groupthink: – Illusion of invincibility – Self-censorship – Pressure on dissenters to conform – Illusion of unanimity Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 17

The Anonymous Crowd • Diffusion of Responsibility: – In organized or anonymous groups, the

The Anonymous Crowd • Diffusion of Responsibility: – In organized or anonymous groups, the tendency of members to avoid taking responsibility for actions or decisions because they assume that others will do so. • Deindividuation: – In groups or crowds, the loss of awareness of one’s own individuality. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 18

Courage and Nonconformity • Situational factors contributing to nonconformity: – You perceive the need

Courage and Nonconformity • Situational factors contributing to nonconformity: – You perceive the need for intervention or help. – Situation makes it more likely that you will take responsibility. – Cost-benefit ratio supports your decision to get involved. – You have an ally. – You become entrapped. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 19

Us Versus Them: Group Identity Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 20

Us Versus Them: Group Identity Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 20

Us Versus Them: Group Identity • Ethnic Identity • Ethnocentrism • Stereotypes Wade and

Us Versus Them: Group Identity • Ethnic Identity • Ethnocentrism • Stereotypes Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 21

Ethnic Identity • Social Identity: – The part of a person’s self-concept that is

Ethnic Identity • Social Identity: – The part of a person’s self-concept that is based on identification with a nation, culture, or group or with gender or other roles in society. • Ethnic Identity: – A person’s identification with a racial, religious, or ethnic group. • Acculturation: – The process by which members of minority groups come to identify with and feel part of the mainstream culture. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 22

Acculturation Strategies Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 23

Acculturation Strategies Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 23

Ethnocentrism • The belief that one’s own ethnic group, nation, or religion is superior

Ethnocentrism • The belief that one’s own ethnic group, nation, or religion is superior to all others. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 24

Robbers’ Cave Experiment • Boys were randomly separated into two groups – “Rattlers” and

Robbers’ Cave Experiment • Boys were randomly separated into two groups – “Rattlers” and “Eagles” • Competitions fostered hostility between the groups. • Experimenters contrived situations requiring cooperation for success. • Cross-group friendships increased. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 25

Stereotypes • Stereotype: – A cognitive schema or a summary impression of a group,

Stereotypes • Stereotype: – A cognitive schema or a summary impression of a group, in which a person believes that all members of the group share a common trait or traits (positive, negative, or neutral). Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 26

Group Conflicts and Prejudice Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 27

Group Conflicts and Prejudice Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 27

Group Conflicts and Prejudice • The Origins of Prejudice • Varieties of Prejudice •

Group Conflicts and Prejudice • The Origins of Prejudice • Varieties of Prejudice • Reducing Prejudice and Conflict Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 28

Reducing Prejudice and Conflict • Groups must have equal legal status, economic opportunities, and

Reducing Prejudice and Conflict • Groups must have equal legal status, economic opportunities, and power. • Authorities and community institutions must endorse egalitarian norms and provide moral support and legitimacy for both sides. • Both sides must have opportunities to work and socialize together, formally and informally. • Both sides must cooperate, working together for a common goal. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 29

Bridging the Cultural Divide • Tips for Successful Travel: – Be sure you understand

Bridging the Cultural Divide • Tips for Successful Travel: – Be sure you understand the other culture’s rules, manners, and customs. – When in Rome, do as the Romans do as much as possible. – Avoid stereotyping. Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 30