Too slow and too difficult Participatory Governance as
- Slides: 33
Too slow and too difficult? Participatory Governance as a lever for Sustainable Research-Based Interventions Tally Palmer Institute for Water Research
We all live on this planet, in a catchment Human & Planetary Well-being Social – Ecological Justice
Research/Development Interventions • Funders increasingly want social impacts • Interventions have a history of ambiguous outcomes & outright failures. • How can research-based interventions with stakeholders: - government, industry, agriculture, researchers, & civil society / residents / “communities” - result in sustainable outcomes that persist beyond the intervention - move towards behavior-change, & social-ecological justice in a system? • Engaged, transdisciplinary action-research
Mutual Learning Shifting power relations Improved decision making Improved mandate delivery Towards Social-Ecological Justice National, Regional & Local Government Resource users – industry, agriculture, domestic Stakeholders: residents, communities, civil society + all above Complexity Systems thinking & analysis Transdisciplinarity Learning & social learning Strategic Adaptive Management Resilience Political ecology Citizen Activities Case Studies Researchers New ideas, approaches, concepts & methods New discourse (language) New practice (doing) Natural Resource Management Agencies Integration, reflection, collaboration Stakeholders
Why participatory governance ? • Government: law, policy, strategy guide governance exercised through institutions • Good governance: the power to allocate resources & effectively manage them, for common/public good • In South Africa we seek to deepen democracy & enable people to act in their own spaces, in their own interests. • When projects end, we need to leave a sustainable legacy. • We aim to empower communities to participate in existing governance structures, to communicate issues and influence decisions: > AGENCY
raw water Water Resource Management: Pipes Water Treatment Work National Water Act Water supply & sanitation: Waste Water Treatment Works Water Services Act Waste 6000 l/house hold per Potable drinkin g water
Key statutory accountability contract [Co. GTA] [Water] representation Department of Water Affairs * cooperation / consultation Department of Co. GTA cooperation Regional Office representation & cooperation consultation & representation Catchment forum Water Resources Management (National Water Act of 1998) accountability & support services contract Water Service Authority services contract accountability Water board representation Water User Association Provincial MEC accountability Catchment WMA / Management Agency accountability & representation Minister services contract Water Service Provider [SRVM] Water Services (Water Services Act of 1997) District Municipality accountability support & cooperation accountability Local municipality Local Government (Muni. Structures Act of 1998) (Muni. Demarcation Act of 1998) (Muni. Systems Act of 2000) (Muni. Finance Man. Act of 2003)
Case studies 1. Sundays River Valley Municipality - Water supply system - Domestic water supply - Waste-water treatment works 2. Makana Municipality - Citizen activism - A Water Forum 3. Crocodile River Catchment - Co-operative water quality management - Sugar cane - Waste-water treatment works - Coal mining 4. Tsitsa River Catchment - building a participatory forum / network
A snapshot of case studies: 1. Sundays River Valley Municipality A land of happy orange trees and unhappy people
Multiple drivers of municipal failure DE LA Y
Interconnected ‘modes of failures’ DE LA Y
Interconnected ‘modes of failures’ DE LA Y
Interconnected ‘modes of failures’ DE LA Y
Interconnected ‘modes of failures’ DE LA Y
Interconnected ‘modes of failures’ DE LA Y
Interconnected ‘modes of failures’ DE LA Y
Interconnected ‘modes of failures’ DE LA Y
Interconnected ‘modes of failures’ DE LA Y
23 rd September 2014: service delivery protests
2. Makana Municipality From community activists to a Water Forum
The Makana Water. Forum Makana Water Enable and facilitate collaborative stakeholder engagement to improve water, sanitation and catchment management.
Early problems Teething problems Lack of byin from the MLM People do not know about the Forum The Forum lacks clear focus Conscious collective decision to improve Forum lost credibility in the eyes of skeptical stakeholders Not all stakeholders and sectors represented Lack of waterrelated knowledge competence of Committee members
New tool: the Water Tour Implementing new model SUNDAY : Makhanda DECLARED A DISASTER AREA
3. Crocodile River Catchment Industry stakeholders
WWTW in the Crocodile R Catchment
Phosphate & Salts Stakeholders Asmang Chrome Elands WUA Millys Sewage Emnthonjeni Sewage Machadodorp Sewage Waterval Boven Sewage SAPPI Ngondwana • Systemic basis to National WQ Policy and Strategy 2017 • Since 2014 Crocodile River in Kruger – mainly meets Resource Quality Objectives
4. Tsitsa River Catchment Silt trap Pod Holding back silt, allowing water to seep through
Forum / Network formation
A shared future: Tsitsa River Catchment Vision The Tsitsa River Catchment will be sustainably and adaptively managed to improve the health of the veld and the rivers and therefore better livestock production, less erosion, and healthy people. Good political leadership will ensure transparent communication to all the people. Natural and financial resources will be used honestly to the benefit of all the people. Empowered, knowledgeable people will live in a safe, low conflict, well serviced, catchment. i. Tsitsa River catchment izakuba yindawo ephetheke kakuhle okanye ekhathalelekileyo kwaye iphathwe ngendlela ezisebenzisa amacebo angcono ukuphucula ubume bamadlelo kunye nemilambo yonke. Lonto ke izakuthi ikhokhelele ekubeni nemfuyo eyondlekileyo, kunciphe nokhukhuseliseko lomhlaba, kunye nabantu abasempilweni. Iinkokheli zopolitiko ezihlakaniphieyo zizakuqinisekisa ukunyaniseka kunxibelelwano nabo bonke abantu. Imithombo yendalo (umhlaba, amanzi, nazo zonke izinto eziphilayo) kunye neyemali iyakusetyenziswa ngendlela enyanisekileyo ukuze wonke umntu axhamle. Abantu abanikezelwe ngamandla kwaye abanolwazi bayakuhlala kwindawo ekhuselekileyo, engenangxwaba-ngxwaba enenkonzo ezaneleyo.
Research outcomes 2015 -18 Ph. D MSc 6 15 ISI Papers 20 Social-Ecological Justice outcomes ? • Intention • Insitutional strength • NGO / Government decadal projects
Thank you
Government, governance & institutions • Government the group of people with the authority to govern a country or state • Governance is the process by which government operates. Government answers the question: What or who acts? Governance answers the question: How is action taken? • Institutions comprise the set of established rules and practices that characterise an organisation. Therefore, governance is closely related to institutional arrangements. • A government will use institutional arrangements to effect governance.
- Too much too many and enough
- Copyright
- Participatory governance
- Too broad and too narrow examples
- Research questions
- Too broad and too narrow examples
- Too broad too narrow
- Too much money is chasing too few goods
- Too big too small just right
- Here you are too foreign for home
- Too anointed to be disappointed
- Pragmatism vs constructivism
- Principles of pla
- Content based task based and participatory approaches
- Disadvantages of participatory approach
- Principles of pra
- Participatory rural appraisal
- What is participatory development
- Participatory budgeting in schools
- Participatory development
- Participatory evaluation
- Types of democracy ap gov
- What is a participant observer
- Pengertian participatory action research
- Participatory vulnerability analysis
- What is participatory development
- What is participatory development
- What is participatory development
- Participatory development
- Role of media in communication ppt
- Participatory process
- Willem van weperen
- Participatory impact monitoring adalah
- Participatory rapid appraisal