Overview of HLLHC FPIX Project 402 7 X

Overview of HL-LHC FPIX Project 402. 7. X Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 1

What is FPIX? Phase-0: Two-layer (disks) Forward PIXel detector Ten-layer, early design for HL-LHC FPIX Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 2

FPIX Basics: What’s new relative to Ph 1? • Coverage: Increased h reach out to h=4 • Access VBF Higgs, increase MET coverage/hermeticity • Electronics: higher bandwidth, rad hard to 1 GRad • Increased LHC luminosity, pileup • Geometry: more layers: now 11, up from 3 in Ph 1 • For h coverage and improved tracking in dense environ. • Envelope: new beampipe, new Outer Tracker, new EC Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 3

Geometry • Will discuss “ 4. 0. 2. 1” geometry in this presentation • One candidate for TDR; • Used in current Bo. Es. Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 4

Arithmetic FPIX FEATURES PHASE 1 HL-LHC Ratio 3 11 ~4 Number of Modules 672 3272 ~5 Number of pixels 45 e 6 1. 5 e 9 ~30 Number of Read. Out. Chips 10752 10096 ~1 Sensor area (cm 2) 6. 7 e 3 36 e 3 ~5 Number of Layers (one side) Approximate scale of task: ~5 x Phase 1 Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 5

Where are we at this point? • Part of planned MREFC project • NSF process: • Conceptual Design Review (CDR): March 2016 • We are between CDR and PDR • Preliminary Design Review (PDR): December 2017 • Final Design Review (FDR): December 2019 • MREFC funds committed January 2020 if successful • Also: CMS TDR, to be finalized spring 2017. Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 6

402. 7 Forward Pixels – WBS to Level 4 L 2: Karl Ecklund, Jim Alexander Bo. E Bo. E L 3: Steve Wagner L 3: Matt Jones 26 -30 September 2016 Lucas Taylor -- Work Breakdown Structure L 3: Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - Andrew Ivanov L 3: Joe 7 Conway USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 7

Contents of typical Bo. E Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 8

WBS 402. 7. 3 Sensors and ROCS • Sensors (3272 needed) • R&D program ongoing • Thin (150 um), planar or 3 D, • Pixel size and shape not yet determined • Vendor not yet selected; First R&D submissions ~now • Read. Out. Chips (10, 096 needed) • RD 53: 16 mm x 22 mm, 2500 mm 2 pixel array • First useable prototype RD 53 A ready ~ next summer • PROC 600: for Phase 1 inner layer. Candidate for Phase 2? • Bumpbonding (1. 5 e 9 bumps) • Vendor discussions ongoing • Bumpbonding to thin silicon is an issue • Sensor + ROCs bumpbonded = hybrid Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 9

WBS 402. 7. 4 Modules • Module assembled from hybrid and thin High Density Interconnect Phase 1 Module • Assembly at 3 Module Factories (UNL, Purdue, CUA) Photo & diagram Credits: Matt Jones Gantry assisted assembly + semi-automatic wirebonding Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 10

WBS 402. 7. 5 Electronics • High BW signal transmission • Send commands, parameters, clocks, etc to ROCs • Send data out on optical fiber • Power and HV in • Power supplies, monitoring (DCS) • FEDs and FECs Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 11

WBS 402. 7. 6 Mechanics • Disks and cylinders • Installation • Services • Thermal management • Barrel support and services provision Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 12

Cost and Schedule • Cost and schedule worked out for CDR. • Changes since then: • WBS structure is new • FPIX nominal design has evolved • New Bo. Es have been drafted to match the new WBS and new design • (new L 2, L 3 managers) • For this workshop we will… • Use new Bo. Es for discussion and P 6 entry • Use CDR cost and schedule data Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 13

Schedule R&D Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 Bo. Es address construction phase construction - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 14

Cost: Calculations • Most costs are estimated by scaling from Phase 1 – GAO estimation category = “Analogy” • A few quotes are available. • Scale factor depends on the item: • • Design work typically scales with SF=1 Per-module items/activities scale with SF= 3372/672 Per-layer (disk) items/activities scale with SF= 11/3 Cylinder specific items/activities may scale with SF= 2 • Labor rates at CDR • Currency exch rates • Escalation 3% • Now: P 6 • Future: all bottom-up Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 15

Cost: Results FPIX total costs, with contingency K$ 7000 Total cost: $39. 2 M 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 Fin al A ss 'y y m bl se As ics ha n M ec ru st In fra DA Q ct -D ur e CS cs ni tro ec El M od ul es ps m Bu Cs RO Se n so rs 0 M&S Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - LABOR USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 16

Other views of cost Sensors & ROCS Modules Electronics Mechanics Total Cost by WBS area K$ Share of total cost by WBS area 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Sensors & ROCS Labor (K$) Labor cost versus M&S cost 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 M&S (K$) Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 Electronics Mechanics Labor and M&S Share of Total 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 Modules - 6000 TOTAL M&S TOTAL LABOR USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 17

Summary • HL-LHC Forward PIXel detector will extend coverage and performance of tracking in regions close to the beam pipe. • Planning has been based on scaling from experience with Phase-0 and Phase-1 pixel detector construction. • Cost and Schedule was reviewed closely in the NSF Conceptual Design Review (March 2016) • Current Bo. E follow CDR versions as closely as possible, albeit scaled differently for larger detector • Cost and schedule info is purely from CDR without revision. • Full Cost estimates, schedules, etc will emerge from P 6 • Future Bo. Es will be based on bottom-up design/costing Jim Alexander, Karl Ecklund September 29 -30, 2016 - USCMS HL-LHC Upgrade Management Workshop- 18