Seeing the universe through redshifted 21 cm radiation

  • Slides: 38
Download presentation
Seeing the universe through redshifted 21 -cm radiation Somnath Bharadwaj Physics & CTS IIT

Seeing the universe through redshifted 21 -cm radiation Somnath Bharadwaj Physics & CTS IIT Kharagpur

Tarun D Saini Collaborators Biswajit Pandey Sanjay Pandey IISc RRI Biman Nath RRI LBSC,

Tarun D Saini Collaborators Biswajit Pandey Sanjay Pandey IISc RRI Biman Nath RRI LBSC, Gonda Jayaram Chengalur BITS, Pilani Tapomoy Guha Sarkar Shiv K Sethi T Roy Choudhury NCRA, TIFR Saiyad Ali NCRA, TIFR JU Suman Majumdar IUCAA Stockholm Abhik Ghosh Jayanti Prasad Kanan Datta

The Expanding Universe

The Expanding Universe

Redshift – distance - time z 2 z 1 Observer z 3

Redshift – distance - time z 2 z 1 Observer z 3

21 cm radiation Neutral Hydrogen - HI Ground state

21 cm radiation Neutral Hydrogen - HI Ground state

Constituents of the Universe Baryons 75 % Hydrogen 25% Helium

Constituents of the Universe Baryons 75 % Hydrogen 25% Helium

Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) Observer T=2. 725 K

Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) Observer T=2. 725 K

HI Evolution

HI Evolution

z > 1000 T =2. 725 K (1+z) Hydrogen is ionized at z>1, 000

z > 1000 T =2. 725 K (1+z) Hydrogen is ionized at z>1, 000 Recombination – HI formed for first time at z=1, 000

CMBR anisotropies Universe ionized and opaque at z >1000 WMAP NASA Z=1000 T=2. 725

CMBR anisotropies Universe ionized and opaque at z >1000 WMAP NASA Z=1000 T=2. 725 K Nearly isotropic T ~ 10 micro K

HI Evolution Dark Age HI seen in absorption against CMBR

HI Evolution Dark Age HI seen in absorption against CMBR

HI Evolution Epoch of Reionization HI seen in emission

HI Evolution Epoch of Reionization HI seen in emission

HI Evolution Post-Reionization HI seen in emision

HI Evolution Post-Reionization HI seen in emision

Evolution of the Universe

Evolution of the Universe

Structure Formation Z=1000 Z=0

Structure Formation Z=1000 Z=0

Rionization Photoionization First Luminous Objects z~30 15 >z > 6

Rionization Photoionization First Luminous Objects z~30 15 >z > 6

Simulation Majumdar, Bharadwaj& Roy Choudhury 2012, MNRAS, Submitted

Simulation Majumdar, Bharadwaj& Roy Choudhury 2012, MNRAS, Submitted

What do we observe? Fluctuations in 21 -cm radiation with frequency ad angle on

What do we observe? Fluctuations in 21 -cm radiation with frequency ad angle on sky

The Dark Matter Power Spectrum

The Dark Matter Power Spectrum

Mini-Summary ● ● Redshifted 21 -cm radiation fluctuates with frequency and angle on sky

Mini-Summary ● ● Redshifted 21 -cm radiation fluctuates with frequency and angle on sky Observations can be used to study: – Universe at z ~ 50 (Dark Age) – only possible probe – Formation of the first luinous objects – – Reionization Structure formation after reionization

Our Efforts Started With

Our Efforts Started With

GMRT Giant Meter-wave Radio Telescope

GMRT Giant Meter-wave Radio Telescope

Radio Interferometric Array GMRT 30 antennas 45 diameter Frequency MHz 153 z 8. 3

Radio Interferometric Array GMRT 30 antennas 45 diameter Frequency MHz 153 z 8. 3 235 5. 0 325 3. 4 610 1. 3 32 MHz bands with 128 separate channels 1420 0

Have we observed the cosmological 21 -cm radiation? No!

Have we observed the cosmological 21 -cm radiation? No!

Predicted Signal m. K 10 arc-minutes Datta, Roy Choudhury & Bharadwaj 2007, 387, 767

Predicted Signal m. K 10 arc-minutes Datta, Roy Choudhury & Bharadwaj 2007, 387, 767 z=10, x=0. 5

Haslam Map - 408 MHz All-Sky Survey) ≈ 40 Angular scales (off-galactic) Synchrotron Radiation

Haslam Map - 408 MHz All-Sky Survey) ≈ 40 Angular scales (off-galactic) Synchrotron Radiation 180 K – 70, 000 K at 150 MHz

GMRT Observations FIELD I Ghosh, Prasad, Bharadwaj, Ali & Chengalur 2012, MNRAS, In Press

GMRT Observations FIELD I Ghosh, Prasad, Bharadwaj, Ali & Chengalur 2012, MNRAS, In Press

14 hrs GMRT Observations RA 01 36 46 DEC 41 24 23 Ali, Bharadwaj

14 hrs GMRT Observations RA 01 36 46 DEC 41 24 23 Ali, Bharadwaj & Chengalur 2008, MNRAS, 385, 2166 FIELD IV

Measured Cℓ Expected 21 -cm Signal Cℓ ~ 10 -3 – 10 -4 Ghosh,

Measured Cℓ Expected 21 -cm Signal Cℓ ~ 10 -3 – 10 -4 Ghosh, Prasad, Bharadwaj, Ali & Chengalur 2012, MNRAS, In Press m. K 2

Foregrounds Point Sources Diffuse Removal is Biggest Challenge

Foregrounds Point Sources Diffuse Removal is Biggest Challenge

GMRT Observations FIELD I Point Source Dominated Ghosh, Prasad, Bharadwaj, Ali & Chengalur 2012,

GMRT Observations FIELD I Point Source Dominated Ghosh, Prasad, Bharadwaj, Ali & Chengalur 2012, MNRAS, In Press

Low resolution Residual Map. Taper @ |U|=170 Diffuse Structure Appearing On the Map on

Low resolution Residual Map. Taper @ |U|=170 Diffuse Structure Appearing On the Map on Scales > 10 arcmin The brightest structures in this map are at 5σ level compared to the local rms value ~ 23. 5 m. Jy/Beam.

The brightest structures in this map are at 10σ level compared to the local

The brightest structures in this map are at 10σ level compared to the local rms value ~ 35 m. Jy/Beam. Taper @ |U|=100

Angular Power spectrum : The power spectrum of the Diffuse emission was fitted by

Angular Power spectrum : The power spectrum of the Diffuse emission was fitted by a power-law down to ℓ = 800 ( θ ≈ 10'): v

Currently working on ● Theoretical Predictions of Expected 21 -cm Signal ● Detection Strategies

Currently working on ● Theoretical Predictions of Expected 21 -cm Signal ● Detection Strategies ● Quantify and Remove Foregrounds

Thank You

Thank You

Concluding Remarks ● Probe Dark Ages, First Luminous Objects, reionization, postreionization ● Potential Probe

Concluding Remarks ● Probe Dark Ages, First Luminous Objects, reionization, postreionization ● Potential Probe of Dark Energy ● Challenge Foregrounds, RFI