NEW INDIA 2022 75 MILESTONES FOR INDIA 75

NEW INDIA 2022 – 75 MILESTONES FOR INDIA @75 NATIONAL LEVEL MONITORING OF RD PROGRAMMES Meeting of Performance Review Committee June 6, 2019 Ministry of Rural Development

Monitoring Framework at Mo. RD ü Use of IT, Direct Benefit Transfers & Space Technology (Geo-tagging) üInternal Audit üSocial Audit üCommon Review Mission (CRM) üResearch and Evaluation Studies üDISHA Dashboard üNational Level Monitoring (NLM)

National Level Monitoring ü Independent Third-Party monitoring of Do. RD, Do. LR & Mo. PR Programmes ü About 55 Independent Institutions - collect field inputs from district/block/GPs & beneficiaries ü Inputs collected for validation of physical progress, assets verification, outcomes etc ü Type of Monitoring visits o Regular Monitoring o Special Monitoring o Complaints & Enquiries ü Target to cover entire country through Regular Monitoring in 2 phases every year ü Designed to yield factual insights/inputs ü District wise reports shared with District Authorities & DISHA Committees ü Regional Workshops

Regular Monitoring 2018 -19 Phase-I Coverage States Districts Aspirational 115 Blocks 28 289 48 869 NRLM Intensive 493 MWC Blocks 284 Villages SAGY GPs 2890 296

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) – Findings üAll Job Cards verified by Field Functionaries - 49% GPs (Job Card verification not taken up in many GPs of Andhra Pradesh, Nagaland , Punjab, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh) üParticipatory process of labour budget preparation - 96% GPs (Needs improvements in Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Nagaland, Punjab, Rajasthan, Telangana Uttarakhand) üMGNERGA Works taken up in Convergence – 45% GPs (Weak in Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Sikkim) üLarge number of incomplete works (Assam, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Nagaland, Odisha, Rajasthan, Telangana) üSocial Audit conducted during 2017 -18 - 81% GPs (Much less in Haryana, Manipur, Nagaland & Punjab)

MNREGA : Maintenance of Records I Job Card- Application, Registration, Issue & HH Employment Report II Gram Sabha Register III Work – demand, allocation & payment of wages IV Works Register V Fixed Asset Register VI Material Register VII Complaint Register States where Record Maintenance & Updation not satisfactory • Gujarat • Haryana • Meghalaya • Punjab • Uttar Pradesh • Uttarakhand 100 I II IV V VI VII 82 80 76 76 73 69 74 All 7 Registers Maintained All 7 Registers Updated 80 60 40 2017 -18 Ph-II 2018 -19 Ph-I 13

MGNREGS : Indication of Outcomes 73% Improved People’s Participation 94 Increased Income 72% 78 80% 86 84 76 89 Land Productivity 82 74 80 84 78 72 79 76 70 74 74 68 69 66 64 64 Participatory Demand Labour Budget Harmonized Satisfaction with works % Villages 72 70 68 Increased Family Income Improved Women's Participation Income Generating Assets % Respondents Water Conservation & Water Harvesting Irrigations Works % Works Land Development

PMAY-G Support to Beneficiaries % of GPs Sensitization of beneficiaries - 77% House design typologies 77% Haryana, Karnataka, Manipur, Trained rural masons - Mizoram, Punjab, Sikkim and Uttar Pradesh need to 90% improve support to beneficiaries -

Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) § Completed Roads § Maintained- 88% 94 Citizen Information Board § Good riding comfort – 94% Roads § Cost effective new technology used – 30% Roads Road Furniture 88 Proper Shoulder Proper Drainage Adequate Camber § Under Construction Roads § 16% roads not inspected by SQMs § 8% roads inspected thrice by SQMs § 46% roads – Cost Effective new technology used 94 80 91

National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) –Pension Disbursement Receive Pension in time (49% as per 2017 -18 Reports) 100 a sh di O an ag al ip an M tti Ch ha d ur es h ad Pr a hr nd GPs 25 2, 5 A Karnataka, MP, TN, Telangana shifted from Cash to Bank 11% 100 N Cash Disbursement 100 h Quarterl y 25% Reduced from 12. 72% as per 2017 -18 reports 57% Arunachal Pradesh Assam Jammu & Kashmir Nagaland Punjab ar Half Yearly 7% • • • sg Irregular 18% Irregular Disbursement Monthly 50% States – Cash Disbursements 26

DAY-NRLM Mobilization of Target Households 70% target households mobilized into SHGs - universal across caste categories (Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Uttar Pradesh & Uttarakhand need mobilization of Target Households) to improve § 80% SHGs following Panchasutra (Only 49% SHGs following Dussutra) § 41% SHGs received revolving fund (Only 22% SHGs received Community Investment Fund) § 36% VOs provided CIF to majority of the SHGs (No CIF Provided to most of VOs in Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Karnataka and Manipur)

States are Partner in NLM System Support for NLM visits ü A State level Nodal Officer for co-ordination with District Authorities& NLM Agencies ü Timely intimation to District Authorities ü Better co-ordination amongst different implementing agencies during Field Visits ü Support/Assistance for logistics and timely completion of NLM assignment Feedback & corrective action ü Prompt acknowledgement and feedback on NLM observations ü Comments/feedback from the States for incorporating in the reports ü ATRs on complaints and findings of NLM Reports ü Effective participation in Regional NLM Workshops

Limitations of Present NLM System üOnly Limited Information üLack of deep insights üIssues about quality of analysis, findings and suggestions üLack of capacity and continuity amongst NLM field staff üLack of Comprehensive Follow up action on NLM Findings

NLM Revamping into a Broader M&E System From Level-I to Level-II Monitoring Level-II Focus on only limited Aspects More clearer understanding of processes Only Concurrent Issues Detailed conclusions on consequences /impacts of pogramme interventions Validation of progress/data reported on MISs Lack of qualitative Inputs More Social-Institutional insights Wider Scope of study & in-depth analysis Special Monitoring of specific programmes Online Feedback and ATR monitoring mechanism Knowledge creation by NLM System (BEST PRACTICES PLUS DATA BASE)

Tier II Common Review Mission NLMS SAANJHI SURVEY AND QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMMES BY NLM Regional Lead Agencies SAANJHI CONCURRENT /IMPACT EVALUATION BASED ON INPUTS FROM NLM, CRMs & PDs

Way Forward üA Committee to advise on monitoring mechanism including NLM üOpen EOI to engage better professional institutions as Tier I NLMs üEOI from ICSSR, Universities, IITs and other institutions to engage as Tier II RLAs üCapacity building of NLM Institutions’ Field Staff üImproved methods of data collection from field üStates requested to give their suggestions as per their needs

THANK YOU