Philosophy of Religion Lecturer Dr Victoria Harrison Department

  • Slides: 23
Download presentation
Philosophy of Religion Lecturer: Dr Victoria Harrison Department of Philosophy University of Glasgow

Philosophy of Religion Lecturer: Dr Victoria Harrison Department of Philosophy University of Glasgow

Philosophy of Religion in a Multicultural World

Philosophy of Religion in a Multicultural World

We can interpret the world • Religiously, or • Naturalistically. • Both are rational.

We can interpret the world • Religiously, or • Naturalistically. • Both are rational.

The world is religiouslyambiguous

The world is religiouslyambiguous

Moreover, a number of religious interpretations are available • Monotheistic • Non-theistic

Moreover, a number of religious interpretations are available • Monotheistic • Non-theistic

Which religious view seems best often depends on a person’s culture, for example •

Which religious view seems best often depends on a person’s culture, for example • Semitic • Asian

If God exists… • Why is neither God’s existence nor God’s nature obvious? •

If God exists… • Why is neither God’s existence nor God’s nature obvious? • Why isn’t atheism foolish? • The evidence neither for nor against the existence of God is overwhelming.

If God exists, God is hidden

If God exists, God is hidden

How hidden is God? The evidence: • • Loss of belief Millions have no

How hidden is God? The evidence: • • Loss of belief Millions have no awareness of God Believers sense God’s presence obscurely Abundance of explanations for God’s hiddenness • Preoccupation of theists with arguments for God’s existence • God is hidden to virtually all within certain cultures

Why would God choose to make belief difficult? • Has God sacrificed ‘goods of

Why would God choose to make belief difficult? • Has God sacrificed ‘goods of clarity’ for ‘goods of mystery’?

Explanations for God’s hiddenness • Human defectiveness theories • Divine transcendence theories • Hiddenness

Explanations for God’s hiddenness • Human defectiveness theories • Divine transcendence theories • Hiddenness is a means to producing goods of mystery.

Goods of mystery • Genuine moral choice

Goods of mystery • Genuine moral choice

Character formation • The self as a project

Character formation • The self as a project

If the existence and nature of God were obvious • Atheism would be irrational

If the existence and nature of God were obvious • Atheism would be irrational • All rational people would be theists. • This is not the case. • Given the hiddenness of God, how should we respond to religious diversity?

Three Types of Theory Responding to Religious Diversity • Religious Exclusivism E. g. ,

Three Types of Theory Responding to Religious Diversity • Religious Exclusivism E. g. , Alvin Plantinga • Religious Inclusivism E. g. , Karl Rahner • Religious Pluralism Eg. , John Hick

Religious Exclusivism • Key claim: One religion is exclusively correct. • Its claims are

Religious Exclusivism • Key claim: One religion is exclusively correct. • Its claims are exclusively true. If the claims of other religions contradict these, then the claims of the other religion must be false. • It alone offers a way to salvation. • Problems…

Religious Inclusivism • One religion has the monopoly of religious truth-claims. • However, salvation

Religious Inclusivism • One religion has the monopoly of religious truth-claims. • However, salvation may be available through alternative traditions – despite their false claims. • Problems…

Religious Pluralism • Key claim: All major religious traditions are authentic. • Different forms

Religious Pluralism • Key claim: All major religious traditions are authentic. • Different forms of religious pluralism: • The most influential is John Hick’s.

The key claims of Hickean pluralism • Each world religion has its own phenomenal

The key claims of Hickean pluralism • Each world religion has its own phenomenal reality. • Since each world religion has its own phenomenal reality, the claims of one world religion do not conflict with those of another world religion. • Each world religion is a response to the same thing: The ‘Real’. • Responding to this phenomenal reality is, so far as we can tell, equally effective in each world religion.

What does this entail? • Each world religion is equally valid.

What does this entail? • Each world religion is equally valid.

Problems with Hickean Pluralism • • Truth Experience Appropriateness of responses Religious language

Problems with Hickean Pluralism • • Truth Experience Appropriateness of responses Religious language

END

END