HIGH CONFLICT CLIENTS UNDERSTANDING INTERVENING WITH HIGH CONFLICT

  • Slides: 41
Download presentation
HIGH CONFLICT CLIENTS UNDERSTANDING & INTERVENING WITH HIGH CONFLICT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CLIENTS Gary Gibbens,

HIGH CONFLICT CLIENTS UNDERSTANDING & INTERVENING WITH HIGH CONFLICT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CLIENTS Gary Gibbens, Ma. Psy

Reasons Not To Label People ØStigmatizes the client ØDiagnosis may be incorrect ØMay affect

Reasons Not To Label People ØStigmatizes the client ØDiagnosis may be incorrect ØMay affect counselor's view of and relationship with the client ØLabeling without appropriate referral or change in treatment approach is not helpful

Common Issues of High Conflict Clients ØRigid and uncompromising ØDifficulty accepting or processing loss

Common Issues of High Conflict Clients ØRigid and uncompromising ØDifficulty accepting or processing loss ØCan appear logical until emotions overwhelm logic ØAvoids responsibility-focus on blaming ØDepends on other people to solve problems ØLimited ability to self reflect ØAlmost no empathy for other’s issues

The Paradox of High Conflict Clients The Paradigm shift for Intervention The HCC is

The Paradox of High Conflict Clients The Paradigm shift for Intervention The HCC is always trying to focus on conflicts with others and trying to involve us in solving these conflicts The Real issue: Conflict is WITHIN these individuals

Characteristics of DSM-IV Personality Disorders ØEnduring patterns of problem behavior from early childhood/adolescence ØExtreme

Characteristics of DSM-IV Personality Disorders ØEnduring patterns of problem behavior from early childhood/adolescence ØExtreme (all or nothing) thinking, emotions, behavior ØInterpersonal dysfunction ØImpulse control problems ØNot the result of substance abuse or trauma

NIH Study 2001 -02 National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and

NIH Study 2001 -02 National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism found: – 30. 8 million Americans (14. 8%) meet diagnostic criteria for at least one personality disorder under DSM-IV – These diagnoses were found to be highly associated with emotional disability and social dysfunction.

Maladaptive Personality Traits ØMeet fewer DSM criteria than PD ØLess rigid ØCan function appropriately

Maladaptive Personality Traits ØMeet fewer DSM criteria than PD ØLess rigid ØCan function appropriately in some environments but exhibit dysfunctional traits in other environments (usually family, home) ØPotentially more workable ØDiagnosis not essential for intervention

Private Working Theory (William Eddy) Private: If you decide that you are working with

Private Working Theory (William Eddy) Private: If you decide that you are working with a High Conflict Client, keep this information to yourself or share only with those you need to consult Working: Use your assessment to guide your approach to this client, not to judge or criticize Theory: Your assessment is only a theory and you may need to revise it as you work with the client

Levels of Conflict Functioning Non-disordered (“normal”) Client Appropriately upset about conflicts; able to resolve,

Levels of Conflict Functioning Non-disordered (“normal”) Client Appropriately upset about conflicts; able to resolve, de-escalate, and make adaptive changes. Maladaptive Personality Traits Appear “normal”, but show inappropriate upset; highly exaggerated ideation; distorted logic; ABLE to resolve conflicts with careful management. Personality Disorders Rigid pattern of behavior; chronic distress; chronic interpersonal dysfunction; tend to be unconscious of the effects of their own behavior; MAY not be able to resolve conflicts

Personalities Either: Adaptive or Maladaptive v Adapts to changing world as needed v Able

Personalities Either: Adaptive or Maladaptive v Adapts to changing world as needed v Able to accept feedback and change behavior v Resilient & Flexible v Conscious control of behavior v Functions like a computer’s operating system v Chronically fails to adapt to changing environment v Repeats failed behavior, insists that others adapt to their viewpoint—self defeating v Despite chronic, increasing consequences, does not adapt or change v May have little conscious control v Functions like a computer operating system that is constantly crashing

High Conflict Clients: Styles vs. • Does not have Personality • • Disorder or

High Conflict Clients: Styles vs. • Does not have Personality • • Disorder or Maladaptive Traits Can be self/aware Can turn high conflict behavior on and off Chooses: • Not to Listen • To Be Aggressive • To Be Inflexible • To Be Out of control Traits/Personality • Has Cluster B Personality • • Disorder or Traits: – Borderline – Narcissistic – Antisocial – Histrionic Despite Chronic Difficulties, does not adapt or change. May be unconscious of inappropriate social behavior Cluster C Personality Disorders – Avoidant – Dependent – Obsessive-Compulsive

Negative Feedback Loop of High Conflict Clients Ø Chronic feelings of Distress Ø Views

Negative Feedback Loop of High Conflict Clients Ø Chronic feelings of Distress Ø Views source of distress/problems as external Ø Fails to self reflect or self awareness distorted Ø Chronic feelings of being a victim Ø Feelings of Helplessness Ø Wants of relieve distress—may use alcohol/drugs at this point Ø Blames others (usually family), attempts to change others (often through abuse & violence), actively tries to recruit negative advocates. Ø Result is Negative feedback to Client—rejection, legal consequences, isolation—self defeating Behavior Ø Leads to chronic feelings of distress

Consequences of Negative Feedback Loop ØHCC has long history of Negative Feedback ØExperiences Feedback

Consequences of Negative Feedback Loop ØHCC has long history of Negative Feedback ØExperiences Feedback as a Threat ØRather than learning from Feedback, Defends against it (the four horsemen) ØAs Intensity of Feedback increases, Client defensiveness increases leading to abusive behavior—again may abuse substances ØResult is more Internal Distress ØClient repeats the Loop again

HCC Negative Feedback Loop 3. ØRecruits Negative Advocates ØExperiences self as victim ØTries to

HCC Negative Feedback Loop 3. ØRecruits Negative Advocates ØExperiences self as victim ØTries to Change others with verbal or physical attacks, justification 1. ØHCC feel Distress ØWants Relief ØTries to avoid consequences ØDenial, Minimization 2. ØCause of Distress External: Intimate others or “System” Blaming

HCC: Extremes Of Behavior Motivated by: Ø Perceived threats Ø Defending self against losses

HCC: Extremes Of Behavior Motivated by: Ø Perceived threats Ø Defending self against losses Ø Need to control or change others Ø Narcissistic Injury Ø Any change in system • Pregnancy of victim • Job change • Illness, Injury HCC feels justified in acts of: Ø Verbal, emotional abuse Ø Physical abuse Ø Stalking Ø Legal abuse Ø Self destructive behavior, suicide, cutting Ø Sexual affairs Ø Substance abuse

HCC: Extremes of Emotion ØExplosive intense anger, panic, sadness, anxiety ØWhen rational thought fails,

HCC: Extremes of Emotion ØExplosive intense anger, panic, sadness, anxiety ØWhen rational thought fails, they feel overwhelmed by emotions ØEmotional outbursts get more attention, are more instrumental ØEmotions help HCC generate facts to fit the emotion (distorted, paranoid) ØEmotions supersede logic and problem-solving

HCC: Extremes of Dependency Ø Problems seen as overwhelming, Ø Ø Ø unsolvable Sees

HCC: Extremes of Dependency Ø Problems seen as overwhelming, Ø Ø Ø unsolvable Sees self as victim Sees others as very powerful: either threatening enemies or life-saving allies Life-long development of high intensity bonding skills: charm, seductiveness, child-like appeal, emotional urgency, manipulation of reality, trauma bonding Ø Results in “Instant Intimacy” Ø Over responds to any emotional Ø Ø interactions Lack of boundaries Unrealistic infantile expectations lead to infantile emotional reactions HCC assumes no responsibility for maintaining relationship, solving problems Loss of relationship results in desperate attempts to re-attach, YO-YO behavior, attach to negative advocates

Typical Responses to HCC Ø Counsellors feel frustrated Ø William Eddy or frightened by

Typical Responses to HCC Ø Counsellors feel frustrated Ø William Eddy or frightened by their Ø Use your EAR emotional sensitivity, abusive behavior, and dependency needs Ø Counsellors get emotionally “hooked” and either withhold responses or over respond. – – – EMPATHY ATTENTION RESPECT

Negative Advocates ØBelieve cognitive distortions of HCC ØWant to help ØMisled or seduced by

Negative Advocates ØBelieve cognitive distortions of HCC ØWant to help ØMisled or seduced by HCC’s charm, hurt, fear, anger, pain ØAdvocate against perceived enemies ØProtect HCC from natural consequences ØEscalate conflicts unintentionally ØMay also be HCC’s

Be a Positive Advocate ØAvoid assumptions ØInvestigate concerns/problems ØProvide support and information ØEstablish appropriate

Be a Positive Advocate ØAvoid assumptions ØInvestigate concerns/problems ØProvide support and information ØEstablish appropriate boundaries, avoid taking too much responsibility for problems and emotions ØAvoid doing MORE work than HCC ØDon’t rescue—HCC needs to feel natural consequences—but don’t automatically reject.

Developmental Basis for HCC: Paul Mac. Lean’s Triune Brain "three interconnected biological computers, each

Developmental Basis for HCC: Paul Mac. Lean’s Triune Brain "three interconnected biological computers, each with its own special intelligence, its own subjectivity, its own sense of time and space and its own memory". Each brain operates as its own brain system with distinct capacities for perceiving and responding to the environment and each can become dominant depending on the circumstances.

Three Levels of Brain Functioning Neocortex Cerebral Cortex or Cerebrum Center of abstract thought,

Three Levels of Brain Functioning Neocortex Cerebral Cortex or Cerebrum Center of abstract thought, creative thinking, all higher cognitive functions. Limbic System Middle part of brain, “old mammalian” concerned with emotions, instincts, feeding, fighting, fleeing, value judgements, sexual behaviour. Reptilian Brain Basal brain consists brain stem and cerebellum. Center of rigid, obsessive, compulsive, paranoid ideas and behaviour, never learning from past mistakes. Automatic functions; breathing, reflex, etc.

Cerebral Cortex: 2 Hemispheres Left Hemisphere Ø Logical Ø Sequential Ø Rational Ø Analytical

Cerebral Cortex: 2 Hemispheres Left Hemisphere Ø Logical Ø Sequential Ø Rational Ø Analytical Ø Objective Ø Looks at parts Ø Positive emotions Ø Higher dopamine Right Hemisphere Ø Random Ø Intuitive Ø Holistic Ø Synthesizing Ø Subjective Ø Looks at wholes Ø Negative emotions Ø Higher norepinephrine

Corpus Collosum ØThe corpus callosum is a bundle of nerve fibers that connects the

Corpus Collosum ØThe corpus callosum is a bundle of nerve fibers that connects the two hemispheres of the brain, enabling them to work together to process information and regulate autonomic function ØArea where the two hemispheres are “stitched” together—through nerve fibers ØLeft Brain needs input from the right, to process non-verbal information & process negative emotional input ØRight needs input from the left to analyze information, to assess danger, to communicate verbally, to achieve positive emotions

Emotional Dysregulation of HCCs ØResearch with BPD and ASPD indicate brain differences in the

Emotional Dysregulation of HCCs ØResearch with BPD and ASPD indicate brain differences in the Hippicampus and Corpus Collosum Working Theory HCCs have difficulty mediating powerful emotions with logic and rationality; as a result they are unable to self soothe or regain a sense of calm.

Flight or Fight Response ØUnder conditions of emotional or physical stress, the limbic system

Flight or Fight Response ØUnder conditions of emotional or physical stress, the limbic system floods emergency systems with adrenaline to energize for quick reactions, over-riding the functions of the cerebral cortex. ØChildren who have been abused over-respond to “normal” situations and show developmental brain differences ØHCCs tend to be HOT responders in handling stressful situations exhibiting distorted thinking about the situation

Cognitive Distortions ØAll or Nothing thinking ØMagnification or Minimization ØShould statements ØOvergeneralizations ØJumping to

Cognitive Distortions ØAll or Nothing thinking ØMagnification or Minimization ØShould statements ØOvergeneralizations ØJumping to conclusions ØPersonalization ØEmotional reasoning

Intervention with Agitated HCCs ØHelp client shift focus to more Left Brain or integrated

Intervention with Agitated HCCs ØHelp client shift focus to more Left Brain or integrated activities: Brain gym, breathing exercise, making a list of options and asking client to logically review choices, make lists, etc. ØThe shift to more “Left Brain” activities does not require solution of the conflict or problem. Client usually feels relief when you help them do this

Preparing Staff for HCCs ØEmotional Grounding and self-care ü Brain Gym ü Good stress

Preparing Staff for HCCs ØEmotional Grounding and self-care ü Brain Gym ü Good stress management skills ØMaintaining clear Boundaries ØUnderstand Explore Counter-transference ØCo-therapy groups if possible ØDebriefing support ØAvoid the extremes: Seduction by or rejection of the HCC ØAvoid Trauma triggers

Service Agreements & Interventions ØProgram involvement—clear simple rules ØSobriety ØNon-abusive Behaviour and Language ØClient

Service Agreements & Interventions ØProgram involvement—clear simple rules ØSobriety ØNon-abusive Behaviour and Language ØClient acceptance that problem behaviour has occurred ØAcknowledges need for help ØAccountable for own behaviour ØConsiderate & Aware of others ØInvolved in the process of Service Delivery ØAvoids blaming others or systems

Karpman Triangle Persecutor Rescuer If you are vulnerable in any of these roles, a

Karpman Triangle Persecutor Rescuer If you are vulnerable in any of these roles, a skilled HCC will find out and exploit it. Victim

Transactional Analysis Ø Parent: Ingrained voice of Parent Adult Child authority. Value statements, Right

Transactional Analysis Ø Parent: Ingrained voice of Parent Adult Child authority. Value statements, Right or Wrong. Ø Adult: Our 'Adult' is our ability to think and determine action for ourselves, based on received data. Ø Child: This is the seeing, hearing, feeling, and emotional body of data within each of us.

Counselling with HCC v Listening with Neutral attention/respect to high intensity emotions (set time

Counselling with HCC v Listening with Neutral attention/respect to high intensity emotions (set time limits--avoid being bullied or rejecting client) v Focus on Tasks—structure sessions v Provide Active Reality Testing v Use low-level but clear Confrontations v Block development of Negative Advocates--Bullying v Reflect back their Self Talk process/point out inconsistencies v Incorporate Time Outs in group/individual tx process v Identify/emphasize Strengths v Help client learn to identify body stress or stressful emotions and “turn down the volume”

Listening to High-Intensity Emotions ØHCCs attempt to establish relationships through trauma bonding. ØThey want

Listening to High-Intensity Emotions ØHCCs attempt to establish relationships through trauma bonding. ØThey want to establish an unconditional “caring” relationship which they can control & exploit ØStaff needs to be very aware of their own limits around emotional intensity ØStaff needs to help HCCs shut down when the intensity becomes repetitive, obsessive, overwhelming to the client (Watch for looping, fight or flight arousal) Breathing, safe place exercises

Focus on Tasks v. Whenever possible, move away from emotional expression and help client

Focus on Tasks v. Whenever possible, move away from emotional expression and help client develop a “structure” for problem solving Example: Brain Gym, relaxation, writing down problems, brainstorming solutions v. Help client break large overwhelming issues into small steps v. If client agrees to tasks, always follow through to see if he/she has completed them

Provide Low-Level Confrontations v. Be aware of HCC Over-reaction to any judgements, rejection, humiliation,

Provide Low-Level Confrontations v. Be aware of HCC Over-reaction to any judgements, rejection, humiliation, abandonment v. Statements like, “I wonder what else happened”– “It seems like you left something out”– “It just doesn’t make sense to me—I guess I don’t understand you” v. Sometimes clear, low intensity value statements can be more effective than anything else v. Don’t attack the relationship but Insist on Accountability v. Hypotheticals can also work

Reflect Self Talk Process v. Help client reconstruct linkage between stimulating event, self talk,

Reflect Self Talk Process v. Help client reconstruct linkage between stimulating event, self talk, emotional response and behaviour v. Explore choices at every step in the linkage and involve client in feedback/problem solving. v. Remember the PROBLEM(S) is almost always internal or inside the client’s mind & body

Listening to High Intensity Emotions v. Model listening with respect & interest v. Respond

Listening to High Intensity Emotions v. Model listening with respect & interest v. Respond with caring, understanding statements if indicated v. Avoid taking on their emotions/insist on client accountability v. Be clear that staff cannot “fix” the problem v. If conflict involves others, ask HCC to listen and respect feedback without interruption

Identify/Emphasize Strengths v. HCC may have some part of life where they function non-abusively.

Identify/Emphasize Strengths v. HCC may have some part of life where they function non-abusively. (work, school, church) Help them identify area and what works for them in that part of their lives. v. Work on developing new strengths in the program: Listening, Being aware of other’s needs, Taking responsibility, Taking Time Outs

Bibliography • Eddy, B. HIGH CONFLICT PEOPLE IN LEGAL DISPUTES, 2006 • Linehan, M.

Bibliography • Eddy, B. HIGH CONFLICT PEOPLE IN LEGAL DISPUTES, 2006 • Linehan, M. COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOUR TREATMENT OF BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER, 1993