Spectrum Futures What do the airwaves foretell THYAGA

  • Slides: 10
Download presentation
Spectrum Future(s): What do the airwaves foretell? THYAGA NANDAGOPAL DEPUTY DIVISION DIREC TO R

Spectrum Future(s): What do the airwaves foretell? THYAGA NANDAGOPAL DEPUTY DIVISION DIREC TO R DIRECT ORA TE OF C OMP UT ER & INFO RMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING NATIONAL S CIENCE F OUNDATIO N

Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are mine

Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are mine alone. These do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Spectrum use: a select (tinted) history 1934 Communications Act of 1934 Federal Communications Commission

Spectrum use: a select (tinted) history 1934 Communications Act of 1934 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established Post. World War I Selfgoverned public broadcast 1900 s Radio use on ships 1912 Radio Act of 1912 (first regulation of spectrum) 1927 Radio Act of 1927 Federal Radio Commission established Radio Licenses created 2015 Three-tier access system for 3. 5 GHz CBRS band 1994 Spectrum Auctions start 1941 – 1945 Frequency Scarcity Principle Radio frequency relocation (AM Station reassigments, FM limits) 2008 TV White Space Reallocation

Common themes Spectrum is scarce ◦ Yet, more spectrum keeps becoming available over time

Common themes Spectrum is scarce ◦ Yet, more spectrum keeps becoming available over time ( technology enabled ) Moving spectrum users around is hard ◦ Yet, it happens when there is a desire to make it happen ( limited by economic and policy constraints ) Regulators are willing to try new methods of spectrum allocation ◦ Yet, it takes a lot of time to make it happen ◦ No harm principle requires data from studies ◦ No unbiased sources of data that regulators can rely on – creates more uncertainty

Where we are today? Fixed frequency assignments (set largely many years/decades ago) Unlicensed spectrum

Where we are today? Fixed frequency assignments (set largely many years/decades ago) Unlicensed spectrum bands (largely governed by Part 15 FCC rules) Shared use in 3. 5 GHz Wired Communications Analogy: ◦ Dedicated circuits ◦ Ethernet ◦ On-demand shared circuits -circa 1993

Where do we need to be? Imagine data networks of today: Multi-homed end devices

Where do we need to be? Imagine data networks of today: Multi-homed end devices Switched Ethernet at the edge Carrier Aggregation for 400 Gbps Ethernet Interconnection agreements with multiple carriers What is the wireless equivalent?

A Spectrum Future… Imagine: A set of unlicensed and unrestricted frequencies (spanning low-, mid

A Spectrum Future… Imagine: A set of unlicensed and unrestricted frequencies (spanning low-, mid - and high-bands) Devices that want to communicate can self-identify the desired swath of frequencies and power levels to get their data transmitted Self-aware networks – ‘learn on the fly’ Highly resilient

A future within realm of possibility DARPA Spectrum Collaboration Competition (SC 2) Challenge ◦

A future within realm of possibility DARPA Spectrum Collaboration Competition (SC 2) Challenge ◦ Hinted at this being feasible with overall efficiency gains in many instances Self-awareness is the primary challenge needed for such a future Artificial Intelligence is key for realization What is needed: ◦ Flexible radios, compute in the radio, diverse waveform library ◦ Light-touch regulation, distributed consensus protocols ◦ Situational awareness and continual learning/inference

How to do it? Research, research and more research ◦ National Science Foundation, Do.

How to do it? Research, research and more research ◦ National Science Foundation, Do. D, DARPA, and others ◦ Hundreds of millions of $ investments at play now National Science Foundation Programs ◦ Spectrum Innovation Initiative: National Center for Wireless Spectrum Research (SII-Center) ◦ Platforms for Advanced Wireless Research (PAWR) ◦ POWDER (Salt Lake City), COSMOS (New York City), AERPAW (Raleigh), Colosseum (Boston) ◦ National Radio Dynamic Zone ◦ Research programs in wireless

Conclusion Current spectrum allocation model is not working There is a clear need to

Conclusion Current spectrum allocation model is not working There is a clear need to innovate There are many ‘futures’ possible, but creative thinking is the need of the hour. ◦ Artificial Intelligence and Data-driven learning/inference are helpful Leverage current R&D programs