Administrative Leadership Meeting Tuesday May 13 2014 Chancellor

  • Slides: 45
Download presentation
Administrative Leadership Meeting Tuesday, May 13, 2014 Chancellor Randy Woodson

Administrative Leadership Meeting Tuesday, May 13, 2014 Chancellor Randy Woodson

Upcoming ALM Topics (all meetings in Titmus Theater) • July 8, 2014 – Update

Upcoming ALM Topics (all meetings in Titmus Theater) • July 8, 2014 – Update on Organizational Excellence • September 9, 2014 – Space, the Final Frontier • November 11, 2014 – Annual Report Card on Progress Toward Strategic Plan

New Undergraduates Fall 2014 • Intend-to-Enroll deposits show ~4, 400 Freshmen – Test scores

New Undergraduates Fall 2014 • Intend-to-Enroll deposits show ~4, 400 Freshmen – Test scores and HS GPAs comparable to last year’s excellent quality smaller freshmen class – Out-of-state freshmen will be ~17% of the class – International down, diversity up, over last year – COE new freshmen up over 25% – Melt is usually 1% between now and fall semester • Undergraduate Transfers up – Intend-to-Enroll up 50% over point in time last year

Degrees Conferred May 2014 • • • 3, 531 Bachelor’s Degrees 1, 333 Master’s

Degrees Conferred May 2014 • • • 3, 531 Bachelor’s Degrees 1, 333 Master’s Degrees 177 Doctoral Degrees 81 Doctor of Veterinary Medicine Degrees 89 Associate Degrees With 3, 664 conferred last December, total academic year is 8, 875 degrees

Building Our Research Capacity Senior Vice Provost Duane K. Larick Academic Strategy and Resource

Building Our Research Capacity Senior Vice Provost Duane K. Larick Academic Strategy and Resource Management Vice Chancellor Terri L. Lomax Research, Innovation + Economic Development

Part 1: SVP Larick • • Faculty & the Strategic Plan Faculty Trends Growing

Part 1: SVP Larick • • Faculty & the Strategic Plan Faculty Trends Growing Faculty Keeping Faculty Part 2: VC Lomax • R&D Expenditures • Building Infrastructure • Recent Successes that Further Build Capacity

2011 -2020 Strategic Plan Goals 1. Enhance the success of our students through educational

2011 -2020 Strategic Plan Goals 1. Enhance the success of our students through educational innovation. 2. Enhance scholarship and research by investing in faculty and infrastructure. 3. Enhance interdisciplinary scholarship to address the grand challenges of society. 4. Enhance organizational excellence by creating a culture of constant improvement. 5. Enhance local and global engagement through focused strategic partnerships.

High Priority Actions • • Replacing the 50 faculty per year who leave NC

High Priority Actions • • Replacing the 50 faculty per year who leave NC State Retaining current faculty Growing faculty 350 T/TT Increasing graduate enrollment 1, 751 Increasing postdocs 150 Adding academic advisers 40 New Living and Learning Villages 4 By 2020

Strategic Plan: FY 2019 -20 • Continuing Budget: $114 M • Cumulative One-time Costs:

Strategic Plan: FY 2019 -20 • Continuing Budget: $114 M • Cumulative One-time Costs: $208 M • Cumulative Space Costs: $198 M

“The returns on a university’s investment in its faculty are multiplicative. World-class scholars attract

“The returns on a university’s investment in its faculty are multiplicative. World-class scholars attract world-class research colleagues and world-class students. Together they create a rich educational environment that fosters innovation and intellectual excitement. ” The Pathway to the Future: NC State’s 2011 -2020 Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan Metric: Enrollment Profile 40 000 Goal Baseline Headcount 30 000 GRAD UG

Strategic Plan Metric: Enrollment Profile 40 000 Goal Baseline Headcount 30 000 GRAD UG 20 000 10 000 0 02 -03 GRAD 6 857 UG 22 780 03 -04 6 883 22 971 04 -05 7 203 22 754 05 -06 7 245 22 904 06 -07 7 400 23 730 07 -08 7 657 24 145 08 -09 8 131 24 741 09 -10 8 564 25 255 10 -11 9 130 25 246 11 -12 9 591 25 176 12 -13 9 507 24 833 13 -14 9 473 24 536 14 -15 15 -16 16 -17 17 -18 18 -19 19 -20 20 -21 11 287 25 713

Strategic Plan Metric: Faculty Profile 2 500 Goal Baseline 2 000 Faculty. FTE NTT

Strategic Plan Metric: Faculty Profile 2 500 Goal Baseline 2 000 Faculty. FTE NTT 1 500 T/TT 1 000 500 - 02 -03 NTT 405 T/TT 1 330 03 -04 427 1 344 04 -05 446 1 327 05 -06 491 1 322 06 -07 505 1 308 07 -08 547 1 327 08 -09 566 1 366 09 -10 550 1 361 10 -11 562 1 343 11 -12 548 1 336 12 -13 541 1 329 13 -14 557 1 367 14 -15 15 -16 16 -17 17 -18 18 -19 19 -20 20 -21 560 1 700

Faculty Costs Totals (x$1, 000) EPA Teaching Salaries* (All Funding Sources) $200 000 $180

Faculty Costs Totals (x$1, 000) EPA Teaching Salaries* (All Funding Sources) $200 000 $180 000 $160 000 $140 000 $120 000 $100 000 $80 000 $60 000 $40 000 $20 000 $0 2003 -04 EPA Teaching Salaries $122 415 2004 -05 $138 132 2005 -06 $142 651 2006 -07 $153 154 2007 -08 $166 790 2008 -09 $177 430 2009 -10 $174 670 2010 -11 $178 193 2011 -12 $176 331 2012 -13 $184 113 2011 -12 $92 324 2012 -13 $93 369 Instructional Salary Rate* (used in 12 Cell Matrix) $100 000 $80 000 $60 000 $40 000 $20 000 $0 Instructional Salary Rate 2003 -04 $72 136 2004 -05 $72 501 *Does not include cost of benefits 2005 -06 $75 072 2006 -07 $76 882 2007 -08 $81 704 2008 -09 $87 075 2009 -10 $91 507 2010 -11 $91 876

FY 2013 Strategic Funding Allocations for New Disciplinary Positions • Allocations made in response

FY 2013 Strategic Funding Allocations for New Disciplinary Positions • Allocations made in response to the individual strategic priorities of the deans • 28. 5 T/TT and 4 NTT – Approx. $4. 2 M allocated for positions – Salary and benefits, no start-up COT 1 3% CVM 4 12% PCOM 2 6% COS 5 15% CHASS CNR 3 2 9% 6% CALS 4 12% COD 1, 5 5% CED 3 9% All Faculty T/TT and NTT by College Total: 32. 5 FTE COE 7 22%

Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty Hires and Separations 76 2013 -14 partial 53 60 2012 -13 53

Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty Hires and Separations 76 2013 -14 partial 53 60 2012 -13 53 Hires Separations 54 2011 -12 51 0 10 20 Note: 2013 -14 data is for Jul 1, 2013 to Jan 20, 2014 30 40 50 60 70 80

New T/TT Faculty: Jul 1, 2013 – Jan 20, 2014 22 54 Totals: 54

New T/TT Faculty: Jul 1, 2013 – Jan 20, 2014 22 54 Totals: 54 disciplinary, 22 cluster 16 14 12 5 3 Headcount 10 8 3 5 6 4 1 7 2 10 9 3 4 1 6 4 3 2 0 Total Clusters Disciplinary Hires CALS 10 3 7 COD 5 1 4 CED 4 0 4 COE 14 5 9 CNR 5 3 2 1 CHASS 13 3 10 COS 11 5 6 COT 4 1 3 4 CVM 5 1 4 5 PCOM 5 0 5 Total 76 22 54

Chancellor’s Faculty Excellence Program • • • Hire outstanding faculty Expand interdisciplinary research opportunities

Chancellor’s Faculty Excellence Program • • • Hire outstanding faculty Expand interdisciplinary research opportunities Increase federal funding Create new academic programs to meet student demand Meet the needs of constituents as a land-grant institution

Original Goal: Hire 38 New Faculty • 27 original lines filled • 11 original

Original Goal: Hire 38 New Faculty • 27 original lines filled • 11 original lines unfilled • 4 pending original line hires • 5 opportunity hires • 1 pending opportunity hire 2011 -12: 2 hires (includes 1 opportunity hire) 2012 -13: 22 hires (includes 4 opportunity hires) 2013 -14: 8 hires, 5 pending hires (includes 1 opportunity hire)

CFEP Hires to Date: 32 TT Asst. Professor 10 31, 3% Instructor 1 3,

CFEP Hires to Date: 32 TT Asst. Professor 10 31, 3% Instructor 1 3, 1% COT 1 3, 1% T Professor 6 18, 8% CVM PCOM 1 1 3, 1% CALS 3 9, 4% COS 10 31, 3% T Assoc. Professor 10 31, 3% TT Assoc. Professor 5 15, 6% By Rank COD 1 3, 1% CED 2 6, 3% CNR 3 9, 4% CHASS 3 9, 4% By College COE 7 21, 9%

CFEP Costs to Date: $23. 67 M Colleges $14 000 $12 000 $5. 84

CFEP Costs to Date: $23. 67 M Colleges $14 000 $12 000 $5. 84 M $10 000 $8 000 $6. 81 M $6 000 $4 000 $2 000 $6. 37 M $3. 14 M $1. 49 M $0 Continuing costs $4. 63 M One-time start-up costs $12. 65 M One-time space renovations $6. 37 M Provost

SOP for Faculty Start-ups Central pool* of funds covers approximately 25% of costs Approx.

SOP for Faculty Start-ups Central pool* of funds covers approximately 25% of costs Approx. $4 M FY 2011 -12 Colleges and units cover the remaining 75% of costs Approx. $12 M FY 2011 -12 * Central pool for strategic expenditures includes a combination of state appropriated funding and F&A.

Faculty Retentions 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Counteroffers Made Successful Counteroffers

Faculty Retentions 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Counteroffers Made Successful Counteroffers Unsuccessful Counteroffers Pre-emptive Counteroffers Made Successful Pre-emptive Counteroffers Unsuccessful Pre-emptive Counteroffers Cost of Successful Retentions 2007 17 11 6 3 2 1 $116, 508 2008 29 21 8 5 5 0 $333, 058 2009 12 8 4 4 4 0 $101, 625 $431, 504 2010 19 15 4 4 4 0 $498, 428 2011 27 22 5 9 7 2 $1, 290, 357 2012 66 60 6 42 40 2 $1, 022, 298 $3, 793, 778 2

Faculty Retentions Nature of Counteroffer (If Known) Salary only 46% FY 2002 to 2013

Faculty Retentions Nature of Counteroffer (If Known) Salary only 46% FY 2002 to 2013 Destination of Faculty Who Left NC State (If Known) U. S. Public Universities FY 2002 to 2013 73% Other (equipment, space, etc. ) 18% Salary and other 36% U. S. Private Universities 11% Foreign Universities Other 5% 11%

University Faculty Scholars • Program to recognize and reward emerging academic leaders among our

University Faculty Scholars • Program to recognize and reward emerging academic leaders among our faculty • Scholars carry the title for a five -year period and receive a $10, 000 annual supplement • First two cohorts named – 2012 -13: 24 scholars – 2013 -14: 20 scholars

Part 1: SVP Larick • • Faculty & the Strategic Plan Faculty Trends Growing

Part 1: SVP Larick • • Faculty & the Strategic Plan Faculty Trends Growing Faculty Keeping Faculty Part 2: VC Lomax • R&D Expenditures • Building Infrastructure • Recent Successes that Further Build Capacity

Peer Comparison of Total R&D Expenditures other sources (FY All 2012) R&D Expenditures ($

Peer Comparison of Total R&D Expenditures other sources (FY All 2012) R&D Expenditures ($ millions) 1 200 1 000 800 Nonprofit organizations Business Institution funds State and local government Federal government 600 400 200 I Co owa lo St ra a do te St NC ate St a Ru te tg VA ers U M of M Tec ich D h iga n CP S U tat of e* IL -U U Pu C of rd Ar ue izo n GA a* Te xa Tec U s A& h of Flo M* UC rid - D a* Oh av io is* U Pe Sta of n te W n. S * - M tat ad e* iso n* - North Carolina State University © 2014 * has Human Medical School

North Carolina State University © 2014 w U a. S M of ta ic

North Carolina State University © 2014 w U a. S M of ta ic Fl te hi o ga rid n a* St N ate C * St R ate O utg hi o ers U St of ate IL * -U V U A C of Te M ch D -C C ol P P or ur ad du Te o S e x ta U as A te of & Ar M Pe izo * nn na U U St * of C at W - D e* - M av ad is* is G on A * Te ch Io R&D Expenditures per T/TT Faculty ($ thousand) 800 Peer Comparison of Total R&D Expenditures per T/TT Faculty (FY 2012) 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 - * has Human Medical School

a. S w t NC ate St Co VA ate lo T M rad

a. S w t NC ate St Co VA ate lo T M rad ech ich o iga Sta n te Te Sta xa te s. A * &M Pu * rd u U Rut e of ge U Flo rs of rid A a U rizo * of na M * UC D - D CP U av of is* Oh IL io UC St a GA te* U Pe T of n ec W n. S h - M tat ad e* iso n* Io R&D Expenditures ($ millions) Peer Comparison of R&D Expenditures – Federal Government (FY 2012) 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 North Carolina State University © 2014 * has Human Medical School

North Carolina State University © 2014 M ch Te of D Ar CP izo

North Carolina State University © 2014 M ch Te of D Ar CP izo U M o na* ich f IL iga - U n St C Io ate w a. S * ta Ru te Pe tg Co nn ers lo Sta ra te do * UC Sta - D te av is* P U O u of hio rdu W St e - M at ad e* iso NC n* U of Sta Flo te rid VA a* Te xa Tec s. A h &M * of GA 120 U U R&D Expenditures ($ millions) 140 Peer Comparison of R&D Expenditures State & Local Government (FY 2012) 100 80 60 40 20 0 * has Human Medical School

iga n U St of ate Co M * lo D ra - C

iga n U St of ate Co M * lo D ra - C U do P of Sta Ar te izo n Ru a* U of Iow tger W a s - M Sta t U adis e of on Flo * rid VA a* Te Pu ch Pe rd nn u St e U at of e* UC IL - D UC av NC is* St GA ate Te xa Tec s. A h Oh & io M* St at e* ich M R&D Expenditures ($ millions) Peer Comparison of R&D Expenditures Business (FY 2012) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 North Carolina State University © 2014 * has Human Medical School

Trends in Total R&D Expenditures & Awards $450 Awards $400 $350 Millions $300 52

Trends in Total R&D Expenditures & Awards $450 Awards $400 $350 Millions $300 52 54 51 53 National Rank of Total R&D Expenditures 52 47 57 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Fiscal Year Sources: NSF NCSES & SPARCS (http: //research. ncsu. edu/sparcs-docs/reports/glance. pdf)

Trends in NC State’s Sponsored Awards by Sponsor Type Sponsored Awards ($ million) $300

Trends in NC State’s Sponsored Awards by Sponsor Type Sponsored Awards ($ million) $300 $250 $200 Other Industry State Federal $150 $100 $50 $0 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 Source: SPARCS (http: //research. ncsu. edu/sparcsdocs/reports/glance. pdf) North Carolina State University © 2014

How are we building research capacity? • Seed Funding • Research Development Training •

How are we building research capacity? • Seed Funding • Research Development Training • Access to Specialized Assets • PI Portal • Reduced Administrative Burdens • Increased Emphasis on Industry Relations

Research and Innovation Seed Funding Sponsored by ORIED & Kenan Institute Fiscal No. of

Research and Innovation Seed Funding Sponsored by ORIED & Kenan Institute Fiscal No. of Year Rounds No. of Proposals No. of Grants Total Awarded 2010 1 10 2 $48, 282 2011 2 49 9 $142, 211 2012 2 30 9 $167, 712 2013 2 58 11 $222, 700 2014 to date 2 74 14 $314, 071

Research Development Workshops • Early Career Series – 7 workshops (Spring 2013) • Research

Research Development Workshops • Early Career Series – 7 workshops (Spring 2013) • Research Leaders Series – 4 workshops (Spring 2013) • NC State Research Proposal Mechanics (open to everyone) – Centennial Campus (1/31/2014) – DH Hill Faculty Senate Chambers (2/21/2014) • Agency-specific Panel Discussions (open to everyone) – NIH (3/7/2014) – Five panelists – Do. D (3/21/2014) – Seven panelists – DOE (3/28/2014) – Five panelists – NSF (4/4/2014) – Seven panelists • Early Career (preference to early career) – DH Hill Faculty Senate Chambers (4/24/2014 – 4/25/2014)

NC University NCState University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Database (27) Human Study

NC University NCState University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Database (27) Human Study (146) Instrument (206) Protocol (5) Research Opportunity (9) Service (571) Software (29) Core Labs (82) NC State University

spectrometer

spectrometer

5 Prioritization by ROC, CILs Directors & Cluster Le

5 Prioritization by ROC, CILs Directors & Cluster Le

Recent Successes That Further Build Research Capacity • LAS • Manufacturing Institute • Eastman

Recent Successes That Further Build Research Capacity • LAS • Manufacturing Institute • Eastman • Climate Hubs

Laboratory for Analytic Sciences (LAS) NSA’s goal is to build an advanced data innovation

Laboratory for Analytic Sciences (LAS) NSA’s goal is to build an advanced data innovation hub in the Research Triangle with LAS as the anchor tenant. North Carolina State University © 2014

LAS Projects to Date • 48 PIs from academia • 7 universities -- NC

LAS Projects to Date • 48 PIs from academia • 7 universities -- NC State, Duke, UNC-CH (RENCI), Notre Dame, UC-Santa Cruz, University of British Columbia, UNC School of the Arts • 6 NC State colleges -- COE, CHASS, CNR, COD, COS, PCOM • 16 NC State departments • NC State awards total $10. 7 M

30 funded projects 8 departments More than $2 M annualized spending 45 RFPs 112

30 funded projects 8 departments More than $2 M annualized spending 45 RFPs 112 proposals submitted

Next Generation Power Electronics Manufacturing Innovation Institute Vision: Wide bandgap technology for a more

Next Generation Power Electronics Manufacturing Innovation Institute Vision: Wide bandgap technology for a more energy efficient world Mission: Develop a manufacturing-focused innovation ecosystem to reduce cost, improve performance and reliability, and enable U. S. industry dominance in WBG semiconductor devices and systems to create jobs. North Carolina State University © 2014

NC State is becoming a climate powerhouse: § § § USDA SERCH DOI Southeast

NC State is becoming a climate powerhouse: § § § USDA SERCH DOI Southeast Climate Science Center NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate Sciences State Climate Office National Weather Service

Southeast Regional Climate Hub (SERCH) • Coordinate efforts of more than two dozen agencies

Southeast Regional Climate Hub (SERCH) • Coordinate efforts of more than two dozen agencies and organizations North Carolina State University © 2014 • Help farmers, ranchers and forest land managers adapt to the negative impacts of climate change