University of Cincinnati DNSSEC Vendor Analysis Senior Design

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
University of Cincinnati DNSSEC Vendor Analysis Senior Design III – Spring 2010 Darryl Marsh,

University of Cincinnati DNSSEC Vendor Analysis Senior Design III – Spring 2010 Darryl Marsh, Patrick Stasko

Agenda • • • DNSSEC Recap DNSSEC Additional Information DNSSEC Burdens Project Description Intended

Agenda • • • DNSSEC Recap DNSSEC Additional Information DNSSEC Burdens Project Description Intended Use Deliverables Proof of Design Final Recommendation Conclusion

DNSSEC Recap

DNSSEC Recap

DNSSEC Additional Information • • Public Key Infrastructure Origin Authentication Integrity Checking Chains of

DNSSEC Additional Information • • Public Key Infrastructure Origin Authentication Integrity Checking Chains of Trust

DNSSEC Issues • Administrative Burden – Multiple tasks – Appliances makes administration easier •

DNSSEC Issues • Administrative Burden – Multiple tasks – Appliances makes administration easier • Overhead • Processor, memory and bandwidth • What DNSSEC Doesn’t Do • Records are not encrypted • Does not protect against specific attacks

Project Description • Research the DNSSEC technology • Independently evaluate DNSSEC appliance vendors •

Project Description • Research the DNSSEC technology • Independently evaluate DNSSEC appliance vendors • Blue. Cat Networks, Infoblox, Secure 64 and Xelerance “At this time we have limited resources in both man power and evaluation units to provide you with [a product demo]. ” - Xelerance

Intended Use • Implement DNSSEC on UCit’s external network • Provide a final recommendation

Intended Use • Implement DNSSEC on UCit’s external network • Provide a final recommendation to UCit – Aid in the purchasing decision

Deliverables • Business Scorecard – – • Blue. Cat Networks Secure 64 Infoblox Xelerance

Deliverables • Business Scorecard – – • Blue. Cat Networks Secure 64 Infoblox Xelerance Technical Scorecard – – Blue. Cat Networks Secure 64 Infoblox Xelerance • Recommendations – Business Recommendation – Technical Recommendation – Final Recommendation

Proof of Design - Process

Proof of Design - Process

Proof of Design - Photos

Proof of Design - Photos

Proof of Design - Photos

Proof of Design - Photos

Proof of Design - Photos

Proof of Design - Photos

Proof of Design – Comparison Blue. Cat Infoblox Secure 64 Xelerance HA Support -

Proof of Design – Comparison Blue. Cat Infoblox Secure 64 Xelerance HA Support - Gigabit Interfaces - NIST Best Practices - Revertible Deployed Changes - No Root Access - Keys Encrypted - DNS Software Core BIND NSD -

Proof of Design - Considerations • Trust Anchors / Islands of Trust – EDUCAUSE

Proof of Design - Considerations • Trust Anchors / Islands of Trust – EDUCAUSE ITAR – Others • Increased Packet Size – Firewalls – Reevaluate bandwidth needs

Proof of Design - Recommendations Blue. Cat Infoblox Secure 64 Technical 130 142 128

Proof of Design - Recommendations Blue. Cat Infoblox Secure 64 Technical 130 142 128 Business 5 5 0 Technical Recommendation Business Recommendation

Final Recommendation

Final Recommendation

Conclusion • • DNSSEC Recap DNSSEC Additional Information DNSSEC Burdens Project Description Intended Use

Conclusion • • DNSSEC Recap DNSSEC Additional Information DNSSEC Burdens Project Description Intended Use Deliverables Proof of Design Final Recommendation

Questions ?

Questions ?