Anticoagulation vs Antiplatelet Therapy after Transcatheter Aortic Valve

  • Slides: 27
Download presentation
Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients Toby

Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients Toby Rogers, MD, Ph. D Med. Star Heart & Vascular Institute, Washington, DC National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD On behalf of the LRT 2. 0 Investigators

Disclosures Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial

Disclosures Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s): Consultant and Proctor: Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic

Background • Current US guidelines recommend 3 -6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin

Background • Current US guidelines recommend 3 -6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) after TAVR and 3 months warfarin after SAVR 1, 2 • In the first LRT trial, hypoattenuated leaflet thickening was observed in 13. 5% of patients on antiplatelet therapy and 4. 8% of patients on oral anticoagulation 3 • Leaflet thrombosis may negatively impact transcatheter heart valve durability 1. Otto et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69: 1313 -1346. 2. Nishimura et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148: e 1 -e 132. 3. Waksman et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 2095 -2105.

LRT 2. 0 study objective To evaluate whether anticoagulation (warfarin) for one month after

LRT 2. 0 study objective To evaluate whether anticoagulation (warfarin) for one month after TAVR in low-risk patients (STS score ≤ 3%) reduces the incidence of structural valve deterioration (subclinical leaflet thrombosis) at 30 -days compared to aspirin.

Low Risk TAVR 2. 0 (LRT 2. 0 Trial) Investigator-Sponsored Study Design: Multicenter, randomized,

Low Risk TAVR 2. 0 (LRT 2. 0 Trial) Investigator-Sponsored Study Design: Multicenter, randomized, interventional Primary safety endpoint: All cause mortality, all stroke, life-threatening or major bleeding, major vascular complications, hospitalizations for valve-related symptoms or worsening heart failure at 30 days (VARC II) Primary efficacy endpoint: Hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening (HALT)* 30 days At least moderately restricted leaflet motion (RELM)* at 30 days Hemodynamic dysfunction Enrollment period: July 2018 – October 2019 NCT 03557242 *Jilaihawi, H. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2017; 10(4): 461 -70

Trial administration National Principal Investigators Toby Rogers, MD, Ph. D Ron Waksman, MD Christian

Trial administration National Principal Investigators Toby Rogers, MD, Ph. D Ron Waksman, MD Christian Shults, MD Med. Star Cardiovascular Research Network Director of Clinical Research Operations Rebecca Torguson, MPH Clinical Review Committee Interventional Cardiology Itsik Ben-Dor, MD Anees Musallam, MD Manager, Data Management Paige E. Craig, MPH Cardiothoracic Surgery Christian Shults, MD Independent Clinical Events Committee Chairman Hector Garcia-Garcia, MD Database Technology Director Alan Monath Core Laboratories Director Echo Core Lab Federico Asch, MD Director CT Core Lab Gaby Weissman, MD Data & Safety Monitoring Board Chairman William Weintraub, MD

Enrolling sites Site Name Med. Star Washington Hospital Center Rhode Island Hospital Stony Brook

Enrolling sites Site Name Med. Star Washington Hospital Center Rhode Island Hospital Stony Brook Hospital Maine Medical Center Henrico Doctors’ Hospital Foundation for Cardiovascular Medicine St. John Heart Institute The Valley Hospital Sentara Norfolk General Hospital Principal Investigators Ron Waksman, MD Christian Shults, MD Paul Gordon, MD Afshin Ehsan, MD Puja Parikh, MD Thomas Bilfinger, MD David Butzel, MD Scott Buchanan, MD Robert Levitt, MD Chiwon Hahn, MD Maurice Buchbinder, MD Ricardo Moreno, MD Nicholas Hanna, MD George Comas, MD Scott Wilson, MD Mariano Brizzio, MD Paul Mahoney, MD Joseph Newton, MD Location Washington, DC Providence, RI Stony Brook, NY Portland, ME Richmond, VA San Diego, CA Tulsa, OK Ridgewood, NJ Norfolk, VA

Low risk subjects with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis Pre-existing indication for anticoagulation TAVR n=124

Low risk subjects with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis Pre-existing indication for anticoagulation TAVR n=124 Exclusion for new AF/DVT/PE or bleeding 1: 1 randomization Oral anticoagulation arm n=44 Aspirin arm n=50 warfarin for 30 days to maintain an INR of 2. 5 Lost to follow-up Registry arm (n=1) 30 -day follow-up n=123 No 30 -day CT or TEE Oral anticoagulation arm (n=1) Aspirin monotherapy arm (n=1) Registry arm (n=1) 4 D contrast-enhanced CT (or TEE) 30 -45 days after TAVR n=120 Registry arm n=30

Key enrollment criteria Key inclusion criteria • • Symptomatic, severe AS • • STS

Key enrollment criteria Key inclusion criteria • • Symptomatic, severe AS • • STS PROM ≤ 3% • Procedure status is elective Life expectancy ≥ 24 months • Low risk according to the multidisciplinary Heart Team Suitable for transfemoral access with commercial TAVR device Key exclusion criteria • Bicuspid aortic valve • Severe CAD • Severe other valve disease • Prior surgical aortic valve replacement • Recent stroke or MI • Severe lung disease • Severe renal failure • Porcelain Aorta • Severe Disease not captured in STS • Alternative access to femoral • Known allergy to warfarin or aspirin

/2 7 10 19 /2 0 27 9/ 19 /2 0 27 8/ 19

/2 7 10 19 /2 0 27 9/ 19 /2 0 27 8/ 19 Number of enrolled patients 40 /2 0 27 7/ 19 19 /2 0 27 6/ 19 /2 0 27 5/ /2 0 27 4/ 19 19 /2 0 27 3/ /2 0 27 2/ 19 18 /2 0 27 1/ /2 7 12 /2 7 11 /2 7 10 /2 0 27 9/ 18 18 /2 0 27 8/ /2 0 27 7/ Patient enrollment timeline 140 120 100 80 60 FDA approval of Low Risk TAVR 20 0

Randomized cohort n=94 Randomized Cohort Oral anticoagulation n=44 Aspirin n=50 Oral anticoagulation n=68 Aspirin

Randomized cohort n=94 Randomized Cohort Oral anticoagulation n=44 Aspirin n=50 Oral anticoagulation n=68 Aspirin n=56 Oral anticoagulation n=24 Aspirin n=6 Registry n=30 n=94 Pooled Cohort n=124 Registry Cohort n=30

Randomized cohort baseline characteristics Mean ± standard deviation or Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value 73.

Randomized cohort baseline characteristics Mean ± standard deviation or Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value 73. 1± 5. 6 73. 6± 4. 0 0. 52 Male 37/50 (74%) 29/44 (65. 9%) 0. 39 NYHA class III or IV 12/50 (24%) 8/44 (18. 2%) 0. 49 1. 5± 0. 5 1. 4± 0. 5 0. 62 Diabetes mellitus 15/50 (30%) 17/44 (38. 6%) 0. 38 Renal insufficiency 1/50 (2%) 1/44 (2. 3%) 0. 93 39/50 (78%) 36/44 (81. 8%) 0. 65 Prior stroke or TIA 0/50 (0%) 1/44 (2. 3%) 0. 28 Chronic lung disease 2/50 (4%) 1/44 (2. 3%) 0. 64 LVEF 64. 2± 8. 9 67. 1± 3. 1 0. 06 Prior PCI 6/50 (12%) 4/44 (9. 1%) 0. 65 Prior CABG 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 1. 00 Pre-existing PPM 1/50 (2%) 0/44 (0%) 0. 35 Prior myocardial infarction 2/50 (4%) 0/44 (0%) 0. 18 n(%) Age, years STS-PROM score †, % Hypertension

Pooled cohort baseline characteristics Mean ± standard deviation or Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value 72.

Pooled cohort baseline characteristics Mean ± standard deviation or Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value 72. 8± 6. 0 74. 2± 4. 9 0. 16 42/56 (75%) 46/68 (67. 6%) 0. 37 13/56 (23. 2%) 13/68 (19. 1%) 0. 58 1. 4± 0. 5 1. 5± 0. 5 0. 48 Diabetes mellitus 18/56 (32. 1%) 21/68 (30. 9%) 0. 88 Renal insufficiency 1/56 (1. 8%) 1/68 (1. 5%) 0. 89 43/56 (76. 8%) 57/68 (83. 8%) 0. 32 0/56 (0%) 2/68 (2. 9%) 0. 20 2/56 (3. 6%) 2/68 (2. 9%) 0. 84 64. 1± 8. 6 65. 5± 6. 3 0. 40 6/56 (10. 7%) 4/68 (5. 9%) 0. 32 0/56 (0%) 1/68 (1. 5%) 0. 36 Pre-existing PPM 1/56 (1. 8%) 4/68 (5. 9%) 0. 25 Prior myocardial infarction 2/56 (3. 6%) 0/68 (0%) 0. 12 n(%) Age, years Male NYHA class III or IV STS-PROM score †, % Hypertension Prior stroke or TIA Chronic lung disease LVEF Prior PCI Prior CABG

Pooled cohort TAVR procedural details Mean±standard deviation or n(%) Aspirin Oral anticoagulation 82. 9±

Pooled cohort TAVR procedural details Mean±standard deviation or n(%) Aspirin Oral anticoagulation 82. 9± 47. 2 82. 6± 31. 8 General anesthesia 11/56 (19. 6%) 16/68 (23. 5%) Transfemoral access 56/56 (100%) 68/68 (100%) Balloon-expandable valve 28/57 (49. 1%) 28/68 (41. 2%) Self-expanding valve 29/57 (50. 9%) 40/68 (58. 8%) 1/56 (1. 8%) 0/68 (0%) 20 mm 0/57 (0%) 0/68 (0%) 23 mm 7/57 (12. 3%) 8/68 (11. 8%) 26 mm 14/57 (24. 6%) 24/68 (35. 3%) 29 mm 25/57 (43. 9%) 33/68 (48. 5%) 31/34 mm 11/57 (19. 3%) 3/68 (4. 4%) Total procedure time, min Transcatheter heart valve type Implantation of >1 valve Valve size implanted

Primary safety endpoint Zero mortality at 30 days

Primary safety endpoint Zero mortality at 30 days

Randomized cohort in-hospital outcomes Outcome (%) Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%)

Randomized cohort in-hospital outcomes Outcome (%) Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 1. 00 2. 1± 3. 3 1. 7± 1. 1 0. 43 VARC 2 life-threatening or major bleeding 2/50 (4%) 1/44 (2. 3%) 0. 64 VARC 2 major vascular complications 2/50 (4%) 0/44 (0%) 0. 18 Acute kidney injury 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 1. 00 Stroke 1/50 (2%)* 0/44 (0%) 0. 35 Endocarditis 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 1. 00 New-onset atrial fibrillation 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 1. 00 New PPM implantation 4/50 (8%) 2/44 (4. 5%) 0. 49 Coronary artery obstruction 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 1. 00 All-cause death Length of stay post-procedure, days * All stroke was non-disabling

Pooled cohort in-hospital outcomes Outcome (%) Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value 0/56 (0%) 0/68 (0%)

Pooled cohort in-hospital outcomes Outcome (%) Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value 0/56 (0%) 0/68 (0%) 1. 00 2. 4± 3. 4 2. 2± 2. 2 0. 61 VARC 2 life-threatening or major bleeding 3/56 (5. 4%) 1/68 (1. 5%) 0. 22 VARC 2 major vascular complications 4/56 (7. 1%) 0/68 (0%) 0. 02 0/56 (0%) 0/68 (0%) 1. 00 3/56 (5. 4%)* 1 /68 (1. 5%)* 0. 22 0/56 (0%) 0/68 (0%) 1. 00 New-onset atrial fibrillation 1/56 (1. 8%) 1/68 (1. 5%) 0. 89 New PPM implantation 4/56 (7. 1%) 8/68 (11. 8%) 0. 39 0/56 (0%) 0/68 (0%) 1. 00 All-cause death Length of stay post-procedure, days Acute kidney injury Stroke Endocarditis Coronary artery obstruction * All stroke was non-disabling

Randomized cohort 30 -day outcomes Outcome (%) Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value All-cause death 0/50

Randomized cohort 30 -day outcomes Outcome (%) Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value All-cause death 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 1. 00 VARC 2 life-threatening or major bleeding 2/50 (4%) 1/44 (2. 3%) 0. 64 VARC 2 major vascular complications 2/50 (4%) 0/44 (0%) 0. 18 Acute kidney injury 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 1. 00 Stroke 2/50 (4%) 0/44 (0%) 0. 18 MI 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 1. 00 Endocarditis 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 1. 00 New-onset atrial fibrillation 0/50 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 1. 00 New PPM implantation 4/50 (8%) 2/44 (4. 5%) 0. 49

Pooled cohort 30 -day outcomes Outcome (%) Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value 0/56 (0%) 0/67

Pooled cohort 30 -day outcomes Outcome (%) Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p-value 0/56 (0%) 0/67 (0%) 1. 00 VARC 2 life-threatening or major bleeding 3/56 (5. 4%) 1/67 (1. 5%) 0. 23 VARC 2 major vascular complications 4/56 (7. 1%) 0/67 (0%) 0. 03 0/56 (0%) 0/67 (0%) 1. 00 4/56 (7. 1%) 1/68 (1. 5%) 0. 11 MI 0/56 (0%) 0/67 (0%) 1. 00 Endocarditis 0/56 (0%) 0/67 (0%) 1. 00 New-onset atrial fibrillation 1/56 (1. 8%) 1/67 (1. 5%) 0. 90 New PPM implantation 4/56 (7. 1%) 9/67 (13. 4%) 0. 26 All-cause death Acute kidney injury Stroke

Randomized cohort hemodynamics 46. 7± 8. 7 2. 0± 0. 5 47. 3± 12.

Randomized cohort hemodynamics 46. 7± 8. 7 2. 0± 0. 5 47. 3± 12. 8 1. 9± 0. 4 0. 8± 0. 2 14. 0± 5. 3 11. 0± 4. 0 0. 8± 0. 2 12. 1± 4. 8 11. 5± 5. 0 *Core lab adjudicated 1. 9± 0. 5 1. 8± 0. 5

Randomized cohort aortic regurgitation Discharge Baseline 30 -days None Mild Moderate in ir sp

Randomized cohort aortic regurgitation Discharge Baseline 30 -days None Mild Moderate in ir sp A O a ral ic nt ion g oa t ula in ir sp A O g oa tic n a ral ion t ula n io lat u ag in pir As a Or *Core lab adjudicated ico nt l a >Moderate

Subclinical leaflet thrombosis HALT: Hypo-Attenuating Leaflet Thickening RELM: Reduced Leaflet Motion HAM: Hypo-Attenuation affecting

Subclinical leaflet thrombosis HALT: Hypo-Attenuating Leaflet Thickening RELM: Reduced Leaflet Motion HAM: Hypo-Attenuation affecting Motion Any HALT + ≥Moderate RELM = HAM Jilaihawi, H. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2017; 10(4): 461 -70

Randomized cohort leaflet thrombosis Oral anticoagulation Aspirin p=0. 07 p=0. 12 Core lab adjudicated

Randomized cohort leaflet thrombosis Oral anticoagulation Aspirin p=0. 07 p=0. 12 Core lab adjudicated

Pooled cohort leaflet thrombosis Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p=0. 01 p=0. 052 Core lab adjudicated

Pooled cohort leaflet thrombosis Aspirin Oral anticoagulation p=0. 01 p=0. 052 Core lab adjudicated

LRT 2. 0 Summary Safety Efficacy Zero mortality and zero disabling stroke at 30

LRT 2. 0 Summary Safety Efficacy Zero mortality and zero disabling stroke at 30 days Hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) was significantly lower in patients taking oral anticoagulation compared to antiplatelet therapy (3. 1 vs. 16. 4%, p=0. 01)* Oral anticoagulation was not associated with increased bleeding events at 30 days *Pooled cohort

Conclusions In low risk patients, oral anticoagulation for 30 days after TAVR is associated

Conclusions In low risk patients, oral anticoagulation for 30 days after TAVR is associated with lower incidence of leaflet thrombosis but does not appear to be associated with increased bleeding

Thank you to all of the LRT 2. 0 patients, site personnel, and investigators

Thank you to all of the LRT 2. 0 patients, site personnel, and investigators who made this trial possible!