Antimatter 2 The Sequel Rolf Landua CERN Summer

  • Slides: 42
Download presentation
Antimatter 2 - The Sequel Rolf Landua CERN Summer Student Lectures 2007 - Part

Antimatter 2 - The Sequel Rolf Landua CERN Summer Student Lectures 2007 - Part 2

Overview Lecture 2 Trapping antiprotons Antihydrogen ATHENA and ATRAP Making antihydrogen Future developments Applications

Overview Lecture 2 Trapping antiprotons Antihydrogen ATHENA and ATRAP Making antihydrogen Future developments Applications PET Antiproton therapy? Rocket propulsion? ? Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

The first nine antihydrogen atoms at CERN (1996) Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

The first nine antihydrogen atoms at CERN (1996) Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

How were the 9 antihydrogen atoms made at LEAR ? Annihilation of 9 anti-atoms

How were the 9 antihydrogen atoms made at LEAR ? Annihilation of 9 anti-atoms ~ 2 n. J ~ Lifting a mosquito by 1 µm Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 4

Press reactions (of course) “Liberation” (France) Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Press reactions (of course) “Liberation” (France) Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Two questions to keep you awake 1. With present techniques, what would be the

Two questions to keep you awake 1. With present techniques, what would be the price and delivery time for an 0. 5 g anti -hydrogen bomb? 2. How much antimatter propellant would you need to accelerate a 10 -ton spacecraft to 95 % of the speed of light (assuming 100% efficiency) The Vatican ? Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 6

III. TRAPPING ANTIPARTICLES Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 7

III. TRAPPING ANTIPARTICLES Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 7

RF trap (“Paul trap”) A radio-frequency current on the electrodes maintains an alternating electric

RF trap (“Paul trap”) A radio-frequency current on the electrodes maintains an alternating electric field that confines charged particles in a small space. -/+ +/- Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Magnetic traps Typical voltages: 1 - 100 V For trapping: ~ several k. V

Magnetic traps Typical voltages: 1 - 100 V For trapping: ~ several k. V Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 9

Special case: Penning trap Electrodes with hyperbolic shape harmonic forces: Er ~ r, Ez

Special case: Penning trap Electrodes with hyperbolic shape harmonic forces: Er ~ r, Ez ~ z precise oscillation frequencies ! Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 10

The inertial mass of antiprotons (PS 196, LEAR) Moving antiprotons induce currents in trap

The inertial mass of antiprotons (PS 196, LEAR) Moving antiprotons induce currents in trap wall The ‘sound of antiprotons’ - at 89. 3 MHz (cyclotron frequency) Compare frequency of antiproton and negative hydrogen ions G. Gabrielse Agreement to a precision of 9 x 10 -11 Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Reminder: Antiproton Production Extraction from AD to experiments: 5. 3 Me. V (~ 0.

Reminder: Antiproton Production Extraction from AD to experiments: 5. 3 Me. V (~ 0. 1 c), 3· 107 Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Trapping antiprotons Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Trapping antiprotons Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Trap for antiproton capture and storage Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 14

Trap for antiproton capture and storage Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 14

IV. Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 ANTIHYDROGEN

IV. Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 ANTIHYDROGEN

The race for cold antihydrogen ATHENA and ATRAP - Experiments (Start 2000) Find a

The race for cold antihydrogen ATHENA and ATRAP - Experiments (Start 2000) Find a way to make cold antihydrogen (done) Trap and cool antihydrogen Precision measurements ATRAP Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 ATHENA

Antihydrogen = Hydrogen ? ? 2 S level is metastable (T ~ 120 ms)

Antihydrogen = Hydrogen ? ? 2 S level is metastable (T ~ 120 ms) à Two photon laser-spectroscopy (1 S-2 S energy difference à very narrow line width = high precision: Δν /ν ~ 10 -15 à Long observation time - need trapped (anti)atoms Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Antihydrogen milestones p- and e+ in mixing trap (cooling) Antihydrogen formation AD Na-22 p-

Antihydrogen milestones p- and e+ in mixing trap (cooling) Antihydrogen formation AD Na-22 p- Production (Ge. V) e+ Production (Me. V) Deceleration (Me. V) 104 p- 108 e+ Accumulation (e. V) Trapping (ke. V) Cooling (me. V) Detection of annihilation Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 Moderation

Overview - ATHENA / AD-1 Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Overview - ATHENA / AD-1 Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

ATHENA Experiment Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 20

ATHENA Experiment Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 20

Positron Accumulation using Buffer Gas 100 million positrons accumulated in 2 min Antimatter (2)

Positron Accumulation using Buffer Gas 100 million positrons accumulated in 2 min Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Recombination *D. S. Hall, G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1962 (1996) Antimatter (2)

Recombination *D. S. Hall, G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1962 (1996) Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Antihydrogen Detection Charged particles 2 layers of Si microstrip detectors 511 ke. V gammas

Antihydrogen Detection Charged particles 2 layers of Si microstrip detectors 511 ke. V gammas 192 Cs. I crystals Inner radius 4 cm, thickness ~ 3 cm 70% solid angle coverage Operates at 3 Tesla, 140 Kelvin (C. Regenfus et al. , NIM A 501, 65 (2003)) Event analysis: • 1. 2. Reconstruct vertex from tracks of charged particles Identify pairs of 511 ke. V γ -rays in time coincidence Measure opening angle between the two γ -rays Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Antihydrogen - The Movie Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Antihydrogen - The Movie Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Antihydrogen Detector Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Antihydrogen Detector Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

First observation of cold antihydrogen Opening Angle Distribution Peak from back-to-back 511 ke. V

First observation of cold antihydrogen Opening Angle Distribution Peak from back-to-back 511 ke. V photon pairs Test: peak disappears when positrons are ‘heated’ (RF) Correcting for detection efficiency: > 100, 000 anti-atoms Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Rate of antihydrogen production quite high Initially > 100 Hz Antimatter (2) - Summer

Rate of antihydrogen production quite high Initially > 100 Hz Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Meanwhile: AD-2 (ATRAP) Different recombination and detection scheme Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Meanwhile: AD-2 (ATRAP) Different recombination and detection scheme Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 28

ATRAP - Recombination scheme 1 Cs atoms are excited to n~50 2 2 Cs*

ATRAP - Recombination scheme 1 Cs atoms are excited to n~50 2 2 Cs* atoms collide with positron cloud 3 4 5 6 3 Formation of excited positronium 4 Ps* collides with cold antiprotons 1 5 Antihydrogen formation (n ~ 45) 6 Antihydrogen detection by ionisation Advantage: Disadvantage: Positron attached to ‘resting’ (=cold) antiproton Low rate (14 antihydrogen atoms detected) Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 29

ATRAP: Antihydrogen detection by ionisation Only works for antihydrogen in high-n states (n>35) moving

ATRAP: Antihydrogen detection by ionisation Only works for antihydrogen in high-n states (n>35) moving along magnetic axis Field ionization - ‘rip’ positron off, antiproton left and detected by annihilation Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 30

Present state of the art Number of produced antihydrogen atoms Energy 1996: 1998: 2002:

Present state of the art Number of produced antihydrogen atoms Energy 1996: 1998: 2002: 2 Ge. V 3 Ge. V 0. 001 e. V 9 (PS 210, CERN) 60 (Fermilab) > 1, 000 (AD) Antihydrogen production works What about trapping? Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Next step: Trapping antihydrogen Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 32

FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Next step: Trapping antihydrogen Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 32

How to trap antihydrogen How to trap (neutral) antihydrogen? 1) magnetic moment (~ μ

How to trap antihydrogen How to trap (neutral) antihydrogen? 1) magnetic moment (~ μ e+) - ATRAP/ALPHA approach 2) induced electric dipole moment (Stark deceleration) ? 3) Formation of positive antihydrogen ions (additional e +) ? ? Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 33

Magnetic bottles ? Example: Sextupole magnet Low field seeking atoms (50%) at r=0 BUT:

Magnetic bottles ? Example: Sextupole magnet Low field seeking atoms (50%) at r=0 BUT: Very shallow potential (~ 0. 07 me. V/T) Realistic ΔB ~ 0. 2 -0. 3 T ➪ E < 0. 02 me. V (reminder: produced antihydrogen has Ekin ~ 1 -200 me. V) Trap antihydrogen from low energy ‘Boltzmann tail’ ? Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Antihydrogen trapping: Laser cooling ? 121 nm laser needed Prototype at MPI Munich …

Antihydrogen trapping: Laser cooling ? 121 nm laser needed Prototype at MPI Munich … only 50 n. W Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 35

V. APPLICATIONS Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

V. APPLICATIONS Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Applications of antimatter - PET Insert e+ emitting isotopes (C-11, N-13, O-15, F 18)

Applications of antimatter - PET Insert e+ emitting isotopes (C-11, N-13, O-15, F 18) into physiologically relevant molecules (O 2, glucose, enzymes) and inject into patient. Reconstruct place of positron annihilation with crystal calorimeter Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Tumour therapy Goal: destroy tumour without (too much) harm to healthy tissue Gammas: exponential

Tumour therapy Goal: destroy tumour without (too much) harm to healthy tissue Gammas: exponential decay (peaks at beginning) Charged particles: Bragg peak (Plateau/Peak better for high Z) Antiprotons: like protons, but enhanced Bragg peak from annihilation Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007

Antiproton Cell Experiment Biological effectiveness of antiproton annihilation in cells Additional damage by nuclear

Antiproton Cell Experiment Biological effectiveness of antiproton annihilation in cells Additional damage by nuclear fragments of short range Chinese Hamster Cells Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 39

Antiproton Cell Experiment Antiprotons Cell survival probability Protons Equal cell mortality for tumour cells

Antiproton Cell Experiment Antiprotons Cell survival probability Protons Equal cell mortality for tumour cells with 1/3 radiation dose (= damage to healthy cells) Interesting result - now compare with Carbon ion therapy - dedicated facility ? ? ? Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 40

Antiproton bombs ? E = mc 2 20 kt TNT ~ 8 · 1013

Antiproton bombs ? E = mc 2 20 kt TNT ~ 8 · 1013 J 0. 5 g antimatter + 0. 5 g matter 0. 5 g antimatter = 0. 5· 10 -3 · 9 · 1016 J = 4. 5 · 1013 J Total energy needed (efficiency =10 -9 ) : 4. 5 · 1022 J EDF discount price CERN (1 k. Wh = 3. 6 · 106 J = 0. 1 € ): Price ~ 1015 € Maximum production at CERN ~ 1014 antiprotons / ( year ~ 3 · 107 sec Delivery time ~ 3 billion years Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007 41

Antimatter driven space engines? 10 -ton spacecraft at 0. 95 c: E = γmc

Antimatter driven space engines? 10 -ton spacecraft at 0. 95 c: E = γmc 2 ~ 10 · 104 kg = 50 tons of antimatter + 50 t of matter Until somebody finds a clever way around these problems, this will stay fiction: noch nicht ! The End. Antimatter (2) - Summer Students 2007