The ASTRAL score to predict functional outcome in

  • Slides: 36
Download presentation
The ASTRAL score to predict functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke George Ntaios University

The ASTRAL score to predict functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke George Ntaios University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece

Let’s design the ideal prognostic score… • not too many variables • readily available

Let’s design the ideal prognostic score… • not too many variables • readily available variables • simple to calculate • applicable as early as possible • widely-used scale for outcome assessment • validated externally • Modified Rankin Scale score • validated in large population • Barthel index • Glasgow outcome scale • validated in multiple populations • Oxford Handicap Scale

ASTRAL registry (Lausanne/Switzerland) n=1645 Development of the prognostic score Double external validation of the

ASTRAL registry (Lausanne/Switzerland) n=1645 Development of the prognostic score Double external validation of the prognostic score Prognostic point-based score Athens Stroke Registry n=1659 Vienna Stroke registry n=653 Color chart

P=0. 43

P=0. 43

ASTRAL registry (Lausanne/Switzerland) n=1645 Development of the prognostic score Double external validation of the

ASTRAL registry (Lausanne/Switzerland) n=1645 Development of the prognostic score Double external validation of the prognostic score Prognostic point-based score Athens Stroke registry n=1659 Vienna Stroke registry n=653 Color chart

P=0. 22

P=0. 22

P=0. 49

P=0. 49

P=0. 82

P=0. 82

ASTRAL registry (Lausanne/Switzerland) n=1645 Development of the prognostic score Double external validation of the

ASTRAL registry (Lausanne/Switzerland) n=1645 Development of the prognostic score Double external validation of the prognostic score Prognostic point-based score Athens Stroke Registry n=1659 Vienna Stroke Registry n=653 Color chart

Take-home messages • the ASTRAL score is a very reliable prognostic score • it

Take-home messages • the ASTRAL score is a very reliable prognostic score • it calculates the probability of poor outcome at three months • it can be used already at admission • it is very simple to use, especially with the help of the color chart

Spare slides

Spare slides

Oxford Handicap Scale score < 3 Stroke 2002; 33: 1041 -1047

Oxford Handicap Scale score < 3 Stroke 2002; 33: 1041 -1047

logit(BI<95) = -5. 782 + (0. 049*age) + (0. 272*NIHSS) Stroke 2004; 35: 158

logit(BI<95) = -5. 782 + (0. 049*age) + (0. 272*NIHSS) Stroke 2004; 35: 158 -162

Stroke 2008; 39; 1821 -1826

Stroke 2008; 39; 1821 -1826

-Score by Weimar et al. - Validation in the VISTA dataset Stroke 2008; 39;

-Score by Weimar et al. - Validation in the VISTA dataset Stroke 2008; 39; 1821 -1826 -ASTRAL score - Validation in pooled Athens/Vienna dataset Neurology 2012; 78: 1916– 1922

Stroke 2011; 42: 3421 -3428

Stroke 2011; 42: 3421 -3428

Stroke 2011; 42: 3421 -3428

Stroke 2011; 42: 3421 -3428

Stroke 2011; 42: 3421 -3428

Stroke 2011; 42: 3421 -3428

P=0. 43 P=0. 49 P=0. 22 P=0. 82

P=0. 43 P=0. 49 P=0. 22 P=0. 82

Predictors of long-term outcome ASTRAL score (per 1 point increase) Atrial fibrillation Heart Failure

Predictors of long-term outcome ASTRAL score (per 1 point increase) Atrial fibrillation Heart Failure Stroke subtypes Lacunar Atherosclerotic Cardioembolic Undetermined 5 -year unfavourable outcome (m. RS=3 -6) 1. 09 (1. 08 – 1. 10)* 1. 53 (1. 14 – 2. 04)† 1. 56 (1. 14 – 2. 13)† 1 1. 71 (1. 10 – 2. 66)‡ 1. 65 (1. 03 – 2. 63)‡ 2. 82 (1. 84 – 4. 34)* 5 -year mortality 1. 09 (1. 08 – 1. 10)* 1 1. 14 (0. 67 – 1. 94) 1. 74 (1. 02 – 2. 97)‡ 2. 39 (1. 46 – 3. 93)* 0. 74 (0. 58 – 0. 95)‡