ERP Implementation Maintenance Joel Freeman IST 402 ERP

  • Slides: 17
Download presentation
ERP Implementation & Maintenance Joel Freeman IST 402

ERP Implementation & Maintenance Joel Freeman IST 402

ERP Implementation • On average, ERP Implementation… – Takes upward of 2 years to

ERP Implementation • On average, ERP Implementation… – Takes upward of 2 years to implement – Costs about $15 M • Periods of mediocre or even a decline in company performance are common • 3 stages of change… – Decline: ERP fine tuned, users re-learn business procedures – Stabilization: Users become proficient with new system – Pay off: Users familiar with system; additional efficiency attained 2

ERP Implementation Why is proper implementation necessary? http: //www. serverworldmagazine. com/sunserver/2000/06/images/barrycal. gif 3

ERP Implementation Why is proper implementation necessary? http: //www. serverworldmagazine. com/sunserver/2000/06/images/barrycal. gif 3

Critical Success Factors in ERP 1. ) Clear understanding of strategic goals 2. )

Critical Success Factors in ERP 1. ) Clear understanding of strategic goals 2. ) Commitment by top management 3. ) Good project management 4. ) Effective implementation team 5. ) Successful coping with technical issues 6. ) Organizational commitment to change 7. ) Extensive end user training Allocates Must Company’s Upper End users understand maintain management funding must technical data fully business and accuracy must Provides Coordinates ERP System system must scope and should handle and monitors satisfy issues provides processes capabilities provide to understand ensure end motivation no being and/or users how confusion worked the to system orwith requirements project all concerning performance scope multiple for andthe activity company desired in project and restrictions support errors works. must with team and Without maintain the must motivation as system well proper be steady dealt asby goes to for ERP addition requirements locations system toand keeping set the forth functions the end progress. with accept live. training, user effectively and support acclimate to areensure unlikely to the project management. that each onusers respective schedule location organizationally-wide new accept system. newfor. system. istoresponsible compatibility with the system. 8. ) Data accuracy 9. ) Focused performance measures 10. ) Multi-site issues resolved 4

Implementation Strategy Options Control Strategy • Total local autonomy – Multi-location organizations implement unique

Implementation Strategy Options Control Strategy • Total local autonomy – Multi-location organizations implement unique instances of ERP independently at each location • Headquarters control – Financial Only – Multi-location organizations allow for customization to business processes at different locations • Headquarters coordination – Customization in several selected business functions • Network coordination – Allows coordination with other business unites without high levels of centralization • Total centralization – Used in tightly coordinated organizations 5

Implementation Strategy Options Software Configuration • Single Financial / Single Operation – Smaller, simple

Implementation Strategy Options Software Configuration • Single Financial / Single Operation – Smaller, simple organizations with centralized layout • Single Financial / Multiple Operations – Single organization with a broad geographical layout • Multiple Financial / Single Operation – Single organization with centralized layout and broad financial responsibilities • Multiple Financial / Multiple Operations – Broad geographical layout and financial responsibilities 6

Implementation Strategy Options Technical Platform • Centralized – Remote access through telecommunications and PCs

Implementation Strategy Options Technical Platform • Centralized – Remote access through telecommunications and PCs • Distributed – Information is distributed across several locations within the organization Centralized is usually more cost effective and more easily organized. 7

Implementation Strategy Options Implementation Execution • Big-Bang – ERP system is developed to completion

Implementation Strategy Options Implementation Execution • Big-Bang – ERP system is developed to completion – Old system goes down / new ERP goes live in one shot – Very risky method; if successful, fastest implementation • Phased Rollout – ERP system goes live by releasing modules a few at a time – Much safer approach; takes much longer to implement 8

Implementation Strategy Options Hershey Foods – Big-Bang Implementation • Desired to transfer Legacy systems

Implementation Strategy Options Hershey Foods – Big-Bang Implementation • Desired to transfer Legacy systems over before Y 2 K • Project fell behind schedule, rushed to completion • Launched in July 1999 • Inventory began slipping through ‘cracks’ in system • Nearly lost business with many large candy vendors because of error • http: //www. phptr. com/articles/article. asp? p=27108&seq. Num=7 9

Implementation Strategy Options Commonwealth of PA – Phased rollout Implementation • • Began rolling

Implementation Strategy Options Commonwealth of PA – Phased rollout Implementation • • Began rolling out ‘Imagine. PA’ in 2002 Continues to roll out solution Current applications have been very successful Pioneer in ERP implementation http: //www. bearingpoint. com/industries/public_services/state_and_local_govt/state_and_local_finance_ERP. html 10

Levels of IT Project Failure • Corresponding Failure – Technical failure; software behaved unexpectedly

Levels of IT Project Failure • Corresponding Failure – Technical failure; software behaved unexpectedly • Process Failure – IT system is over budget or overscheduled; investment no longer justifiable to organization • Interaction Failure – System doesn’t get used as much as anticipated; lost benefit • Expectation Failure – System functions correctly, but may be lacking some requirements set forth by management or users • Strategic/Competitive Failure – System works entirely as intended, but fails to meet organization’s strategic goals 11

ERP Implementation Failure • Technological determinism – IT team takes on too much responsibility

ERP Implementation Failure • Technological determinism – IT team takes on too much responsibility for system – User and organizational requirements often not met • Supplier/Consultant-Driven – CIO and IT is neglected in implementation – ERP is outsourced to outside contractors – Often exceeds projected costs • Outdated relationships & capabilities – Organization lacks the resources to successfully implement the system 12

Features of Successful ERP Implementation Key IT Capabilities • IT Leadership • Business systems

Features of Successful ERP Implementation Key IT Capabilities • IT Leadership • Business systems thinking • Relationship building • Architecture planning • • • Technology Fixing Informed buying Contract Facilitation Contract Monitoring Supplier Development 13

User Training • Thorough training is often overlooked as a criteria for success •

User Training • Thorough training is often overlooked as a criteria for success • Some common reasons users are inadequately trained… – Software-specific training; little attention placed on business processes – Lack of explanation behind why users complete required tasks in system – Lack of adequate training time – Sticking to the old style rather than converting to the new efficient practices 14

ERP Maintenance Common Maintenance Tasks • Corrective – Application of vendor patches and upgrades

ERP Maintenance Common Maintenance Tasks • Corrective – Application of vendor patches and upgrades – Troubleshooting user complaints • Adaptive – Testing any upgrades – Further enhancements • Perfective – Version upgrades • Preventive – Monitor backups, error logs, response times, etc. – Track flow of maintenance times 15

ERP System Migration • Continuous upgrades allow vendors to support only newer versions of

ERP System Migration • Continuous upgrades allow vendors to support only newer versions of ERP systems – Reduces maintenance headaches – Lowers overhead vendor costs • Added functionality • Compliance to new standards • Eliminating user disappointment with system performance 16

References • http: //www. serverworldmagazine. com/sunserver/2000/06/images/ba rrycal. gif • http: //www. phptr. com/articles/article. asp?

References • http: //www. serverworldmagazine. com/sunserver/2000/06/images/ba rrycal. gif • http: //www. phptr. com/articles/article. asp? p=27108&seq. Num=7 • http: //www. bearingpoint. com/industries/public_services/state_and_lo cal_govt/state_and_local_finance_ERP. html 17