Direct Design Method Design of Two Way floor

  • Slides: 28
Download presentation
Direct Design Method Design of Two Way floor system for Flat Plate Slab

Direct Design Method Design of Two Way floor system for Flat Plate Slab

Given data [Problem-1] Figure-1 shows a flat plate floor with a total area of

Given data [Problem-1] Figure-1 shows a flat plate floor with a total area of 4500 sq ft. It is divided into 25 panels with a panel size of 15 12 ft. Concrete strength is and steel yield strength is fy= 50, 000 psi. Service live load is 60 psf. Story height is 9 ft. All columns are rectangular, 12 in. in the long direction and 10 in. in the short direction. Preliminary slab thickness is set at 5. 5 in. No edge beams are used along the exterior edges of the floor. Compute the total factored static moment in the long and short directions of a typical panel in the flat plate design as shown in Fig. -1. 2

Fig. -1 3

Fig. -1 3

The dead load for a 5. 5 in slab is w. D=(5. 5/12)(150)=69 psf

The dead load for a 5. 5 in slab is w. D=(5. 5/12)(150)=69 psf The factored load per unit area is wu =1. 2 w. D +1. 6 w. L =1. 2(69) +1. 6(60) = 96 + 102 =198 psf Using Eq. 5, with clear span Ln measured face-to-face of columns, 4

Given data [Problem-2] Review the slab thickness and other nominal requirements for the dimensions

Given data [Problem-2] Review the slab thickness and other nominal requirements for the dimensions in the flat plate design example. 5

Minimum slab thickness For fy=50 ksi, for a flat plate which inherently has α

Minimum slab thickness For fy=50 ksi, for a flat plate which inherently has α = 0, and Ln=15 -1=14 ft, from Table-1, min t=linear interpolation between fy=40 ksi and fy=60 ksi 6

Table-1 Minimum thickness of slab without interior beams WITHOUT DROP PANELS f*y EXTERIOR PANELS

Table-1 Minimum thickness of slab without interior beams WITHOUT DROP PANELS f*y EXTERIOR PANELS (ksi) α=0 α 0. 8 WITH DROP PANELS INTERIOR EXTERIOR PANELS α=0 α 0. 8 INTERIOR PANELS 40 60 75 *For fy between 40 and 60 ksi, min. t is to be obtained by linear interpolation.

A table value seems appropriate and entirely within the accuracy of engineering knowledge regarding

A table value seems appropriate and entirely within the accuracy of engineering knowledge regarding deflection. The 5. 5 in. slab thickness used for all panel satisfies the ACI-Table minimum and exceeds the nominal minimum of 5 in. for slabs without drop panel and without interior beams. 8

Given data [Problem-3] For the flat plate design problem-1, compute the longitudinal moments in

Given data [Problem-3] For the flat plate design problem-1, compute the longitudinal moments in frames A, B, C and D as shown in Figs. 1 & 2. 9

(b) Total factored static moment M 0 The total factored static moment Mo from

(b) Total factored static moment M 0 The total factored static moment Mo from the results of previously found; thus Mo for A = 58. 2 ft-kips Mo for B = 0. 5(58. 2) Mo for C = 46. 3 ft-kips Mo for D = 23. 1 ft-kips =29. 1 ft-kips 10

(c) Longitudinal moments in the Frame. The longitudinal moments in frames A, B, C,

(c) Longitudinal moments in the Frame. The longitudinal moments in frames A, B, C, D are computed using Case-3 of Fig. 22 for the exterior span and Fig. 19 for the interior span. The computations are shown in Table-1 and the results are summarized in Fig. 2&3. Longitudinal Moments (ft-kips) for the flat plate 11

Longitudinal distribution of moments

Longitudinal distribution of moments

Fig. -2 13

Fig. -2 13

Fig. -3 14

Fig. -3 14

Table-1: Longitudinal moments (ft-kips) for the flat plate FRAME A B C D M

Table-1: Longitudinal moments (ft-kips) for the flat plate FRAME A B C D M 0 58. 2 29. 1 46. 3 23. 1 Mneg at exterior support, 0. 26 Mo 15. 1 Mpos in exterior span, 0. 52 Mo 30. 3 15. 1 24. 1 12. 0 Mneg at first interior support, 0. 70 Mo 40. 7 20. 4 32. 4 16. 2 Mneg at typical interior support, 0. 65 Mo 37. 8 18. 9 30. 1 15. 0 Mpos in typical interior span, 0. 35 Mo 20. 4 10. 2 16. 2 8. 1 7. 6 12. 0 6. 0 15

Given data [Problem-4] For the flat plate design problem-1, Compute the torsional constant C

Given data [Problem-4] For the flat plate design problem-1, Compute the torsional constant C for short and long beam 16

Since no actual edge beams are used, the torsional members is, according to Fig.

Since no actual edge beams are used, the torsional members is, according to Fig. 4, equal to the slab thickness t by the column width c 1. Fig. -4 17

Given data [Problem-5] Divide the 5 critical moments in each of the equivalent rigid

Given data [Problem-5] Divide the 5 critical moments in each of the equivalent rigid frames A, B, C, and D, as shown in Fig. 2&3, into two parts: one for the half column strip (for frames B and D) or the full column strip (for frames A and C), and the other for half middle strip (for frames B and D) or the two half middle strips on each side of the column line (for frames A and C). 18

The percentages of the longitudinal moments going into the column strip width are shown

The percentages of the longitudinal moments going into the column strip width are shown in lines 10 to 12 of Table-2. 19

Table-2 Transverse Distribution of Longitudinal Moment LINE NUMBER EQUIVALENT RIGID FRAME A B C

Table-2 Transverse Distribution of Longitudinal Moment LINE NUMBER EQUIVALENT RIGID FRAME A B C D 1 Total transverse width (in. ) 144 72 180 90 2 Column strip width (in. ) 72 36 3 Half middle strip width (in. ) 2@36 36 2 @54 54 4 C(in 4) from previous calculations 474 363 5 Is(in. 4) in βt 2, 000 2, 500 6 βt= Ecb. C/(2 Ecs. Is) 0. 118 0. 073 7 α 1 0 0 8 L 2/L 1 0. 80 1. 25 9 α 1 L 2/L 1 0 0 10 Exterior negative moment, percent to column strip 98. 8% 99. 3% 11 Positive moment, percent to column strip 60% 60% 12 Interior negative moment, percent to 75% column strip 75% 75% 20

Table-2: Percentage of longitudinal moment in column strip ASPECT RATIO L 2/L 1 Negative

Table-2: Percentage of longitudinal moment in column strip ASPECT RATIO L 2/L 1 Negative moment at α 1 L 2/L 1 = 0 exterior support α 1 L 2/L 1 > 1. 0 0. 5 1. 0 2. 0 βt=0 100 100 βt 2. 5 75 75 75 βt = 0 100 100 βt> 2. 5 90 75 45 α 1 L 2/L 1 =0 60 60 60 α 1 L 2/L 1 > 1. 0 90 75 45 Negative moment at α 1 L 2/L 1 =0 75 75 75 interior support α 1 L 2/L 1 > 1. 0 90 75 45 Positive moment

Table-3: Factored moments in a typical column strip and middle strip EXTERIOR SPAN Line

Table-3: Factored moments in a typical column strip and middle strip EXTERIOR SPAN Line number Moments at critical section (ft-kips) 1 Total M in column and middle strips (frame A) 2 Percentage to column strip (Table-2) 3 Moment in column strip 4 Moment in middle strip Negative Positive moment INTERIOR SPAN Negative Positive moment Negative moment 22

Table-3: Factored moments in a typical column strip and middle strip EXTERIOR SPAN Line

Table-3: Factored moments in a typical column strip and middle strip EXTERIOR SPAN Line number Moments at critical section (ft-kips) 1 Total M in column and middle strips (frame C) 2 Percentage to column strip (Table-2) 3 Moment in column strip 4 Moment in middle strip Negative Positive moment INTERIOR SPAN Negative Positive moment Negative moment 23

Table-4: Design of reinforcement in column strip EXTERIOR SPAN INTERIOR SPAN LINE NUMBER ITEM

Table-4: Design of reinforcement in column strip EXTERIOR SPAN INTERIOR SPAN LINE NUMBER ITEM 1 Moment, Table-2, line 3 (ftkips) 2 Width b of drop or strip (in. ) 3 Effective depth d (in. ) 4 Mu/Ø (ft-kips) 5 Rn(psi)= Mu/(Øbd 2) 6 ρ, Eq. or Table A. 5 a 7 As = ρbd 8 As =0. 002 bt* 9 N=larger of (7) or(8)/0. 31 10 N=width of strip/(2 t) 11 N required, larger of (9) or (10) NEGATIV E MOMENT POSITIV E MOMEN T NEGATIV E MOMENT 24

Table-5: Design of reinforcement in Middle Strip EXTERIOR SPAN LINE NUMBER ITEM 1 Moment,

Table-5: Design of reinforcement in Middle Strip EXTERIOR SPAN LINE NUMBER ITEM 1 Moment, Table 3, line 4 (ftkips) 2 Width b of strip (in. ) 3 Effective depth d (in. ) 4 Mu/Ø (ft-kips) 5 Rn(psi)= Mu/(Øbd 2) 6 ρ 7 As = ρbd 8 As =0. 002 bt 9 N=larger of (7) or(8)/0. 31* 10 N=width of strip/(2 t) 11 N required, larger of (9) or (10) NEGATIV E MOMENT POSITIV E MOMEN T INTERIOR SPAN NEGATIV E MOMENT POSITIV E MOMEN T NEGATIV E MOMENT 25

Given data [Problem-6] • Investigate the shear strength in wide-beam and two-way actions in

Given data [Problem-6] • Investigate the shear strength in wide-beam and two-way actions in the flat plate slab system for an interior column with no bending moment to be transferred. Note that 26

(a)Wide beam action. Assuming ¾ in clear cover and #4 bars, the average effective

(a)Wide beam action. Assuming ¾ in clear cover and #4 bars, the average effective depth when bars in two directions are in contact is Referring to the fig. 5 Avg d = 5. 50 -0. 75 -0. 50= 4. 25 in Vu = 0. 198(12)6. 65 = 15. 8 Kips Fig. -5 27

(b)Two- way action, Referring to Fig. 5 The perimeter of the critical section at

(b)Two- way action, Referring to Fig. 5 The perimeter of the critical section at d/2 around the column is Shear reinforcement is not required at this interior location. 28