June 25 Town Hall Meeting Agenda 1 Update

  • Slides: 34
Download presentation
June 25 Town Hall Meeting

June 25 Town Hall Meeting

Agenda 1. Update on City’s current water project 2. Presentation of City findings regarding

Agenda 1. Update on City’s current water project 2. Presentation of City findings regarding Nestlé Waters project feasibility 3. Information stations regarding project feasibility findings 4. Community questions, concerns, comments about project impacts on the City

City of Cascade Locks Water System Improvement Project

City of Cascade Locks Water System Improvement Project

Ø REQUIRED BY STATE AND FEDERAL FUNDING AGENCIES Ø EXAMINES THE IMPACT THE PROJECT

Ø REQUIRED BY STATE AND FEDERAL FUNDING AGENCIES Ø EXAMINES THE IMPACT THE PROJECT ALTERNATIVES HAVE ON THE FOLLOWING RESOURCES: ØLAND USE - NO IMPACT ØSOILS - GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ØFLOOD PLAIN - NO IMPACT ØWETLANDS - NO IMPACT ØCULTURAL RESOURCES - SURVEY, TEST PITS, REPORT PENDING ØBIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - SURVEY WITH NO IMPACT NOTED ØWATER QUALITY - NO IMPACT WITH PROPER CONTROLS ØCOASTAL RESOURCES - NOT RELEVANT ØSOCIO-ECONOMIC - NO IMPACT ØAIR QUALITY - NO IMPACT WITH PROPER CONTROLS ØTRANSPORTATION - NO IMPACT ØNOISE - NO IMPACT WITH PROPER CONTROLS ENNESON NGINEERING CONSUTLING ENGINEERS ● SURVEYORS ● ORP. PLANNERS

Ø MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDE: Ø EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Ø LAND CLEARING TO OCCUR

Ø MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDE: Ø EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Ø LAND CLEARING TO OCCUR OUTSIDE OF NESTING SEASON Ø LIMIT CONSTRUCTION HOURS AND REQUIRE MUFFLERS Ø DESIGN RESERVOIR TO ACCOMMODATE POSSIBLE SETTLEMENT Ø IDENTIFY AND AVOID, IF POSSIBLE, CULTURAL RESOURCES Ø DEVELOP AN INADVERTENT DISCOVERY PLAN Ø POSSIBLY RETAIN AN ARCHAELOGIST DURING GROUND DISTURBANCE OF HIGH PROBABILITY AREAS ENNESON NGINEERING CONSUTLING ENGINEERS ● SURVEYORS ● ORP. PLANNERS

Assessing Nestlé Project Impacts

Assessing Nestlé Project Impacts

Nestlé Proposal Consideration Process 1. City and ODFW filed for a cross transfer of

Nestlé Proposal Consideration Process 1. City and ODFW filed for a cross transfer of water rights April 10, 2015 2. Townhall meeting inviting Cascade Locks residents’ comments and questions 3. City and ODFW negotiate an intergovernmental agreement the use of Oxbow Springs water and City replenishment water 4. Oregon Water Resources Board issues permit decision

Nestlé Proposal Consideration Process 5. City communicates to Nestlé the issues and concerns raised

Nestlé Proposal Consideration Process 5. City communicates to Nestlé the issues and concerns raised by the community which any proposal from the company needs to address 6. If City cross transfer of water rights with ODFW is approved, it is anticipated that Nestlé will present a proposal to the Port for land to the City for development of that land.

Nestlé Proposal Consideration Process 7. City and Port vet any proposal for compliance with

Nestlé Proposal Consideration Process 7. City and Port vet any proposal for compliance with Community Development Code and responsiveness to issues and concerns presented to Nestlé, and negotiate contract(s) to provide utility services 8. Sale of the land must be approved by the Port Commission 9. Development of the land must be approved by the City

Project Issues Examined by the City 1. Can the City legally sell “waters of

Project Issues Examined by the City 1. Can the City legally sell “waters of the State of Oregon” to a business? 2. Is there enough water available that the City will not be damaged by the sale of that water in any way? 3. Is the process appropriate for the end goal? 4. What is the benefit to the ODFW Fish Hatchery? 5. Can the City establish limits, both mechanical and contractual, that protect the City in the long run?

Project Issues Examined by the City 6. Who pays the bill? 7. What is

Project Issues Examined by the City 6. Who pays the bill? 7. What is the “enterprise zone property tax abatement incentive”? 8. How does the City benefit financially if we don’t get the property taxes for a while? 9. What is the impact of development in the Business Park on City Streets?

Water Usage in the US (usgs 2010) Thermoelectric Mining 38% 1% Industrial 5% Aquaculture

Water Usage in the US (usgs 2010) Thermoelectric Mining 38% 1% Industrial 5% Aquaculture Livestock 3% 1% Irrigation Domestic Public Supply 38% 1% 14%

Water Rights Transfers versus Water Exchanges Exchange: Trading water, but not rights Transfer: Changing

Water Rights Transfers versus Water Exchanges Exchange: Trading water, but not rights Transfer: Changing ownership of water rights Cross Transfer: ODFW and Cascade Locks trade water rights for. 5 cfs

ODFW Oxbow Spring Water Rights (10 cfs) City

ODFW Oxbow Spring Water Rights (10 cfs) City

In the last 10 years, Oregon Water Resources Department has had just two exchange

In the last 10 years, Oregon Water Resources Department has had just two exchange applications (one being the earlier Cascade Locks/ODFW exchange proposal) and 2, 500+ water rights transfers.

Future Use of Water Rights (cfs) City Usage; 0. 2 City Water Loss; 0.

Future Use of Water Rights (cfs) City Usage; 0. 2 City Water Loss; 0. 2 Potential Bottling (City); 0. 4 Water Rights Remaining; 2. 1 Potential Bottling (Spring); 0. 5 Potential Production; 0. 1 Fish Hatchery; 0. 5

City Well Capacities Current New cfs gpm Water Rights 4. 0 1, 792 Well

City Well Capacities Current New cfs gpm Water Rights 4. 0 1, 792 Well #1 1. 0 448 2. 2 1, 000 Well #2 1. 1 493 Well #3 – – 2. 2 1, 000 2. 1 941 5. 6 2, 493

Oxbow Flow to Hatchery (30 year average flow) 7. 0 6. 0 5. 0

Oxbow Flow to Hatchery (30 year average flow) 7. 0 6. 0 5. 0 4. 0 3. 0 2. 0 1. 0 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Flow Jun Nestle Jul Aug Adjusted Sep Oct Nov Dec

Fish Hatchery Flow 7. 0 6. 0 5. 0 4. 0 3. 0 2.

Fish Hatchery Flow 7. 0 6. 0 5. 0 4. 0 3. 0 2. 0 1. 0 - Jan Feb Mar Flow Apr May Nestle Jun Jul Adjusted Aug City Sep Oct Hatchery Nov Dec

Water Comparisons (Illustrative Only) Nestlé Requirement: 224 gallons per minute (0. 5 cfs) (bottling

Water Comparisons (Illustrative Only) Nestlé Requirement: 224 gallons per minute (0. 5 cfs) (bottling spring water) 118 million gallons annually Cascade Locks Currently Sells 48 million gallons annually Loses to Leakage 48 million gallons annually

Water Comparisons (Illustrative Only) Nestlé Requirement: 224 gallons per minute (0. 5 cfs) (bottling

Water Comparisons (Illustrative Only) Nestlé Requirement: 224 gallons per minute (0. 5 cfs) (bottling spring water) 118 million gallons annually Intel Requirement: 1 billion gallons annually (Hillsboro) (8. 6 times Nestlé’s requirement) Google Requirement: 1. 5 billion gallons annually (The Dalles) (Nearly 13 times Nestlé’s requirement)

Cascade Locks Water System Schematic City Wells (Wells #1 & #2) Chlorine Contact Chamber

Cascade Locks Water System Schematic City Wells (Wells #1 & #2) Chlorine Contact Chamber Water Distribution System 12” (emergency use) Oxbow Springs (0. 5 cfs) 6” 6” 4” Water Meter “E” (Not to exceed “C” annually) 6” ” Water Meter “A” Nestlé Facility Office ODFW Fish Hatchery New Well #3 Water Meter “B” Water Meter “C” Pure Life Mountain Spring Production Sewer Flow Meter “F” Wastewater Treatment Plant Trucks to Customers

Nestlé Plant Infrastructure New City Well #3 Business Park Oxbox Springs Water to Nestlé

Nestlé Plant Infrastructure New City Well #3 Business Park Oxbox Springs Water to Nestlé Plant ODFW Water returned from City Well #3 Water to Nestlé Plant from City Well #3

Pipe Size Capacities Size Gallons/Minute 12" 8" 4" 2" 2” 45 2. 5” 75

Pipe Size Capacities Size Gallons/Minute 12" 8" 4" 2" 2” 45 2. 5” 75 3” 130 4” 260 6” 800 8” 1, 600 10” 3, 000 12” 4, 700 7. 5 gallons in a cubic foot 449 gallons per minute = 1 cubic foot per second (1 cfs) 1, 571 gallons per minute = 3. 5 cfs 1, 795 gallons per minute = 4. 0 cfs

Cascade Locks Employment Population: 1, 235 Workforce: 580 Unemployment: 18. 8% People Unemployed: 109

Cascade Locks Employment Population: 1, 235 Workforce: 580 Unemployment: 18. 8% People Unemployed: 109

Cascade Locks Job Growth Puff Factory: 20 Bear Mountain: 10 Heuker Bros. Fish Processing:

Cascade Locks Job Growth Puff Factory: 20 Bear Mountain: 10 Heuker Bros. Fish Processing: NWNA: 50 90 10

City Utility Benefits Water Revenue: 30% Increase Wastewater Revenue: Electric Revenue: Bottled Water Revenue:

City Utility Benefits Water Revenue: 30% Increase Wastewater Revenue: Electric Revenue: Bottled Water Revenue: 50% Increase 100% Increase Unknown

Enterprise Zone Property Tax Abatement Program To qualify, the average employee wages and benefits

Enterprise Zone Property Tax Abatement Program To qualify, the average employee wages and benefits of the project have to exceed 150% of Cascade Locks’ median household income. Median Household Income = 150% of Median = $41, 696 $62, 544

Estimated Nestlé Property Taxes* Based on $50 million Potential Assessed Value Local Government County

Estimated Nestlé Property Taxes* Based on $50 million Potential Assessed Value Local Government County Library District 911 Comm District NORCOR School District Col Gorge ESD HRC Transit District Wind Master URD Mt. Hood CC Port of CL City of CL Total Tax per Thousand Tax Assessed Less 3% Disc Over 3 Years Over 5 Years $1. 5925 $0. 3876 $0. 5608 $0. 2435 $7. 8153 $0. 4649 $0. 0719 $0. 0547 $0. 4917 $0. 0256 $79, 625 $19, 380 $28, 040 $12, 175 $390, 765 $23, 245 $3, 595 $2, 735 $24, 585 $1, 280 $77, 236 $18, 799 $27, 199 $11, 810 $379, 042 $22, 548 $3, 487 $2, 653 $23, 847 $1, 242 $231, 709 $56, 396 $81, 596 $35, 429 $1, 137, 126 $67, 643 $10, 461 $7, 959 $71, 542 $3, 725 $386, 181 $93, 993 $135, 994 $59, 049 $1, 895, 210 $112, 738 $17, 436 $13, 265 $119, 237 $6, 208 $2. 7050 $14. 4135 $135, 250 $720, 675 $131, 193 $699, 055 $393, 578 $2, 097, 164 $655, 963 $3, 495, 274 * Based on 2014 -15 Tax Rates

Managing Traffic from the Business Park I-84 – 22, 000 Vehicles per Day Wa.

Managing Traffic from the Business Park I-84 – 22, 000 Vehicles per Day Wa. Pa. Na – 4, 300 VPD (12% trucks) Forest Lane – 1, 500 -2, 100 VPD

Questions the City Is Still Working on: 1. Water curtailment plan 2. Transportation alternatives

Questions the City Is Still Working on: 1. Water curtailment plan 2. Transportation alternatives – with the goal to remove as many trucks off of Forest Lane as possible 3. Large-scale development application parameters and funding

Thank you for your interest. As the process continues, we’ll keep the community informed.

Thank you for your interest. As the process continues, we’ll keep the community informed.

Your feedback is the purpose of tonight’s meeting. Please use the Post-It Notes to

Your feedback is the purpose of tonight’s meeting. Please use the Post-It Notes to share your comments, concerns and questions. Please provide your email or phone number so we can be in touch with you. Post your comments on or near the posters for issues you’re commenting on, or on the poster for other comments and concerns.