2015 SUNYLA Salary Survey A Preliminary Report of

  • Slides: 29
Download presentation
2015 SUNYLA Salary Survey: A Preliminary Report of the Personnel Policies Committee Eugene J.

2015 SUNYLA Salary Survey: A Preliminary Report of the Personnel Policies Committee Eugene J. Harvey Assessment Librarian, SUNY Buffalo State Chair, Personnel Policies Committee Jill Locascio Senior Assistant Librarian, SUNY College of Optometry Nancy Abashian Head of Reader Services & Resource Sharing, Binghamton University Chris Keough Libraries Annex Manager, University at Buffalo

Outline 1)Description, Purpose, Brief History of PPC 2)Salary Reports 3)Methodology - first attempt 4)Methodology

Outline 1)Description, Purpose, Brief History of PPC 2)Salary Reports 3)Methodology - first attempt 4)Methodology - second attempt 5)Analyses & Results 6)Conclusions, Trends, Directions 7)Questions

WHOA! Before we get started… Assume there is a difference in salaries between SUNY

WHOA! Before we get started… Assume there is a difference in salaries between SUNY faculty and librarians. Write down (or make a mental note of) the answer to the following: Which group earns more? In dollars, how much is the average difference in salaries between these two groups?

Purpose of the Personnel Policies Committee (PPC) Purpose The Personnel Policies Committee is concerned

Purpose of the Personnel Policies Committee (PPC) Purpose The Personnel Policies Committee is concerned with the development, coordination and implementation of the policies, procedures, and standards of appointment and other terms of employment of SUNY librarians. • Salary Surveys (originally every 2 years) • Exit Surveys • Librarian Equity Learn more at: http: //www. sunyla. org/ppc

History of the PPC Origination and History of PPC • 1966 Salary Concerns →

History of the PPC Origination and History of PPC • 1966 Salary Concerns → inequitable to faculty salaries – “research. . . though different in detail…. should be comparable in seriousness. . . to instructional faculty” • 1968 Recommendations to the Chancellor : – Facilitate professional development of librarians consistent with the needs and resources of the University. • 1969 SUNY Library Directors: – – Passed resolution supporting academic year schedule Four ranks equal to professorial ranks Remuneration for summer employment Remuneration equal to professorial compensation for library faculty

History of the PPC • 1970 -85 SUNYLA Leaders: – Highlighted SUNY’s distressing lack

History of the PPC • 1970 -85 SUNYLA Leaders: – Highlighted SUNY’s distressing lack of concern for academic rights of Librarians – Recommended librarians exercise extreme caution before accepting a position in SUNY – UUP Committee on Librarian Concerns serves to bring implementation of salary plan to UUP Executive Board. – Resolves to achieve salaries accurately reflecting the true value and worth of Library Professionals

History of the PPC 2002 -TODAY: • SUNY library faculty are evaluated by criteria

History of the PPC 2002 -TODAY: • SUNY library faculty are evaluated by criteria the same as or similar to classroom faculty, but SUNY does not support librarians the way it supports its classroom faculty. • Contract Year Inequities • Salary Inequities • Inequities of Status & Rank

PPC’s Actionable Plan: Salary Survey The Committee conducts, prints, and distributes a SUNY Library

PPC’s Actionable Plan: Salary Survey The Committee conducts, prints, and distributes a SUNY Library Salary Survey, generally every two years, with the time of the final report distribution being such that the data may be useful in contract negotiations. ● Previous surveys: 2006, 2008 ● Large gap from 2008 - 2015

Issues with previous surveys ● Low participation/response rate ● Incomplete or inadequate representation ●

Issues with previous surveys ● Low participation/response rate ● Incomplete or inadequate representation ● By institutional rank ● By title rank ● Difficulty obtaining data without hurt feelings ● Despite being public data, some people dislike others knowing or investigating their salary

2015 Survey ● Use similar categories as past surveys for data collecting/ comparing ●

2015 Survey ● Use similar categories as past surveys for data collecting/ comparing ● Create options to make it easier on data collectors ● Step up outreach efforts to improve upon previous failed attempt in 2014

Methodology - First Attempt • Sampling method – SUNYLA representatives to gather data for

Methodology - First Attempt • Sampling method – SUNYLA representatives to gather data for their library staff • Original Survey • Data obtained, but… – Problems with validity, reliability, and integrity of data! – Inconsistent reporting, also some misunderstandings and confusion despite instructions and coding sheet

Methodology - First Attempt First Survey conducted via Google Form or manual entry into

Methodology - First Attempt First Survey conducted via Google Form or manual entry into Excel. https: //goo. gl/9 RK 2 p. O

Methodology - First Attempt • Exported the Google Docs Results into a spreadsheet and

Methodology - First Attempt • Exported the Google Docs Results into a spreadsheet and combined with the results entered via Excel. We cleaned and tried to normalize the data, but…. .

Methodology - Second Attempt • Contacted SUNY headquarters – Human Resources - Julie Petti

Methodology - Second Attempt • Contacted SUNY headquarters – Human Resources - Julie Petti (is the Director of Universitywide Human Resources) • FOIL Request • Data Categories & Sampling • Issues pertaining to release of data pertaining to gender and race (limitations) ** Special thank you to Ron Foster @ SUNY POLY for his comments & guidance **

Sample & Data Cleaning Highlights • Sample demographics – Clinical faculty titles were excluded

Sample & Data Cleaning Highlights • Sample demographics – Clinical faculty titles were excluded per suggestion from SUNY HR – Gender, Race - aggregate numbers from SUNY HR • not able to use in analyses unable to determine potential impact • Campus Type • Rank – Faculty of various Full Professor titles were collapsed into same category – Same for Full Librarians • Salaries adjusted to 12 -month (for all titles)

Sample - Gender GENDER Faculty Librarian Female 5107 42% 214 72% Male 7042 58%

Sample - Gender GENDER Faculty Librarian Female 5107 42% 214 72% Male 7042 58% 85 28% Grand Total 12149 *Not able to use in analyses 299

Sample - Race RACE Faculty Librarian Asian 2141 18% 15 5% Black 571 5%

Sample - Race RACE Faculty Librarian Asian 2141 18% 15 5% Black 571 5% 10 3% Other 218 2% 6 2% White 9219 75% 268 90% Grand Total 12149 *Not able to use in analyses 299

Sample - Campus Type Faculty Librarians TCH 851 11% 31 10% COL 3002 38%

Sample - Campus Type Faculty Librarians TCH 851 11% 31 10% COL 3002 38% 115 41% DOC 4033 51% 138 49% * Major limitation: not able to obtain data for community colleges

Sample - Rank Librarians. Assistant (N = 284) Faculty. Lecturer (N = 7886) 1%

Sample - Rank Librarians. Assistant (N = 284) Faculty. Lecturer (N = 7886) 1% 5% Full 13% Senior Asst. 31% Associate 51% Full Professor 33% Assistant 30% Associate 36%

Audience Participation Which group earns more: faculty, or librarians? In dollars, how much is

Audience Participation Which group earns more: faculty, or librarians? In dollars, how much is the average, overall difference in salaries between these two groups?

Statistical Significance Testing • Independent Samples T-test – Independent Variable: Title Type (Librarian or

Statistical Significance Testing • Independent Samples T-test – Independent Variable: Title Type (Librarian or Faculty) – Dependent Variable: Salary (Adjusted to 12 -month) – Average Librarian Salary = $ 71, 070 – Average Faculty Salary = $ 110, 618 • t (408) = -32. 81, p <. 001 At first glance, on average, it appears that librarians earn approximately $39, 548 less than faculty. But WHY is there a significant difference? What other factors affect salary? – need to be careful!!

Salaries by Campus Type & Rank by Campus Salary % Difference DOC Professor* $167,

Salaries by Campus Type & Rank by Campus Salary % Difference DOC Professor* $167, 794 Librarian $88, 164 -47% Associate $116, 920 Associate $73, 979 -37% Assistant $98, 425 Sr. Assistant $65, 568 -33% Lecturer $76, 729 Assistant $45, 681 -40% COL Professor* $110, 106 Librarian $77, 857 -29% Associate $87, 433 Associate $79, 120 -10% Assistant $75, 662 Sr. Assistant $60, 993 -19% Lecturer $64, 220 Assistant $52, 839 -18% TCH Professor* $105, 827 Librarian $82, 983 -22% Associate $84, 878 Associate $66, 612 -22% Assistant $72, 511 Sr. Assistant $55, 484 -23% Lecturer $58, 498 Assistant $59, 689 +2% * Full Professor rank includes chairs and distinguished professors, titles/ranks not typically achievable by librarians skews data upwards (but chose to include…)

Mean Salary Comparison by Rank Faculty Librarians % Difference First Rank (lowest) $66, 482

Mean Salary Comparison by Rank Faculty Librarians % Difference First Rank (lowest) $66, 482 $52, 736 -21% Second Rank $82, 199 $60, 682 -26% Third Rank $96, 410 $73, 237 -24% Fourth Rank (highest)* $127, 909 $83, 001 -35% * Full Professor rank includes chairs and distinguished professors, titles/ranks not typically achievable by librarians skews data upwards (but chose to include…)

Statistical Significance Testing • Other variables affecting salary: – Level of Education – Campus

Statistical Significance Testing • Other variables affecting salary: – Level of Education – Campus Type – Years of Service in Title – Could be others…but limited to data provided by SUNY HR • Statistically, we can control for multiple variables, including those above, and separate their effects/impact using a procedure called Multiple Regression, a form of linear regression. – In a sense, we want to “tease out” the “pure” difference between librarians and faculty without concern for other variables like the ones above.

Statistical Significance Testing Variable Education Level Years of Service in Title Campus Type **

Statistical Significance Testing Variable Education Level Years of Service in Title Campus Type ** Title Type ** (Librarian vs. Faculty) Coefficient $2, 685 $1, 540 $24, 529 $33, 246 Interpreting Multiple Regression: For every 1 unit of change, salary changes by the amount of the coefficient. For example: Masters Degree = 18 years of education X $2, 685 = Education level accounts for $48, 330 of a person’s salary Controlling for other variables/factors affecting salary, librarians earn approximately $29, 200 to $37, 200 less than faculty (95% confidence interval for Title Type: $29, 213 to $37, 279)

10 Year Salary Comparisons Title 2006 2016 % Difference Average % Difference Faculty Professors

10 Year Salary Comparisons Title 2006 2016 % Difference Average % Difference Faculty Professors 143863 127909 -12% Assoc. Profs. 92954 96410 4% Assistant Profs. 74663 82199 9% Lecturers 49897 66482 25% 6. 5% Librarians Full Librarians 77361 83001 7% Assoc. Libs. 62283 73237 15% Sr. Asst. Libs. 46084 60681 24% Assistant Libs 43326 52736 18% 16%

Conclusions • Summarize findings – Limitations! • Lack of CC data • Gender •

Conclusions • Summarize findings – Limitations! • Lack of CC data • Gender • Race • Emphasize important results • Next Steps – Full report forthcoming – later this summer – Need for Advocacy • Increase starting salary • Hire at rank comparable to faculty • Promotion

Questions & Discussion

Questions & Discussion

Thank you! Eugene Harvey: harveyej@buffalostate. edu Jill Locascio: Nancy Abashian: Chris Keough: jlocascio@sunyopt. edu

Thank you! Eugene Harvey: harveyej@buffalostate. edu Jill Locascio: Nancy Abashian: Chris Keough: jlocascio@sunyopt. edu abashian@binghamton. edu ckeough@buffalo. edu