69 th International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy June

69 th International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy June 16, 2014 Deperturbation Studies of d 3Δi- a 3 r Transition of CS Molecule M. D. Saksena (Retd. from Bhabha Atomic Research Centre) INDIA

P 316 ABSTRACT DEPERTURBATION STUDIES OF d 3 - a 3 TRANSITION OF CS MOLECULE K SUNANDA, Atomic and Molecular Physics , Bhabha Atomic Research center, Mumbai, Maharastra, India; M N DEO, High Pressure and Synchrotron Radiation Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; MADHAV DAS SAKSENA, A-10 Basera, Off Din-Quarry Road, Deonar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; KENTAROU KAWAGUCHI, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology , Okayama University, Okayama, Japan. The F. T. Spectrum of CS molecule was recorded with Bruker IFS 120 HR spectrometer at a spectral resolution of 0. 03 cm-1 using liquid nitrogen cooled In. Sb detector in the region 10500 - 1800 cm-1. Intense spectrum of CS radical was excited by DC discharge of mixture of CS 2 (120 m. Torr) and He (2 Torr) in flowing condition. Two hours integration time was used for obtaining a good S/N ratio. The recorded spectrum is more intense compared to previous studies, therefore, it has been possible to excite lower values of v’ and v” for the d 3Δi – a 3 r transition. The bands of three sub-systems occur with varying intensity. The following bands have been rotationally analyzed, viz. 1 -0, 2 -1, 3 -2 (d 3Δ 3 - a 3 2); 2 -0, 3 -1, 4 -2 (d 3Δ 2 – a 3 1); and 1 -1, 3 -3 (d 3Δ 1 -a 3 0). The d 3Δi is state is highly perturbed. Using a Deperturbation program PGOPHER (C. M. Western, Univ. of Bristol, UK) the molecular constants of the two states have been derived.

Motivation for high resolution spectroscopy of CS v CS radical plays an important role in the formation of aerosols in troposphere & found in inter stellar medium, carbon rich stars and comets. v CS is similar to CO and Si. O belonging to group IV-VI diatomics, therefore it presents itself as an excellent candidate to study off diagonal interactions, since the first two excited electronic configurations result in many rotational interactions in their spectra. v The rotational analysis of the high resolution spectra helps in evaluation of effective molecular constants and interactions viz. spinorbit, spin-spin and rotation induced interactions. The true molecular constants can be determined only when all the perturbations have been completely taken into account. Hence it is interesting to know the energy level structure of CS where each of the bands in the spectra has its own story to tell.

Brief history of CS • A 1 -X 1 + system of CS was first reported in 1934 in the near ultraviolet region by Crawford et. al. . Later perturbations in the A 1 state were attributed to e 3 - and a 3 + states by Lagerqvist et. al. [1958]. Barrow et. al. [1960] in their absorption study of the A-X system also introduced the d 3Δi state. • Rotational analysis of a 3 - X 1 + emission spectra was presented by Tewarson et. al. [1968] and Cossart, Horani and Rostas [1977]. • Precision measurements of -doubling intervals Stark effects using optical double resonance technique were done by Field et. al. [1971]. • The ab initio calculations of CS were given by Robbe et. al. [1976]. • Detailed study of the lower excited states of CS along with the report of the d 3Δ- a 3 + system was done by Bergeman and Cossat [1981]. • Fourier Transform spectrum of d 3Δ-a 3 is reported by Jong-in Choe et. al. [1991]. • Ground state mw and ir study was presented by Ram et. al. [1995]. • Chuanliang et. al. [2011, 12, 13] reported the perturbation analysis of the v =6, 7 and 8 levels of d 3Δ state and anomalous -doubling in 6 and 7 state by optical hetrodyne-concentration modulation abs. spectroscopy.

Recording of CS radical Spectra in the 1900 - 9500 cm-1 v CS spectra were recorded on FT Bruker IFS 120 HR spectrometer at the Graduate School of Natural Science and talk s i h t Technology , Okayama t of c e j Sub University, Okayama, Japan. v Intense spectrum of CS radical was excited by DC discharge of mixture of CS 2 (120 m. Torr) and He (2 Torr) in flowing condition, with 2 hrs. Integration time. v Spectral resolution : 0. 03 cm-1. v Recorded high resolution spectra of the d 3 –a 3 and CS Potentials from Cossart et. al. a +–a 3 system. v LN 2 cooled In. Sb Detector.

Energy level scheme of CS

BRIEF INTRODUCTION (Steps followed for Rotational Analysis) § Using known Vibrational Constants bands-positions are located and from the known molecular constants of the lower state combination differences are determined and the rotational analysis of the various bands was carried out. § The rotational constants were obtained using the PGOPHER Program for Simulating Vibl. , Rotl. And Electronic Spectra ( Colin M. Western, Bristol, UK) § In the spectra of d 3 -a 3 system only the =0 sub-bands appear implying that the two states involved could be best described in Hund’s case(a) § A few perturbed lines were then also included invoking the perturbation parameters. § The -doubling in the ≠ 0 states arises from the perturbations with the ± states and is strongest for states. § In general the -doubling in the 3 0 is the largest, while for other components 3 3 1, 2 and in 1, 2, 3 states is very small that could be resolved and is J dependent.

BRIEF INTRODUCTION The molecular Hamiltonian consists of the following terms H = Hev + Hrot + Hso +Hss + Hsr For unperturbed electronic states the effective Hamiltonian consists of Hev[Te] Vibronic part and Hrot [B( R)] Rotational part of the Hamiltonian one for each parity. For near degeneracy between vibronic levels of two electronic states, the Hamiltonian needs to incorporate the off-diagonal matrix elements : HSO is the spin-orbit, HSS [ ] the spin-spin, HSR[ ] the spin-rotation interactions treated by second-order perturbation theory. The rotational [B] and spin-orbit [A] constants being function of the internuclear distance have non-zero matrix elements off diagonal in vibrational quantum numbers are also treated as second order parameters giving rise to centrifugal distortion constants [D] and [Ad] respectively. Ad along with spin– rotation [ ] and spin–spin [ ] parameter is required to fit the observed spin splitting for states with 0 and S 0. The interaction of ~ levels require the second order -doubling parameters p, q and o (a parity dependent spin-spin term) in the Hamiltonian to fit the lambda doublets observed in the state.

BRIEF INTRODUCTION PERTURBATIONS The most important aspect of this molecule is the presence of interaction between the close lying vibronic levels of different electronic states Of these the first excited electronic configuration 4 * (a 3 , A 1 states) interact with the vibronic levels of the second excited configuration 3 2 *(a 3 +, d 3Δ, e 3 -, A 1 +, 1 -, 1Δ states). The perturbations between the states of the two groups are due to the electronic spin-orbit matrix elements (AL±) and the electronic rotation matrix elements (BL±) also known as the l-uncoupling operator. It has been reported that both these terms are relatively large in CS. Thus the Perturbation parameters can be determined from the analysis of the interaction of the vibronic levels between any two electronic states , given as ½ 3 , v │AL ± │3Δ/3 , v =0 3 , v │B(R)L±│3Δ/3 , v A 3 , v │A L±S±│1 Δ /1 ±, v =± 1

New bands of d 3 i-a 3 system of CS

The bands of d 3 i-a 3 system included in the fit 3Δ -3 3Δ -3 3Δ -3 1 0 2 1 3 2 0 -3* 3 -3* 0 -2* 1 -2* 3 -2* 4 -2* 9 -2 10 -2 11 -2 12 -2 2 -1* 3 -2* 4 -2* 7 -1 8 -1 9 -1 10 -1 11 -1 12 -1 10 -2 11 -2 12 -2 13 -2 14 -2 *Our new data & Ref: Choe et. al. [1991]: 1 -1* 2 -1* 3 -1* 7 -1 8 -1 9 -1 10 -1 11 -1 12 -1 13 -1 14 -1 35 bands 3 -0 4 -0 5 -0 6 -0 7 -0 8 -0 9 -0 2 -0* 3 -0 4 -0 5 -0 6 -0 7 -0 8 -0 9 -0 10 -0 1 -0* 2 -0* 3 -0 4 -0 5 -0 6 -0 7 -0 8 -0 9 -0 10 -0 11 -0 12 -0

Matrix elements of the Hamiltonian: 3Π and 3Δ States |3 2 + Origin*1 + B*(J+J^2 -2) + A*1 + D*(2*J+J^2 -2*J^3 -J^4) + AD*(((J+J^2 -2)*sqrt(6))/sqrt(6)) 3 2 3 1 3 0 + + ± + B*(-sqrt(2*J+2*J^2)) + gamma*(sqrt(2*J*(J+1))/2) + D*((2*J+2*J^2+4)*sqrt(2*J+2*J^2)) + AD*(sqrt(6*(2*J+2*J^2))/(2*sqrt(6))) + p*((-sqrt(2*J*(J+1)))/2) + q*(-sqrt(2*J*(J+1))) + B*(-sqrt(2*J+2*J^2 -4)) + gamma*(sqrt(2*(J*(J+1)-2))/2) + D*((2*J+2*J^2)*sqrt(2*J+2*J^2 -4)) + AD*((-sqrt(6*(2*J+2*J^2 -4)))/(2*sqrt(6))) Origin*1 B*(J+J^2+2) gamma*-2 D*(-8*J-9*J^2 -2*J^3 -J^4) q*((J*(J+1))/2) 3 0 + Origin*1 + B*(J+J^2+2) + A*-1 + gamma*-2 + D*(-6*J-7*J^2 -2*J^3 -J^4 -4) + AD*(((-J-J^2 -2)*sqrt(6))/sqrt(6)) ± o*1 + p*1 + q*1 H 3Δ 3 3Δ 2 3Δ 1 ± D*(-2*sqrt(-2*J+J^2+J^4 -2*J^2+2*J^3)) ± q*(sqrt(J*(J*(J+1)-2)*(J+1))/2) 3Δ + + + + 3 Origin*1 B*(J+J^2 -4) A*2 Lambda. SS*(2/3) gamma*1 D*(6*J+5*J^2 -2*J^3 -J^4 -4) AD*((2*(J+J^2 -4)*sqrt(6))/sqrt(6)) 3Δ 2 3Δ 1 + + B*(-sqrt(2*J+2*J^2 -12)) gamma*(sqrt(2*(J*(J+1)-6))/2) D*((2*J+2*J^2 -2)*sqrt(2*J+2*J^2 -12)) AD*((-sqrt(6*(2*J+2*J^2 -12)))/sqrt(6)) + D*(-2*sqrt(-8*J+J^2+J^4 -8*J^2+2*J^3+12)) + + + Origin*1 B*(J+J^2+2) Lambda. SS*(-4/3) gamma*-2 D*(-8*J-9*J^2 -2*J^3 -J^4+12) + + B*(-sqrt(2*J+2*J^2 -4)) gamma*(sqrt(2*(J*(J+1)-2))/2) D*((2*J+2*J^2+6)*sqrt(2*J+2*J^2 -4)) AD*(sqrt(6*(2*J+2*J^2 -4))/sqrt(6)) + + + + Origin*1 B*(J+J^2+4) A*-2 Lambda. SS*(2/3) gamma*-3 D*(-10*J-11*J^2 -2*J^3 -J^4 -12) AD*((2*(-J-J^2 -4)*sqrt(6))/sqrt(6))

Rotational structure the 2 -1 band of d 3 1 –a 3 0 sub-system Observed Simulated

Combined fit of d 3 i(v=1 -12) - a 3 r(v=0) system of CS (Incorporating only few perturbation interactions) Observed perturbations evaluated are at d 3Δ 3(v=1) ~ a 3 2(v=8) at J=7 d 3Δ 2(v=2) ~ a 3 0(v=9) at J=16 d 3Δ 3(v=5) ~ a 3 2(v=11) at J=13 d 3Δ 0(v=6) ~ a 3 2(v=12) at J=15 d 3Δ 3(v=6) ~ A 1 2(v=1) at J=16 Most of the vibrational levels of a 3 interact with those of d 3Δ at J >25 implying two states are highly mixed. For higher v’s of the d 3Δ state, the interaction results in perturbation such that some of the components of the sub system could not be observed. It was observed in the fit that constants for only those perturbing terms could be evaluated with good standard deviations and reproducibility for which the data were available.

States of CS d 3 v=12 v=11 15 v=9 14 v=7 3 2 3 3 2 13 v=6 12 1 v=5 11 0 v=4 01 1 4 v=10 v=8 1 a 3 A 1 v=3 10 v=2 9 v=1 8 v=0 Reduced term values

Residual fit before incorporating perturbation Residual fit after incorporating few perturbation parameters Simulated data and fit of the d (v=1 -12)–a (v=0) bands 1 -0 2 -0 3 -0 4 -0 5 -0 6 -0 7 -0 8 -0 9 -0 10 -0 11 -0 12 -0

Molecular constants for the d 3Δ and a 3 states Te (v=1) B A SS D AD Te (v=2) B A SS D AD Te (v=3) B A SS D AD Te (v=4) B A SS D AD Present work Literature {BC} 36213. 6942(878) 0. 628373(190) 36213. 36 0. 62794(12) 1. 99(21)e-6 1. 6 e-6 -0. 0002 36989. 04 0. 6223(4) 36999. 1662(840) 0. 622232(147) 2. 123(143)e-6 1. 6 e-6 -0. 0002 37757. 81(6) 0. 61576(22) Te B A SS o p q 37756. 0026(413) 0. 617391(122) -50. 4053(459) 4. 7103(730) 2. 368(122)e-6 -6. 63(28)e-4 38510. 7224(407) 0. 613587(112) -49. 7342(459) 3. 6900(730) 3. 739(102)e-6 -1. 4151(282)e-3 a 3 (v=0) 27582. 263 0. 781808(111) 91. 2904(1092) 1. 2196(652) -0. 1731(33) -0. 11598(2992) 1. 89(78)e-3 -5. 8(11)e-4 D 1. 923(106)e-6 0. 154(4)e-5 AD -1. 8489(6031)e-3 -0. 00017(1) 1. 55(20)e-6 -0. 0002 38510. 42(6) 0. 60900(20) 1. 62(5)e-6 -0. 0024 27582. 99(2) 0. 78127(5) -0. 0059(3) 0. 0042(2) Error : 0. 084 Present work Literature {BC} 3 d (v=1 -12) Te (v=5) 39260. 4071(485) 39254. 31(7) Te (v=9) 42146. 1314(419) 42139. 26(6) B 0. 603777(122) 0. 60329(7) B 0. 579817(141) 0. 57895(23) A -52. 9139(451) A 54. 4481(461) 7. 0995(787) 6. 8818(725) SS SS D 1. 770(121)e-6 1. 635(23)e-6 D 2. 05(18)e-6 1. 63(17)e-6 AD 3. 69(29)e-4 -. 000260(14) AD -6. 6(31)e-5 -0. 00031(8) Te (v=6) 39997. 3204(478) 39991. 92(5) Te (v=10) 42841. 6309(892) 42835. 56(42 B 0. 597936(124) 0. 59704(12) B 0. 572040(266) 0. 57295 A -53. 5332(475) A 6. 7188(739) SS SS D 1. 993(130)e-6 1. 52(11)e-6 D 3. 7(42)e-7 1. 70 e-6 AD -3. 109(413)e-4 -0. 00028(5) AD 0. 00023(7) Te (v=7) 40723. 067(283) 40718. 90(3) Te (v=11) 43527. 5142(890) 43522. 71(7) B 0. 592121(169) 0. 59094(16) B 0. 567605(249) 0. 56638(45) A -53. 5250(1410) A 6. 4481(710) SS SS D 2. 156(118)e-6 1. 58(18)e-6 D 2. 84(29)e-6 1. 93(63)e-6 AD -3. 427(588)e-4 -0. 00025(3) AD Te (v=8) 41439. 3522(417) 41434. 17(5) Te (v=12) 44203. 7298(915) 44199. 23(6) B 0. 585874(126) 0. 58549(24) B 0. 561038(489) 0. 56006(27) A -53. 8396(460) A 6. 5281(723) SS SS D 2. 079(131)e-6 1. 70 e-6 D 1. 8(11)e-6 1. 2(4)e-6 AD -2. 45(29)e-4 0. 0004(4) AD Perturbation parameters 3 Di <a 3 Pi_8|LS|v=1> Value 42. 25(57) 18. 34/-0. 06 3 Di <a 3 pi_9|LS|v=2> Value 26. 902(817) 35. 214(21)/ -1. 040(9) 3 Di <a 3 Pi_11|LS|v=5> Value 31. 19(15) 9. 29(12)/ -0. 0012(54) 3 Di <a 3 Pi_12|LS|v=6> Value 6. 72(14) -1. 15(16)/ -0. 004(11) 3 Di <a 3 Pi_13|LS|v=7> Value 21. 586(3383) -11. 13/0. 02 3 Di <a 3 Pi_15|LS|v=10> Value 17. 290(308) -3. 70(15)/0. 13(2) 3 Di <A 1 Pi_1|LS|v=6> Value 27. 70(109) 20. 98(5) 3 Di <A 1 Pi_2|LS|v=7> Value -1. 39 3 Di <A 1 Pi_3|LS|v=9> Value No of Observations : 1956 10. 93(33) Parameters derived : 73

Residuals from fit before and after incorporating perturbation terms Deperturbation fit of the 6 -0 band of d 3 -a 3 transition

Summary q The intense bands of CS molecule in the 1900 -10000 cm-1 recorded using the FT spectrometer at a resolution of 0. 03 cm-1 helped in assigning new bands involving low v’s for the first time in the two systems, viz. a 3 +- a 3 and the d 3Δ-a 3 transitions. q Compiling the data on the CS a 3 +, a 3 and d 3Δ states from previous studies and our new data helped in obtaining effective molecular constants for these states, most of them previously known only through perturbation with the A 1 state. q The set of constants were obtained by least square fit of the Hamiltionian matrix to the observed rotational spectral data using the PGOPHER fitting software. q The deperturbation of the rotational spectrum gave the perturbing parameters viz. the spin-orbit, spin-rotation, second order -doubling constants and perturbing parameters for a few levels of d 3Δ ~( 3 and 1 ) could also be determined.

REFERENCES • F. H. Crawford, and W. A. SHURCLIFFP, Phys. Rev. 45, 860 (1934). • A. Lagerqvist, H Westerlund, CV Wright and RF Barrow, Arkiv Fysik 14, 387 (1958) • R. F. BARROW, R. N. DIXON, A. LAGERQVISTA, NDC. WRIGHT, Ark. Fys. 18, 543 (1960). • J. M. Robbe and J. Schamps, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 5420 (1976). • R. W. Field and T. H. Bergeman, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 2936 (1971). • A. Tewarson, H. B. Palmer, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 273 246– 251 (1968). • D. Cossart, M. Horani, J. Rostas, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 67 283– 303 (1977). • D. Cossart, J. Phys. 41 489– 502 (1980). • D. Cossart and T. Bergeman, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 5462 (1976). • T. Bergeman, D. Cossart, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 87 119– 195 (1981). • J. I. Choe, Y. M Rho, S. M. Lee, A. C. Le. Floch, S. G. Kukolich, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 149 185– 213 (1991). • C. L. Li, L. H. Deng, Y. Zhang, L. Wu, X. H. Yang, and Y. Q. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 2978 (2011). • C. L. Li, L. H. Deng, Y. Zhang, L. Wu, and Y. Q. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. 25 513 -516 (2012). • C. L. Li, L. H. Deng, J Zhang, X Qiu, J Wei, and Y. Q. Chen, J. Mol. Spectrosc. A 284 -285, 2932 (2013). • R. S. Ram, P. F. Bernath, S. P. Davis, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 173 146– 157 (1995). • C. M. Western, PGOPHER, a Program for Simulating Rotational Structure, University of Bristol, http: //pgopher. chm. bris. ac. uk.

Diatomics Studied BO Al. O Ga. O In. O/In. O+ Al. Cl Ga. Cl/Ga. I Mg. Cl Se 2 In. Cl/In. Br In. Cl+ CS New Laser transitions discovered Ga. Cl Ga. Br In. Br

I had privilege of working with a number of persons : From India : SPECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS TEAM : B. R. Vengsarkar, G. S. Ghodgaonkar, L. C. Chandola, N. P. Karanjikar, S. V. Grampurohit, P. S. Murthy, V. S. Dixit, V. N. P. Kaimal and S. K. Kapoor MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY TEAM : Mahavir Singh, V. B. Kartha, V. A. Job, G. Lakshminarayana, T. K. Balasubramanian, G. L. Bhale, G. Krishnamurthy, S. Gopal, M. N. Deo, Sunanda K. , Saraswathy P. , R. V. Subramanian, H. A. Khan, B. J. Shetty, K. S. Chandrasekar; S. H. Behere, Ashok Jadhav, and C. T. Londhe; K. N. Uttam, Renu Singh, Pavitra Tandon and Shipra Tiwari. From Abroad : W. J. Balfour, R. F. Barrow, J. M. Brown, I. D. Malcolm, Andrew. M. James, Orson L. Bourne, Benoit Simard, Jonathan P. Towle, and K. Kawaguchi