Ch 4 Difference Measurement Difference Measurement In Ch

  • Slides: 28
Download presentation
Ch 4: Difference Measurement

Ch 4: Difference Measurement

Difference Measurement • In Ch 3 we saw the kind of representation you can

Difference Measurement • In Ch 3 we saw the kind of representation you can get with a concatenation operation on an ordered set A • “The question arises whether similarly tight representations ever exist when there is no concatenation operation. ” 136

Difference Measurement • Extensive measurement: consider a set of movable rods • Difference measurement:

Difference Measurement • Extensive measurement: consider a set of movable rods • Difference measurement: consider fixed points on a line. Consider a set of intervals between points • We can construct standard sequences in A with an auxiliary, uncalibrated rod to lay off equal intervals 136

Difference Measurement • Denoting elements of A by a, b, e, d, we denote

Difference Measurement • Denoting elements of A by a, b, e, d, we denote intervals in A by ab, cd, etc. • We distinguish between ab and ba. • Comparison with a set of movable rods generates an ordering on the intervals in A. • ab ≿ cd if some rod does not exceed ab but exceeds or matches cd. 137

Axiomatization of Difference Measurement • Holder (1901) showed how the measurement of intervals between

Axiomatization of Difference Measurement • Holder (1901) showed how the measurement of intervals between points on a line can be reduced to extensive measurement. • Standard sequences of equally spaced elements a 1, a 2, a 3, . . . , where the intervals a 1 a 2 ∼ a 2 a 3 ∼. . . • Equivalent intervals are identified with a single element, their equivalence class 143

Otto Ludwig Hölder

Otto Ludwig Hölder

Positive Difference Structures 145

Positive Difference Structures 145

Positive Difference Structures 145

Positive Difference Structures 145

Positive Difference Structures Interpret A as the set of endpoints of intervals. A* is

Positive Difference Structures Interpret A as the set of endpoints of intervals. A* is the set of positive intervals, and is a subset of A x A. 147

Positive Difference Structures Transitivity 147

Positive Difference Structures Transitivity 147

Positive Difference Structures Axiom 3 guarantees that there are no null intervals. Note it

Positive Difference Structures Axiom 3 guarantees that there are no null intervals. Note it also follows that A* is not reflexive or symmetric. 147

Positive Difference Structures Weak monotonicity: this is needed to guarantee that concatenation of non-adjacent

Positive Difference Structures Weak monotonicity: this is needed to guarantee that concatenation of non-adjacent intervals gets the right results 147

Positive Difference Structures Archimedean axiom: ana 1 = (n-1)a 2 a 1 147

Positive Difference Structures Archimedean axiom: ana 1 = (n-1)a 2 a 1 147

Positive Difference Structures Archimedean axiom: ana 1 = (n-1)a 2 a 1 147

Positive Difference Structures Archimedean axiom: ana 1 = (n-1)a 2 a 1 147

Positive Difference Structures 147

Positive Difference Structures 147

Positive Difference Structures 147

Positive Difference Structures 147

Algebraic Difference Structures We now allow for negative and null intervals, so we don’t

Algebraic Difference Structures We now allow for negative and null intervals, so we don’t need A*. 151

Algebraic Difference Structures Axioms 2 and 3 of Definition 1 are here replaced by

Algebraic Difference Structures Axioms 2 and 3 of Definition 1 are here replaced by Axiom 2. It is a pretty intuitive axiom 151

Algebraic Difference Structures Axioms 3 -5 are correspond to axioms 4 -6 of Definition

Algebraic Difference Structures Axioms 3 -5 are correspond to axioms 4 -6 of Definition 1 151

Algebraic Difference Structures 151

Algebraic Difference Structures 151

Cross Modality Difference Structures Solvability axiom: The first part says that any element in

Cross Modality Difference Structures Solvability axiom: The first part says that any element in Ai x Ai can be matched with an element in A 1 x A 1. The second part is just the normal solvability property for A 1. But because of the first part, it follows that all the Ai have the solvability property. This is also why the Archimedean axiom is formulated for A 1. 165

Finite, Equally Spaced Difference Structures 167

Finite, Equally Spaced Difference Structures 167

Absolute-Difference Structures Axiom 3: Betweenness is well behaved i) If b is between a

Absolute-Difference Structures Axiom 3: Betweenness is well behaved i) If b is between a and c, and if c is between b and d, then c and b are between a and d. ii) If b is between a and c is between a and d, then ad exceeds bd 172

Absolute-Difference Structures Weak Monotonicity: If b is between a and c and b’ is

Absolute-Difference Structures Weak Monotonicity: If b is between a and c and b’ is between a’ and c’, and ab ∼a’b’, then bc ≿ b’c’ iff ac ≿ a’c’ 172

Absolute-Difference Structures Solvability: if ab ≿ cd, then there is some d’ that is

Absolute-Difference Structures Solvability: if ab ≿ cd, then there is some d’ that is between a and b such that ad’ ∼ cd 172

Absolute-Difference Structures Archimedean: ai is between a 1 and ai+1 for all i, and

Absolute-Difference Structures Archimedean: ai is between a 1 and ai+1 for all i, and successive intervals are non-null. aia 1 is strictly bounded. 172

Absolute-Difference Structures 173

Absolute-Difference Structures 173

End

End