Spring School of Spectroscopic Data Analyses 8 12

  • Slides: 31
Download presentation
Spring School of Spectroscopic Data Analyses 8 -12 April 2013 Astronomical Institute of the

Spring School of Spectroscopic Data Analyses 8 -12 April 2013 Astronomical Institute of the University of Wroclaw, Poland 9 april 2013 LOG G 1 Giovanni Catanzaro INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania Spring School of Data Analyses SPECTRAL LINE ANALYSIS:

SPECTRAL LINES Hydrogen Energy Levels b Balmer = R [ 1/nl 2 – 1

SPECTRAL LINES Hydrogen Energy Levels b Balmer = R [ 1/nl 2 – 1 /nu 2] Spring School of Data Analyses g b 9 april 2013 a An absorption line is produced in a stellar spectrum whenever photons of energy E=h =hc/ =EU-EL are absorbed by an atom or ion that jumps from a lower to an upper energy level. R = 3. 288 x 1015 Hz a Lyman 2

SPECTRAL LINES Hydrogen Energy Levels 9 april 2013 Ionization Energy for Hydrogen (n to

SPECTRAL LINES Hydrogen Energy Levels 9 april 2013 Ionization Energy for Hydrogen (n to infinity): Spring School of Data Analyses I = 13. 6 e. V ( 912 Ǻ) ionization energy I n excitation potential of the level n 2 = 10. 2 e. V 2 3

SPECTRAL LINES 9 april 2013 The intensity of a spectral line is related to

SPECTRAL LINES 9 april 2013 The intensity of a spectral line is related to the number of absorbers, i. e. atoms or ions of the given elements at the lower level of the transition. In LTE (Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium) the fraction of ions that can absorb is given by the Saha and Boltzmann equations. Spring School of Data Analyses Electron pressure gravity Element abundance Ionization - Saha temperature Excitation - Boltzmann 4

SPECTRAL LINES 9 april 2013 There are several mechanisms that broaden a spectral line,

SPECTRAL LINES 9 april 2013 There are several mechanisms that broaden a spectral line, which is never a function (infinitely-narrow feature). Dispersion profile (Lorentzian) Spring School of Data Analyses 1) Natural atomic absorption 2) Pressure broadening Gaussian profile 3) Thermal Doppler broadening 4) Microturbulence 5) Rotation Etc. 5

 Spring School of Data Analyses Change in energy of the levels induced by

Spring School of Data Analyses Change in energy of the levels induced by the collisions Different types of pressure broadening n Type Lines affected Perturber 2 Linear Stark Hydrogen Protons, electrons 4 Quadratic Stark Lines in hot stars Ions, electrons 6 Van der Waals Lines in cool stars 9 april 2013 Pressure broadening implies a collisional interaction between the atoms absorbing light and other particles: ions, electrons, atoms or molecules (in cool stars). Neutral hydrogen 6

SPECTRAL LINES “Weak” lines G( ) Dispersion (Lorentzian) profiles 9 april 2013 Thermal Doppler

SPECTRAL LINES “Weak” lines G( ) Dispersion (Lorentzian) profiles 9 april 2013 Thermal Doppler profiles L( ) Spring School of Data Analyses Both broadening mechanisms at work the line is shaped by the convolution G( )*L( ): “Voigt function” 7

SPECTRAL LINES “Strong” lines Dispersion (Lorentzian) profiles 9 april 2013 Thermal Doppler profiles L(

SPECTRAL LINES “Strong” lines Dispersion (Lorentzian) profiles 9 april 2013 Thermal Doppler profiles L( ) G( ) Spring School of Data Analyses When the line intensity increases (e. g. abundance) the optical depth at the line center becomes high the line core reaches a minimum level and the wings get broad. These lines are said “saturated”. Strong lines of abundant elements and ions (HI, Na. I, Mg. II, Ca. II, etc. ) 8

SPECTRAL LINES normal 9 april 2013 To observer A Spring School of Data Analyses

SPECTRAL LINES normal 9 april 2013 To observer A Spring School of Data Analyses Star surface Optical depth. k , l continuum and line absorption coefficients Line transfer equation Source function j emission coefficients 9

SPECTRAL LINES E 2 exponential integral of order 2 To a first, rough approximation:

SPECTRAL LINES E 2 exponential integral of order 2 To a first, rough approximation: In LTE the source function at is the Planck function evaluated at T( ) S is decreasing outwards Spring School of Data Analyses Numerical solution! 9 april 2013 The solution of transfer equation gives the emerging flux (at the top of the atmosphere =0) as: For 10

SPECTRAL LINES Spring School of Data Analyses The flux at the line center (where

SPECTRAL LINES Spring School of Data Analyses The flux at the line center (where l is maximum) comes from the upper atmospheric layers, where the source function is lower. 9 april 2013 The larger l the smaller x 1 must be to obtain an optical depth 1 x to the star center 11

MEASURING THE GRAVITY IN STARS Spring School of Data Analyses 9 april 2013 In

MEASURING THE GRAVITY IN STARS Spring School of Data Analyses 9 april 2013 In principle we can measure gravity in a direct way: • Obtain Mass via spectroscopy and the Doppler effect (binary stars for example) • Measure the radius by an independent means (interferometry, lunar occultations, eclipsing binaries) In principle this can only be done for very few stars must rely on spectroscopic determinations 12

Increasing of gravity translates into a compression of the photosphere and therefore in an

Increasing of gravity translates into a compression of the photosphere and therefore in an increase of the pressure Spring School of Data Analyses Therefore pressure dependences can be translated in gravity dependences 9 april 2013 • Ionization equilibrium • P sensitive to damping constant for strong lines • P dependence of the linear stark broadening in H 13

The strenght of a spectral line is related to the ratio of the line

The strenght of a spectral line is related to the ratio of the line and continuous absorption coefficients: Include all terms not dependent on pressure Spring School of Data Analyses Number of atoms/ions in r+1 ionization stages 9 april 2013 Rewrite the Saha equation in a more schematic form Number of atoms/ions in the r ionization stages Remember also that: 14

WEAK LINES (NO STRONG WINGS) IN COOL STARS In cool stars H- dominates the

WEAK LINES (NO STRONG WINGS) IN COOL STARS In cool stars H- dominates the opacity of the continuos These lines are insensitive to gravity, but are useful to set the abundance of the element Spring School of Data Analyses Saha 9 april 2013 Most part of an element in the next higher ionization stage 15

WEAK LINES (NO STRONG WINGS) IN COOL STARS 9 april 2013 Most part of

WEAK LINES (NO STRONG WINGS) IN COOL STARS 9 april 2013 Most part of an element in the same ionization stage Again H- dominates the opacity of the continuos Spring School of Data Analyses Saha These lines are sensitive to gravity 16

Example: in solar like stars iron is mostly ionized 9 april 2013 Fe I

Example: in solar like stars iron is mostly ionized 9 april 2013 Fe I lines are insensitive to gravity Fe. II lines are sensitive to gravity Spring School of Data Analyses Fuhrmann et al. (1997) A&A, 323, 909 Procyon Teff = 6500 K log g = 3. 58 17

BROAD WINGS OF NEUTRAL LINES IN COOL STARS Van der Waals Quadratic Stark Most

BROAD WINGS OF NEUTRAL LINES IN COOL STARS Van der Waals Quadratic Stark Most part of element is ionized Depending of the relative size of damping constants we will have different regimes: from no gravity dependence (gnat dominant) to maximum dependence (van der Waals dominant) Spring School of Data Analyses H- dominates the opacity of the continuos 9 april 2013 18

9 april 2013 HD 100623 K 0 V HD 99322 K 0 III POP-UVES

9 april 2013 HD 100623 K 0 V HD 99322 K 0 III POP-UVES Database Spring School of Data Analyses 61 Cyg - K 5 V Teff=4500 K logg = 4. 57 15 Aql – K 1 III Teff=4520 K logg = 2. 65 19 Courtesy of A. Frasca (Priv. Comm. )

HD 71297 Teff=7500 ± 180 K log g = 4. 00 ± 0. 10

HD 71297 Teff=7500 ± 180 K log g = 4. 00 ± 0. 10 9 april 2013 log g = 2. 0 log g = 3. 0 log g = 4. 0 log g = 5. 0 Spring School of Data Analyses Teff=7500 K Teff=7150 K, log g = 4. 20 Teff=7380 K, log g = 4. 08 Teff=7250 K, log g = 4. 20 Teff=7670 K, log g = 4. 44 Catanzaro et al (2013), MNRAS, in press Fossati et al (2011) MNRAS, 417, 495 20

BROAD WINGS OF IONIC LINES IN COOL STARS 9 april 2013 Log g =

BROAD WINGS OF IONIC LINES IN COOL STARS 9 april 2013 Log g = 3, 4, 5 HD 152311 Teff=5597 K Log g = 3. 97 [Fe/H]=0. 10 Vsin i = 4 km/s Spring School of Data Analyses Again, depending we have different regimes: from no gravity dependence (gnat dominant) to maximum dependence (van der Waals dominant) Ramirez et al. , 2007, 465, 271 21

BROAD WINGS OF BALMER LINES IN HOT STARS R The resulting splitting of atomic

BROAD WINGS OF BALMER LINES IN HOT STARS R The resulting splitting of atomic levels can be expressed as the of the spectral components: Greater compression of the photosphere results in a greater E, so l is proportional to E and than to Pe Spring School of Data Analyses Distribution of ions gives a non-zero E at the position of the H 9 april 2013 Struve (1929): great wings of Balmer lines in early-type stars are due to linear Stark Effect In this stars H absorption dominates k than it is proportional to NH H lines increase in strength toward lower luminosity classes 22

In this case more is the gravity narrow is the line Teff=10000 K Spring

In this case more is the gravity narrow is the line Teff=10000 K Spring School of Data Analyses Teff=7000 K 9 april 2013 log g = 2. 0 log g = 3. 0 log g = 4. 0 log g = 5. 0 Teff=25000 K 23

Influence of chemical composition 9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses 24 Catanzaro

Influence of chemical composition 9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses 24 Catanzaro et al. (2004), A&A, 425, 641 Leone & Manfre’ (1997), A&A, 320, 257

THE GRAVITY-TEMPERATURE DIAGRAM 9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses Each curve is

THE GRAVITY-TEMPERATURE DIAGRAM 9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses Each curve is computed for a costant iron abundance (fixed using lines not sensitive to g), while varyng the surface gravity for a given temperature (or vice versa) to recover the observed EQWs 25

9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses Lehner et al. , 2000, MNRAS,

9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses Lehner et al. , 2000, MNRAS, 314, 199 Lyumbikov et al. , 2002, MNRAS, 333, 9 26

BALMER JUMP AS LOG G INDICATOR 9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses

BALMER JUMP AS LOG G INDICATOR 9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses log g = 3. 00 log g = 4. 00 log g = 5. 00 27

Example: g Boo Teff=7600 K, log g = 3. 7 (Ventura et al. ,

Example: g Boo Teff=7600 K, log g = 3. 7 (Ventura et al. , 2007, MNRAS, 381, 164) 9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses log g = 3. 00 log g = 4. 40 28

EMPIRICAL INDICATORS: THE WILSON-BAPPU EFFECT 9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses log

EMPIRICAL INDICATORS: THE WILSON-BAPPU EFFECT 9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses log g 29

Example: Arcturus (K 1. 5 III) vs x Boo A (G 8 V) Courtesy

Example: Arcturus (K 1. 5 III) vs x Boo A (G 8 V) Courtesy of Antonio Frasca 9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses Ca. II K line Star Teff (K) log g Arcturus 4158 ± 127 1. 89 ± 0. 16 x Boo A 5230 ± 115 4. 58 ± 0. 05 Allende-Prieto, 2004, A&A, 420, 183 30

9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION 31

9 april 2013 Spring School of Data Analyses THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION 31