THEMIS Mission CDR Project Management Peter R Harvey

THEMIS Mission CDR Project Management Peter R. Harvey University of California - Berkeley THEMIS Project Management 1 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Agenda Project Status • • • Mission Architecture Programmatics Organization Processes Reviews and RFAs Schedule Resources Cost Risks Issues Summary THEMIS Project Management 2 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Mission • Launch Vehicle: Injection: Date: • Space Segment Spacecraft: Instruments: Orbit Period(s): Orientation: • 5 Spinning probes with fuel for orbit/attitude adjust 3 -Axis Electric Field, Magnetic Field 3 -D Ion & Electron Particle Detectors 1, 2 and 4 days Ecliptic normal (South Pointing Antenna) Ground Segment Observatories: • Delta II, Eastern Range 305 km x 12 Re, 9. 5 degrees inclination October 19, 2006 20 Northern of All Sky Imaging and Magnetometers Operations Phases: Lifetime: THEMIS Project Management I&T, L&EO (3 mo), Campaigns (Dec-Mar), Deorbit 2 years 3 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Programmatics • “PI/GSFC Team” Mode PI Team Provides Space, Ground, Data Segments PI Team Provides Cost, Schedule, Performance Assurance PI Team Provides Education/Public Outreach GSFC to Provide Oversight in QA, Safety, LV, Range interface • Cost and Schedule Caps Single Cost Cap for the Mission Launch no later than March 2007 • Performance Assurance MIDEX Quality Requirements Ø Implementation Strategy Use Heritage Instrumentation Coordinate Common Buy Parts Keep Probe/Probe Carrier Simple and Robust THEMIS Project Management 4 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Organization Mission Manager Frank Snow, GSFC Project Scientist Launch Vehicle D. Sibeck, GSFC G. Skrobott, KSC THEMIS PI V. Angelopolous, UCB EPO Project Manager N. Craig, UCB P. Harvey, UCB Financial Mgr K. Harps, UCB Science Co-I’s Quality Assurance R. Jackson, UCB Scheduling D. Meilhan, UCB Subcontracts J. Keenan, UCB Mechanical/ Thermal Systems P. Turin, UCB C. Smith, UCB Mission Systems Software Systems Mag Cleanliness Mission I&T Ground Segment D. King, UCB C. Russell, UCLA R. Sterling, UCB M. Bester, UCB THEMIS Project Management E. Taylor, UCB Probe/Probe Carrier Management UCB Oversight: D. King Swales Mgr: M. Cully 5 Instruments P. Berg, UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Organization Instruments P. Berg Instrument Data Processor Unit (IDPU) M. Ludlam Robert Abiad Peter Berg Heath Bersch Dorothy Gordon Frank Harvey Selda Heavner Jim Lewis Jeanine Potts Chris Scholz Nestor Castillo Electric Field Instrument (EFI) J. Bonnell Forrest Mozer Greg Delory Art Hull Bill Donakowski Greg Dalton Robert Duck Mark Pankow Dan Schickele Stu Harris Hilary Richard Electro. Static Analyser (ESA) C. Carlson Solid State Telescope (SST) D. Larson Robert Lin Davin Larson Ron Canario Robert Lee T. Moreau M. Marckwardt Bill Elliott Ron Herman Chris Scholz Heath Bersch TUBS/IWF Uli Auster K. H. Glassmeier W. Magnes Search Coil Mag (SCM) A. Roux CETP Alain Roux Bertran de la Porte Olivier Le Contel Christophe Coillot Abdel Bouabdellah Mag Booms LASP Robert Ergun Aref Nammari Ken Stevens Jim Westfall THEMIS Project Management Fluxgate Mag (FGM) U. Auster Hari Dharan Y. Kim Tien Tan Bill Tyler 6 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Organization Ground Segment Mission Ops Science Ops (Mission Planning) Manfred Bester Mark Lewis Tim Quinn Sabine Frey Tai Phan John Bonnell Laura Peticolas GSFC/GCND Ground Based Observatories All Sky Imagers Stephen Mende Stu Harris Steve Geller Harald Frey David Sibeck Mark Beckman Bob De. Fazio David Folta Rick Harman THEMIS Project Management 7 Ground Magnetometers Fielding & Operation (UC&UA) UCLA Chris Russell Joe Means Dave Pierce Bob Snare UC Eric Donovan UA J. Samson UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Organizational Roles and Responsibilities THEMIS Project Management 8 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Processes Management Responsibilities § § § ü § § § Staffing and Facilities, Training and Certification – Ongoing (more to go) Subcontract Generation and Tracking – Only SAI to be completed Schedule Generation and Tracking – Bi-weekly & bi-monthly reviews Budget Generation and Tracking – Monthly Cost. v. Schedule Compliance – Monthly (see below) Risk Identification, Risk Tracking, Risk Actions - Weekly Descope Identification, Cost Evaluation, Descope Actions - Complete Trade Studies Identification, Evaluation, Changes – 13 System changes Action Item Generation, Distribution and Tracking - Ongoing Technical & Financial Report Generation – Monthly THEMIS Project Management 9 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Processes Systems Engineering Responsibilities ü ü § ü § § § Requirements Identification and Formalization - Complete Design Coordination, Studies (FTA, FMEA, etc) - Complete Technical Review Coordination, Informal and Formal - Ongoing ICD Generation - Complete Configuration Control - Ongoing Verification Matrix Development - Complete Design Compliance - Coming Up Operations Plan Development - Complete Action Item Management - Ongoing Weekly telecons on S/C bus, Instrumentation, Ground Systems - Ongoing Periodic On-site meetings - Ongoing THEMIS Project Management 10 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Processes Request for Action Status – not including SC peer reviews THEMIS Project Management 11 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Processes Performance Assurance Responsibilities ü ü ü ü § § § Assurance Requirements Identification - Complete Performance Assurance Implementation Plan - Complete Subcontractor Assurance Plan Reviews - Complete System Safety – Complete (to date) Supplier On-Site Inspections of Facilities and Procedures - Complete Parts and Materials Research, Selection - Complete Parts Qualification, Procurement incl. Common Buy Program - Complete Verification Planning (Oversight) - Upcoming Inspections and Test Verifications - Upcoming Failure Report Management - Upcoming Weekly telecons on S/C bus, Instrumentation, Ground Systems - Ongoing Periodic On-site meetings - Ongoing THEMIS Project Management 12 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Processes Independent Verification and Validation IV&V Initial Assessment of Essential Software • Bus Avionics Unit: Telecom, Bus Control, Minimal Autonomy - Completed • IDPU : Instrument Control, Data Storage, Calculations - Completed • Operations: Re. Use of GSFC-supplied software – Completed IV&V Recommended Approach / MOA – Completed IV&V Participation in FSW Monthly Status - Ongoing THEMIS Project Management 13 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Processes Team Communications Day-to-Day ü Email List Server ü FTP sites for documents ü Expanded Conferencing Weekly Meetings/Telecons ü ü Status of Space & Ground Eng Change Notices Cost and Schedule Risks Monthly Meetings and Reports ü ü Comprehensive Report Integrating All Internal Status All Development Team Leads Provide Narratives Swales Narrative, Long-Lead and Milestone Schedules, Costs Integrated Reports Available on the THEMIS website THEMIS Project Management 14 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Schedule Key Features Instrument Development • • EM Instrument I/F Testing with EM Probe I/F – August 2004 Integrate Instrument Complement at UCB Prior to S/C Integration Instrument Complement F 1 Tested First Followed by Pairs Added F 1 Pre-Ship Review before F 2 -F 5 Qualification All Instrument Complements are Complete before S/C I&T Begins – Not! Instrument I&T Team Will Be Focusing Upon S/C I&T – Need 2 teams Added Facilities for Qualifying Instruments in Parallel Spacecraft Development • • • Integration and Test of Probe 1 Completed Prior to Probes 2 -5 – OK Added P 1 Pre-Ship Review before P 2 -P 5 Integration Sufficient Manpower and Equipment for Parallel I&T Ground Development • Development and Deployment of 5 GBOs 2 in 1 Q 05, all 20 in 1 Q 06 Launch No Earlier Than October 19, 2004 – GSFC Requirement THEMIS Project Management 15 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Schedule THEMIS INSTRUMENT TOP LEVEL SCHEDULE PROJECT MGR. : PETER HARVEY MISSION MGR. : FRANK SNOW STATUS AS OF 6/04/04 MILESTONES MAJOR REVIEWS M MISSION PDR 1 IDPU DEVELOPMENT CRR M A CR 11/12 FGM/SCM CDR J J CY 2005 CY 2004 S A O 4/19 -20 MISSION CDR IDPU ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T 7/20 IDPU ETU I &T COMPL 8/12 FLT 1 BD FAB/ASSY COMPL 2 EFI SPB / AXB DEVELOPMENT ETU COMPL ETU 6/22 COMPL FLT FAB 7/02 5/03 3 ESA DEVELOPMENT 8/12 3/25 EFI FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T LEGEND 6 5 3 2 9/30 1 10/21 2 -- ETU Activity 4 11/18 3 10/19 11/09 4 -- Flight Activity 5 -6 12/09 11/30 ESA ETU I &T COMPL 8/26 FLT 1 -6 BD FAB/ASSY COMPL 12/30 5 -6 FLT I&T COMPL 12/21 1 -6 FLT I&T COMPL 10/20 DSG COMPL. 11/26 BOARD I&T COMPL. SST ETU I &T COMPL 6/11 3/05 SST FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T 6/25 1 FLT 1 -6 BD FAB/ASSY COMPL 2 5 4 3 6 FLT I&T COMPL 9/10 FGM ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T 4 3 FLT I&T COMPL 11/01 11/16 11/30 11/09 11/23 12/07 1 9/28 BOARD I&T COMPL. DSG COMPL. ESA ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T 5 FGM DEVELOPMENT M FLT I&T COMPL 8/26 FLT MACH 2 1 10/04 SST ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T A 6/14 -18 IDPU FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T 4 SST DEVELOPMENT M F 4/22 BOARD I&T COMPL. EFI AXB DESIGN, FAB, I&T (ETU & FLT) J 4/06 -08 2/04 INSTRU. CDR EFI SPB DESIGN, FAB, I&T (ETU & FLT) D N 10/12 11/02 11/23 10/22 10/01 11/12 FGE ETU DEL. To GERMANY 3/19 FGM FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T FGE ETU/F 6 I &T COMPL 6/04 FGE/PCB FLT 1 -5 DEL to GERMANY 1 -2 3 -5 11/08 1/31 FLT I&T COMPL 9/13 6 SCM DEVELOPMENT SCM EM DESIGN, FAB, I&T SC/EM I &T COMPL 6/11 SCM FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T 7 CUBE DEL. 4 -6 1 -3 FLT I&T COMPL ETU I &T 7/23 COMPL FAB FLT HINGES FGM/SCM BOOM FLIGHT FAB & I&T 3/05 7/08 7/16 9/28 1 -2 3 -4 9/30 FLT I&T COMPL 10/14 10/28 ETU INSTRU. I &T COMPL 8 INSTRUMENT I&T 8/12 INSTRUMENT INTEGRATION & TEST **BASED ON SCHEDULE FROM 2/20/04 THEMIS Project Management 5 -6 11/10 10/08 START FLT INSTRU I&T 11/01 1 1/17 3 2 3/03 2/21 4 5 6 5/18 4/07 4/14 16 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Schedule THEMIS S/C & I&T MISSION SCHEDULE PROJECT MGR. : PETER HARVEY MISSION MGR. : FRANK SNOW MILESTONES CY 2004 J CRR MAJOR REVIEWS F M 2/04 FGM/SCM CDR INSTRUMENT CDR INTEGRATION & TEST 1 PROBE SUBSYSTEM HARDWARE BUS INTEGR. & BUS/INSTRU. INTEGR. BUS/INSTRUMENT ENVIRONMENTALS A M J J A S O N D J F M A M CY 2005 J J 4/22 CR @ HQ 4/06 -08 4/19 -20 CY 2006 A S O D N J J J A S O 12/14 P 4/P 5 DELTA PER 6/15 -16 MISSION CDR BOTTOM PANEL RCS 2/03 AVIONICS 2/04 3/18 INSTRU COMPL LEGEND BUS/INSTRU. 5/09 -- Bus Slack 20 DAYS 6/08 -- Critical Path Contingency -- Project Reserve 8/22 12/27 9/06 15 DAYS AVIONICS BUS/INSTRUMENT ENVIRONMENTALS -- Instrument Slack BUS/INSTRU. 6/23 10/31 8/04 INSTRU COMPL 9/28 6 DAYS 11/10 1/31 12/24 1/06 POST ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES 5 DAYS P 3 INTEGRATION & TEST PROBE SUBSYSTEM HARDWARE AVIONICS BUS/INSTRU. 6/23 BUS INTEGR. & BUS/INSTRU. INTEGR. 10/31 8/04 9/28 INSTRU COMPL 6 DAYS 11/10 12/24 2/7 POST ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES 1/06 5 DAYS INTEGRATION & TEST 4 PROBE SUBSYSTEM HARDWARE AVIONICS BUS/INSTRU. 8/05 BUS INTEGR. & BUS/INSTRU. INTEGR. 12/05 9/15 11/01 INSTRU COMPL 6 DAYS 12/15 2/11 3/7 POST ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES 2/22 5 DAYS 5 P 5 INTEGRATION & TEST PROBE SUBSYSTEM HARDWARE AVIONICS BUS/INSTRU. 8/05 BUS INTEGR. & BUS/INSTRU. INTEGR. 12/05 9/15 INSTRU COMPL BUS/INSTRUMENT ENVIRONMENTALS 3/14 11/01 6 DAYS 12/15 2/11 2/22 POST ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES 5 DAYS 3/07 6 PROBE CAR. / INSTRU. INTEGR. 5/16 7 PROBE CARRIER ASSY TEST 7 DAYS 8 MISSION RESERVE 7/31 45 DAYS 9 MISSION RESERVE 10 DAYS 8/01 10 LAUNCH PROCESSING/LAUNCH THEMIS Project Management M 11/09 P 2/P 3 DELTA PER 5/25 -26 BUS INTEGR. & BUS/INSTRU. INTEGR. BUS/INSTRUMENT ENVIRONMENTALS A 5/26 PSR POST ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES BUS/INSTRUMENT ENVIRONMENTALS M F 6/07 P 1 PER INTEGRATION & TEST 2 PROBE SUBSYSTEM HARDWARE 3 STATUS AS OF: 06/13/04 10/19 17 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Deliverables Contract Deliverables – PDR-CDR THEMIS Project Management 18 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Deliverables Contract Deliverables – PDR-CDR THEMIS Project Management 19 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Deliverables Contract Deliverables – PDR-CDR THEMIS Project Management 20 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Resources SSL Projects at PDR STEREO Personnel Not Available; MMS Now Starting Up SNAP and MMS Projects Will Help Offload Personnel THEMIS Project Management 21 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Resources SSL Projects at CDR “Moon/Mars” Delay for MMS & SNAP removes incentive to complete Will Lose Talent Capable of Building MMS unless something done Moon. Mars Gap THEMIS Project Management 22 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Resources Facilities Chamber Availability at UCB/SSL • • • Numerous Tanks of Varying Sizes & Types – All Still in Use by STEREO! One New Chamber Needed for THEMIS – 3 Being Built/Tested! One Calibration Chamber Needs Parts – Could not be Fixed, Replaced. TV Plan Assumptions ü 2 Component-Level TV Cycles ü 6 Instrument Level TV Cycles Schedule has assumed new chambers are ready. • • • Established weekly tag-up meetings on these TV chambers Put people experienced in these systems on the project Have contacted NTS (LA) for availability of chambers as a backup. THEMIS Project Management 23 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Cost Changes from PDR Additional Management • Added Swales/FSW Oversight Growth in Probe/Probe Carrier • Added RCS Pressurant System to deal with Mass Growth • ESC Compliant Solar Arrays Growth in I&T Costs • GSFC Review of P 1 Qualification before P 2 -P 5 Integration • GSFC Review of F 1 Qualification before F 2 -F 5 Qualification Growth in LV Cost • All “TLX” separation system recommended by GSFC • Disallowed as a Mission Unique by KSC THEMIS Project Management 24 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Cost Performance v Budget thru MCDR • Cumulative Costs + Liens v Budget at +3% • Cumulative Costs v Budget alone at – 19% • Schedule is appx – 12% (bracketed by the float) THEMIS Project Management 25 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Cost Descopes Remaining L 1 Requirements Allow Flexibility in Instrumentation Power, Mass, Cost Impacts THEMIS Project Management 26 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Risk Reduction Activities since PDR • • • Added Thermal Expertise (Paul Cleveland) Added Structural Expertise (Terry Scharton) Added Spacecraft Oversight (David King) Added Bi-Monthly Schedule Reviews with Code 500 Added Monthly Probe Software Status Meetings Increased Fuel Capacity to re-establish adequate margins Added Instrument and Probe #1 Reviews before #2 -#5 Changed to the “all TLX” separation system Prioritized Safety Studies and Planning Added ESA HV Enable Plug THEMIS Project Management 27 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Risk List (UCB view, Top-Down) THEMIS Project Management 28 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Risk List (UCB, Top Down) P/I Definitions Matrix THEMIS Project Management 29 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Issues Significant New Issues since PDR • Delay in Confirmation Review for 2 months – • No LV-to-Spacecraft Interface Definition for CDR Delay in Launch Date for 2 months – Decreased Time to Deploy 5 Probes Before 1 st Winter – Will Switch Science Plans at some point if launch date slips more Ø Need to have a clear launch-date decision point • KSC Determination that TLX be Handled by UCB/Swales – Messy Organizational Interface with Boeing – If there is a mishap, this will be the “root cause. ” Ø Recommend a clear MOU on roles & responsibilities • Delay in MMS and SNAP Projects – Difficulty in Offloading Personnel – Potential Cost and Schedule Impacts Ø PM to develop offloading strategy THEMIS Project Management 30 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004

Summary Stable Science and Mission Concept No Show Stoppers Identified Development or Review Teams Organization is Active in All Development Areas Weekly and bi-weekly Telecons Active in all Major Areas Systems Engineering Reliability Analyses, ICD’s and Verification Plans Complete Review Process in Place Successful Reviews at Subsystem Level RFAs Being Worked Detailed Design Efforts at Full Speed Drawings Complete Board-level Engineering Modeling in Progress Mechanism ETU Testing and Qualifications in Progress THEMIS Project Management 31 UCB, June 14 -16, 2004